Video

Martinez Mark Lee Jose Lewis Laura

Hernandez Charles Young Paul Hernandez Charles

Miller Karen Robinson Daniel Young Brian

Ive found this video exactly 7 years to the day of when it was posted. ☺️

couldn't find a convincing explanation online, and voila this guy appears. thank you

Thank You!

such a great video thank you SO MUCH!!

Well here I am 4 years later.... this past LSAT (June 2024) was officially the last LSAT with a logic games section. Funny to watch this video now.

czcams.com/video/w5_R-DRsAVc/video.html

New to your channel. I appreciate your educational Law School support. This shows your compassion and purpose. Thank you again.

bro, i would kiss you right now, your channel is my new bible

So smoking increasing the likelihood of one having cancer by 5% is a CAUSAL claim. Yet, the claim that "people who smoke are more likely to get lung cancer" is CORRELATIVE. It seems to me the only difference between these is the quantification of these likelihoods. I can't imagine that it is a statement having numbers or not as being the deciding factor here. So what am I missing?

Thank you! I was stuck on this one.

Sooo helpful! Thank you!

Great lessons. Clear and straight to the point. But can you please add an example or two in the same video to help visualize the concept? Examples will help us to put the lesson into practice.

Took me 10 minutes. This is one of the most brain tickling question i've ever seen on LSAT

i just struggle when i get down to two answer choices

If questions 12:15

Very understood

Is there any point in doing practice samples if you already write fairly well? It just seems pointless since there is no metric to evaluate it, such as with practice questions from the other test sections.

Wheres Le' embrace failure explanation?

I think a main strategy to answering the Reading Comprehension questions is, Looking at the Question 1st. This way you have in the back of your mind what to keep an eye for, particularly in some of the long passages.

Excellent

Smexy 🤍😁 thank you for your videos.

You're an excellent teacher!

Ben seems so strong, young and so happy here. Very interesting to note what 4 years did to Ben and most of us... Thanks! Such a great video.

Very helpful. Ty.

Love your explanation of turning the passage into a kids book.

anyone studying now for January's lsat?

This guy is funny. If I had a tutor I'd want it to be like him #nohomo

Direct to the point and AMAZING explanation!!! Thank you

Thank you so much for these videos! The opportunity to “experience” the classroom environment as someone who can’t afford classes is so useful! The students have a lot of the same questions and misconceptions as I do and it’s so great to hear not only that the choice is wrong but why!

Pleaseeee tell me you are still teaching! This has been one of the best explanation I've come across! I've believed that my trying to understand was wrong, but indeed that's insanity, UNDERSTAND what you are reading (not for agreement sake) to be confident and pick the correct answer.

If NO mammals lay eggs, then the platypus is NOT a mammal. What is the answer? Please show how you get the answer.

What is the answer to sarah not crying? Is it she IS outside?

More of thee please

Awesome!

Thank you so much!!!

Is there a playlist where you talk about types of problems and how to categorize them?

This is so helpful!!

The students comment at around the 27:45 minute mark really helped me make sense of this

Hhg

This is a poor setup. We know the contra positive is -L->-M and that for sure will happen in 1 one the groups because of the max going 2x rule (L can’t go 3x). This means that there will for sure be a group of NPQ. so the question is where can that group go? Well we know P can’t go in group 3. So make 2 options. One with group 1 with NPQ and the second option with group 2 NPQ. Further, there has to be two L and that fills out one of the charts.

Why can’t N go twice on Friday. eg Thrus: MLP Fri: NNP Sat: LMQ?

It’s so cool to see Mike Ross prep students for the LSAT!

i am going to kill myself studying for this shit test I have been studying for 6 months and I still get -8 on logic games FUCK LSAC

wow this guy is good!

Are there any study groups in MD that you know of?

One of the best. You tell me there are two ways to make a long sentence, one is to make subject long, another is to use structure. You then suggest to use visualization to help to understand. Also, U points out the key is to understand the idea from the sentence. Your explanation is straight to the points!