Video

banger

What an honor to have access to this meeting of minds, recorded for posterity.

This needed to be higher quality. Those are huge philosophers in contemporary thought which simple TikTok video is significantly much better resolution. I.e. quite ironic...

Oh, dear. 7 years and only 3 comments. How unfortunate. I rather liked it. I think she has some terrific Ideas. I only wish the sound was better or she spoke up a bit. 24:27

I have a problem with calling time a "substance."

This is very helpful for summarising aspects of this issue. Thanks for making this presentation.

58:19

😍💕💕💕

Truly appreciate Jenny Butlers immense contribution in Religious studies. My wife's heritage is from Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Absolute fascination for myself to view the rich history of the UK. Thank you for this presentation with Jenny. 🗿

Very easily misapplied.

Even Bill Maher, a screaming liberal has pointed out how ridiculous this concept is. Presentism is no longer a working concept.

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

Meaning: Reference, mind, language and their Equivalence in relation to mental states. Compartmentalizing events with perception, semantic expression/ prejudice and intuition. Excellent discussion on externalism thank you all very much.

I as a survivor of FIVE INDUSTRIAL SCHOOLS, A SELF EDUCATED MAN, I am in deep shock e how you have ignored me in the past I have left messages to you explaining how we need to contact you and let you know we need our wages and pensions, on how we still have been silenced by a gagging order that we fear speaking up on our own human rights. I strongly oppose your research you claim to have done you have a list of survivors you referred to who have absolutely nothing to do with us survivors of the INDUSTRIAL SCHOOLS. We have been refused our legal rights to everything, when we demanded those rights to protect our compensation, you know as the Caranua fund RTE made the statement the statement that there will be (( no gravy train coming this time)) according to Minister Rury Quinn. Meaning we will have no professional legal protection for the 800 million euros or so, plus the interest rates on this sum. You yourself you knew what was happening and as a Professor in law did nothing, like all Legal teams, we are to be ignored how on earth any professional in law such as yourself can ignore the GAGGING ORDER and the neglect once again of being denied legal rights has turned this Country into a dictatorship incriminating the very victims by making the same decisions that caused us all our Childhoods and lives as in our professional chances you have had in your life. This is a disgrace i can assure you it is damaging how you can plan this survivor's archive without contacting even me or Maurice or Catherine who have been keeping information and freely helping to understand exactly what it means to all survivors for twenty years day and night where i have a webpage "Survivors who strand together" Robert Artane and Survivors who unite at last I never once offened you or anyone I kept the intentions and evidence of how our we are being treated. Example, I had by the Education Ministers office and Caranua, legislation used against me to prevent rather than PROIVIDE my young daughters education fund, that she was entitled to between 2002 and 20012 only to have it denied and i had no legal office to challenge this yet the evidence is there i have this. I am the only one in my child's Fathers side and you all turned your backs on ppeople like us trying sdesparately to give them the chance that was robbed stolen abused by the Irish Government the law courts in this country, If you have no money in Ireland you are not intitled to professionl law courts. The GAGGING ORDER is what we got and now as like when we were children you have us all thrown into the same institution once again cvontratulations to you and that horrid list of so called interlectual lists i had, I have had a HIGHER DEGREE than mpst nearly all on that list and in this whole cess pit of Irish Justice I have been more of a Diplomat than anyone claiming to represent survivors I have always declared no I do not represent I just say and do, what is expecected of me as a self educated man who was Illegally sentanced to Childhpod slavery in Ireland leaving me without a family anda country as many survivors suffered firstly where only then we abused personally. This as you know was CULTURAL ABUSE of the highest order we have not been paid wages or pensions yet we worked b;oody harder than adults in any working life we worked night and day in them slave camps and not onelegal office in this country is helping bring this to justice it is disgusting. You npw want to lock us up as colateral damage asif we are cattle. All you have doen is denied the irish poor their legal human rights to a free court of law under the Irish Flag. I knpw people on that list they look after themselves not the survivors i knew them for year. I would challenge any of them in a court of law because i know that even the Groups funded by the Govrnmet the HSE Religious were NOT LEGALLY VETTED AND THA TTHE CLAIM THE Right of Place was squandering money and abusing survivors and thrown out while the trojan horse staff supported only for information was put in place. Because if we had a proper legal office, we could have brought issues to such as legislation and intitements in, redress, education funds, and health, wages, for slave Labour in the institutions, and pensions we are owed yet to be protected by your aclaimed law. It is a constitutional right that anyone who workson Irish soild is fully intitled to wages and pensions and health. It is not the conatitution to gagg people for payments to prevent the full truth being exposed. Saying all this who doesthe Poor plate belong to? in Land Property and money from Irish tax payers ? then why were we not paid for thework and pensions as like that of the Bishops, the priests, the nuns as well asall adults we the children were forcedx to do their work as well. Our wages were Beatings so why werewe not allowed to claim ? Redress seen this as well you had to earn your keep that was said to me in redress why? that was not constitutional and the solictor never challenged anything only how much i was to get fpr personal abuse but you do not get personally abuse if you are safe in a proper care inviorment do you? This was not long ago either while the rocking 50s swinging 60s and glam 70s we as children were suffering secret slavery on Irish SOIL. We collected the money in the churches listening to the spill of how it s for the poor Orphans well ? Billions in land property and coin and we did not see a dime why? NOW you kneow this as a professor of law what can you do to help usall gain our legal and human rights wo wgaes and pensions and medical cards ? Please do not deny us our legal rights we have a voice and if Survivors have no undertsnading their FAMILIES NOW DO SUCH AS THEIR CHILDREN WHO ARE WELL ABLE TO DECIDE SP WEHAT IS THE EXCUSE ? we have a right to voice our own opinion rather than listen to trouble makers who elevate their fake intelligence as they did Groupswho were not vetted to makesuch decissions Now whewre does this fit in Sean Mac Dermot street? IT DOES NOT BECUAE IT IS HUSHED UP

