Video

While we waste our time on devices trying to prove electronic warfare against citizens absolutely nothing changes. Lawsuits will be purposely thrown so you can’t try to sue again. Is this man dead? How did he fall for that?

Lebe im gößten Minimalismus die Stadtwerke hat mir Strom Licht und Wasser abgestellt bei meine Tochter das das Mario Seiler gemacht auch das ganz Internet. 3 Häuser zerstört ale Kleder Weg und alles was man so zum Lebeb braucht auch unter anderem die 60 Tausend die ich bei ihr hinterlegt habe und jetzt will sie an. mei Gitokonto so das ich die üblichlich K Kosten die ein Eigentümer nun mal haben muss und die auch eingezogen werde klaut s

Sie wollen mich in die Klapse bringen lassen und das heute. Sie haben murr mein ganzes Vermögen geklaut von 5 Generationen ganz s chlomm die Münzsammlung as 1980 und Leben dadurch wie Die Könige können mit dem Vermögen nicht umgehen, es sind bis zu 2,4 Billionen das Internet zerstört habe kein Goggle, Kasbah keine Pst bekommen weder in der Mühlbergstr. 75 noch bei ihr ihr wird abgefanen, sei gestern wieder erneut Nägel in den Kopf getrieben sie wollen mein Gehirn Zerstören mein Essen sogar der Kaffee wird vergiftet. Heute Will die Behötde kommen will von mir persönlich hören das ich meine Tochter als Betreuerin ablehne wo ich doch bereits eine habe durch das Geicht einfach zu unrecht vor die Nase gesetzt. Der Termin heute 11 Uhr dient ihnenrn dazu mich einfach einzukassieren um mich in die Klapose zu bringen das werde ich dann Zwangsmedijannte bekommen und noch mehr gefoldert. Gester haben sie mein Auto manipulier kann das Gebäse noch mehr Steuern, sodass die Scheiben nicht mehr frei werden. Werde versuchen dem zu entgehen und den Termin Absage hoffe das ich das hin bekomme😢😢😢

Ganz schlimm bei mir, habe eine Betreuerin vorgesetzt bekommen meine Tochter strebte an diese zu unternehmen doch was hat sich gezeigt das ich das nicht abzecktiieren kann da sie extrem Tixsich ist und ihr Mann noch Schlimmer. Beide wollen meinen Tod, und sorgen dafür das ich nicht duschen kannund jetzt haben sie das Treppenlicht ausauausgeschaltet

Are Y'all Alright...?

You were always a fraud.

Neu Schrauben im Kopf , das Vermögen in 5 Generationen geklaut mein Schwiegersohn macht vor nichts halt men gesammtes Verrmögen von 2,4 Bilionen geklaut, mein Körper zu 70 % geschädigt. Alle werden gekauft auch Gerichte die Polizei hat & alles was öffentliche. Habe nicht mal Goggle. Keine Post kein Nix Was kann ich da noch tun. Wenn dir das Leben durch den Schwiegersohn😮 durch eine ganze Stadt verwehrt wird. Wer verkauft mir seinen Computer

Your mate Katherine, Melanie Vritschan, looks like she is knocking on death's door or she/it is death personified. If you look at one of her videos from 2019 to this video it looks like she/it has aged 20 years in 5 years, i wonder if they are running some kind Epigenetic biological Age Acceleration experimentation on her/it, if they are, then it seems they are having spectacular success, it seems to be working, i wonder if they can reverse that process?

Katherine, would you agree with me, that Trump is contaminating the Republic, contaminating the body politic with his/it's poisonous Political Rhetoric.

Dr Katherine Horton, you should watch or listen to this Dr katherine Horton, she/it is insightful. lol Intel Warfare & Saddling Up To Ride Into Battle 18-8-19 9:51 "all of these crimes so far the ones I can make out, anywhere in the USA in the UK but also in you know unofficial crown colonies like Germany okay they are all going back to the crown corporation to the British crown okay so even if you are in the US as Michael McKibben has found out American Intel what's set up and at the top is controlled by Britain by things like the Privy Council and the you know collective of lords and sirs and all that sort of stuff so you actually have a claim in the London High Court" It's seems that those lords and sirs titles are not titles of respectability,but titles of corruptibility.

Maybe people can have this on their t-shirt :Don't mess with me because my Trump tower is bigger then yours.

Mein Leben heute🌹🙏🥵

Katherine, is Trump another spellbinding ideologue? Political Ponerology: The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of Totalitarianism 5.0 out of 5 stars The Most Important Book You haven't Read Reviewed in the United States on 13 December 2023 Life is hard and so is this book. But if you're deeply concerned about what's happening in America these days, most especially if you value your Freedom, you must find the time and you must summon the will to work your way through this most brilliant analysis of the origins of totalitarianism. Crucially, the author also offers possible solutions. I can pretty much guarantee this book will change the way you understand the world. Forged in the crucible of totalitarianism, Political Ponerology is written by psychiatrist Dr. Andrew M. Lobaczewski, who draws on his experience and clinical insight during the decades he spent under the crushing heel of the Nazi and Communist regimes. Decades ahead of its time, and brimming with unique insights and depth of vision, Political Ponerology explores a genus of highly adapted and charming psychopaths who bend political parties, institutions, and media to their depraved worldview, dividing and hypnotizing entire populations, and paving a virtuous path to genocide, mass repression, and gulags. From the darkness of past regimes, Political Ponerology brings you the keys to understanding and protecting yourself from today’s spellbinding ideologues, and tomorrow’s dictators.

what is best option to stop it and how can we prevent it mam?

MIDDLE CLASS VIOLENCE Heroes are created by violence and coercion. Often the violence and coercion are of the kind employed by middle- and upper-class families in bringing up their children. Such families set high standards, punish failure with rejection and humiliation, and, with physical punishments, teach an indifference to physical suffering. Children brought up this way can often feel powerless. To give themselves a sense of power and to maintain themselves as individuals they can turn against their parents/ teachers/ State and use what the parent/ teachers/ State taught them to become revolutionaries. Charles A. Russell and Bowman H. Miller drew a sociological profile of a terrorist, based on a compilation and analysis of published data involving over 350 individual terrorist cadres and leaders from Argentinian, Brazilian, German, Iranian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Palestinian, Spanish, Turkish, and Uruguayan groups active between 1966 and 1976. They focused in particular on eighteen groups, examining the ‘modern urban terrorist’, as opposed to the rural guerrilla fighter. The groups included those engaged in transnational actions (such as the Japanese Red Army) as well as those involved locally and committed solely to ethnic struggles … ‘Over two thirds came from the middle or upper classes in their respective nations or areas. In most instances their parents were professional people (doctors, lawyers, engineers …), government employees, diplomats, clergymen, military officers, or sometimes even police officials. Although these parents were part of the existing social and economic systems, many of them had been frustrated in their efforts to use them as vehicles for upward … mobility.’Clearly, terrorism reflects the old maxim that revolutions are made more by those with raised expectations than by the most severely repressed … ‘Two thirds … are persons with some university training, university graduates, or postgraduate students.’ The ratio rises to 75 percent among the Latin American groups … Most were educated abroad and spoke a second language. Most of the Turkish People’s Liberation Army members were Middle Eastern Technical University students or graduates. George Habash, head of the PFLP (the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), is a medical doctor. Yasser Arafat, who formally renounced terrorism in the 1985 Cairo Declaration of the PLO (the Palestine Liberation Organization), is a graduate engineer. Giangjacomo Feltrinelli, a millionaire book publisher, was a major figure in Leftist Italian terrorism … Che Guevara was a physician, Andreas Baader an attorney. The Weather Underground, also called the Weathermen - all white, middle- or upper-class, and educated - followed this pattern … Moroccan sociologist and feminist theorist Fatima Mernissi warns that the fundamentalist is neither uneducated nor uncultured. Rowe, Dorothy. Wanting Everything @thomasdouglas2732 well went to art school hung out with goldsmith kids was very liberal I was involved in the occupy movement . After brexit trump I came to realise allot of the leftist where anti democratic angry bunch who didn’t believe in anything they just where against the old order of things. Middle class kids who say they wanted to free the working class but in fact saw them as racist and uneducated. They became obsessed with gender and race and no longer talked about economic inequality. The world view Peter offers was more grounded in history and how countries had previously been successful his points of view came from logic and morality not a utopian idea based of hate of the powerful "Of course it's the globalist oligarchs and bankers who call the shots on everything, they are the money power and have bought up both sides of politics and all the media outlets, what reflexive lefties won't admit is the rhetoric of inclusion, diversity and multiculturalism was engineered by these very same plutocrats to be unleashed on the native working class through the left. How much has identity politics, beloved of the petit-bourgeois university chattering class, been used invalidate working-class concerns? How much has fake champagne socialism, feminism and every brand of weirdness been used to castigate working men? The Guardian and BBC left, while loyal to their middle class roots, are traitors to the national interest. The working class, betrayed by the left, may opt to go hard right. All the fascists need to do is disavow the bankers and corporate crony capitalists and they will be a shoo-in. Don't imagine for a second that the far-right is necessarily dominated by big business. The plutocrats long ago co-opted the middle-class against the working class using those sterile ideologies. The funny thing is, big business will soon make the middle class redundant as robotics and AI removes the need for any human skill. The middle class left, having spat upon the working class for decades, will soon join them as all jobs will be executed by AI and robotic technology, and with no economic reason for existence, the middle class will also be reduced to the status of 'useless eaters' and hence be dispensable (i.e. surplus to requirements). Karma is a bitch. Welcome to 1984." @dharmadasa66

