Video

Thank You Professor Wright! I learned a lot from you. Wake Forest, PRO HUMANITATE, FOR HUMANITY! That’s the Attorney I was taught to become. To do what I do as an attorney for the betterment of Humanity! Be blessed Professor Wright and Wake Forest, in Jesus Name, Amen!

I learned a lot about the pretrial detention process. I also learned that wake forest students are as distracted as any other students in the nation.

My question would be what would give any state judge the right to Grant a search warrant for somebody's house or property when that's not law the actual law is the Constitution and your fundamental rights

May Scher and his pos wife rot in hell.

So if it’s not testimonial it can be used in court

🤔 And the court case will be starring everyone. 🌈 💖💖💖💖💖💕 🫠

When considering Pretrial Release, Courts need to be cautious and strictly enforce Pretrial release conditions and ask: "What infractions are defendants committing while under Pretrial supervision that are not disclosed to the Court/Judge, potentially necessitating a revision of their bond conditions, or even revocation of their bond and incarceration until their case is resolved?" It is deeply concerning that Denver Pretrial does not consistently report when supervised individuals breach their conditions to the Court or Judge. Of particular concern are DUI defendants who persist in driving under the influence before their case is resolved, and individuals on Pretrial for domestic violence charges who violate protection orders imposed by the Court. These transgressions pose an immediate and direct threat to public safety, with a profound impact on the victims in domestic violence cases, and just as important officers from all divisions.

My brother is being held on false allegations and prosecutors are definitely withholding evidence that proves he's innocent, but i don't want to wait until after he's found guilty bc the jury didn't get the whole truth. It takes two years to rewrite their wrong. How do we prevent it before it's too late?

Okay. NOW I get it.

So let’s say they used extent of harm caused- but the complaint just sat unsigned from November to June. For a car accident where I had no drivers license and accident caused serious injury because they were on a motorcycle. If they person died 9 months later they would have had to prove that it was cause from the car accident and not negligence from a medical professional? Because I can’t be responsible for any action past that day correct? Medical care, and to that effect people ran over to help and started moving these people. I am a RN and I didn’t even get out of my car once I saw them moving them in fear I could be blamed further on my professional license. I also was in shock, didn’t want to speak to anyone as I was protecting my own interest. I felt if I say nothing and do nothing nothing can be held against me. My instinct said to keep my ass in my car. I did until a paramedic came to my door and the police were on scene. They waited 262 days before a warrant was put into the Lein system. I wasn’t arrested that day, the sgt. came to get my keys and never said they were pursing criminal charges. I have zero evidence to defend myself. My loan company doesn’t even have pictures. I have nothing. But the police investigation making it all prejudice! Right? They didn’t even get a statement from the other driver. It says three different points of impact in the police report. I know where I was hit. They didn’t even hit there brakes. You have to avoid a collision as a driver. You have to hit your brakes. This man was not paying attention. They said I went across 4 lanes of traffic but you can make a left turn. It’s the Same thing. It’s a common knowledge and accepted traffic rule and no sign in front of you prohibiting what I did. The motorcycle test, requires you know how to stop in an emergency and I was only doing 18 mph. He had 5 secs and still did not react.

Good talk but also academic. In the real world several states have no speedy trial clause of any kind and can keep an individual locked up indefinitely. In addition we currently have hundreds if not thousand of citizens in jail without trial for years on end, no days, or weeks or months by years. This is not a speedy trial. The fact that you can be arrested by a handful of people or less, locked up in jail for years without trial means the system is broken. I would love to see your explanation for those cases. You even sort of mention it when you say there isn't a exact time limit but when the courts kind of think it might be an issue. Well the courts are never in a hurry to do anything, they are not sitting in jail for years on end while someone at a desk shuffles papers and leaves early on a Friday.

Why do you have music playing over this? Jfc. This is supposed to be educational and is a required scholarly source for many courses.

Isn't a home more protected than anything else under the fourth amendment?

i did not concent in a vehical nor peorson search, so they get the k-9 dog to run the whole time the dog was trying to pull away the officer kept pointing and saying here, he put dog up and told me their is your fucking warrant, then searched myself my car and my purse also searched my 2 passangers without concent. i was cuffed put in cruiser and ask if i would work for them , i was detained in cuffs in cruiser for 45 min setting on site of stop mean while they asl me 3 more time if i wanted to work out a dealnever did the officer or k=9 cop read me my miranda rights/. then a under cover pulls up i was ask if id talk to him i said ill talk to everyone, i stated to undercover i dont do drugs, buy drugs, nior sell drugs i can not help you, the under cover read me the miranda then 5 min later i hear 9 christy sargent an officer opens door uncuffs me gives me a citation and sent me walking, they towed my car 10n min fter stop and sent my two passangers walking at same time is any of this legal, i feel my right were violated along with my passangers, i feel my property was seized unlawfuly, and i feel i was detained in cuff on traffic stop site unlawfuly, the cop tried to bully me into being an informant

Blanket statements of just prosecuting all charges because they happen to have a DV designation is also dangerous. People lie and exaggerate. Peoples lives can change forever with that stigma. There should actually be to consider the facts and the other side of the story. Obviously I’m not promoting violence, but just assuming that somebody is guilty because it has a DV designation, and therefore should be prosecuted is a miscarriage of justice.

