Video

All bull I’m at my 4th week after surgery and still bleeding!Had to keep resting! Hopefully back to work in a month more

Never

Sound

This doctor is extremely optimistic. Recovery happens, but not this quickly.

I am a possibly maybe just blessed or maybe lucky , I am fully continent from day one ( but I did level exercises for two months ) my sexual function returned after 3 weeks , the skill of Dr Coetzee counts above all else. Bottom line test every year , treat early so you give this good Dr a fair chance to save you. Reach out to me and I will witness my journey to you. Early detection early intervention , best Dr is the simple solution

An amazing revolution to treating prostrate cancer , but requires a true specialist like Dr Lance Coetzee who preformed my operation and I am blessed with a fantastic result . The real trick is to test early , operate early and pick a true professional like Dr Coetzee , plse connect with me if you in doubt and I will call you a witness my experience. total success

I had that exact situation but Dr Lance Coetzee dealt with it perfectly and my PSA is undetectable , I cannot recommend him more highly. The thing I learnt is go early and trust his immense knowledge and skill.

The few words I can say after being operated on by Dr Lance Coetzee , is that he is a genius and incredibly gifted . I am 3 weeks post op , I have full continence from day one , I wore one nappy the first night after my catheter was removed. My sexual function has returned after 3 weeks to my great surprise and relief. I cannot speak more highly of Dr Lance Coetzee and his team. He is a world recognised Urology Specialist we in SA are so lucky to have.I was blessed to be squeezed into his busy schedule and cannot thank him enough for his kindness and care.

Full recovery NEVER

What if the cancer cells have spread to the bladder neck?

If you can’t record videos so that the speaker can be heard, then quit making videos!

DON'T be at the mercy of chemo and radiation therapy have a look at professor Thomas Seyfried from Baston College metabolic clinic

I agree with Art I think your numbers are quite optimistic. I had the robotic surgery in 2017 the good new is the cancer has not come back. The bad new is I was completely incontinent which never got better even after physical therapy. I finally opted for an ASU. This did make the incontinence manageable. Along with the incontinence was the ED the only way I could get an erection after surgery was injections. I had mixed results with them the last time I used the injection I got the erection from hell and had to go to the ER. When I had the ASU surgery I had penile implants installed too. They were very painful and I was left very underwhelmed if you get my drift. I had the implants recovered after about 9 months because they were a joke and still very painful. The surgery seems to have taken care of the cancer but I’m dealing with the side effects of the surgery everyday.

Had this but it still missed the cancer

My concern is proving to me I'm going to get what is prescribed!! Once your over radiated it's done.

STOP THE DECEPTION HORMONE therapy or ADT is actually cruel and barbaric CHEMICAL CASTRATION. Patients must be fully informed about exactly how much real or imagined benefit to overall survival is actually achieved and carefully weigh that against the horrific quality of life and often life threatening side effects. .....And men must be warned that up to twenty percent of older men NEVER RECOVER ABOVE CASTRATE LEVEL and remain castrated for life. Without full disclosure, there can be no free and fully informed consent. .....The administration of these toxins by coercion or deception without informed consent is CRIMINAL ASSAULT CAUSING GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM

So, the movement of rotation where I go for EBRT is not smooth. It's more of a jerking motion with frequent very short pauses. Is this normal for this kind of machine. Or are the servo motors not working correctly?

Dr Lance I want to thank you and your team for removing an aggressive prostrate cancer ( prostotecyomy) in September 2015 and with all odds against me was released after 3 days - I am am extremely well and wish you sir and your team a very Happy and Prosperous 2023! God bless bless all and the great work you are doing ( Mike Layard - Port Elizabeth) ' Your hospital and staff I also congratulate - winning the top award for cleanliness and hygiene!

No one cares about your bullshit you asshole.

the sound on this video sucks

Your numbers are wildly optimistic, alas. I had prostate surgery 13 months ago at a major NYC institution with a well known and highly regarded surgeon. Robotic, laparoscopic. Incontinence has been horrendous, despite extensive pelvic physical therapy and exercises. Erectile dysfunction total despite my being told that the nerves were spared and I'm doing viagra daily plus injections of bimix twice a week. Question: Does anyone know exactly HOW to do a prostate surgery without causing permanent incontinence? I've read about a growing consensus that longer urethra's post-surgery reduce the incidence of incontinence. Any truth to this? My surgeon says that no one really knows. Most days I find myself thinking that prostate surgery should be outlawed! Thank you.,

Couldn’t you find a noisier environment to try to explain this? Ridiculous.