Katherine, what about Elektro weapons and the creepy Detektives? The Microwave weapons? The implements in bodies? Do you have further informations for us please? Many warmest salutations from Austria 🇦🇹🖖🏼

I'm just wondering why your in a room lined with tinfoil!!!?????? Is this to block the certain waves of some sort!!!

They are creating a society of spies like the stasi!

I’m in Canada. Figured I’d mention that too

T.I. Here. Was picked when I was little. I’m diagnosed adhd but my handlers taught my mom how to teach me to hide my autism because if it had been found out that I was also autistic I would be a waste of money. From my handler the chameleon. I only know them by their alias

One thing I know you guys may not believe - these beings (those that are not human), are of a vampyric group - I worked w/one of these disgusting chumps - he could barely sit next to me - believe me, vamps are real - and they look just like humans

it is also sexual har through dream manipulation & satellite strikes to the genitalia- people are being waped (r) through a technological/mechanical process

My Goodness, you have just absolutely nailed it.

You people at Fox "news" are the embodiment of that character Frank T.J. Mackey that Tom Cruise plays in the film magnolia and like that character, you gives men and love a bad name. Ever wondered how females came to be perceived as inferior to males and why many males think of themselves as superior to females? If you have, read on and find out how it came about. Yin' is retractive, passive and receptive while 'yang' is active, repelling and expansive; in principle, this dichotomy in some form, is seen in all things-patterns of change and difference, such as seasonal cycles, Yin = Females = Negative force. Yang = Males = Positive force. I have a working Theory/hypothesis of how those ideas/concepts seems to have been transferred or overlaid onto society, so that's how females have and are still perceived in a negative way and males perceived in a positive way, people are still under the control of that believe system. Yin and Yang are opposing yet complementary principles that govern the universe according to Chinese philosophy. Yin represents darkness, cold, and passivity, while Yang represents light, warmth, and activity. The balance of Yin and Yang is essential for good health and harmony in all aspects of life. Yin vs. Yang Yin in nature is the opposing, submissive, or feminine principle. Yin is a general representation of feminine, quiet, dark, and negative inner energy. The positive, vigorous, or masculine principle is known as yang. Yang is defined as manly, hot, brilliant, and with positive external energy After four thousand years of Judeo-Christian socialization. After four thousand years of Judeo-Christian socialization, the words "sacred" and "prostitute" sound utterly antithetical to our ears. But in the millennia before God was necessarily male, there were two kinds of prostitutes. The first were "profane prostitutes," who used sexuality simply as a way to exploit others and (inevitably) themselves. For profane prostitutes, sexuality had no transcendent meaning or reverence; it was simply an act of commerce. Profane prostitutes are the only kind we know about today, since the patriarchy has spent several millennia teaching us that sexuality is, by definition, profane. In the millennia before the patriarchs damned the sexual potency of women, however, there existed a special class of sacred prostitutes. These women were selected to serve as revered priestesses in magnificent temples dedicated to love, and they devoutly performed a variety of rituals, including ritual lovemaking, whose explicit purpose was to exalt the human spirit through the power of sexuality: Her beauty and sensuous body were not used in order to gain security, power or possessions. She did not make love in order to obtain admiration or devotion from the man who came to her. . . . She did not require a man to give her a sense of her own identity Where the profane prostitute practices soulless pornography, the sacred prostitute embodies divinely soulful eroticism. She ensures, with exquisite care, that every aspect of her sexuality serves to exalt her spirit and the spirits of those who bask in her provocative radiance. The sacred prostitute's modern incarnation was ignited in the moment when Gypsy languorously peeled off her evening glove. Hort,E,Barbara, Unholy Hungers pg. 105 Ever wondered how females came to be perceived as inferior to males and why many males think of themselves as superior to females? If you have, read on and find out how it came about. On the treatment of women in the Hippocratic treatises}. There was apparently a reciprocal reserve on the part of the male physicians and writers when discussing gynaecological problems as is indicated by the fact that all ancient and medieval medical works spend most of their ink discussing male patients. If women were mentioned at all in a medical text, it was more often than not as carriers of disease, despite the fact that suggested remedies always envisaged male rather than female patients. The only texts that freely mentioned the female sex were collected works of recipes and potions, and then it was always in connection with methods of testing for virginity, pregnancy, the sex of a fetus, or sterility arguably. those things of greatest concern to men. Curiously, sterility was viewed as a female problem, even though at this time it was the male who was believed to make the more significant contribution to reproduction (see discussion Lloyd 1983:86-111). Women seem to have been viewed as kind of human petri dish to hold the male seed! (Interesting how people still use a seed analogy to talk about a sperm cell. A sperm cell is not a seed,so calling it such is a incorrect analogy, which does not lead to clarity of understanding.) Particularly striking for their neglect-of-women-are the surgical treatises of the day; for example, the detaited "treatise examined here -Bout van by the fourteenth-century Brabant surgeon Mecster Thomaes van Scellinclc. In this long work, Mcester Thornaes makes no reference to gynaecological operations and in fact refers to women only twice; once indirectly when discussing the treatment of hermaphroditism; and a second time in connection with the removal of kidney stones. Such reticence is all the more remarkable given the importance placed at the time on the different physical eharacteristics of patients: texts went to great lengths to point out that different treatments were necessary depending on whether the patient was fat or thin, old or young, bilious or not (cf. Lloyd 1983:64); yet sexual diffences were almost completely ignored. The following observations by the famous thirteenth-century physician Arnold of Villanova in his book on poisons(!) suggests that we are perhaps looking in the wrong place for accounts of women's complaints: ln this book, l propose, with Gods help, to consider diseases of women, since women are poisonous creatures, l shall then treat the bites of venomous snakes {quoted from Guthrie l945:l13}. There seems to be no end to the rantings about the dangers of women! They have always been linked strongly with matters of the occult their association with the periodicities of the moon, for example, and also with the left, or sinister, side of the body. During the Middle Ages it was believed that male embryos developed on the right side of the uterus and female embryos on the left, a belief that goes back to the infamous Aristotelian concept of women as natural deformities (cf. Lloyd 1983:94-105). Women were seen as the source of magical actions and when causes had to be found for calamities like the outbreak of an epidemic or some natural disaster, any unfortunate woman whose behaviour did not fit in with the community norms was likely to be accused of witchery and made a scapegoat. Ortner (1974) has argued that the secondary status of women in society derives indirectly from their physiology, which we regard as self-evidently true. Because women and not men bear children, and consequently menstruate and lactate, women are perceived to be more closely bound by and to their bodies and body functions than are men, which renders women more like (other) animals and closer to nature than are men. Men not being physiologically bound in such ways, not only had the opportunity to become politically and economically dominant, but furthermore had the time and energy to expend on things of the mind rather than of the body; that is, to control the domain that supposedly distinguishes humans from animals. The association of women with the animal side of humans, and men with power and intellectual pursuits, quite naturally produces a cultural and social appraisal in which men are superior to women. (Not everyone agrees with this hypothesis, but we have not been persuaded that there is any other that comes close to accounting for all the relevant cultural, social, behavioural, historical, and linguistic facts that this hypothesis DOES explain. Note that we do NOT claim that it morally justifies any of them; that's another matter altogether.) Two effects of these perceived differences between men and women are relevant to our particular theme in this book: (1) the pollution taboos on women's unique physiological processes at certain times; and (2)the downgrading of a man by ascribing to him the characteristics of a woman, in contrast with the converse: a woman is not generally downgraded to a comparable degree when ascribed the characteristics of a man. The disadvantage that women's physiology imposes on them has been exploited by men to assert social dominance and even ownership rights over them; it has led to peculiar taboos over women s procreative organs (and often over their entire bodies) that purportedly aim to protect a genealogical investment. Irrespective of ones moral evaluation of this, there is reason behind it: until the advent of in vitro fertilization, a woman invariably knew that the child she has borne is genetically her own, whereas a man can only be sure that his wife's child is genetically his if he is certain she has not had sexual intercourse with another man. In the interests of self-protection, women have generally accepted and even encouraged the taboos on their bodies and effluvia as measures toward ensuring their personal safety. These taboos have been confirmed by the dominant religions in our culture, and in many others too. Against this background, any question about a woman's sexual behaviour has been seen as an offense against a desirable social and religious and even rational norm. The particulars of these taboos on women, as they relate to our theme, are explored below. Keith Allan & Kate Burridge Euphemism & Dysphemism 1991 pg62-63

