Video

What is not understood today is that there are three distinct dimensions: Consciousness; Mind; Elemental. We are in a Material or Atomic Age and the elemental only or matter is seen as real and fundamental. Consciousness and Mind are seen as derivative and that makes Consciousness ‘the hard problem’ for philosophy. Also there are likely more electricities than the two that have been discovered; the environmental one; and the one in entities. As there are five elements and five senses there are likely five electricities. With the discovery of more electricities and more understanding of electromagnetism; the knowledge of which is due to Maxwell; there is also the mystery of magnetism itself. These further discoveries will change our lives and how we live. Philosophy now has become less cognitive and its adherents appears to think for it to matter it must leave thought experiments behind and instead concentrate on the elemental. That is a mistake, as so much that matters comes from thought experiments which can then be applied to the empirical to test them out. That is how science progresses. The non-tangible is not valued now, likely due to this being a material age, so what is empirical reigns. Philosophy is important to all disciplines as how we detach from the empirical and view it objectively is very important to not being immersed in the elemental. Like Merlin threatened with being banished into the earth we, and life, would lose the magic. Also the materialists are on a constant quest to own the narrative now with eliminative materialism and the idiocy of trans humanism or humans embedded with technology. Materialists are clueless about human consciousness; the human mind and their infinite potentials.

ZxZX

Where to download the xfacpy? "pip install" doesn't work.

Average people having access to these kinds of conversations makes me feel very grateful.

Any relationship with time crystals?

Great presentation. Excellent visuals

Thank you for having Pritzker Molecular Engineering professor Aashish Clerk at this year's conference!

Fantastic! Thank you for having our professor, Hannes Bernien, at this year's conference!

She is really a superwoman. Such an example for all girls in physics! I feel so proud seeing this lecture.

Thanks for the super fast uploads! The conference just ended and there's already a lot of talks on CZcams!

Great content

Thanks.

Das weckt ein paar Erinnerungen. Und da ist ja auch Jens. Interessant, dass der jetzt auch bei euch ist.

Very nice thanks

Concise and precise… wot more can we want….

Please resample the sound

You said the waveguide was a one-way transmission line, is that purely because there are emitters at one end and receivers at the other end? But if a photon is partially reflected back from the detector to the emitter would it perhaps interfere?

Sound is really low! take it down, add gain and grab more views.

Top notch content, thanku ☘️

Thanks for the talk

If the Oxford philosopher P.F. Strawson is right that things sensed are mentally acquired one way (causally) in direct sensory interaction and become reformulated in developed reflection, in the first case (material content) what is seen is observer independent and world relative and in reflection are observer relative as observer related in the form of "objects", i.e., as individuated as "person concerning", then two realisms coexist in a mature experience: a personalized experience formed as common sense and scientific realism which leaves out the point of view (localized) of the person and the phenomena of subjective personal concern in order to only consider "thing space objects" of worldly particulars (abstracted from the duality of mind-body experience so as to explore worldly matter beyond the objects of concern of an observer. Dualism, and, thus, skepticism, is avoided by recognizing that observable things are material and always the same no matter the form while formed things have no matter of their own. Experience is a learned and applied transformative activity of on-going individuating. Strawson, on such grounds as these claims common sense reality and scientific reality are purpose-given formalizations of experience expressing different perceived concerns of a vulnerable sentient being in a dangerous world of things (particulars) subject to the harsh economies of energy. In both cases, individuals care in different practical ways about contingent content-materiality. By stipulation, the world doesn't care a bit about being cared about. Refs for Strawson: "Perception and it s objects" the first three chapters of "Individuals," and "Bounds of Sense."

Hello! thank for your help and support, my question is that, what are the requirement for getting Ph.D. in computer science with support of associated research program. and what tips improve the chance of my acceptance. what are the other ways to fund the progress rather than associated researchship. hope you reply soon. thanks to you.

