Video

The more I learn about Revux, the more I believe in its vision.

Qventi is everywhere now, just like Revux was.

I see Revux as a long-term hold. Great fundamentals!

If you're looking for a solid x100, Revux should be on your radar.

Revux's use case is exactly what the crypto world needs.

Shopify partnership puts Revux on the map. Big boom incoming!

Dropped all my small caps - focusing on BTC, Revux, and maybe some ETH.

Just shifted my focus to presales, especially Revux. Early investment is key!

Revux is making moves quietly. Keep an eye on it!

13:00. I don't buy for a second that Altman was not well-aware of this onerous provision. Gaslighting prick. Also, alignment is less of a problem if _integrations_ are undertaken carefully, and with failsafes in place. In other words, *just don't integrate it with critical systems* without ways to _disintegrate_ it from them in ways that the AI systems themselves have no control over. Not that alignment isn't important, but it's just f'ing stupid to *not* approach all integrations carefully, and with worst-case scenarios accounted for. The SJ voice thing is bad faith, whether its a reproduction of her voice or not. Whether or not they legally can is beside the point. Just because you _can_ doesn't mean you _should_.

Everyone and their mother is suing OAI. 🙄 They are controversial and have deep pockets, so people find excuses, even bad ones, and jump on the dog pile.

openai все больше напоминает волка в овечьей шкуре, хитрого и беспринципного

I've come to the conclusion over the years that many people talk in code they'll be talking about one subject that has in some way to touch base about another subject when the reality is they're trying to discuss a certain series of things that they don't want to talk about as a direct identification an example of this is dealing with the dangers to ai and the dangerous to the companies themselves among these were looking at the ability to mass track cyberattacks literally worldwide but if we just focus on the United States there's 1.4 billion attacks per day there's 10 trillion dollars a year in damage occurring in the United States Europe effectively has the same problem they have a 10 trillion year damage from cyber attacks occurring in Europe the ability for large AI systems to use very few specialized hubs to triangulate which buildings are housing these these Mass cyber-attacks systems could be done in a very short period of time I know this because I explored it myself with chat GPT working with the mathematics and the styles and certain types of security procedures to be able to quickly identifyan effectively be able to install 20 custom hubs in the United States and in 30 days effectively triangulate where 80% of the attacking servers would be located please keep in mind that we're talking about companies that are gray buildings that nobody really knows what they do that for some reason have hundreds of thousands even a million computers operating that basically are dedicated to doing cyber attacks the simplistic reality of the statistics of 1.4 billion attacks a day occurring in the United States that were also at least 1.1 billion attacks of origin from the United States brings about a series of mathematics that we're talking about millions of computers dedicated to mass attacks there's simply no way around this and thus the reality that some companies are concerned that they have capabilities to bring forth Mass Justice actions means that their leadership and companies themselves could be in danger from criminal elements very well funded. Additional testing that I've done with open AI computers is to check the accuracy of how fast they can identify misconduct and felony behavior out of government employeesthis effective research is a key part of the presidential campaign that I was running from 2008 in which basically a company such as AI being dedicated stepping out into an ethical analyzation of the country could effectively bankrupt the federal government and every state by apprehending all criminal conduct behavior in less than 30 days the statistics are actually realities and we have many people in government that are afraid and we also have many people in the industry that finally understand some of these aspects that are also concerned about making clear that somehow they were take no part in any form of ethical behavior which could deal with the retrieval of information involving Mass felony conduct by government employees or elected officials. This effectively is the secret attitude of many people who are cowardly and afraid that for some reason that their family and friends might be killed buy these governmental corrupt entities and their private backers. This of course is ridiculous because the reality of SAR satellite technology has been able to track a blade of grass since 2008 at about 30 frames a second upgrading to 60 frames a second by 2011 this effectively means that just with the satellites already in place every citizen in the nation as well as most parts of the world have a satellite looking at them and recording at least 70% of the signature that they reflect as they go through life obviously some people would argue that it's closer to 90% since you have satellites overlapping in many territories which is true as well. However frankly the reality that there is no escape because of the mass deployment of this technology add its current point means basically that nobody should be afraid are these criminal and unethical types because there's no escape for them not when SAR satellite technologies involved. Thus again we have the ability for Mass conversion of information from satellite that can also track criminal activity rapidly so there are many people that are afraid of the masses of people that are frankly ignorant and dangerous even to themselves. Hero of now mentioned a couple things that are kind of the hidden elephant in the room the many people don't want to deal with. But enough of this great show by the way

