Michael Fralick
Michael Fralick
  • 53
  • 231 485
Adjusting for confounders: everything you need to know in 6 minutes
If you don't know what a confounder is, watch this first: czcams.com/video/CSyF3ZU_9k8/video.html.
For higher level techniques like propensity score methods: czcams.com/video/DdCGzNygobw/video.html
Learn more about the Fralick Lab: fralicklab.com
Want to stop wasting time on journal formatting - jrnowl.com
zhlédnutí: 47

Video

Acetaminophen (tylenol) - a crash course for nurses in under 5 minutes
zhlédnutí 64Před 14 dny
Created by fralicklab.com References [1] www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1508375 [2] www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2861975/ Other crash course videos for nurses: [1] ECG 101 - czcams.com/video/xVUXDja662Q/video.htmlsi=Mj1p4zNYFm2ob3mA [2] NG tubes - czcams.com/video/CA_OUUJQ9Xs/video.htmlsi=sevGkIM6LN9hDmmc
PCR vs culture vs antigen test: everything you need to know in 5 min
zhlédnutí 82Před měsícem
PCR vs culture vs antigen test: everything you need to know in 5 min by Hania Siddiqui. Hania is an MSc candidate at the university of toronto and team member at fralicklab.com & cube-ontario.github.io
SGLT2i: Everything you need to know in 5 minutes
zhlédnutí 314Před 2 měsíci
www.sglt2rx.com/ www.glp1-rx.com/ References [1] www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720 [2] www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107038 [3] www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022190 [4] www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107038
Ozempic (semaglutide): Everything you need to know in 5 minutes
zhlédnutí 386Před 2 měsíci
www.glp1-rx.com/ fralicklab.com References www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2403347 www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2306963 www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2307563 www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141
Confounding: Everything you need to know in 5 minutes!
zhlédnutí 156Před 3 měsíci
Brought to you by www.fralicklab.com Check out jrnowl.com to stop wasting your time when trying to find journal submission requirements! Higher level teaching point: Confounder is a common cause* of the exposure and outcome and not on the causal pathway. *Markers of a common cause also fall in that bucket. For age to be a confounder it does not have to cause anything but it is a marker for othe...
Stats 101 for med students: everything you need to know in 7 minutes
zhlédnutí 284Před 4 měsíci
95% CI: everything you need to know in 5min - czcams.com/video/5eAGXsY9LSI/video.html p values: everything you need to know in 5 min - czcams.com/video/jZdMYUT1R6Y/video.html Jrnowl.com - a free resource to waste less time when you are submitting manuscripts for publication tinystats.github.io/teacups-giraffes-and-statistics/index.html Thank you to Katarina Zorcic (Queen's University medical st...
Bias: everything you need to know in 5 min!
zhlédnutí 362Před 7 měsíci
Brief video to introduce and define bias. Past videos include: - 95% confidence interval: czcams.com/video/5eAGXsY9LSI/video.html - p values: czcams.com/video/jZdMYUT1R6Y/video.html - RCTs: czcams.com/video/cfymxVWy8YY/video.html www.jrnowl.com/ Follow on twitter - @fralickmike
Tight vs liberal glycemic control: 3min summary
zhlédnutí 81Před 7 měsíci
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2304855 cardiotrialfiles.substack.com/
Intro to 95% confidence intervals: 6 min crash course
zhlédnutí 1,4KPřed 8 měsíci
[1] Great resource here: tinystats.github.io/teacups-giraffes-and-statistics/index.html [2] www.jrnowl.com follow along on twitter @fralickmike
Lecture: crash course from pragmatic to adaptive RCTs
zhlédnutí 156Před 9 měsíci
Here is the unabridged version of a lecture I gave on October of 2023 at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Ontario. www.jrnowl.com trialfiles.substack.com/ fralicklab.com/
P values: everything you need to know in 5 min
zhlédnutí 1,8KPřed 11 měsíci
Jrnowl.com - a free resource to waste less time when you are submitting manuscripts for publication NEJM Evidence stats stat - czcams.com/video/85lLfUHmmYQ/video.html&ab_channel=NEJMGroup Episheets - www.rtihs.org/episheet
3 min RCT: once weekly insulin!!
zhlédnutí 561Před 11 měsíci
Twitter: FralickMike The Rounds Table Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rounds-table/id826703161 JRNOWL: www.jrnowl.com/ www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2303208
RCT in 3min: SGLT2s improve hemoglobin in CKD!
zhlédnutí 200Před rokem
Twitter: FralickMike The Rounds Table Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rounds-table/id826703161 JRNOWL: www.jrnowl.com/ evidence.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/EVIDoa2300049
Thrombocytopenia - everything you need to know in 3min
zhlédnutí 275Před rokem
This is a brief 3min crash course on thrombocytopenia meant for medical trainees and generalists (e.g., internists, family doctors). fralicklab.com/
Preventing critically low hemoglobin: 3minute overview
zhlédnutí 132Před rokem
Preventing critically low hemoglobin: 3minute overview
RCT in 3min: Goals of Care Conversations
zhlédnutí 92Před rokem
RCT in 3min: Goals of Care Conversations
So you want to start an RCT: everything you need to know in 16min
zhlédnutí 271Před rokem
So you want to start an RCT: everything you need to know in 16min
NG tubes - everything you need to know in 5 minutes
zhlédnutí 186Před rokem
NG tubes - everything you need to know in 5 minutes
RCT in 3min: CLEAR trial of bempedoic acid
zhlédnutí 308Před rokem
RCT in 3min: CLEAR trial of bempedoic acid
3min RCT: RSV vaccine for older adults!
zhlédnutí 124Před rokem
3min RCT: RSV vaccine for older adults!
RCT in 3min: Hydrocortisone in Severe CommunityAcquired Pneumonia
zhlédnutí 1KPřed rokem
RCT in 3min: Hydrocortisone in Severe CommunityAcquired Pneumonia
3 min RCT: IRONMAN - IV iron for heart failure
zhlédnutí 364Před rokem
3 min RCT: IRONMAN - IV iron for heart failure
ECG crash course in 7min for nurses and medical students
zhlédnutí 1,6KPřed rokem
ECG crash course in 7min for nurses and medical students
A crash course on types of RCTs: Everything you need to know in 6min!
zhlédnutí 700Před rokem
A crash course on types of RCTs: Everything you need to know in 6min!
3 min RCT: NOSTONE Trial HCTZ for recurrent kidney stones
zhlédnutí 320Před rokem
3 min RCT: NOSTONE Trial HCTZ for recurrent kidney stones
3min RCT: DELIVER Trial
zhlédnutí 312Před rokem
3min RCT: DELIVER Trial
Anemia crash course: everything you need to know in 3min
zhlédnutí 625Před rokem
Anemia crash course: everything you need to know in 3min
Run in phases for clinical trials: everything you need to know in 2min
zhlédnutí 746Před rokem
Run in phases for clinical trials: everything you need to know in 2min
3min RCT: CLASSIC trial
zhlédnutí 145Před rokem
3min RCT: CLASSIC trial

