Video

🤡aged well

Yeah sorry about that

Caruana , Anish and even Ding lmao

@@somethingsomething2825 never of them won Candidates twice

@@somethingsomething2825 bro ding is World champion just read it again

I'd say Fabi is slightly over him

IN classical fabi is better but in rapid and blitz nepo is clearly better@@X30N1

That would be humiliating, good thing it was Ding and not you there.

@@erikasilva6154 fr

Sheesh taking me back to 03-07, Madden tournaments, playing for money, at the homies house with everybody watching. Just to be the man in your city was something to strive for. Good times.

The winner deserves to win, unless there’s foul play. Races are decided by cm’s sometimes. Great chess games are lost in single moves. Etc. He absolutely had the potential to win, but that doesn’t mean he deserved to. In the end he was bested this time around

lol yes she is Indian that’s why

😂🤕

he was sitting on his left leg

1. Literally everyone has "an accent" 2. Tania Sachdev does in fact have an Indian accent, if that's what you meant 3. They weren't in the room live commentating, they were recording audio over the match from elsewhere for the livestream

@@ItsAsparageese My man there are just three classic English accents British, American and Austrailian she is trying to use British accent but to talk in English if you are not European you need to know all the vocals she is just using vocals and the way she wants to pronounce words are not right to talk in english you need the European expressions not Asian i am an American myself and I can understand who is born to talk in English and who is trying to speak in English without any training

​@@Corpsarious ... Wow. Okay. There's a lot to unpack here. I guess I'll just go point by point. *1. "there are just three classic English accents"* This is not a thing. You have either been misguided or you made this up. There are literally thousands (millions maybe, depending on how granular we get) of anglophone accents, and none of them are in any formal way designated as "classic". That is not a legitimate linguistic term. *2. "if you are not European"* Wtf does this have to do with anything? That's super random and irrelevant. *3. "you need to know all the vocals she is just using vocals"* Wtf is this supposed to mean? "Vocals" just means any and all sounds produced by a voice. Did you mean "phonemes" maybe? To speak about speech and language, you need to have some idea of the vocabulary related to speech and language. You keep using words that do not mean what you seem to think they mean. *4. "the way she wants to pronounce words are not right"* There is no objective "right" way to speak any given language. Period. Idk what weird elitist bs you've been fed but the idea of there being a "right" way to use a language is just an elitist construct. _(I recognize that this point is philosophically contentious, but I think it's the strongest position on the topic to take, and I'm very comfortable with the soundness of my arguments for it.)_ *5. "you need the European expressions not Asian"* Again, there's nothing wrong with having literally any accent in literally any language. And again, I think you're fishing for words and don't know the real vocab here. "Expressions" refers to either facial expressions or to specific word choice. I'm guessing you were going for "phoneme" or "pronunciation", but honestly your comment is so incoherent altogether that it's hard to make guesses about what you mean. *6. "I am an American myself"* Okay, same, so what? Once again, this has no relevance to the topic. *7. "I can understand who is born to talk in English and who is trying to speak in English without any training"* Okay first of all "training" is a really weird way to word that, wtf is this, the vocal coaching scene from Singin' In the Rain? And secondly, this sounds incredibly xenophobic and snobby. *8. Finally, even if we DO pretend, just for the sake of this conversation, that there is a valid "correct" way to use a given language, the fact is that Tania uses conventionally "correct" English a whooooole lot more accurately and consistently than you came ANYWHERE near doing in your comment.* (This doesn't have anything to do with correct points/arguments -- you could have said legitimate criticisms without using conventionally "correct" language to do it -- but it does really weaken your credibility as someone claiming to have authoritative knowledge about English usage.) Quite honestly (and I don't mean this as an insult, just my sincere take) ... I think you've pretty much just made up a bunch of things that you hope sound like real facts and legitimate positions to hold. Or alternatively, maybe you're repeating some stuff that you've misunderstood, or perhaps that you've heard from very misguided people. I'm also guessing that you are probably a child, though I'm less sure of that part. But yeah ... I can't be sure what's going on inside your head, but it really, really, really sounds like you set out to try to sound like you have a lot of knowledge about linguistics. And it's very, very, _very_ obvious that you do not. As someone who, when I was a lot younger, sometimes insecurely made things up (although I tended to make up false stories rather than pretend to have knowledge on topics I didn't know, but it's a similar trait) ... I really encourage you to work on NOT doing that. Seriously. The sooner you learn to say something like "It just sounds weird to me" instead of ... whatever all _that_ is ... the better off you'll be. Pretending to have authoritative knowledge of topics you don't really understand is a fast track to getting yourself into some EXTREMELY embarrassing situations. I really hope, for your sake, that you learn not to do that, before you end up with some really rough memories from making something up that everyone around you can see right through. I hope you've learned something useful from this comment. If anything here is hard to understand then I'm happy to try to answer any questions or clarify anything, but if you double down and try to insist more on saying things that aren't based in any kind of reality, then this is as far as my investment in this thread goes, 'cos I refuse to end up here in a low-willpower moment and start flexing my education on someone I suspect is a literal child XD Wishing you well either way.

@@ItsAsparageese bud you are weird as hell You know nothing you are just repeating everything again and again what is your reply supposed to mean aren't you ashamed of yourself you think you are some Scientist I tried to let you know how The English has its basis and where should be worked to Improve but you are just a weird kind of psychopath I have invested my almost 12 years of my life to read the human psychology but never seen an person like you are you texting from Mars or something I would like to respect you but you don't want it you made a really small issue a giant thing how is this world going to survive with people like you sorry to say but you need to be mature and a little bit smart large texts doesn't shows the small mentality and last thing I would like to know your age to atleast Know how much grown man are you

I guess, for the most depressed looking person on the planet.