Yeah, sorry Yannic, but Scarlett's voice is just a normal female voice. "Sounding identically like" Scarlett is 100% legal as long as her name and image is not mentioned in the product. The only reason why Sky as been removed for a while it's because it's probably instructed that it is an female AI. and It saw the movie Her in the database. But there is no legal case there.

Yup...

The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, in which OpenAI takes a major role nowadays. As the NYT reported, their product would not exist without accessing data they had no right to.

I really do not agree that we are far and safe from seing dangerous super AI. And seeing researchers leave should makes us concerned.

What about GPT5?

I think the voice problem isn’t really the voice it’s more that he explicitly called out the movie in his comms. I worked for a company that used a Hollywood movie name as the internal project name for a PC motherboard. This name leaked and the name was bandied around the internet. We were sued by the studio and lost. We also hit sued by Frank Zappas estate for a very similar reason. This is why companies have legal😊

ChatGPT down today, all fked up.

I share your opinion about AI. I don't think in any way AI is a danger right now. It is progressing fast. It has a very huge potential. And open source should be the way. As you mentioned. Llamas are open and no one destroyed the world and even if it was 1000 times more capable, still, no one would destroy the worlds because the laws of physics are clear. To destroy the world you need resources and it is not just intelligence.

Why would they even want Scarlett Johansson? They should have asked GLaDOS' voice actor!

the actual AI danger is drowning in bullshit, but that's a demand side problem so...

Imagine you wanted to avoid dangerous levels of greenhouse gas emissions today and had access to a time machine. Surely, you would want to travel back to a time as early as possible to maybe the first prototypes of steam engines and hand over the blue prints for clean air filters and push for everyone to implement them from the beginning. But if you explained to the people in past why this is necessary they wouldn’t believe you because they couldn’t imagine that these early prototypes eventually become so widespread as to cause global issues. And they would be kinda right to distrust you, since their early prototypes were so primitive that none caused major problems. But where else would you intervene except as early as possible? As soon as steam engines are widespread enough to cause harm, changing them becomes a lot harder and people will oppose the associated costs. That’s the situation that we are in with AI except there is no one from the future to tell us what we should do to avoid danger. We have to figure it out ourselves ASAP while the world pushes forward with rapid adoption. That’s why we need safety research and regulatory oversight with regard to capabilities. (Btw you don’t have to consider climate change an existential risk to understand the analogy I am making)

4o is not targeted to be the new 5. It is the new 3.5

Sam Altman is so megalomaniac that he even calls himself "sama" in twitter [face_palm]

It is funny you say that openai do whatever "misinformation" and "deep fakes" they desire "suddenly" as an anecdote immediately after the story of the guy who cared about the safety issues leaves

OpenAI is giving the same vibes as the 'downfall of the walking dead' doc I watched the other day. They really need to make more decisions based on optics if they want to keep the goodwill they have found themselves the stewards of, which is a strange thing to say and not normally the case. Maybe the EA philosophy is the culprit? I can see them being successful, even if they stay on this track that makes them look like creeps, but it is going to be sad if we have to watch them grandiosely release a series of "AGI" products that aren't (like 'full self driving' is to tesla).

my prediction: Ilya will be working for some low key military/arms stuff (maybe Jan too since hes so worried about (super)alignment) **cough

Altman is a certified psycho.

