Video

As much as I agree about the importance of spacing, space was limited once we went around the hill and north into PL Charlie. Overall this was a tight AO with a bit of restrictive terrain like trees and hills. We made use of bounding overwatching each other sections which worked well for us up until the end.

@@PhanPhantasy No you guys really played it well for what you had to work with. Spacing was my only bitch...

It's much more affordable than DCS.

@@PhanPhantasy hell no, have you ever considered that USD isn't the only currency ? I got like 4-5 modules for the price of this classic game key. Also it seems like the Devs are allergic to just selling the game the normal way, they really make everything so complicated with the USB sticks. Actually is it even possible to buy this game outside of the US?

@chapman3641 the cost is $115 USD for the full license for the Pro Pe. If you were to compare it with DCS, you'll need a joystick, jet/heli/plane models, maybe some of the maps. Sure you can play for free but most people will spend more. The sims primary market is military institutions, and consumers like us are secondary. And USB stinks are common in government softwares and to protect its product from piracy. But I do agree it can be a pain to install and, I would love to see SBP available for all. I'm not American so yes, they do sell to people outside of the US (unless your country has an arms trade embargo). I highly encourage you to try it out 1 month license for $10 USD (no usb needed) go through the Abrams or Leopard tutorial, play a few SP games or play with us or with a community, and see if you enjoy it. You are more than welcome to try it out with us.

I haven't read anything if they gave the DUs to Australia, but it's likely they didn't export those.

@@PhanPhantasy ok good, they use another composite for export

DU inserts aren't really what's special about the armor, tungsten inserts and DU inserts offer pretty much the same protection. Rather what's important is the armor generation, Australia is getting NGAP in their sepv3's just with tungsten inserts most likely as I haven't seen anything saying they changed their stance on DU from the original asking for an alternative to DU. Important to note though, they were offered DU, we do provide the option for nations buying abrams to have DU in their tanks.

@@BentCheeks DU is only for American tanks since it's composition is classified

@@hellishcyberdemon7112 The entire composite layout is classified, if there was a security concern we wouldn't be providing the nation our most advanced composite layout and just simply changing the insert. In Australia's initial acquisition of the abrams they chose to specify that they didn't want DU. DU was available to Australia but they chose to not have it in their tanks. Don't believe you can provide links through youtube but the source is "Acquisition of the ABRAMS Main Battle Tank - Australian National Audit Office" Jul 17, 2007 With the quote from the source being: "2.38 Defence has chosen to specify that there should be no depleted uranium in the tanks destined for Australia. In this regard, the US Government manufactures an alternate, comparable armour choice for ABRAMS tanks, which does not rely on depleted uranium."

Check out Revenant's video on how to install: czcams.com/video/Qk4qKSoeeI4/video.htmlsi=839j05jsZrH_zVTH

so never then

@@harveyknguyen their playerbase would massively increase if they did so

@@mysteriumxarxes3990 the dev team is 10 guys, only 3 of them are full time and all of them don't have much experience in Unity or the time to do it also what makes you think the playerbase would increase because of it

If you need help, I suggest you join my discord. It's much easier to troubleshooting in there.

Boring.

Standart skins available in steelbeasts....no need to DL anything

the dev's have no plans for official mod support

No need to hope -- The roadmap for the game is noted on their website.

​@@samargrewal929if I recall correctly the devs didn't say that, just that they focused on the game right now.

Infantry is still in the works, not downplayed. Optimization will always be in the works as new content is added and from what I understand, it's more CPU heavy than GPU.

Also depends on how you define "backer" because if you're a current backer on Patron, you would've seen some the preview of the development of this game.

guess you missed the early-Access part the developer's have shown off infantry model's multiple time before and also if you look at the road-map number 8 is expanded campaign and the dev's have the game reaches the 1.0 launch the campaign will be similar to M1 tank platoon but they will add there own twist and ideas into the mix do some Research before forming you own opinion

i have a 4060 and the game is running well above 60fps

I have GTX 960 and it runs perfectly fine lol

already in the game

Night missions for red are impossible withot flares. You are dying before you can see enemy with your night vision

@@Podorozhn1k historically accurate