Komentáře

  • @artworthi
    @artworthi Před 4 dny

    if probability score matching improves the validity of overall impact of cofounders, why aren't they used mor often in entertainment, movies, ect? Sounds like an entertaining way to infer or narrow in on a hunch, so im confused why this isn't as generally mentioned? I had to go down so many A.I. rabbit holes to even ask the question - What are propensity scores.

  • @TheProblembaer2
    @TheProblembaer2 Před 22 dny

    Wonderfull, thank you so much!

  • @abhijithasok4314
    @abhijithasok4314 Před měsícem

    This is the reason why the side effects for Statin were under reported.

  • @heenajariyal6620
    @heenajariyal6620 Před měsícem

    Tirzepatide from Eli Lilly

  • @nesrinaa4844
    @nesrinaa4844 Před 2 měsíci

    THANK YOU

  • @danielaperezvasquez3340
    @danielaperezvasquez3340 Před 3 měsíci

    Omg!! This was perfect thanks!

  • @jananys3156
    @jananys3156 Před 3 měsíci

    thank you so much for this video helped me with my journal club!

  • @ghadah9120
    @ghadah9120 Před 4 měsíci

    Michael, the man that you’re!! Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

  • @frankpeprah6198
    @frankpeprah6198 Před 4 měsíci

    Very informative

  • @josephinechikapa9587
    @josephinechikapa9587 Před 4 měsíci

    Thank you for this lecture it is really helpful

  • @FROSTHAWK247
    @FROSTHAWK247 Před 4 měsíci

    I am a masters student studying social work and even when the focus of the research is different the process of calculating these scores is more or less similar. This video was a great deal of help and extremely digestible, thank you so much!

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 4 měsíci

      That’s very kind of you. And I’m glad you found it helpful !

