- 82
- 2 403 915
By: Rachel Taylor
United States
Registrace 15. 01. 2018
Short, informative biology videos to introduce new topics or to facilitate a flipped-classroom approach to teaching.
By: Rachel Taylor- High School Teacher in New York City.
By: Rachel Taylor- High School Teacher in New York City.
Video
Zucchini
zhlédnutí 256Před rokem
1) Why do you think that the plant have not yet produced any female flowers?.. 2) Do plants reproduce sexually or asexually?.. 3) Compare and contrast reproduction in plants with reproduction in humans
Red Peppers
zhlédnutí 206Před rokem
1) Why are these peppers changing color? 2) What is the mechanism of the color change?
Exponential Logistic Growth AP Biology
zhlédnutí 16KPřed rokem
Population growth equations AP Biology CED 8.3 and 8.4
Transcription AP Biology
zhlédnutí 9KPřed rokem
Transcription and mRNA processing in eukaryotes for AP Biology - CED 6.3
DNA Replication AP Biology
zhlédnutí 16KPřed rokem
AP Biology CED 6.2 - DNA Replication NOTE: The specific type of RNA polymerase that constructs the RNA primer during DNA replication is called "primase." This is beyond the scope of the AP curriculum, so I chose to simply call it an RNA polymerase (which IS in the scope of the curriculum- 6.3 Transcription).
Nucleic Acids AP Bio
zhlédnutí 7KPřed rokem
NOTE: This video covers AP Biology content related to nucleic acids from Unit 1 (1.6- nucleic acids) AND Unit 6 (DNA and RNA structure). If you're in Unit 1- it's a good idea to get learn ahead!
Cell Communication AP Biology
zhlédnutí 5KPřed 2 lety
This video is designed to cover the illustrative examples from AP Biology C.E.D. 4.1
How to Access DOE Accounts, DOE Zoom, and Millennium Live Classes
zhlédnutí 586Před 3 lety
How to Access DOE Accounts, DOE Zoom, and Millennium Live Classes
Charles Darwin The Origin of Species is a Great Science Book 📕
Thanxxxx alot u made it clever more than anyone elsee🥹♥️♥️♥️♥️ Thank you !🥹🩷
Thank you
Wowww thank you!!! Now i understand!!!
thank you .
Anyone in 2024 over here? Add like if you’re here!
The "Debate" is over. Biological Evolution is science and has been accepted science for 150 years. Creationism is fraud, it is magic that has never been demonstrated and it has NO place in any science classroom.
thank you so much for this video!
Was it useful for the students to answers these questions
Make an example whereby you calculate the number of years it would take for maybe deers to reach a given capacity
Very clear explanation. Thank you!
Thank you
Very good slidehsow !!Good explanation 😂😂😂❤❤❤
You explained that so well! thank you
❤❤
the explanation is amazing. thank you for your video. it is easily understood.
Random mutation doesn't exist , it's called adaptive mutation or directed mutations , if evolution is true why bacteria don't change their type at all , bacteria e coli remain e coli even after mutation happen and it can no more what's written perviously in dna
Exam time🥲🥲
🤨That is neither proof nor evidence for evolution
I am not impressed by either ignorance nor arrogance.
Birds ARE reptiles though, unless crocodilians are not. Because crocodilians are more closely related to birds than to lizards or turtles.
“Science is a growing collection of knowledge” “YEAH THAT WE DONT NEED” I have a final exam and I have to studyyyy 😭😭😭😭😭
Dps 6 class hi
Best video on ecological pyramid.. thank you Rachel❤️
FUCK FUCK FUCK
The peppered moth experiment was later found to be a hoax. They glued the moths to the trees for their pictures.
Hey Teach! Great work on the chanel!!! I suggest you make You Tube SHORTS :) !!!! This will help your channel so much, just keep them short and interesting, basically what you do!! :)
Oops.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
this is how we learn. cool
Well, the Fossil record doesn't exist for evolution and claims on such things as the Piltdown man, Nebraska Man, Lucy and others have been shown to be either frauds or wild conjectures based on very few bones. The Comparative Embryology by Haeckel was a known fraud right from the beginning; from taking embryos from different developmental stages to changing the drawings to try and emphasize similarities that weren't there to claims on body parts that had nothing in common with different species while in development. Homology is not an indication of evolution. It's just a design that is efficient. As for DNA, the claim of apes and humans being 99.5% the same has now dropped to something like 80% because the methodology used was a pick and match system from different areas of the DNA. Even Chinese scientists are rejecting this tree of Life scenario from Darwinian Evolution and describing life as a forest. While Evolutionist want to claim that this theory is real, there is less and less evidence supporting it. From the problems inherent in Origin of Life chemical issues to the fact that no one has actually found any fossils supporting it. It's time to go back to the drawing board as this theory requires more blind faith than anything else.