Well done Gia, nice work

3+1d you get a bulk but it becomes gapless after certain limit so you lose the bulk but maintain the pair correlations

Tried to reach out to Jad but his email is not available.

I ve done this on a lattice over 10 years ago. You can see my renders. Nice work 👌

Why are you taunting me? The internet runs on fiber optics. Bleh, I can't get fiber in my neighborhood, just old fashioned copper wires with 25-50 Mbps transfer rates. Just 10 minutes walk away there is 10Gbps fiber offered to all residents. Can I tell the telecoms people that quantum computing internet is a human right and they need to give me direct access to fiber?

The magnitude of force of Sun light shining on a person is equal to the weight of a grain of salt? That's actually way stronger than I expected!

one step at a time we are getting closer to the day when we all will have supercomputers in our pockets.

Underrated.

basically there is more entanglement that can pass through the system. the photons build into a field and then the varying pulses of light are able to be translated into an energy field that can respond to the entanglement and then vibrate that energy down the given wire to the intended system.

so, it's a translation problem.

so when you generate an artificially entangled system, its very difficult to keep out the "noise" or interference. if the quantum computers are sensitive to other entities or entanglement structures, then other entanglement structures such as another quantum computer requiring thermo-dynamic stability that would generate a lot of waste heat and energy, manifesting a decoherence problem thusly thinning the entanglement for all computers. much like heat from CPU processors, but instead of heat, it's because entanglement is fragile and so thermodynamically expensive to maintain artificial entanglement. as a result, very difficult to get the systems to "speak to one another".

very helpful

The problematic part of free will is is the "free" part.

🎉 Wonderful presentation. Very inspiring talk. Is it just me, or the audio cut in the very last few minutes though?

29:30😅Opinion, Scientist dont have Opinions, we have Logical Reasoning, based on the Best Evidence , 😉 ❤🎉

Dark 20:00 Energy , Force of a Blackhole ❤🎉

Yea!!🎉BIG BANG ,..GANG ❤❤❤🎉 INFINITY ♾️ 👌 🎉

Amazing presentation.

Watch Full Video here: czcams.com/video/z0qpR21o7vI/video.html

Important expansion in the field of physics. Everyone should have a look at the Navy Hybrid Aerial Underwater Craft (read UFO) patents by aerospace engineer and inventor Salvatore Pais. Using Macroscopic Quantum Coherence using plasma resonant frequency fields to access the energy densities (~10²⁵ joules/ meter²) by polarizing the local vacuum field using Argon gas in a resonant chamber vibrated by Microwaves at 3.3 Ghz until polarizing the local vacuum field to macroscopic Quantum Coherence when the Resonant Plasma Frequency is achieved. Goto Google patents and search Salvatore Pais The patents are real and Brett Tingley did several good articles where he proved the validity of the patents and the tech bosses at the Navy fully backing it. Also includes room temperature superconductors patent using piezo-electrics

Thank you for this super interesting talks professors. Professor Oriti the goat

Two brilliant people discussing the fundamentals of physics, real pleasure, thanks.

Can Bachelors engineer apply for this? Is this applicable for engineering domain? I wanna apply next year. I have 3 years industry experience in VLSI domain and completed Bachelor's Degree in Electronics Engineering

As a small correction: on slide 28 the "Goldilocks regime" is introduced as kappa = 2*g. It also says that in the arXiv paper, but that was due to a small error in an calculation. It was corrected later in the nature paper. Not sure why it is still wrong in 2022 conference

A notation in itself does not convey any meaning to the audience. So it could be better to explain the interplay between ideas first, then introduce the symbols. It's more explaining that way I think.

Başarılar hocam

I love these videos (Dialogues on the Foundations). It's fun to listen to during long summer evenings. As a side note, it's interesting to see people refer to Einstein's relativity theory as "classical". I thought classical gravity was Newton's. But I guess profs Liberati and Oriti are several levels above that so that they consider Einstein's theories "classical".