  • @frankvanschellen4980
    @frankvanschellen4980 Před 4 měsíci

    thank you for this great explanation! Is there also a possibility when having 3 treatment groups to calculate propensity scores with the same strategy?

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 4 měsíci

      You’re most welcome. There is but that gets complicated fast! If there are 3 groups and one is the ref then I do two pair wise comparisons to the ref. Hope that helps.

  • @dr.tomadragos-medicreziden1806

    DB RCT are the best! Thank you for the content! Why should i listen to other trials if they are vulnerable to biases?

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 5 měsíci

      Sometimes double blind trials is not feasible and sometimes not possible. also, unblinded RCTs are still very useful. but they are just prone to some biases that double blinded trials are not

  • @josefoso15
    @josefoso15 Před 5 měsíci

    Fantastic! Nicest explanation of PSM ever

  • @akshitbhalla874
    @akshitbhalla874 Před 6 měsíci

    Thank you so much for making this video!

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 6 měsíci

      My pleasure. Thank you for your kind words!!

  • @augustinechukwunta680
    @augustinechukwunta680 Před 6 měsíci

    Great video - well explained

  • @augustinechukwunta680
    @augustinechukwunta680 Před 6 měsíci

    Great video - you made it so easy to understand

  • @osashruf
    @osashruf Před 6 měsíci

    Great vid! Would love to see a crash course on Kaplan-Meier/survival analysis

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 6 měsíci

      Great idea. Will work on that one in the future for sure

  • @yoshtisune
    @yoshtisune Před 6 měsíci

    Can you talk about confidence intervals in depth? I’m having a hard time trying to interpret it

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 6 měsíci

      Yes here is recent video on it. czcams.com/video/5eAGXsY9LSI/video.htmlsi=58K48FXROpUEm4is

  • @stanislavlegkovoy2119
    @stanislavlegkovoy2119 Před 6 měsíci

    thanks, pretty clear

  • @svenkreutzer5617
    @svenkreutzer5617 Před 7 měsíci

    Great, thanks!

  • @silverlight7938
    @silverlight7938 Před 7 měsíci

    Really helpful, I wanted to ask What is the difference between Propensity score matching and Case control matching (SPSS)?

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 7 měsíci

      Case control matching is unrelated. Here is great resource on everything you need to know about case control studies sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/EP/EP713_Case-Control/

  • @user-uu7co5li9v
    @user-uu7co5li9v Před 7 měsíci

    Thanks for the clear explanation!

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 7 měsíci

      My pleasure. Thank you for watching

  • @flori2611
    @flori2611 Před 8 měsíci

    THANK YOU SO MUCH

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 8 měsíci

      My pleasure. I’m happy you enjoyed it

  • @ericyeh4315
    @ericyeh4315 Před 8 měsíci

    genius! deeply appreciate this video! helpful for med students drowned by statistical terms

  • @A_Psych_Nurse
    @A_Psych_Nurse Před 8 měsíci

    Hi Michael, Appreciate this breakdown, despite most of it going over my head. When you say these statistical methods do not mimic RCTs, what exactly does that mean? How closely do we get to the results of a RCT using this method, and has this method been verified against the findings of RCTs? The reason I'm asking this is b/c I came across a cohort article comparing adolescents who took antipsychotic medication vs. those who didn't, and compared how they were doing 5 years later. The article suggests, after using IPTW, that antipsychotic medication in those w/ their first episode of psychosis, actually makes for a worse 5 year outcome. I'm skeptical though b/c it's a cohort study and no randomization was done. The authors acknowledge this weakness, and then state that the Stabilized IPTW is used to eliminate the possibility that those with worse psychosis were the ones who were given an antipsychotic medication. (I think this is the most probable explanation for why those who were given AP medication fared worse. . .simply b/c they already were experiencing more profound psychosis and so we would expect them to be doing worse at a 5 year follow-up). Seems super fishy to me. . .any thoughts here are appreciated, thx.

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 8 měsíci

      You are totally right to be skeptical. There’s no way to answer this Q “how close do we get to the results of a RCT”. It would be like asking how much does this glass of wine taste like a beer. They are two different things. To learn more about why RCTs are so powerful and what randomization achieves (that no cohort study can) here is link to my 6min crash course on RCTs: czcams.com/video/oQt8jR5RgVQ/video.htmlsi=cpMn3c6YQnWYj3wv

    • @A_Psych_Nurse
      @A_Psych_Nurse Před 8 měsíci

      awesome, thank you for the insanely prompt and helpful response Michael!@@Fralickmike

  • @yutingchen9701
    @yutingchen9701 Před 8 měsíci

    great video!

