Video

What an excuse for a man...

czcams.com/video/AFngmnJ7rZU/video.html

Go Am!

I like her and how she stood her ground in her presentation.

I think this author should experience MDD himself for half a year or so (with full recovery, of course) or should deal with patients on a daily basis before making these idiotic theoretical statements. What is functional about letting your children starve because you cannot get out of bed, or getting layed off because you don't show up to work for months or commit suicide? Maybe this author is confused because the label depression is handed out much too easily these days.

Great

craig konnoth is the worst professor i had in law school, I highly discourage anyone from taking his class

surprising slip of the tongue: at 9:24 , if I'm hearing correctly, Kingma sais adoption instead of abortion... Might this be related to other terminology in this lecture? I thinking of foster, wich reminds of foster parent ...

“We AAs have never called alcoholism a disease because, technically speaking, it is not a disease entity. For example, there is no such thing as heart disease. Instead there are many separate heart ailments or combinations of them. It is something like that with alcoholism. Therefore, we did not wish to get in wrong with the medical profession by pronouncing alcoholism a disease entity. Hence, we have always called it an illness or a malady - a far safer term for us to use.” - Bill Wilson addressing the National Catholic Clergy Conference on Alcoholism in 1961.

Awful lecture. Not worth watching

Why empirical confidence intervals and not empirical elasticity to escape the trap of counter factuals, because surface roughness, room temperature air pressure all have marginal impact and honestly so does every background process in our universe displaying a power law distribution as spatiotemporal proximity recedes, it would allow for a share of causes, better suited for the regression analysis of the non linear universe we so clearly live in

Globalised and localised dynamic coupling of sobiometric data through bayesian inference would allow for generalised and personalised medicine in an integrated fashion, allowing for 'empirical data' to be collected in aggregate as a gestalt of collective humanity and of personalised data to find the bottom up causal inference from collective man, it would allow for mulitobjective measures of similarity allowing the personalisation of would be empirical data

Thank You

Clinical Reasoning. 34:00

Fantastic lecture!

Progressive I love how you can see how complex it really is ?

Your channel is really growing. Congrats!! The secret to YT success = "PromoSM" !

1:24:23 That's why the 'science' of addiction tends to be absolute nonsense.

*1:24:00** not having internet is a disease,* it is all word games and criteria setting. you just have to set the criteria comparing a person of otherwise same age & function in time today, to one in a day pre internet, and their ability to compete on different task sets. & then it will spectrum by context. being the only one on the internet in 1710 may have fewer advantages, but they likely walk more etal. but you get the point. we all draw these lines: theyre made up. function has to matter, including supra-funcion where available. we all want the apex, the only question is how to reach in swiftly, & share resources wo war. _JC

*not understanding how cameras function in 2022; malfunction? disability? certainly non-normative.* not that i dont like looking at whiteboards and walls, im not a monster. love the minimalists. just. saying. _JC

1:05:00 "pre" & "subclinical" illness is not a disease state, it is a con. a massive, expensive, harmful con. if we dont treat it, it isnt malfunction (except in the cases whr our tx are just that much worse.) & if it is a cosmetic malfunction, that we all agree on, then in that class it is still malfunction. _JC

*i just want to be young & beautiful & wealthy & healthy, & more so than other people in the majority of rooms @ any given time; what category is that?* i think that is the aim. call it whatever you like. i think most pts just want us to get it done. _JC

58:00 it is 6. _JC

47:00 reference class _JC

*19:40** is this about pandemic interventions, that you arent allowed to talk directly about?* you heard thr was a pandemic hey. where we did a lot of harm for a theoretical other in the factions of a percent, who were (arguably) not even assisted by the interventions. _JC

ᎮᏒᎧᎷᎧᏕᎷ 💪

As Robert Lechler pointed out in his closing remarks we need healthy scepticism and perhaps lots of it. The use of the word Nihilism is a misnomer that does us a terrible disservice.

քʀօʍօֆʍ

*whats the billing code for "weird"?* oh come on, we were all thinking it. otherwise: sure! gr8 biz. -JC

Quassim Cassam is a good example of a run of the mill academic: overflowing hubris, self assuring pompousness, high amounts of naivete from being indoctrinated by the school system. He knows it all, yet understands nothing of it. One of the reasons professors and teachers are so immature and inept is they spend their whole life around children, they talk down to everyone as if they know better because they haven't had a proper amount of interaction with other adults in their lives. It's not like they ever have a real job, it's straight from school into school without real world experience, no wonder they say such ridiculous things; they're removed from reality. For a teacher's whole life they don't contribute to the tax revenue once. Everything they have, from wage to retirement, is funded by the state. They're used to being the only adult in the room and no one telling them they're wrong, they let the authority go to their heads. Uni profs and teachers in general are no more than daycare nannies and babysitters, if you want your child to have a good education = home-school them.

its laughable seeing a man who promoted such bad science

terrible line up considering how nasty sir Simon is to ME CFS patients over the years you can keep your philosophy its bigotry and prejudice and nastiness towards the patients and public you don't respect and treat so badly .

Thank you for this, very interesting

4:00 that is not what hapnd. you have not engaged the data. philosophers of science are far closer to vague historians most of the time. oh, nm. you got thr in the end. yes, that is closer to correct. it didnt change: public health just is never about pts. which is fine, if it didnt also involve record breaking profits. & all that goes w it. -JC

Wow

Good job

Good job

excellent

Beautiful

amazing

Nice

Wow

🙉🙉🙉🙉🤟🤟🤟🙉🤟

nice work.....

nc♥

nice

Nccc+?

Amazing

Bbfhv

Md Ashikur Rahman 0 seconds ago Tusca Plus cvczc