You people at Fox "news" are the embodiment of that character Frank T.J. Mackey that Tom Cruise plays in the film magnolia and like that character, you gives men and love a bad name. Ever wondered how females came to be perceived as inferior to males and why many males think of themselves as superior to females? If you have, read on and find out how it came about. Yin' is retractive, passive and receptive while 'yang' is active, repelling and expansive; in principle, this dichotomy in some form, is seen in all things-patterns of change and difference, such as seasonal cycles, Yin = Females = Negative force. Yang = Males = Positive force. I have a working Theory/hypothesis of how those ideas/concepts seems to have been transferred or overlaid onto society, so that's how females have and are still perceived in a negative way and males perceived in a positive way, people are still under the control of that believe system. Yin and Yang are opposing yet complementary principles that govern the universe according to Chinese philosophy. Yin represents darkness, cold, and passivity, while Yang represents light, warmth, and activity. The balance of Yin and Yang is essential for good health and harmony in all aspects of life. Yin vs. Yang Yin in nature is the opposing, submissive, or feminine principle. Yin is a general representation of feminine, quiet, dark, and negative inner energy. The positive, vigorous, or masculine principle is known as yang. Yang is defined as manly, hot, brilliant, and with positive external energy After four thousand years of Judeo-Christian socialization. After four thousand years of Judeo-Christian socialization, the words "sacred" and "prostitute" sound utterly antithetical to our ears. But in the millennia before God was necessarily male, there were two kinds of prostitutes. The first were "profane prostitutes," who used sexuality simply as a way to exploit others and (inevitably) themselves. For profane prostitutes, sexuality had no transcendent meaning or reverence; it was simply an act of commerce. Profane prostitutes are the only kind we know about today, since the patriarchy has spent several millennia teaching us that sexuality is, by definition, profane. In the millennia before the patriarchs damned the sexual potency of women, however, there existed a special class of sacred prostitutes. These women were selected to serve as revered priestesses in magnificent temples dedicated to love, and they devoutly performed a variety of rituals, including ritual lovemaking, whose explicit purpose was to exalt the human spirit through the power of sexuality: Her beauty and sensuous body were not used in order to gain security, power or possessions. She did not make love in order to obtain admiration or devotion from the man who came to her. . . . She did not require a man to give her a sense of her own identity Where the profane prostitute practices soulless pornography, the sacred prostitute embodies divinely soulful eroticism. She ensures, with exquisite care, that every aspect of her sexuality serves to exalt her spirit and the spirits of those who bask in her provocative radiance. The sacred prostitute's modern incarnation was ignited in the moment when Gypsy languorously peeled off her evening glove. Hort,E,Barbara, Unholy Hungers pg. 105 Ever wondered how females came to be perceived as inferior to males and why many males think of themselves as superior to females? If you have, read on and find out how it came about. On the treatment of women in the Hippocratic treatises}. There was apparently a reciprocal reserve on the part of the male physicians and writers when discussing gynaecological problems as is indicated by the fact that all ancient and medieval medical works spend most of their ink discussing male patients. If women were mentioned at all in a medical text, it was more often than not as carriers of disease, despite the fact that suggested remedies always envisaged male rather than female patients. The only texts that freely mentioned the female sex were collected works of recipes and potions, and then it was always in connection with methods of testing for virginity, pregnancy, the sex of a fetus, or sterility arguably. those things of greatest concern to men. Curiously, sterility was viewed as a female problem, even though at this time it was the male who was believed to make the more significant contribution to reproduction (see discussion Lloyd 1983:86-111). Women seem to have been viewed as kind of human petri dish to hold the male seed! (Interesting how people still use a seed analogy to talk about a sperm cell. A sperm cell is not a seed,so calling it such is a incorrect analogy, which does not lead to clarity of understanding.) Particularly striking for their neglect-of-women-are the surgical treatises of the day; for example, the detaited "treatise examined here -Bout van by the fourteenth-century Brabant surgeon Mecster Thomaes van Scellinclc. In this long work, Mcester Thornaes makes no reference to gynaecological operations and in fact refers to women only twice; once indirectly when discussing the treatment of hermaphroditism; and a second time in connection with the removal of kidney stones. Such reticence is all the more remarkable given the importance placed at the time on the different physical eharacteristics of patients: texts went to great lengths to point out that different treatments were necessary depending on whether the patient was fat or thin, old or young, bilious or not (cf. Lloyd 1983:64); yet sexual diffences were almost completely ignored. The following observations by the famous thirteenth-century physician Arnold of Villanova in his book on poisons(!) suggests that we are perhaps looking in the wrong place for accounts of women's complaints: ln this book, l propose, with Gods help, to consider diseases of women, since women are poisonous creatures, l shall then treat the bites of venomous snakes {quoted from Guthrie l945:l13}. There seems to be no end to the rantings about the dangers of women! They have always been linked strongly with matters of the occult their association with the periodicities of the moon, for example, and also with the left, or sinister, side of the body. During the Middle Ages it was believed that male embryos developed on the right side of the uterus and female embryos on the left, a belief that goes back to the infamous Aristotelian concept of women as natural deformities (cf. Lloyd 1983:94-105). Women were seen as the source of magical actions and when causes had to be found for calamities like the outbreak of an epidemic or some natural disaster, any unfortunate woman whose behaviour did not fit in with the community norms was likely to be accused of witchery and made a scapegoat. Ortner (1974) has argued that the secondary status of women in society derives indirectly from their physiology, which we regard as self-evidently true. Because women and not men bear children, and consequently menstruate and lactate, women are perceived to be more closely bound by and to their bodies and body functions than are men, which renders women more like (other) animals and closer to nature than are men. Men not being physiologically bound in such ways, not only had the opportunity to become politically and economically dominant, but furthermore had the time and energy to expend on things of the mind rather than of the body; that is, to control the domain that supposedly distinguishes humans from animals. The association of women with the animal side of humans, and men with power and intellectual pursuits, quite naturally produces a cultural and social appraisal in which men are superior to women. (Not everyone agrees with this hypothesis, but we have not been persuaded that there is any other that comes close to accounting for all the relevant cultural, social, behavioural, historical, and linguistic facts that this hypothesis DOES explain. Note that we do NOT claim that it morally justifies any of them; that's another matter altogether.) Two effects of these perceived differences between men and women are relevant to our particular theme in this book: (1) the pollution taboos on women's unique physiological processes at certain times; and (2)the downgrading of a man by ascribing to him the characteristics of a woman, in contrast with the converse: a woman is not generally downgraded to a comparable degree when ascribed the characteristics of a man. The disadvantage that women's physiology imposes on them has been exploited by men to assert social dominance and even ownership rights over them; it has led to peculiar taboos over women s procreative organs (and often over their entire bodies) that purportedly aim to protect a genealogical investment. Irrespective of ones moral evaluation of this, there is reason behind it: until the advent of in vitro fertilization, a woman invariably knew that the child she has borne is genetically her own, whereas a man can only be sure that his wife's child is genetically his if he is certain she has not had sexual intercourse with another man. In the interests of self-protection, women have generally accepted and even encouraged the taboos on their bodies and effluvia as measures toward ensuring their personal safety. These taboos have been confirmed by the dominant religions in our culture, and in many others too. Against this background, any question about a woman's sexual behaviour has been seen as an offense against a desirable social and religious and even rational norm. The particulars of these taboos on women, as they relate to our theme, are explored below. Keith Allan & Kate Burridge Euphemism & Dysphemism 1991 pg62-63