@@PhilipK-xk4by There are no examples of a full skeleton found together for any of the so called ape to man progression. They are just parts that have more missing bones than actual finds. The rest is fantasy. Drawing hair, eyes, skin tone from bones is nonsense. Even using the chimp argument, the DNA is vastly different. Science keeps changing its claims as often as the Kardashians change men. The vast amount of DNA used to be called Junk DNA and now apparently it is incredibly important. You want mock the Chinese for actually having the intelligence to question evolution where in North America it's so much of a cult that even questioning it gets people fired, then fine, go ahead. At least they are looking at the problem. And a good Designer understands how to use designs over and over in much different situations instead of redesigning the wheel all the time. So that claim is again nonsense. And saying Homology IS evidence of evolution is nonsense claim. Oranges and apples are round, rocks are round. They are homologous in shape. They sure the heck aren't indications of evolutionary progress from rock to apple. People see stuff all the time and most of it is in their mind, not in the actual item. And Evolution is a theory. Micro Evolution can studied, but that's just variation within a species and it in no way represents the Macro Evolution that people try to claim is the same. They are not. And no one has seen Macro Evolution occur. As for the raptors, it's a supposition about the feathers, just like everything else in this Evolutionary nonsense.
You drank all the creatard koolaid didn't you? We know you did. You spew out all the old creatard lies as if they would impress us. Saddly for you, we KNOW your examples are all bullshit, lies, missrepresented and just simply wrong. Your assertions have no basis in reality.
it is great for home schooling
what is this music? ts fire. lmk rachel taylor
Literally doing this bs for studying and preparing for the Nyc state regents exam. And yes my yappertron Living teacher forced us to watch this😭🙏
5:08 Not all dinosaurs had feathers. And the closest living relatives to dinosaurs are crocodilians, not birds. Birds ARE dinosaurs.
Good, but a couple nitpicks. 1) At 3.14 on screen (and read I think a few seconds earlier) it says that all life on Earth has genetic sequences we share. That is ambiguous, and could be taken to refer to the entire genetic sequences of genomes. Better would have been adding "some" to qualify it ("All life on Earth has some genetic sequences we share") 2) And around the same point, there is a grammatical error. It asks, "What could us humans have ...". That should be "we". "What could we humans have ..."
Miss zainab the goat
you just saved my life
I love this video man this is the only topic i was iffy about before the test but now I am undeniably locked in 😊😎😎
Let’s lock in ap bio students!
🔒 🔒 🔒
Dios te bendiga
amazing vid!
good luck soldiers, 'tis will be a tough battle.
No matter how much they want to wish it away, evolutionists still cannot eliminate the brute fact that intelligent design is precisely one of the two possible causes for structures in the universe. Given any physical structure, including DNA, it is either designed, or formed via natural causes. Evolutionists are so desperate to cling to thier failed theory they intentionally lie to the public that design is not a scientific fact. Why trick people into rejecting design 'a priori' when evolution can simply be proven? Because of course Evolution cannot be proven scientifically but must be accepted as a Mythos through which state it is interpreted. Yet, evolutionists are so bad at philosophy and logic that they do not even comprehend they have undermined their own scientific claim! Anyone who claims that the fact of design is not possible has already undermined the scientific underpinnings of evolution because they have made evolution into a claim that cannot be disproved. One of the many reasons the failed science of evolutionary theory has perpetuated so long is exactly because of ideologues who dismiss criticism with the ad hominem fallacy that critics "don't understand evolution". What a simple minded way to never have to deal with the science! 😂 Evolutionary theory is unobservable, untestable, unrepeatable, is the only major theory to be proposed with no mathematical proofs, and it reveals no scientific knowledge that can be applied in the present; it's a story about the past that far better meets the description of a historic myth than it meets the criteria of a scientific theory. Evolution is wrong not merely because it contradicts theology and philosophy; it's wrong because it's bad science Yet evolutionary theory is not merely wrong, it actually causes harm to science, in this case, by holding back the study of epigenetics for decades. What can you do if you believe in the theory of evolution? Nothing at all because it's just a story about the past and does not convey any real scientific information useful in the present. On the opposite side, what can you do if you believe in intelligent design? You can do epigenetics! Evolutionists have held back science for decades by calling the metadata in DNA "junk DNA" and completely ignoring the information that was right in front of us the entire time. That's how severely dangerous the evolutionary theory is to real scientific progress. But by understanding DNA from an intelligent design framework science has come to understand that the "junk DNA" is actually metadata that controls the expressions of genes. There is no incorrect theory that is merely neutral; it inherently harms the advancement of science when a theory is wrong but people adhere to it out of social fear and group-think, like they do with evolution. Darwin himself is the one who first suggested irreducible complexity as a method to disprove his theory. Why are evolution ideologues always so ignorant of science? 😂 "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." -Charles Darwin, 'On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life' I provided the full title for Darwin's book so you can see what a racist you are for believing in it. 😂
No matter how hard creationists wish for it, magic will never be an explanation.
Or God just created each species exactly as they are.
@@PhilipK-xk4by Yes it does. Because that was Gods design.
@@reneesantiago6496 Prove it.
Animals evolve, in snakes there are tiny bones that used to be legs
In the population growth why did u add 59 + 173 We already found B-D And 173 experienced it sooo I didn't really understand that part
crazy video
what does the water by product from the electron transport chain do
It’s just a byproduct/ becomes part of the cell fluids.
ily
well explained
THIS WAS SOOOO HELPFULLL
This saved me for my exam tmrw, ty! :)