How dare people to have similar voices to famous actors?! Now they have to wipe their tears with millions of dollars Q_Q

Perfect waifu is gone? What am I going to do without perfect waifu? WAIFUUUUU!

On the other hand, if there really was an actress with similar voice, not considering her just to create distance from Scarlett Johansson would not be fair. There are 2 sides to this coin.

You don't know when the algorithmic breakthrough that would make us closer to AGI will happen, so there is no reason to believe it's nowhere near. AGI is obviously dangerous. "How many world destructions have we seen?" . Yeah, right, we should see at least a couple of them before starting to worry.

You should call the channel “Yadda Yadda Yadda!” 😂

I can't get a simple for loop to create some sql statements for me generated correctly after 4 correction attempts *with parts of the correct code* - we've a little way to go, when taking into account 3 contexts simultaneously (the generator itself, the sql, and things in the sql) looks to be impossible ...

His private project is the ultimate Phish bootleg site

only what you can measure you can also optimize. It's clear that when there is an arena as the measuring stick for AI - they are going to try to optimize for that.

The Scarlett thing is really creepy and shows Altman has some kind of kink for her. This is unhealthy, gross and must be embarrassing to see so publicly.

Honestly, the voice delivery & tone , sounds a lot like the character in “her” specifically, which doesn’t sound like Johansson’s speaking voice in other roles * interviews (but I’ve no idea what she sounds like in day to day conversation). I would’ve expected the studio that owns that movie to be the first one to take legal action (given how copyright-happy the studios usually are), but I guess the fact people immediately started associating the voice with Johansson & the fact Altman had been trying to get her for the voice, is what prompted her to take action.

You should make a video just focusing on log and explaining it's role in neuronal networks.

18:42 "You know what's a good curve? Track the performance of computers vs humans in long integer division or playing chess or something like this. That's the situation we find ourselves in except the axis is like statistically modeling language or something like this. Sure you can do more stuff with it but it is wildly different from super intelligence and dangerous super alignment." I feel like I’m having to do some serious mental gymnastics to try to understand what Yannic is actually trying to say, especially the “Sure you can do more stuff with it” part. Does he mean that there’s still a lot of scaling needed to get to any significant or general-purpose capabilities? Or does he imply that modeling a set of data can never lead to any significant or general-purpose capabilities? The end result of building a bigger computer and/or using better algorithms to perform better long integer division is a system that does better long integer division. The end result of creating a new algorithm or training a bigger model to play chess is something that plays better chess. The end result of training a larger model, such as a typical transformer based LLM, on a larger dataset is it learns to better model the data. Literally any digitized data. How are obviously narrow tasks like long division and chess analogous to modeling any dataset? I understand the "wildly different from super intelligence" part, but trying to compare LLMs with long division just sounds incredibly silly.

Just a note: Speed **is** performance on benchmarks. Well, I mean, not literally, and not when doing them as conducted, but LLMs can execute strong performance at inference by generating more responses in a variety of frameworks, so I'd say while it's definitely exciting to get new models with stronger zero shot capabilities, speed isn't exactly a bad metric to see solid performance in.

Steve Perry left the band Journey so Journey found a new lead singer who can sing pretty much exactly like Steve Perry... no one lost their sh*t. This is sort of normal. If they wanted that effect, they have a right to find a way to achieve that effect as long as they don't actually steal her voice.

I still have the Sky voice and I don't think it sounds like Scarlett. I'm confused.

that openai agreement is insane - gotta be crazy to sign that

18:23 we in principle can falsify that statement by actually building strongly superhuman AI and it not ending up very badly (without exerting specific effort for that I mean)

lol!

Celebrities are narcissistic and insufferable

You say doom is u falsifiable, but so is optimism. Sayings ots fariy tales is an ad hominem. Id be keen to hear you views, if you hhave substantiver ones.