Video

I love that doggie❤

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Just goes on all day… all day 😂

correction the aperture ring will work in photo mode on the new r5ii and r1 body. also new bodies going forward

Clever boy!

So cute

Absolutely love this kind of videos and not glazing big corporations … 3k dollars in US , in europe thats more like 3.5k euros … it’s insanely expensive and a product like this shouldn’t rely on software to fix it’s problems. About the auto profiling a lens, i have no idea what setting it is , but there’s definitely an option because everytime i import any picture the proper distortion profile is applied. I thought this was the default setting for LR classic

This lens is mainly made for video with the new Canon C400 camera. Photographers should look elsewhere.

Enjoy himself...wonderful🤣

Were can l get one of these? My dogs would love it❤️❤️❤️❤️

we Amateurs need people like you

I need one of those .

100% agree! Very frustrating ...

Back in abt 1960, the Mattel Toy Company put out a similar toy for humans called Pop-za-ball. We had a great time playing with it.

Dogs are so easily amused 😂

Oh my God that is fantastic!! Where do I get one!?

How he runned Idk why but it got me dying 😂😂😂😂 The little one is soo adorable ❤

love it!!

Loved your intro!!

My daughter needs that for her dog, which is the same breed.

Yes it is. Wonderful pup.

Man macht den Hund zum Balljunkie weil man keine Zeit oder Lust hat sich um ihn zu kümmern. Der arme Hund😢

*He activated the Anti-lag of the paws!* 😂🤣😭

great help!

Where I can buy it?

You are very defensive in your comments. You don’t have to be. You have nothing to justify. You and your opinions are you. Just keep on walking along and singing your song, I love my white shoes, I love my white shoes.

Man you all wouldn’t know sh if this video wasn’t made. Sam you wouldn’t know with 10 final images presented in your face. Y’all need to chill with this bashing sh and just shoot. You don’t like it fine get what you like and go shoot. You’re not stopping these big boys from doing what they’re doing. Why do you think lens correction was made?

I need this! In my dogs life! I get so tired of throwing hers. What’s the name of it and where can I purchase PLEASE?

❤ just love him Can I borrow him lol In love

Where do you buy this. I want one for my dashy

Yes generally you don't change settings while recording unless you're moving around to different lighting situations (run & gun), but its nice to be able to smoothly change aperture vs click click click. Like ISO is notched, shutter speed is notched, so being able to smoothly transition in video is a nice feature. Yes agreed this is not a photography only lens, seems more of a hybrid and they obviously made some compromises on the wide end, probably to keep it thin...its remarkably grippable I have to say, and I like using the collar as a platform to hold it by putting on a wide flat plate...all subjective of course. The zoom is smooth and easy to move with one finger and the distortion you showed actually wasn't all that unpleasant other than the cut off corners. I shoot a lot of events, promo videos, corporate videos, photography, etc and really look forward to using it for that. I can't tell you how many times I wished my 28-70 had just a bit more reach and a bit more wide angle. So this will be used most of the time and when I need that nice bokeh I'll whip out the 28-70. I used teh f/4 version as my workhorse and in a practical sense, that is the best overall lens for what I do, but now I have one that's a bit sharper and faster. Also , I have been using my R5 and R6 mk II to shoot more video and always feel a little uneasy mounting my body to the tripod with that big ole heavy 28-70 and 85 f/1.2 with no lens support...so now having this lens with the collar I can breath a little easier with a more balanced setup. My colleagues have even felt the R5 II update makes sense if you shoot video too since that has been vastly improved, but photography only...not as compelling.

❤❤❤

Changin aperture with the ring is when ur goin from light to dark or dark to light situations. In the launch video of the C400 they showed a use case scenario with this goin in a buildin w/ C400 and this lenes. Worked really good .

I would not mind the distortion that much, BUT, I can not accept that using some of their L glass (e g. 14-35 f4) results in the in-camera distortion correction being enabled and cannot be turned off. AND...this means that multiple exposure (e.g. HDR) is not available.

How do you feel about the idea of balancing innovation and usability/desirability/price of a lens? Unless I'm mistaken, they're the only manufacturer with an f2.8 at this focal range. If they were to produce the EF style L glass you're used to, what would that look like, what would the weight be and how much would it cost? All the rf glass has some variation of this distortion, but they're smaller and in most cases a pound or more lighter than their EF counterparts. A friend of mine got the 28 to 70 f2, and I shot with it. my God that thing takes some amazing pics. The weight is not an issue for me personally, but it does get annoying after a while... that said, u wound not catch me dead using that thing because of the form factor. I watched a review from another CZcamsr 2 weeks ago on the R1 and he had that beast attached to it. It looked like an inflatable raft, or a capsule that you reenter earth's atmosphere in. It's cartoonish it's so large. So I think it's a matter of making glass with features that current day photographers value, like amazing sharpness and colors, lightweight equipment, etc or a 12 pound lens that costs $1000 per pound.

I always used to equate high end lens manufacturing as being of the same vein as high end watchmaking. A thousand little parts that the wearer will never know or see, put together in an item to fulfil a function. The same way a watchmaker might use a variety of springs, gears, and jewels to regulate timing to within a certain level is probably the same way a lens designer needs to plan around elements, motors, and coatings. It's kinda sad, but inevitable I imagine, that Canon seems to be leaning quite heavily now on software corrections to deliver a usable image. The one at 10:00 is especially egregious and I completely agree with your reasoning; when I am paying this amount of money I really want a product that doesn't completely rely on something like an external profile correction to be usable.

Great video! Would you recommend Nikon as a brand over canon for wedding photography?

Great Deep-Dive,, Thanks !!!! :) :) :)

Are you going to be reviewing the r5 mkii ?

If this were a 400 dollar lens this would've been fine BUT for a 3K USD lens?! Absolutely not

😂😂😂

Dude chill with the add bokeh rant… you might give Canon some ideas 😂

I have to agree. When you're spending that much on glass, you expect certain baseline optical performance. Your example with bokeh is good, and another may be - why buy a camera with a good low light sensor? We can just use "Denoise" in Lightroom. It's because final results are still better when you have better data to begin with.

Canon wants to be the new adobe..

Love the pup also

I need 1 of those What is it called

You can see more and more how canon is cutting corners with these new lenses. Makes sense why they don’t want third parties making lenses for them. They are the only game in town for the RF mount. However, cutting corners isn’t good for selling lenses

Where did you get that?

My cats bring me their toy mice and balls I throw them and they run after them and bring them back over and over. It's so cute. My Red Tip Siamese started it. ❤ I have 6 cats. It's like having a house full of children. I have a little dog and an African Grey 🩶 we've had him since 1996. I told my husband when we got him he was still feathering go to work today and think of a name. He came home and I said let's say the name at the same time. We both picked Harry. We love our zoo. 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

😂😂😂