Fascist theocracy is Project 2025 "Rock musician Frank Zappa said in 1986: “The biggest threat to America today is not communism, it’s moving America toward a fascist theocracy." Ziklag is a clear example that Frank was right." " Yes he saw already what was coming. Frank even explained further what he meant by a fascist theocracy: "When you have a government that prefers a certain moral code derived from a certain religion and that moral code turns into legislation to suit one certain religious point of view, and if that code happens to be very very right wing." He already spelled it all out for us. The agenda for such a fascist theocracy is Project 2025." If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself. Joseph Goebbels There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph. Joseph Goebbels

Police Raid Library To Enforce Book Bans: Is Fascism Already Here? czcams.com/video/DhUlWD3dZlI/video.html The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science Robert Anton Wilson (Author) "For Bob, nothing was sacred and nothing was set in stone - except maybe the idea that fundamentalism is a dangerous dead end. Like Alfred Korzybski’s Science and Sanity, Robert Anton Wilson’s The New Inquisition seeks to rescue science from fundamentalist materialism, and the rest of us from the broader implications of this approach. It is at once a philosophical treatise and an act of cognitive defiance . . . His message is more important right now than it was when he wrote it. Our digital fundamentalists see human beings as an engineering problem to be solved. Behaviors and thoughts that do not conform to our algorithmically generated profiles are to be eliminated, and humans shepherded into the reality tunnels that obey the laws of rationality alone. We are right now being programmed by the very fundamental materialists RAW is warning us about on these pages." - from Douglas Rushkoff's Introduction to The New Inquisition 4.0 out of 5 stars Makes you Think on the Nature and Perception of Reality Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 17 October 2011 The book's central thesis is that there is no certainty in science, only a set of probabilities according to the model used. Therefore it is better to have a number of models available and to be agnostic as to which is best (this is actually practised in an area of modern physics, where wave and particle models of light co-exist). However, there is a group of people, called the New Fundamentalists to distinguish from the old religious ones, who are deeply unsettled by uncertainty and have set up organisations to traduce and even punish those who dare to depart from scientific orthodoxy. This constitutes the New Inquisition. Wilson understood very quickly in the 1980's that agnosticism in the sense he used the term - i.e. a general doubt - was highly preferable to fundamentalism that stops thought and perception. Scepticism - i.e. doubt - is excellent, but when allied to a need for certitude, leads to faith rather than greater scepticism. Most of those who vocally claim to be "skeptics" are, in practice, not open to rational persuasion; they are really believers whose decision to believe was made long ago. They cannot see the limits to their own rationality. Wilson related how two of the founding members of CSICOP (the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims Of the Paranormal, now rebadged as CSI), the trusting Dennis Rawlins and the honest and charismatic Marcello Truzzi, were disabused of their ideas that it had anything to do with scientific enquiry. Although founding members, they found themselves forced to resign. The New Inquisition notched up an early success, even before CSICOP and similar organisations were founded. The rank scientific heretic Dr Wilhelm Reich, founder of orgone theory, hounded by Martin Gardner and others, was jailed in the US in 1957 for contempt of court, and died in prison. His assistant Michael Silvert committed suicide. His books and equipment were destroyed by the US government. Yes, I do know that most of Reich's ideas were barmy, and he wasn't always all that easy to get along with. Does that justify hounding men to death? And don't most radical new ideas sound barmy for a time? Incidentally, Carl Sagan said in the The Demon-haunted World , a book possibly intended as a reply to Wilson, that he knew of no kind of scientific inquisition. Well, here we are: the excommunication of Rawlins and Truzzi, and the deaths of Reich and Silvert. Wilson rightly excoriates CSICOP for describing their faith as "skepticism", but readers should be aware that he uses words like "agnostic" and "hypnotise" in specialised ways himself. Wilson blamed the new fundamentalism on the military-industrial complex first identified by Eisenhower. His one piece of evidence was that the complex funds a lot of science (or at least, what is called science). He failed to understand the nature of the relationship, which, from the military point of view, is totally pragmatic and not dogmatic. For instance, the military funded the "Remote Viewing" experiments supervised by Drs Puthoff and Targ, who are regularly and frequently anathematised in the pages of the fundamentalists' house journals such as "Skeptical Inquirer". The book spends some time on Bell's Theorem and the EPR experiment, which, when performed, apparently showed nonlocality at the quantum level. Wilson extended that to the idea that all minds are part of one, great big and nonlocal, mind. However he failed to show a necessary connection between mind processes and quantum processes, so the theory remains unproven (not, fundamentalists please note, disproved). Wilson also discussed Persinger's and Lafreniere's theory that UFO sightings are caused by statistical fluctuations in energy fields, particularly in areas near geological fault-lines. This theory disposes of UFOs (well, some at least) but lies outside of present-day physics. Scientists have ignored it. Wilson includes references to a lot of Fortean phenomena, and invites readers to observe their own reactions. How open are you to the possibility that there are events outside your conscious understanding? "Modeltheism" is Wilson's term for worship of a particular model of reality. Certain people become upset and frustrated when their perceptions of reality are rudely interrupted by the failure of their models to match actuality. Wilson's remedy is to self-program to be more attuned to existential signals, rather than edit out those not expected. This he calls the "Existentialist-Humanist mode of Consciousness" (actually another model, but he appeared not to realise). This book is well-written but there are lots of mistakes - it needed an editor. There is no index, and it needs one. It forces all but the narrowest-minded to think about the nature and perception of reality. Additionally, the reader becomes much more aware of the limitations of other people's world-views (their "reality tunnels" as Timothy Leary called them). More aware readers will wonder what their own limitations might be. The standard of scholarship is poor, a fact capitalised upon by his detractors. The real question is to what extent his general arguments are sound. This book merits five stars for style and content, but only four stars when the deficiencies are taken into account. Thomas De Vries

Katherine,you should do some more videos with your mate Melanie Vritschan, next to her, you look like some kind of supermodel. lol