the whole idea that our language's use of kind terms has to line up with what science thinks is the essence of those kind terms is rather forced and frankly weirdly medieval

interesting

It would be helpful if they figured out how to display the text AND Professor Haack at the same time on the same screen, or perhaps incorporate it into closed caption.

The music is annoying and is an unnecessary distraction. Please remove it, thanks.

vot.fyi glorious

the boys

I had to listen to the "Experimental Philosophy Anthem." The video of the burning armchair accompanied by the music created a funny bit of performance art. The "Hey, hey, hey" part was inspiring. But as an anthem, people will have real trouble marching to this. Dancing to it would prove difficult, too. And I have to admit, as I tried to follow the lyrics, I kept thinking of the early Wittgenstein (from the Preface of the Tractatus): "What can be said at all can be said clearly; and whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent." I also thought of A. J. Ayre's Language, Truth, and Logic, Chapter 6, "Critique of Ethics and Theology." Moreover, I am not sure that going out to the "streets," the "parks," the "parking lots" and the "primary sources" will prove effective in finding out who we really are. In fact, we could note a number of contemporary eliminative materialists who would regard that question as meaningless. But I might be mistaken. This new philosophical movement might be the New Wave in philosophy--a real trendsetter. So we will need more music of this kind. In no time at all, we will have a popular program on Cable--"The Ontological Dance Party." This may revolutionize the teaching of intellectual history at the universities. Imagine philosophy classes dancing to the "Ionian Boogie" or the "Enlightenment Rap" or the "Hegel Trance Three-Step." Even if this fails at education, I am sure it will prove quite entertaining. But I would offer one caution. If we want to keep our armchairs in one piece, we will need to keep those identifying with this school of thought away from the living room furniture.

Karen de Boer is a genius philosopher.

Kinda like how voltage is current times resistance

Enumeration of resistances... Sounds like psychoanalysis works literally no matter what. Isn't it definition of unscientific or irrational?

This kind of falls apart after Burge speeks. I thought the subject was externalism?

Anyone knows where I can find the paper? It is not included in the volume I am reading from

Happy to say I took a class from Burge. Everyday you'd start out thinking you could hang. And every class end the good students came out of it not sure what happened. If you wanted to have someone speak over your head, he's the one. He would get there eventually, just not so quickly. But when you are done, you begin to worry if you are smart enough to understand what he said. Makes me feel like jello just thinking about it

doing the lords work! ty for uploading

Boring

As the poles melt, the seas drown the poor, and lslamofascism infects the west, the left will be disgussing the linguistic helter skelter of continual circularity as deep impedimenta of the salmons journey through the upstream of metaphor.

what a bunch of jerks

Amazing lecture, its super-helpful in taking one;s mind off other problems. Thank you for uploading from Bulgaria.

www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/watchtower-no4-2017-july/paradise-on-earth/ love free writing platforms what does the philosopher think this website learn from it and find out ?

please, just define this "I" that is bothering us all.

Is the transcript of this roundtable available anywhere?

I'm a bit new to contemporary analytic philosophy, and therefore confused - externalism seems to be an idea in both the philosophy of mind and in epistemology, and I don't see how they're related. In the phil of minds, externalism seems to refer to how mental contents and linguistic statements get their meaning. So, for instance, to meaningfully say "I served in vietnam," do I need to actually have been a soldier, or is it sufficient to hallucinate the war? Externalism in epistemology seems to be a position about how to assess the truth value of various propositions, and thereby gain knowledge. So, for instance, do I need to view A cause B in order to know they have a causal relation, or could I establish this kind of truth through deductive, or a priori reasoning? Are these two kinds of externalism really distinct? Does mental externalism entail the epistemic variety, or can they vary independently?

Great video! Great quality! Great philosophers! Great debate! Thank you!

I thought this was UC Davis

vernünftig means reasonable rather than rational, therefore hegel never speaks of a rational state

As long as classes exist there can never be a state of the entire people, only serving society as a whole. In Feudalism, Capitalism and so forth the state is always the instrument of the ruling minority while in Socialism the state becomes the instrument of the ruling majority. Only in Communism when classes finally disappear completely can the state become truly objective. Ironically when that happens it also becomes unnecessary and withers away because the fundamental role of the state is to serve the interest of the ruling class whether it be the idle minority or the working majority against the interests of the opposing class. When classes disappear so will the state.

Thanks for the lecture. The Philosophy of Right is an interesting book. archive.org/stream/cu31924014578979#page/n7/mode/2up