Video

Thank you very much for the whole class, loved the teacher, would love to see more of those! I feel they can create small scale revolutions in the lives of individuals who listen to them!

Lecture starts at 04:35

Lecture starts at 04:50

Freaking⚡𝘓𝘐𝘛⚡!

Lecture starts at 05:38

The steam engine and coal mining predated the boom in textiles production. Thomas Savery rudimentary steam engine was invented in 1680s. Thomas Newcomen’s improved engined was invented in 1712 and used to improve output in water mill powered textile production. The steam engine allowed continuous power supply which aided textile production.

Audio starts at 04:45

Audio starts at 05:30

how is this not moving backward in time? A black grad celebration? This is segregation not inclusivity.

"Against the day" by Thomas Pynchon

He throwing up the set frfr? Dude still alive?

LORD PLEASE DON’T LET OTHER FOLKS SEE THIS OUTSIDE THE FAMILY 🤦🏿‍♂️

The plane/triangle normal must be N = (B - A) x (C - A); N = |N| ( he wrote N = (A - B) x (A - C);

THATS SOME GOOD SHIT DER 😂😂😂😂

Calling the "Glorious Revolution " a democratic revolution is neither give real meaning to the word democracy nor value the American Revolution itself. Spain by the time of the Glorious Revolution had a very afluent elite but had not political openness. And Russia , Germany, Japan and China got industrialized under severe authiritarian regimes....

The impact of a revolution can only be explained in comparison to its precedent period and not with eyes on the periods that followed. The global economic History is full of revolutions with enourmous impact: neolitic revolution, the invention of rare metal money which was portable and allowed trade between distant societies, the improvement of ships... The Protestant Reformation and a supposed "indoutrious revolution " are not even economic per se and cannot be implied that pre modern societies were driven by ludus other than labore...

They threw this event just so it could be a shuk n jive graduation, it's more important for them to remain this way then ascend. They want you to get over yourself. That's fine for the club, fashion, etc but when it has to be in a graduation, it is disrespectful to the actual word that is GRADUATION, THIS IS Good energy but not in this situation. It's a degradation. Sure they enjoyed it. But if you sober the mind and analyze it. He got a response by doing what is a stripper move and a hood one. Then he started crip walking which is just gang bangers most famous dance. He popped a stripper split and a Crip walk , and flexed a miss on the man putting the honors. If you want a laugh at it and not use a high IQ perspective I get it. But don't complain when people ask for their doctor to be...... Qualified🎉

24:00 I think they forgot the 1/2 factor in one of the lines 😮 (nice lecture!!)

My intuition tells me that a more productive (mind the pun) way of looking at things is not income per person but productivity per person. Are we really saying that heavy plows, crop rotation, the three field system, and so on didn't lead to marked increases in people's wellbeing? As a subsistence peasant you're not really making much of an income regardless. Most of the things you have are things you made or bartered for, or so I thought. This is kind of incoherent I'm sorry. Like, isn't one of the reasons for the proto-urbanization of the high middle ages a surplus of food production resulting from advances in agricultural productivity? Is that really nothing?

I wish I was black.

Nothing like a Black Graduation no matter the level of degree. We get down and throw it down!

Little boy blue lmao ♿️

Whats a black graduation ceremony? Do they have it racially segregated? The USA never fails to amuse me lol

Things like this event are one of the most obvious signs of the decay of western society, have never been so sure about that. The same ones that claim for a more "inclusive" society, "fight" racism, ask for respect, etc... then come up with this brilliant idea. Why not "38th annual white graduation"? Are we not equal and inclusive? Don't we live in a democracy? Hmm.....I'm just thankful I wasn't born in the United States, because my mental health would be very low... They set the bar lower each day, it's unbelievable

Disrespectful to the school and others.

Did you notice that gem at the end, how the chancellor or whomever acted like he was going to do a split too and the ladies in the back go wild

Unfortunately, Jesse can no longer have kids.

This gone viral now. 😂

Cmon man ! This is the best and put some James brown music over it !!