No mention of the leaks and having to wear pads. It took me 6 months before i was continent

These are very useful videos, but given that the speaker is wearing a lavalier mic, the sound quality should really be a lot better

Am going in on Monday to have mine removed I wish it was over

They all have side effects. Seeding is probably the best. But there's no money in it. Not enough doctors do it. Now I'm talking encapsulated cancer. Cure rate are the same as removal. Seeding is done in less than 2 hours and your done. All radiation can have side effects 5 years down the line. Removal can cause death and also has its side effects

What is Gleason

get a better mic so we can understand what you said

Not so simple when you have to go in with a full bladder. Had 44 treatments to start with 2 years ago. And 9 chemo treatments but finally got it in remission. So don’t give up.

Thank you doctor. So the new connection between the bladder and urethra is strong enough after six or seven days?

Is it true that if you have Radiation Therapy and the cancer comes back, prostate removal is not an option?

Hyperthermia therapy is the best for cancer in Germany and please search for it. GOD BLESS.

Sound quality, with the background hiss of medical devices?) is sadly v poor.

Absolutely agree with you. Non invasive my arse. I have also found on my journey you have to do your own detailed research. These consultants often hide the life changing side effects of there own treatments which is disgusting.

If you watched this you probably have been diagnosed or know someone who has been diagnosed with prostate cancer, I went through it and I am now 6 years cancer free. I am passionate about this because I find the current attitude of doctors protecting their own specialty instead of the patients best hope for a positive outcome offensive. Each treatment has it’s best application,how early or late the disease was discovered etc. There are no blanket answers. I am only writing this to hopefully warn guys about some of the things I encountered. Wow, are these guy’s serious? Radiation, passes through other tissue. And because of that you could be prone to bladder or colon cancer in a few years. Don’t forget once you’ve had radiation the tissue of and around the prostate look like a melted mess, and that severely limits for salvage treatment should you ever need it. There is zero radiation in HIFU or surgery, I did HIFU because I did my research and didn’t want to risk a secondary cancer. Doctors like this should be ashamed of them selves for being so misleading. Sure its very precise where it can be aimed, but its coming from the outside of the body. and its probably passing through part of the bladder on its way in or colon on its way out. By the way that also means its passing through the nerve bundle on and around the prostate as well. Don’t believe this guy, or even me. The stakes are to high, do your own research, when I was diagnosed I spoke to at least 3 others that out of the blue had to be rushed to the hospital and have emergency radical prostatectomy.

This author could do a little more homework. The viruses we live with are in the air, like oxygen, which travels freely through pretty well all types of masks. Masks don't stop infection..only cough/sneeze spray.Here's a list of studies from 1981-2015 proving this: Neil Orr’s study, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.Ritter et al., pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1157412/ in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”Ha’eri and Wiley, europepmc.org/article/med/7379387 in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”Laslett and Sabin,onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ccd.1810170306 in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.In Tunevall’s 1991 study, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0310057X0102900402 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.”Lahme et al., in 2001, europepmc.org/article/med/11760479 wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”Figueiredo et al., in 2001, www.advancesinpd.com/adv01/21Figueiredo.htm reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 pdfs.semanticscholar.org/751a/cd427c20c8dc7d1fbc1b45eead104286f481.pdf and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.”Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=2085803 recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.Webster et al., onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05200.x in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub2/full and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.Carøe, in a 2014 review europepmc.org/article/med/25294675 based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/2014/09030/Surgical_Attire_and_the_Operating_Room__Role_in.11.aspx investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.”Da Zhou et al., journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0141076815583167 reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. On the other hand keeping people with 'symptoms' at a distance or at home is reasonable. About the only reason one might have for a face mask is to stop coughing phlegm and sneezing spray. But even in that case, that individual ought to be home anyway. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them. (on behalf on of Arthur Firstenberg's research of 2020)

Fantastic job. How would You Describe yourself in 4 words? Let's build each other up x3