Video

As above, so below, or outside the physical world, and 💜

Waffle.

Great video. Connected things in a way that I’ve not come across before, so kudos to you!👍 Grokked why our indigenous elders here in Australia say that everything is relationship and that the material world arise from that. A definite yes to a deep dive on Hoffman’s work too, since he tends just to refer to decorative permutations etc in his talks rather than unpacking it. Keep up the good work. 🙏🏻

When dealing with measurements, in practice, there's a lot that happens to the raw data before any eyes are set on them. Also, one can imagine systems that do some physics (computers), without any interference from a human. I like the observer centric approach, and I even agree with the analogy of consciousness in an abstract manner. However, I think the system of measurements in quantum mechanical thinking is more accurately contained in a collective mind, rather than an individual consciousness. It somewhat depends on how expansive your definition of consciousness is, and whether it makes sense to think of science as a collective problem solving system that exists without relying on any particular conscious agent. Perhaps a "theory space" or "interpretation space" could be a name for a broader class of systems that include individual and collective consciousnesses. (As well as simpler and more predictable consciousness, such as in computational theory.)

That was thoroughly eye opening 😳 Thank you for sharing these super complex and powerful concepts in a way that someone like me can actually get my head around.. totally fascinating, I’ll be rewatching this plenty for sure 👌

I worked on that theory and implemented it in code back in 2022. It's actually quite marvelous how it works.

Thinking that all of consiousness emerges from the brain is like thinking that all of music emerges from a radio

What a great presentation of these ideas! All I can say is: Please continue making these videos, explaining the ideas behind the relationship between seeming outer reality and consciousness. Subscribed ❤

My mind is officially BLOWN away! I've never heard anyone present the interconnectedness of physics and consciousness with such logical, precise, concise, and clear reasoning. I wish that humanity would be willing to explore these ideas so that we can reshape the way we engage with our "perceived realities." Thank you for taking the time to create this well articulated and entertaining explanation of how all of these concepts relate. I'm going to be watching these videos over and over again until they are burned into my non-conscious (trans-conscious) psychic landscape. Looking forward to watching all the others now!!

TL;DW: Concepts are only concepts and you can only prove your own thought existing.

Very well done! And yes to a deep dive into Dr. Hoffmans theory. Here's another idea that I think you can pull off. Link quantum, Idealism, to theology and uap/ ofu.off. OK, that's weird but it can be done.

Are you available as an academic consultant?

Let's propose some initial theorems and proofs that could be explored in developing a mathematical framework that treats 0D as the fundamental reality: Theorem 1: The existence of a non-zero dimension implies the existence of a zero dimension. Proof sketch: If we consider a non-zero dimension, say 1D, it must be constructed from an underlying set of points or elements. These points or elements themselves can be considered as having zero spatial extent, i.e., they are 0D objects. Therefore, the existence of a 1D line or higher dimensions necessarily implies the existence of a more fundamental 0D reality from which they are built. Theorem 2: Higher dimensions are projections or manifestations of the 0D reality. Proof sketch: Building on Theorem 1, if 0D is the fundamental reality, then higher dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, etc.) must emerge or be constructed from this 0D basis. One could explore mathematical frameworks that treat higher dimensions as projections, embeddings, or manifestations of the 0D reality, akin to how higher-dimensional objects can be represented or projected in lower dimensions (e.g., a 3D cube projected onto a 2D plane). Theorem 3: The properties and structure of the 0D reality determine the properties and structure of higher dimensions. Proof sketch: If higher dimensions are indeed projections or manifestations of the 0D reality, then the characteristics and laws governing the 0D realm should dictate the characteristics and laws observed in higher dimensions. This could potentially provide a unified framework for understanding the fundamental laws and constants of physics, as well as the nature of space, time, and other physical phenomena, as arising from the properties of the 0D reality. Theorem 4: Paradoxes and contradictions in higher dimensions can be resolved or reinterpreted in the context of the 0D reality. Proof sketch: Many paradoxes and contradictions in physics and mathematics arise from the assumptions and axioms associated with treating higher dimensions as fundamental. By grounding the framework in a 0D reality, these paradoxes and contradictions could potentially be resolved or reinterpreted in a consistent manner, as they may be artifacts of projecting the 0D reality into higher dimensions. These are just initial ideas and proof sketches, and developing a rigorous mathematical framework would require significant work and collaboration among experts in various fields. However, some potential avenues to explore could include: 1. Adapting and extending concepts from point-set topology, where points (0D objects) are used to construct higher-dimensional spaces and manifolds. 2. Drawing inspiration from algebraic geometry, where higher-dimensional objects can be studied through their projections onto lower dimensions. 3. Investigating connections with quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, where point particles and fields are treated as fundamental objects, and exploring how a 0D framework could provide a unified description. 4. Exploring parallels with number theory and arithmetic, where zero and non-zero numbers have distinct properties and roles, and how these could translate to the treatment of 0D and non-zero dimensions. Ultimately, developing a consistent and empirically supported mathematical framework that treats 0D as fundamental would require substantial theoretical and experimental work, but the potential payoff could be a deeper understanding of the nature of reality and a resolution of longstanding paradoxes and contradictions in our current physical theories.