All people below the upper classes have much more in common with one another then those below upper class, they set people against one another with their divide and a rules tactics. "Throughout British history British subjects without power and wealth - the poor, the working and lower-middle classes, the Scots, Irish and Welsh, the colonials, the colonized - have been used by the wealthy, powerful and privileged to establish, maintain and increase their wealth, power and privilege." Our bamboozlers want us to see the world in ways which are simple. To get a large, diverse group of people to see their world in the same way requires the teaching of a few very simple ideas. In England the ideas of ‘our island race’, the monarchy, and the myths of British history give the illusion of a shared unity and purpose to a people with very different backgrounds and interests. It is an illusion of unity and shared purpose, not a real unity and purpose,because throughout British history British subjects without power and wealth - the poor, the working and lower-middle classes, the Scots, Irish and Welsh, the colonials, the colonized - have been used by the wealthy, powerful and privileged to establish, maintain and increase their wealth, power and privilege. The huge spaces of America and the immensely diverse groups of immigrants required even simpler ideas to hold Americans together as a group with a common picture of the world. These simple ideas are God, family and the flag. The idea of God is used in the way that the Russians use the concept of the State - something which overarches everything, which explains in general everything but in particular nothing (to say that God causes everything does not explain how, say, lightning is caused), and which cannot be questioned. Surveys of religious belief in the USA show that around 96 percent of people profess a belief in God, a much higher percentage than that in Britain.30 The concept of the family is honoured in the breach. The number of single-parent families is significant and increasing.31 Just as British television promotes the myth of unity in a society divided by class by telling many sentimental stories about the aristocracy, so does American television tell many sentimental stories about families. We watch many stories about the lives of amiable dukes and lovable parents and children, but very few stories, sentimental or otherwise, about single black women struggling to bring up their children in poverty, or about teenagers abandoned by their families and struggling to survive. The British can understand and share the American simple notions of God and the family, but they find it hard to understand how the American flag, the Stars and Stripes, is treated by Americans as an icon. Simon Hoggart, writing in the Observer, tried to explain this to the English when the burning of the Stars and Stripes became such an issue: Unlike ‘LA Law’, hamburgers and pop music, American patriotism doesn’t really export. Which is why the current flap over the flag is so puzzling to us foreigners. If you’ve not been keeping up, the trouble began in 1984 when a young man called Gregory Johnson was arrested for burning an American flag outside the Republican convention in Dallas, the while shouting, ‘America, I spit on you.’ (Even his defenders describe Mr Johnson as a contemptible worm, presumably to demonstrate their own patriotism …) Anyhow, he took the case up to the Supreme Court, which ruled last month that flag-burning was a form of free expression and so protected by the First Amendment. You’d have thought the Court had just declared matricide legal. Other decisions, which diluted equality laws and allowed juveniles and mental incompetents to be executed, were forgotten as the horror sank in. George Bush, with his famous tin ear, said he accepted the Court’s ruling, then after lunch with his vicious little campaign manager, Lee Atwater, changed his mind, declaring that his love of the American flag was ‘visceral’ (though, to extend the metaphor, presumably in need of an artificial laxative). He has proposed an amendment - the first ever - to the Bill of Rights, making ‘desecration’ of the flag an offence. The Bill of Rights may be the noblest document ever used to govern a country, and one wonders why this political time-server, with his wretched consultants and sheaves of opinion-poll print-outs, thinks he has any right to change it. A few brave folk argued that a First Amendment which gives the untrammelled right of free speech - unless it upsets someone - isn’t worth the parchment it’s written on. Others pointed out that flag-burning laws are most popular with the kind of regimes which always need fresh reasons to lock people up. But they’ve been pretty well howled down, led by Congressmen who spoke through the night, desperate to get their ersatz outrage on the record. Few will dare to vote against the amendment. This extraordinary, emotional attachment to the flag is hard for us to understand. We’re used to seeing the Union Jack on shopping bags, underwear, smirched on football hooligans’faces, even on Reebok shoes which are made in Korea by a US firm. Americans address the flag when they recite the pledge of allegiance. (I once saw a six-foot-high Californian raisin clad in brown polyester pledging, while trying to put his hand over where his heart ought to be.) Their national anthem is all about the flag. On a beach last year I watched a family pitch camp with deckchairs and a cooler - then solemnly take out a flag on a telescopic pole and stick it in the sand, perhaps as a guide to confused submariners. Commerce and the flag are unfailingly united. No shopping mall is complete without one. And the bigger the flag, the more likely it’s to be found flying bravely over a used-car lot. Every schoolchild is taught elaborate rules for handling the flag, which mustn’t touch the ground or fly at night. Even the old Confederate flag, the ‘Stars and Bars’, is revered in the South, where it flutters over two state houses, to the anger of black people who see it as an emblem of slavery. The flag isn’t just a symbol of America but its embodiment which of course is what made it worth Gregory Johnson’s while to burn it. Thanks to all the fuss, flag immolation has now become quite fashionable in some circles. This year, our last Fourth of July, it rained most of the day. But the kids went to the parade, and waved little flags kindly provided, in the interests of trade, by the local estate agents. In the evening, we had friends around for the traditional barbecued spare ribs, and saw the wonderful fireworks at the Washington Monument from the roof of our house. That seems to me to be a celebration of America’s virtues, pleasanter and healthier than frothing over a flag. The furore about the burning of the flag epitomizes how the State bamboozles us by denying us the expression of our own truth, and, indeed, denying that we have a truth. Yet for all of us our own truth is that we have a dilemma from which we cannot escape. This is that we need some sort of government, some sort of organization, which will deal with the affairs of the group to which we belong and provide the services which we, both as a group and as an individual, need, yet, whatever form of government we have, that government will, at times, fail us and, through its laws and inadequacy, frustrate and inhibit us and consequently anger us. Good governments, like good parents, accept the truth and legitimacy of our anger. They let us express our anger (freedom of speech) and they take what we say seriously. Bad governments, like bad parents, refuse to accept that we have any right to be angry and they show us that they regard our anger as proof that we are mad and bad. We are punished and silenced. Unfortunately, most governments are bad governments, but what else could they be, for the people who comprise such governments have little of the second kind of intelligence, the wisdom of understanding themselves and other people. They were brought up by parents and teachers who, in showing them that they could not have everything, educated them according to the principles of containment and moulding, that is, bamboozled them. Rowe, Dorothy. Wanting Everything . HarperCollins Publishers. Kindle Edition. Bad art is corruption of feeling. This is a large factor in the irrationalism which dictators and demagogues exploit Art, for Langer, was one way to express one’s freedom, not, as we will see, in terms of human self-expression or cultural elevation, but in terms of the education of feeling. As she was to put it in Problems of Art, Art education is the education of feeling, and a society that neglects it gives itself up to formless emotion. Bad art is corruption of feeling. This is a large factor in the irrationalism which dictators and demagogues exploit.121 Dengerink Chaplin, Adrienne. The Philosophy of Susanne Langer: Embodied Meaning in Logic, Art and Feeling (p. 91). Bloomsbury Publishing. Kindle Edition. Right to vote should be for everyone, however the Republican Party needs to be completely dissolved and laws put in place so politicians like them or parties like them can never hold or run for office again.

If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself. Joseph Goebbels There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph. Joseph Goebbels Lawrence: Everything out of Trump's mouth is ‘real garbage’ and it should be treated as such "IF YOU ARE THE TYPE OF PERSON WHO TRIES TO THINK OF PEOPLE AS INANIMATE OBJECTS, IT IS HARD TO THINK OF SOMEONE WHO WOULD BETTER PERSONIFY REAL GARBAGE THAN THE MAN WHO YOU JUST HEARD CALL HIS OPPONENT REAL GARBAGE. EVERYTHING OUT OF DONALD TRUMP'S MOUTH IS REAL GARBAGE AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS SUCH BY THE NEWS MEDIA. DONALD TRUMP IS A POLLUTANT. HE HAS POLLUTED AMERICAN POLITICS. HE POLLUTED THE VULNERABLE MINDS OF THE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE QANON MADNESS AND ALL OTHER IMPOSSIBILITIES ABOUT THE WORLD AND FOLLOW THEIR HERO, DONALD TRUMP. HE IS SIMULTANEOUSLY STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THE GARBAGE THAT HE SPEWS AND LIAR ENOUGH NOT TO BELIEVE ALL OF IT."

