Video

I love this series🙌 also the time to analyze the games us spot on. Can‘t wait for the next one

It's all too fast for me to keep up. PGN please?

Looking forward to more Ulf content!

Ulf Karpov and Kramnik are among my favourite players but Ulf is the hardest to understand for me Thanks for this!

Very glad you did this serie dedicated toward endgame. Any information about the release of your 1.e4 repertoire? Thanks a million for your content!

If only my opponent would oblige by playing his white squared bishop to F5 , which seems to me ( a mere 2000 on Lichess) like a lousy move , allowing E4 with tempo. Is that really what an engine would recommend ? Actually , what would you have played instead? Thankyou

nice, i can't decide if i want to learn this or your benoni course.

wher ethis karo kann you play - with bishop fianketo?

Heeeey John Bartholomew is on Lichess? how come i never found him? he was my first virtual coach hehehe. you should play him some elite matches we learn how to do the hippo against strong players.

I play the hippo exclusively, it has increased my opening drastically.

I will use the benoni simplified chessable course to counter this opening

Tillis!!! Just found your channel.

Bryan,when is the time frame for Master the English? is it a full 300-500 line repertoire like your french or is it a 100 line rep? Please make it a LTR or a good sized rep as its the final piece in the puzzle for your releases.Got to say,i can't wait for it...

I *DESPISE* 2.e5! That and knowing nothing but the stonewall are the reasons i quit playing chess for around a decade. I live for open tactical games and hate pawns with a seething passion. e5 forces a positional game and I don't do positional. I play 2...c5 and generally ...Bf5, but not being able to play ...Nf6 is UNBEARABLE. at 1700ish, I still have a terrible seriously losing record against that VILE cowardly pawn push. I've tried to book up on the "sicilian advance" variation, and got nowhere as it's a confusing move order nightmare. I gave up trying to learn theory for it. I'd rather play "reverse king's gambit" variations, but gave up on trying to create a repertoire after the miserable calabrese gambit requires MORE than 700 lines of theory before move number 8! 1.e4 e5 is the ONLY WAY to avoid the e5 cramp.

I look forward to buy your e4 repertoire. I stopped to play it a long time ago but I was just not convinced by the lines given in books or what I checked at the time (and so many time to prepare against some openings). Now I am stronger and feel ready to be back on it with your guidance.

I suggest you to look also at the games of Zoltan Ribli, just like you do with Andersson. Both play the same way.

I love watching gambits vs gambits too see which is wins most of the time

Please do a ulf type english course bryan...chessable is begging for a english course at the level you make them,always looked after and updated.

Hi, I saw your video on the Nimzo Larsen attack and I found that you explain insanely well so I wanted to know if there is a possibility to have a hole video about the 1.b3 e5 variation ? Thank you very much, LEGEND.

Great video

Sorry for my ignorance, but at about 1 minute, is there a chance to move to the Black Lion at that point? I was watching videos on these various openings, and that looked to me like a possibility. Are I wrong? Would that have been bad?

You are obviously not the ONLY reason, but you are a part of why I am getting better at chess. Thank you.

Thank you. I was interested in 17.a3 It seems Morphy had concern about Black pieces coming to the Queenside to play this, while Stockfish chess engine gives 17.Bf5 I sure need more of my own analysis & so impressive it was blindfold....Be like Morphy!? I wish... ;-)

Looking forward to this series...

www.chessable.com/world-chess-champion-strategy-training-for-club-players/course/200809/?

GM Maxime Vachier-Lagrave is French. His name is pronounced max-eem vosh-ee-ay lah-grov (those are short "o"s).

Great book,i have it as well.

I've gone through this game a few times already, and there's 1 move that I simply don't understand from Topalov : 18...Ba8. Maybe this is why my rating isn't so high, but never in a million years I would've even considered avoiding that trade I know grandmasters like their bishops, and maybe this comes from the hindsight of knowing the sacrifice on d4, but that knight on a5 looked so much more dangerous than whatever potential/defensive purpose the bishop had on b7, even if it was the best move i don't think I would've played it. I wonder what your thoughts are about this kind of move?

Por qué, luego de a4, se encierra el alfil negro con e6?