Absolute worse case law on the books; uneducated with life experience will deem this case law gods gift on earth. This has excused mountains of unlawful detainment on innocent people from LAW ENFORCEMENT. This case law should be overturned; return to actual evidence of a crime; not instilling 'probable cause' as evidence.

Does anyone know what due process pre-trial proceeding must take place in order for a criminal case to officially begin against the defendant?

Search warrants are handed out like candy. And all they state is that the police can search for "evidence of a crime".

Why did you associate crime a with the word or color beige?

2001 illegal wire taps. 2016 Due process violation 4th 5th 6th 14th Amendment violation. A Writ of habeas corpus a violation of my constitution rights violated 2019

Don’t ever talk to the police. They are not your friend. They get paid to make arrests.

This video should be taken down, because a license to practice law well is not a law lmfao, its a secure right to practice law, we should all educated under the law, so please explain are we talking law or some form of commercial policy, and is a bar memeber ship car a sign thay your part of a gang to hide certain shit from the public, like if a man can be fooled then let him be fooled right, so who is lying if my attorney does not have its clientsbest interest.. or wont make certain argumentssssssssssss, nit that it should be an argument with the language being the real issue........

Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine: A rule under which evidence that is the direct result of illegal conduct on the part of an official is inadmissible in a criminal trial against the victim of the conduct.

The POWER of NOT FILING CHARGES. i wouldn't chatmrge my friends coworkers or people that provide my department funding

Thank you

UFO 🎉😊

Not 🎉 at all

We are to slow

Inventory searches are never for anything other than evidence gathering. If you can reasonably seal a crime scene using items like tape them you can reasonably seal a car's doors and trunk with the same that will show if the car has been tampered with.

helping students 9 years later, Thank you Professor!! enjoyed the background music too haha

Terry v Ohio needs to be overturned.

The courts and law enforcement are also in violation of the 14th amendment section 1 if they illegally search any American citizen, their house, papers or effects (personal property) without a legal lawful search warrant signed by a judge under oath and affirmation. 14th amendment section 1 No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states

The fourth amendment text explicitly states unreasonable searches and seizures "SHALL NOT BE violated " therefore the only reasonable search and seizure is only with a legal lawful search warrant.

These people don't know a bloody thing about constitutional law,most of them their reading comprehension is pathetic. The fourth amendment text explicitly states no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause. Reasonable suspicion exists nowhere in the 4th amendment text of the constitution of the united states of America supreme law of the land.

Your car is your effects,the things in your pockets are your effects your body is your person, your ID, driver's license, insurance, registration are your papers,all protected under the 4th amendment warrant clause there is no probable cause to search anyone or anything without a legal lawful search warrant.

4th amendment text explicitly states probable cause is only to get a legal lawful search warrant nothing more. The justice department (courts), and law enforcement have been operating illegally unconstitutionally for the past 100 years.

your window covers a good bit of the info..

Thank u for posting

My request for elaboration ( if background of defendant from law inforcement is incorrect and or incriminating?

Probable cause. = damages every one knows that.

No... use the definition at the time it was written. By 1940 it has been changed

what about things like letting them see a clock or use their phones or the conditions of the jail (say the bedding)? also getting more chances to make phone calls. are there any appeals about these recently?

Wake forest was among one of the top education facility next to Pennsylvania

Thank you so very much. This was extremely helpful

You and I could pass as brothers! But not important; however, when you use red, I can not read your slides. Color blindness triggered by red is signifenty higher than other colors.

Wow sounds like a real free country....mean while prison overflowing massive problem most non violent.... Who is to say what not to say when to say specially when ya find out how they live behind close doors . Conspiracy more less in lame terms means Officer Biden and procicuter Trump don't got no evidence or leads just here say or a hunch. So they slap a conspiracy on Jane and john Doe with a possession charge. Resulting in felony charge and loosing k separating many families.... Protect the prison complex by serving corrupted Powers In evil they trust! I'd like to see them put in a cage for this conspiracy crap. It makes cops and detectives lazy and unethical.

the prosecutor has a duty to investigate things that counter their argument MY prosecutor, a DA, not only withheld evidence, but evidence that disproves their circumstantial evidence and theory, flipping it 180 degree from what they presented the state also edited evidence to make me look guilty my lawyer said it doesn't count cause the detective did it, how did he know the detective did it? my lawyer didn't even object to the prosecutor saying I was guilty to the jury

Judges who are about to apply for higher courts should first watch this video, because they could be asked to explain what a _Brady_ motion is.

Thanks, professor for this amazing mini-lecture series! This helps a lot!

One of the Supreme Court justices who ruled on this case was once in the KKK. Justice Black was born in the 1800s.