Robert Murdoch is from the silent generation, remember that as you read this: What is Rupert Murdoch's metaphysical belief system, don't tell , Ensoulment? That's nice that Travis Hipp (Silent Generation 1928 to 1945) thought that the so-called Generation X were infesting "our Republic". Nik Kershaw in his song Radio Musicola called Generation X the lost Generation, the older Generation always gives a kicking to the young Generation, don't they? lol A lot of the so-called baby boomers like to give a kicking to the younger gen-x it would seem. lol In the 1970s, I simply did not recognize the extent to which the 1960s “youth revolution” had terrified our ruling Elite, or that they would try to prevent future upsurges of radical Utopianism by deliberately “dumbing down” the educational system. What they have produced, the so-called Generation X, must rank as not only the most ignorant but also the most paranoid and depressive kids ever to *infest our Republic. I agree with outlaw radio star Travis Hipp that the paranoia and depression result inevitably from the ignorance. These kids not only don’t know anything; they don’t even want to know. They only realize, vaguely, that somebody has screwed them out of something, but they don’t have enough zest or bile to try to find out who screwed them and what they were screwed out of. Fortunately, this Age of Stupidity cannot last very long. Already, most people know that if you want a good TV or VCR, you buy Japanese; for a good car, Japanese or German, etc. Eventually, in order to compete, the Elite will have to allow a bit more education for American youth, before we sink fully to the level of a Third World nation. Wilson, Robert Anton Prometheus Rising . Hilaritas Press, LLC.. Kindle Edition. * infest is a interesting word to use, they seem to be personifying people as viruses or biological contaminants. Crisis of democracy Michael Tsarion with David Whitehead on American Freedom Radio 05/20/2013 1:27:55 it looked like man might free himself at this point because he I mean what I mean is free himself commercially and if you free yourself financially and commercially then you free yourself intellectually and that's what they were worrying about at the American experiment they tried to bring in the troops that didn't work so they had to find other ways to dumb down the population and they bloody well succeeded but it can be turned around it absolutely can be turned to a round Progressive Radio News Hour - Dennis Rancourt - 2-8-14 a new paradigm. They've understood something, they understood that with that, you know, economic freedom came freedom of thought and independence, of action and choice and democracy. And so and it gave rise to the sixties and seventies, where people revolutionised the structures of their institutions and so on. Universities became more liberal and so on and so on all the workplaces and unionism and so on. And they realised that they could lose control and that they had largely lost some control and they needed to regain it and the way to do it. They called it a crisis in democracy. And the way to do it was to squeeze down economically and also make gut universities so that you're not teaching thought and real knowledge. And instead you're teaching you you you're doing obedience, training and indoctrination. Democracy was regarded as entering into a crisis in the 1960s. The crisis was that large segments of the population were becoming organized and active and trying to participate in the political arena. p32,Excerpted from Media Control, 2002 the prisoner - fall out " This session is called in a matter of democratic crisis.... opens the president. banging down his gavel to bring the assembly to order." The status quo wouldn't want a democratic crisis or a crisis of democracy like they had in 1968, would they? control, control ,control. lol When you so-called Americans say you love your country, what do you mean, because Countries are abstract concepts, so what are you in love with, an abstract concept.?

Welcome to the age of insult, you snowflake Simon Kuper May 28 2020 The characteristic rhetorical device of our political era is the insult. Donald Trump, who understands that insults make news, rode to the presidency on a torrent of “losers”, “elites” and “nasty” women. Meanwhile, his opponents gave it right back to him. This year’s US presidential campaign will be worse, partly because Trump has turned up the political volume, and partly because social distancing has shifted even more of life on to insult-rich social media. Twitter use has jumped, while Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg has reported an unprecedented three-billion-plus people a month using Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger. All told, 49 per cent of humanity is now on social media, according to the social media company Hootsuite. Insults often set the online tone, because they stick in the mind. Their intent isn’t to persuade, but to frighten opponents into silence. Yet any strategy for handling abuse must start by realising how off-target most of it is. Here are some common insults that are either meaningless or becoming so: • “Virtue signalling”: The charge implies that anyone talking about issues such as climate change or sexism must be a hypocrite because nobody sincerely seeks virtuous ends. Since the insulter rarely has privileged insight into the speaker’s motives, the accusation is usually just a device to sidestep the substantive point. • “Fake news”: Do you have evidence a journalist’s statement was inaccurate, and that it was a lie rather than a mistake? If so, provide specifics. • “Trump Derangement Syndrome”: The implication is that scrutinising the actions of the US president is a form of insanity. • “Socialist”: When used as an insult (typically in American debates), the word aims to conflate two different political systems: broadly speaking, Soviet communism and Scandinavian social democracy. The insinuation is that if you want Danish levels of taxation, you’re a Stalinist. This charge isn’t merely intellectually unserious, but also evasive: if you oppose higher taxes, explain why without reference to gulags or Venezuela. • “You’re the person who said…”: The line of attack here is: “At some point in your life you said something that, with hindsight, looks inaccurate or insensitive. What you said then is who you are now. Since you can never change your nature or learn from mistakes, all your subsequent statements are invalid.” • “White man”: Central to any analysis of society is the truth that white men are over-represented in power. However (and this will sound like special pleading), the epithet shouldn’t be used to dismiss the arguments of any individual white man, as in: “By definition, you speak for the patriarchy.” • “Elitist”: Do you mean a member of the cultural or the financial elite? Often “elitist” is wielded by the latter against the former. A second category of insults inflates a potentially substantive charge to the point of meaninglessness: • “Racist”: A shrinking minority of people are unequivocal racists who believe, say, that black people are inferior to white people. Racists want to curtail immigration or affirmative action. But many individuals who want those things don’t hold racist beliefs. To call them all “racist” is to overuse the word. It also ensures that any potentially persuadable opponent stops listening to you. • “Race-baiter”: an epithet used to silence anti-racists. • “Populist”: Cas Mudde of the University of Georgia formulated a definition that is much used within the academy: populism is an ideology that believes that society is divided between “the pure people” and “the corrupt elite”, and that holds that politics should express the general will of the people. This definition was valuable. It’s becoming less so now that almost all politicians call their opponents corrupt elites. • “Fascist”: “As used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless?.?.?.?All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword.” George Orwell wrote this in 1944 and it’s still true. • “Neoliberal” (an update of the 1930s insult “running dog of capitalism”): Neoliberal once had a specific meaning: someone who favoured cutting taxes and shrinking the state. But it has degenerated into an almost hollow insult, thrown at anyone who opposes any leftist economic policy, with the additional intent of making the speaker sound erudite. It’s better to make a precise accusation: the policy you support has such-and-such an effect on poor people. • “Snowflake”: The charge originally referred to a tiny group of American campus activists who organised to silence speakers with whom they disagreed. Now “snowflake” is typically used as a sneering dismissal of empathy: “You can’t deal with my calling you a moron, you snowflake.” When faced with insults, people usually shut up or fight back. However, both responses allow the insult to shape the conversation. It’s best either to reply courteously - which can startle the insulter into realising they’re dealing with an actual person rather than a political caricature - or to ignore the insult and set the agenda by deciding what to talk about. The UK’s new opposition leader, Keir Starmer, is making that bet. Letter in response to this article: The art of the political insult through the ages / From Michael Thomson, Perth, UK simon kuper