  • @ishikahalder799
    @ishikahalder799 Před 8 měsíci

    🤩

  • @user-oj2bu6sv3n
    @user-oj2bu6sv3n Před 9 měsíci

    Very good lesson except that you are extremely fast. I wish you could slow down your pace

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 9 měsíci

      Thank you for feedback. Note you can slow the speed to 0.75 or 0.5 to slow it down

  • @ajkovic914
    @ajkovic914 Před 9 měsíci

    Thank you so much. Plz make more videos especially about meta-analysis

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 9 měsíci

      Thank you for your kind words!!

  • @jamesharte8390
    @jamesharte8390 Před 10 měsíci

    excellent breakdown and synopsis. Thank you.

  • @girlthatcooks4079
    @girlthatcooks4079 Před 10 měsíci

    There are 3 scores as 0.6, would it be fair/unbiased to match with random 2 only?

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 10 měsíci

      that is a good question. you are right that it would be ok to pick at random. In some studies people match "many to one". so you could keep all 3. But the "ideal" approach is 1:1 based on prior studies.

    • @girlthatcooks4079
      @girlthatcooks4079 Před 10 měsíci

      @@Fralickmike Thank you!!

  • @ruiz_aeg
    @ruiz_aeg Před 10 měsíci

    I learnt so much. Such a good presenter. Thank you!

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před 10 měsíci

      Thank you! That’s very kind of you

  • @articulatepro4449
    @articulatepro4449 Před 10 měsíci

    This lecture coul even solve a particular question... kept rigmaroles coming...

  • @taifshah9003
    @taifshah9003 Před 10 měsíci

    you are so stupid, while giving a lecture, avoid your shit chatting with people

  • @datadoctor10
    @datadoctor10 Před 11 měsíci

    Thanks for the video

  • @yuyangzhu6822
    @yuyangzhu6822 Před 11 měsíci

    Thank you for the video!! saved me when I got totally lost in my intermediate pharmacoepidemiology class 😂

  • @sushiman972
    @sushiman972 Před 11 měsíci

    Doing an analysis on a controlled trial you were involved in just feels like cheating. But super helpful video, Thank you!

  • @DrogbaPT454
    @DrogbaPT454 Před rokem

    Great summary. I think the only point that I would have added on patient baseline was highlighting the fatc that all patients were statin intolerant (and they signed a informed consent)

  • @MA-dd9dd
    @MA-dd9dd Před rokem

    Thank you for uploading

  • @ivytruong4997
    @ivytruong4997 Před rokem

    how do you set the 20% margin on the forest plot?

  • @rajmacwan665
    @rajmacwan665 Před rokem

    Thank you Dr. Fralick for this video!! Can you please post your talk about everything you need to know about statistics ? Thanks again

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před rokem

      Yes you are right that is a long overdue talk. I will work on it next

  • @addisalemtsegaye1271

    Thank you

  • @ec.juanfranulcuangolee3294

    Thank you dear teacher. Excellent, in spite of it wasn't in Spanish or without subtitles

  • @marjorieaijeelucero1149

    I cannot emphasize how helpful this lecture is. Thank you for making this available. Topics like these are very hard for me to understand on live face-to-face/online lectures. I need to pause a bit, rewind a bit to catch the concepts. THANK YOU!

  • @chadibenchakroun6465

    Can you please explain the slide at 5:10? Why don't we have the same number of persons, means...? Is it just that we do not take into account people without a match?

  • @user-yw1ul4xq1g
    @user-yw1ul4xq1g Před rokem

    Very helpful video for rookies like me😊

  • @TheVishu27
    @TheVishu27 Před rokem

    One of the best 👍💯

  • @khadeijahussain6000

    Great lecture Michael! can anyone help me understand how to use the Newcastle Ottawa scale a little better? The questionnaire seems pretty straightforward but I'm not sure if I am interpreting it correctly.

  • @hpthelegend
    @hpthelegend Před rokem

    Very informative video😊 I will suggest the channel to my colleagues too

    • @Fralickmike
      @Fralickmike Před rokem

      thank you!!

    • @georgestone6807
      @georgestone6807 Před rokem

      Can u make a video how to critical analyze clinical trials , the interpretation is so varied Will appreciate that