25:33 Shouldn't it be: _cos(theta/2), sin(theta/2) * v_ ? 🤔

Hamilton invented the quaternion, not... Heisenberg. There's even a plaque on a bridge in Dublin where it "hit" him to use "ijk". He wrote it down as: _i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1_

Terrence Howard 2024

How the wonderful this prof.is.........

An interesting story of preindustrial world... gonna watch this video again

Your parents shouldn’t have had children as you are no gem to humanity. You’re a pathological liar and a disgusting person who will spend your life having to explain for being such filth.

anyone knows where I can find the videos he is talking about?

amazingly good videos/ lectures thank you sooooo much for uploading and letting me have a chance to understand the history of eco[which is so important] better!!! thank you so much

He sounds like Jonathon Haidt with an accent. Interesting topic.

Me and Reza did our thesis together at state, my dawg right here💪🏾

Your patience with the chalk is admirable.

Godel's "Theorem" is a complete farce and absolute bullshit. Godel assigns a unique number to all the symbols in real numbers via the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra: e.g., the syntactical symbols "+", "-", "x" (multiplication) as well as the actual numbers and powers (e.g. 3^2). By his criteria, a "proof" consists of a tautology on each side of the equal sign. At first, one might think the statement "3 + 4 = 7" is a "proof", since it can be reduced to a sum of units on either side. But that would be a contradiction, according to Godel, because "3 + 4" has a different Godel Number than "7". So the only "proofs" for Godel are G(wff) = G(wff); any other statement is a contradiction by Godel Number. I call BS - a giant twittering machine built on nothing, see my pdfs on physicsdiscussionforum dot org Remember, you read it here first... :)

This professor is remarkably ignorant yet he's a good talker. If you actually know what you're talking about many of the things he's saying will be marred objectionable but he's got a good voice. I much prefer to be intelligent... Check out Mises institute... The Austrian school of economics lecture on the same material would be so much better...

What is the name of the profesor? Nice lecture!

I don’t get the multiplication part.

It was James Watt's Invention of the Steam Engine. A 500 times increase in the Power output for the whole country. From 20,000 Waterwheels in 1800 to 10,000,000 Steam Engines in 1900 !!!

I just plug in a 5 tick stop and 8 tick target on Ninjatrader

Britain from 1800 to 1900. 20,000 Waterwheels decreased in number. Windmills decreased in number. Englishman Thomas Newcomen's 1,500 Atmospheric Pumps disappeared. Scotsman James Watt's 500 Steam Engines increased in number to 10,000,000 !!! For every SINGLE Waterwheel in 1800 we now have an additional 500 Steam Engines in 1900 !!! That's an increase in Power Capacity and therefore Productive Capacity for the whole country of 500 times !!! In one human lifetime. And there's no need for flowing rivers of water for each one either, so they can be sited anywhere. This WAS the Industrial Revolution. It was a Power Revolution. And it was all due to only one single Invention, James Watt's Invention of the world's first PRACTICAL Steam Powered Engine. Spinning and Weaving boost had nothing to do with the Industrial Revolution , that was due to unfair trading practices.

Back in the mid 1980's I took an extension course at UCLA. I didn't have time to eat a decent meal before class, so I ate out of a vending machine and went up to the Engineering-Math Library before class. I Stumbled on to some IBM Research Journals that were very enlightening. Math PhD's had carefully researched algorithms and presented how they would do it if memory was not constrained. Then, they bastardized the algorithms to squeeze them into crippled computers. Before I finished the course, the friends of the library literally gave away these volumes because they were more than 15 years old and the library had run out of shelf space. So, the bastardized algorithms survived, but the research into what should have been got destroyed. Our algorithms today are simply the patched versions of the bastards. Nobody has ever revisited what should have been. Its simply very awkward settled science, good enough for half a century ago when the bigger IBM 360's had 16K of core.

I just wanna say Doc, as a gamer and enthusiast of graphic processing I am really enjoying your lectures. Thanks so much for posting and sharing information with the world. You’re awesome.

mind boggling shit