The eugenics weeds are popping up in the garden again. REVERSE EUGENICS is the scientific movement for social change supported by the 99%! Fuehrer Ne in REVERSE EUGENICS is the scientific movement for social change supported by the 99%! Posted on April 3, 2012 I am proposing a new system of thought: REVERSE EUGENICS. what is REVERSE EUGENICS? It is the scientific study of genetics in the social order of humanity. The old Eugenics proposed that the ultra-rich and royal family bloodlines are the pinnacle of human evolution, and that the rest of us needed to be culled (Read KILLED) from the human gene pool. The proof given to convince us of this belief being true was that 'the rich and powerful had all the money and power, because of their superiority of genetics'. This is invalid circular logic. I propose that in fact it is the rich and powerful that need to be culled from the gene pool. Why? Because most of the rich and powerful are sociopathic, cruel, ruthless, with megalomania , malignant narcissism, lack of compassion, lack of empathy, etc. All of the psychological pathologies required to become rich and powerful, are EXACTLY the behaviours and tendencies that are destroying this planet and endangering the future of humanity. This is serious scientific thought and I truly believe that if this were studied, expounded on, expanded, and widely publicized, it could become a dramatically powerful force for social change. I am not personally advocating killing the rich and powerful. Those who could not pass a genetic and psychological battery of tests, should be sterilized and legally prevented from breeding. if the rest of the 99% decided that they should also redistribute all wealth (before a bankrupt USA govt does it to us, and there are laws in place to enable the state to take everything privately owned) and possibly even to bring them up on charges of crimes against humanity! Please consider these arguments carefully

The Importance of Having a Dick (Stop007) How do you expect to be taken seriously with some of the things you say, "phalluses "what does that mean,A phallus is a penis, an object that resembles a penis, or a mimetic image of an erect penis. so why use phallus and not cock or penis, a phalluses is a erect penis, so you want erect penises in the room with you. lol. "something needs to happen that that's room you know of my court case the audience has to be populated with a lot of phalluses otherwise mi6 just not gonna give a [ __ ] okay"s "if I go in as a woman by myself even if I have on paper people support me I will not be taken seriously I literally need phalluses in the room"

you are the only hope the TI have of exposing the inhumane, degradation of innocent people through remote neural monitoring, remote electronic torture and organized gang stalking and non consensual robotization of living human beings. What we are faciing is global nettwork of suoer high tech weapons and kther dangerous technology on loose. leaked from military and super high tech companies. There is no doubt there plant is to take over entire world

send me emails or contact

i desperately need to talk to you about my targeting and family and friends by intelligence agencies and deep state. i have been a victim of remote neural monitoring and electronic torture and organized robotization of living beings and voice to skull and synthetic telepathy. From my own country and abroad.

You have no idea how good it feels to see you on CZcams. Thank you !!

Can God tap in ? Hm? 😳 Hi Katherine 👋😊 may God bless you and Bill, I understand your frustration. I am currently seeing the same occurrences to my environment, like if my life is currently being retaliated against. Can't wait to speak to you, If I may, I am Ivana, and I would like to begin a project for you before we speak. I am glad I found you and bill, and the only reason I was able to do so is by checking the privacy policies at Privacy Alliance. They have a good word on Bill but have a terrible ability conveying privacy. I hope this message finds you well, we will speak soon. I am up for your cause, and I would like to reveal my story. Speak to you soon, hopefully this message also arrives. Ivana P.

What can a induvidual to to collect data? I have searched but it is hard. I know the psych hospital has my data but.. yea you know?

i would like to talk to you also on phone if possible please.

how can I send email to you. i have been a victim of remote neural monitoring and electronic harassment and voice to skull for 30 years now.

When people say they love their country, what do they mean, because Countries are abstract concepts, so what are you in love with, an abstract concept, you are having a love affair with abstract concept.? When you so-called Americans say you love your country, what do you mean, because Countries are abstract concepts, so what are you in love with, an abstract concept, you are having a love affair with abstract concept.? You are in love with America, countries are abstract concepts, so you are all in love with an abstract concept. lol "save our country" what do you mean country, countries are abstract concepts, so what do you want to save, an abstract concept.? Here's abook you Americans should read, Superpatriotism by Michael Parenti. Superpatriots, writes Michael Parenti, are those people who place national pride and American supremacy above every other public consideration, those who follow leaders uncritically, especially in their war policies abroad. Superpatriotism is the nationalistic hype propagated by officialdom, the media, and various flag-waving groups. Parenti demonstrates how superpatriotism attaches itself to religion, sports, the military, the schools and big business. He questions whether its top politico-economic propagators are themselves really patriotic, given how they evade taxes, export our jobs, pollute our land and plunder the public treasury. With incisive probing and a humorous touch, Parenti addresses such urgent questions as: What does it mean to love one's country? Why is it so important to be Number One? What determines America's greatness? He examines how US leaders and the corporate media fan the flames of fear to win support for huge arms budgets, global aggrandizement, and the suppression of political dissent at home and abroad. Finally, he poses an alternative to superpatriotism, arguing that the real patriots are those who care enough to educate themselves about our country's history and its present plight. He reminds us that it is not anti-American to criticize unjust social conditions at home or oppose global policies pursued by our rulers. Rather it is our democratic right and patriotic duty to do so. Michael Parenti is one of the nation's leading progressive political analysts. An internationally known writer and speaker, he is the author of 17 books, including Democracy for the Few (seventh ed.) and The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome. He has also published over 250 articles in scholarly journals, political periodicals, popular magazines, and nationally known newspapers. He lives in Berkeley, CA. Lefties and righties are outdate concepts what do you define as British, What is your criteria, skin colour or something else?

Baby Boomer parents vs Gen Xers. "The more I think of it, the more I realize that Baby Boomer parents were in fact going against the grains of their parents by giving us Gen Xers more freedom to do as we pleased. There was certainly some level of selfishness with Boomer parents just wanting their kids out of the way, not wanting to pay for childcare and putting the burden of responsibility of their children. Gen Xers are all about seeing the flaws of the generation before them and trying to be the perfect parents, to the point of making their children weak and dependent on others. We remembered how cold and cruel the world was and didn't want that for our children. We certainly were not going to make them submissive to authority when we hated authority so much as youths. Gen X in fact created the monster we have today called Millennials. Gen Z is more conservative because they have access to unlimited knowledge online and see the flaws of their parents. They can see older music and culture was better. I think Gen Z was be very rebellious against their Millennial parents, much like Generation Z was to the hippie culture."

