Video

Source imagery as ISMs and style; hmm methinks Zaha didn’t need all that. She just needed to look in the mirror when she changed. How long can Follies sustain without the aura of Zaha.

So much in love

Love this so much

It is strikingly of course how varied can be a space in a range of one algorithm. I agree with the statement that repetition of one volume not acceptable, it depress. But I afraid that an architect in this future just a relic . His role in a spatial solution abolished . An operator of system exist. But is he an architect ? And I can't agree with Mr. Schumacher’s vision of old world . It is not the scattered volumes of different epochs. It is an individual vision of different persons - this world by their eyes that has passed through the Solid Prism of thier soul and morphed into a spectrum that has been embodied . It is a reflection of technological level and perception of the world for them. Human wanted to differ from nature, to show that one can create the forms that far from nature's shapes or can rework natural forms . My humble opinion that humanity is doing a new ascending loop with this new architectural vision. It is nature-based, and very interesting with unique grace of course. But it will be a loop for creating of new vision in next century. And it is, I reckon, just one of numerous directions of the future ...

Wow vad fint, du och Zaha var ni bästa tem i världen. Tack så mycket

Baroque architecture with no sense obtained by the use of rhino 3d & grasshopper...

The aesthetic loses power at small scales, like physical theories, the math changes and the forms disappear, become forced audaciousness, vacuformations, beautiful in their own right, but next to the architectural scale only fit perfectly. The constant movement obliterates edges and can be disorienting and clueless, and can regress in a way to the industrial. Mr Lynn talked a lot about these ideas as well. Zaha Hadid and Patrik Schumacher are two geniuses in my opinion. He said, while drawing drainage details for a local project....lol...Thank you for sharing this lecture.

thx

Its become too repetative and predictable. You can't announce yourself as being stylish. Thats the opposite of being truly stylish. Its like soeone walking into a party in a flashy suit and telling everyone how stylish he is. Sophisticated style is understated and not taken for granted because of sheer quantity and populist following.

I cant pay hes book (it would have to be sent to my country and i cant do that) but i want to learn, how can i get hes book on pdf?

Apartamentos en venta en guadalmina Marbella httpp://www.spainforsale.properties

This phrase in minute 22 sums all of Patrik Schumacher theories: "...and then something comes out, maybe a piece of furniture"

which 3d softwares they use to control these spaces???????

Was für ein degenerierter Vollhorst. Ausdeutschen und nicht mehr über die Grenze lassen.

I am not architect, but I study Autopoiesis for 30 years and his book Autopoiesis in Architecture is real revolution. With old paradigms it is impossible to accept parametricism, so we should meditate, learn and we will connect faith ( good), science ( truth), and art ( beauty). Than divine nature and artificial nature will correlate much better, than it is now.

As I understand, firstly you make attractive shape for nowadays aestetic tastes, then you would fill that shapes with plans, spaces etc...Hmmm are you knitting socks whithout of knowledge what size, type etc

Parametricism is actually genuine functionalism because the form is controlled by specific mathematical inputs. The geometric morphology however can be various, even platonic. So i haven`t read his book but i am not sure if this is a solid argument against for example a system of more platonic shapes

I liked the video , I have a question to manage the program which uses Zaha Hadid NECESSARY FOR YOUR PYOYECTOS master mathematics 'd really appreciate it ?, THANKS

Nice lecture, and I spécially agree with you when talkin' about vernacular architecture use.....And I admit that parametricism is a clean concept even if it seem to be more expensive to build......I like it

A bit to much video editing makes it a bit jarring to watch- thanks for posting though :D

Very interesting but isn't the lack of importance on material (variety and relation to its shape) used to create this architecture contradicting the main principles of" no simple repetition", "all systems differentiated" "all systems correlated". It seems to me that there is too much emphasis on shape and not enough on what the shape is created out. I think we can clearly see this in every building shown in the lecture. Although each shape is carefully made with both thoughtful organization and structured differentiation.. it is lost because all the buildings appear to be made out of the same white material (maybe due to physical limitation of material to create these organic shapes). But shouldn't parametricism also take into account the rules of material as they exist in the physical world to create these thoughtful shapes? While it might limit the flexibility of the shapes it would create a more correlated and differentiated systems. If you are using nature and its organic form as a model it would be important to note that nature places a big importance on material and its variety in relation to its shape.

Sly intro music...

an idea for a new architecture school to rule the mainstream.. just like the previous ones from the past, moving from an architecture school to another while ditching all that's prior to it. Its is quite childish to boldly suggest "to ditch everything and start from zero" as if tens of generations of architects managed to do nothing right so far. Maybe Hadid&Schumacher's Parametricism work well now because it's something different, and that the boring mainstream is showing its beauty, but to imagine a world filled with liquid-architecture, natural, slick, shapes allover... it would be unbearable, and a new architectural school will be needed to occur and 'start from zero' allover again.