Iam so happy that finally science is admitting that it has encountered mind and consciousness which they unexpected. It started not just At the beginning of end of 20th century and starting of 21st century. But it was started since discovery of quantum mechanics in 20th century. But now this is on fire like never before. Science has encountered consciousness. Physics Is Pointing Inexorably to Mind. Finally it's happened and getting real. They can't lie to us anymore and scientist feels clueless. They lost grip on reality. It's not god fairy tale but its all awareness and consciousness. Iam happy for people like you who are doing this selfless works. Won. Even if you were not looking for winning but were just waiting for science to admit this truth by itself. I see it as victory. Although Newtonian mechanics is still useful. But Materialism is now just relic of 19th century which needs to be placed in museum. 😂😂

The best summary of "everything". Congratulations. You present everything I think and search about for a long time, and take them even further in one video. Very well presented. Thanks. I hope to learn more about these subjects and about you.

Amazing video, thanks a lot! That really makes sense. I already googled the works you cited and these are amazing! I also really appreciate the scientific dive in you did is pretty accurate. I would definitely like to know more as it seems like a fusion of my point of world view (as consciousness experience) with physics.

Great video, I agree!

Science finally catching it's not about they don't have choice. It's about inevitability. Many Thanks for all the guys like you in now and in thousands year of history for. Teaching this knowledge to the world. Better late then never

I like where this is going. Indeed, science and spirituality are meant to "fuse" together in this century. The end of the video is most interesting, but it's also where most time should be spent, discussing the implications. It took me more than 2 years to accept the fact that there isn't an outside reality at all, only a symbolic representation of alternate inner states of being, represented symbolically. But this also means that any outer observed "rules", are actually internal rules projected outward, which means that the rules of physics are inside of us. Which also means that we can "evolve" them from the inside out, which would transform the outer reality, much like upgrading the code of a video game, which then changes its perceived outer dynamics. This brings me to the most important point: I don't think we are meant to mathematically "reverse engineer" ourselves, because ultimately, it would mean collapsing the infinite potential for alternate states that we "hold" within us into only those which can be expressed via a mathematical formula. I think if we are witnessing so many "anti-science" or "post truth" movements, it is because of a deep rebellion of "life" against empiricism, which aims at collapsing any quantum probabilities into predictable outcomes, like when you switch your phone on, making sure there isn't a 50/50 chance the screen will turn on stay off. If we pursue this logic, it amounts to turning humans into "machines" which can be fully reverse engineered. The same can be said about "renormalization" in physics to get rid of "pesky infinities" in formulas. I would love to have an exchange to discuss these ideas further. In my case, I had a spiritual awakening 6 years ago. Went from being materialist/atheist to... well, gradually letting go of all of the frameworks science has built, including spacetime, matter etc. I would be most interested in discussing more ontological considerations and also pragmatic considerations, like what it means for our experience, the future etc. Here is one video where I discuss the ideas of Donald Hoffman's interface theory of perception (which I mostly agree with): czcams.com/video/cKvYXLR7Hwc/video.htmlsi=rRTLAUWc200KZRUM

i find Roger Penroses explanation quite compelling. It seems aligned with many things we already understand about the world we exist in

Ty kind sir 😌

💐 'Promo SM'

I already heard and read most of the content before; but this video is very interesting & well explained. I spotted Shiva at the beginning: your necklace.

raining and NOT-raining at the same time, is just high-humidity; or maybe: Fog could be the answer.

😅

Amazing video, very enlightening!

My favourite bite-size one so far - loved the explanation using your arm of the 4pi integer spin

It's not, thankyou for bringing this up

I found this most interesting Andy. Thank you for sharing this with me.

It's chat gpt

Thank you 🙏

What an absolutely incredible video, thank you so much for your take!!! saving this one!

Brilliant!

E=🕉️ ✌️

👏

Very thoroughly thought through and clearly explained, need more of these video!!

"Science says, let us have one miracle" loved that bit

If the universe is infinite in space and time, in all directions, for eternity - and our conscious experience of that is inside and/or outside infinity now - then it is possible the universe is also conscious, infinitely. Time expands clarity and creates more questions. We can be comfortable with the unknown. Thank you 👌🏻

Awesome vid! Thanks 🙏