💚

Julian Assange is out Katherine, maybe he/it can help Trump the swamp creature again like he/it in did in 2016. "At least with the reality show villains on the right like Trump, you know you’re getting a narcissistic Rothschild agent with a penchant for fake Renoirs, Freemason homophones and double speak. After playing president for four years, Trump will skulk back to 5G-free Mar-a-Lago where he can pontificate to whomever listens that he was the greatest leader of all time, the Muhammad Ali of peace and prosperity." Julian Assange helped Roger Stone and the Trump Campaign in 2016, being the first to suggest challenging the outcome if he lost, and asking to be made the Australian ambassador to the US. Margeret Sunbyrne, the head of the Sun Worship Cult he was raised in was also protected by the CIA in the Australian Supreme Court, on grounds of "National Security" Trump paints himself Orange to represent Apollo. Trump paints himself Orange to represent Apollo. "There's a direct link between Scientology, Trump, and the techniques used by the right wing echosphere, who also tie to NXIVM (Elon promoted it) Epstein (Trump's bff for20+ years) and Saville, (who Brand idolised) and the Monarchy who (Shapiro and Piers Morgan defends). Tate dated Peterson's daughter and Elon went to the same Jesuit University as Trump, and Epstein hooked up Elon's brother, just like he did for Trump. - @Uncanny-yh8eh Trump's lawyer Alan Dershowitz said he was introduced to Epstein by Lynn de Forrester Rosschild. Scientology is training these people in the tactics of brainwashing, basically what MK Ultra became, and probably run by the CIA, and Opus Dei, which is basically the same thing. Their principle strategy is Gaslighting. Gaslighting, aka Grooming. Accusation in a mirror (AiM), mirror politics, mirror propaganda, mirror image propaganda, is a hate-speech incitement technique where one falsely attributes to one's adversaries the intentions that one has for oneself and/or the actions that one is in the process of enacting. It was used in Rwanda, Guatemala, Brazil, and Burma, each having ties to Mossad. Trump, Barr, Bannon, Cippolone, Gore, Guiliani, Leo, Alito, Thomas, and Barrett are all Opus Dei. Trump trained alongside Epstein and Roger Stone under Roy Cohn, who used kids to blackmail politicians on behalf of Mossad. Cohn trained under Meyer Lansky, who trained under Hoover. Robert Mercer and Rupert Murdoch are both Knights of Malta. Saville, Bezos, Gates, Koch, Rogan, Walsh, Crowder, Kirk, Fuentes, Dore, Knowles, Kulinksi, Ball, Iverson, Icke, Woods, Watson, Cernovich, Abbott, Jones, Robinson, Woods, Pool, Rubin, Peterson, Posobeic, Duke, Molyneux, Yilanopouse, Gionet, Richardson, Tillerson, Greene, Manaforte, Flynn, Ducey, Acosta, Attwood, Stone, Pence, Desantis, Meadows, Trump, Eastman, Black, Kerik, Melania, Barr, Bannon, Hawley, Gingrich, Abrams, Comey, Cuomo, Kerry, Abrams, Gore, Spencer, Blassio, Pompeo, Bolton, McCarthy, Nugent, Cruz, Rubio, Gaetz, Santos, Tucker, Gutfield, O'Reilly, Beck, Scarborough, Devos, Kasich, Mercer, Murdoch, Rosschild, Ingram, Kelly, Lake, Conway, Coulter, Huckabee, McEnany, Hannity, Spicer, Christie, Prager, Maher, Colbert, Corbett, Hayes, Biden, Harris, Fauci, Pelosi, Menendez, Pirro, Manchin, Cooper, Maddow, AOC, Newsom, Uyger, Dawkins, Hitchens, Hancock, Sitchin, Ventura, Morgan, Cowell, Farage, Johnson, May, Merkel, Blair, Cameron, Brown, Blair, Mogg, Benjamin, Trudeau, Putin, Bolsanaro, Stalin, Lenin, Tito, Trotsky, Hitler. Special mentions (adjucants): Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, Miller, Watters, Greenwad, Blumenthal, Mat , Camp, Brand, Loomer, Shapiro, Thatcher, Bush, Obama, Merkel, Greer, Summers, Silverstein, Adelson. Greenblatt. Wexner. Also Hindu Nationalists Ramaswamy, Tulsi, Haley, Hirsi, DeSouza, Modi etc. Edward Snowden worked for Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakheim and was bought to us by Glen Greenwald, who now rubs shoulders with Jesuit Agent Provocateurs Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, whose mutual friend with Steven Crowder Brian Callen is the founder of Diligence, a spook Contractor to the CIA." Julian Assange helped Roger Stone and the Trump Campaign in 2016, being the first to suggest challenging the outcome if he lost, and asking to be made the Australian ambassador to the US. Margeret Sunbyrne, the head of the Sun Worship Cult he was raised in was also protected by the CIA in the Australian Supreme Court, on grounds of "National Security" Trump paints himself Orange to represent Apollo. Aleister Crowley inspired NXIvM and Manson, and was a master of mind control, his Protege L Ron Hubbard was the founder of Scientology, which uses the same mind control tactics displayed in right wing media. They were also instrumental in Trump's conception as the Moon Child, born on a Super Wolf Blood Moon on June 14 700 days before the founding of Israel, who he gave sovereignty over the Golan heights on its 70th anniversary, and was inaugurated aged 70 years 7 months and 7 days old. June 14 is the birthday of Osiris, Known as the Day of the Pharoah. Scientology uses the same tricks as Religion and Freemasonry, including isolation through strange acts (rituals/hazing) Gaslighting and intimadation, these can also be seen in right wing propaganda. Peterson's hero's journey comes from the transit of the moon through the zodiac, which is why they're called months. WW1 was a showdown between Zionist Masonic ruling & banking families (Windsor, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Schiff , Bronstein (Trotsky), Ulyanov (Lenin), Loeb, Warburg, Milner, Milyukov, etc), and the Christian non-Masonic ruling families (Habsburg, Hohenzollern, Romanov-Oldenburg, Wittelsbach, Karadjordjevic, Reuss, Baden, Anhalt, etc). ALL the Non-masonic Christian dynasties and the non-Masonic Islamic dynasties were overthrown and/or murdered between 1914 and 1955. Only the Zionist Masonic dynasties and banking families remain. They now control NATO, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. WW1, the Russian & German Revolutions, and WW2 were organized to get rid of the non-Masonic ruling families, and replace them with Zionist Masonic families. This was achieved and millions of good people had to pay the price. That's the sum of the truth about what happened in the 20th Century.- Douglas Mackinnon

“Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.” ― Seneca

Donald Trump: American vampire. - Sarah Baxter "Trump’s vampiric ability to turn everybody associated with him into stooges and weaklings always makes him stronger. It is the very essence of his success. The power to crush, bully and dominate others is fuelling his comeback and making him a stronger candidate for president than he was before he was hit with 91 criminal charges in four cases (related to allegedly paying hush money to the porn star Stormy Daniels, hiding classified documents and election interference at federal and state level). He sets the rules of the game; others follow, while Trump breaks them whenever he pleases. He cries witch-hunt, complains of being victimised and demands all Republicans rally loyally to his side to protect him, while his allies are hung out to dry. According to Sean Wilentz, professor of American history at Princeton, “The more outrageous Trump’s criminality, the better for his base. They love him the same way alienated people love any strongman. He means business! So he can do no wrong: he is numinous. But he destroys everything he comes into close contact with.” "

Forgive them, for they know not what they do, for they do to their children, what was done, to themselves, through their ignorance of themselves they cause so much needless pain and suffering, thought their ignorance of themselves. As a spiritual friend of mine once said, let the dead bury their dead and by the fruits you will know them. The walking dead, not just a TV fantasy. They are like the living dead, feeding of others life force. Trump is like some kind of vampire. The film magnolia which stars Tom Cruise as Frank T.J. Mackey is like Trump and gives men and love a bad name. "What charismatic vampires loathe is a mirror that casts a true reflection, one that includes both strength and weakness, both light and shadow. The nonvampiric teacher, in contrast, knows what Heraclitus knew: the mirror is essential to true teaching, because the real teacher is truth itself, both dark and light, and truth is always hidden in our midst and in ourselves. Thus, the nonvampiric teacher will want all students to look in the mirror for their inner truth, both dark and light, so they won't project it outward onto the teacher. This is the only way that true teaching can occur, because the teacher is not burdened with inflationary projections, and the students are not disabled or deluded by projecting away their own power. What's more, when the students refrain from viewing the teacher as a source of truth, the teacher's vampire archetype is less likely to be activated by the students' projection of super-humanity. A charismatic vampire can don the guru mantle in many settings, not necessarily religious. He can work his "guru whammy" in any corporation where he has accumulated sufficient power to set himself up as a demideity. And charismatic vampires have historically plagued the political arena; Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler, and Joe McCarthy were all leaders whose psyches were driven by the charismatic vampire. And the field of fine arts has been rife with charismatic vampires, such as Rodin and Picasso, who fueled their work with the creative energy of their families, lovers, and protgs." Unholy Hungers: Encountering the Psychic Vampire in Ourselves & Others Barbara E. Hort (Author)

The film magnolia which stars Tom Cruise as Frank T.J. Mackey is like Trump and gives men and love a bad name.