Video

She is very right whatever she saying about Muslims and Islam. She speaks the truth and follow her please we need more of her and you can ask any questions of Middle East. They’ll tell you exactly what happened to our people since this Islam came and invaded our country. We have no life no place to live. We came to America scattered to Europe. Canada still came after us where we gonna go ask yourself as it’s not religion. It’s a movement of Satan wants to destroy our freedom, invade our country and brainwash our young people wake up people clean house.

I respect both of you highly to do this show for educating the world about this movement of Islam good for you I am proud of you

That was so good. Great to see the connection with brothers & sisters on the other side of the globe!

God is fully sovereign, that doesn't mean that God micro-manage everything. That's how I would sum it up.

If it turns out that the physical world can be derived (or created) from math and logic, then neither is the physical world conserved by God because then it is as timeless as math.

Dr Craig is so woefully incorrect here and let me explain why. Dr Craig makes foundationally incorrect assumptions so everything that springs from those errors is also in error. His first mistake is to think that those who are not descended from Adam & Even are in need of redemption. He even thinks that if intelligent aliens exist on planets thousands of light years away and who lived a million years before the time of Adam & Even then they too would be born in need of redemption. The reason why Adam and Even and all their descendants are in need of redemption is because Adam an Even 'unengrafted' from God and instead engrafted to the false god Satan. As a result, all those generations born engrafted to their original ancestor Adam and Even are born engrafted to that same branch that is wedded to Satan and not God. So each branch of the branch has to sever itself from that lineage and engraft to Jesus. But beings who did not sin against God and fall and engraft to a false God do not suffer from that state of being unengrafted from God so there is no need to 're-engraft'. Dr Craig's second disastrous assumption is that physiology is not that relevant to spiritual growth. So if you have this or that hominid physiology then you can just as easily grow spiritually to perfection. Well God went to great lengths over vast amounts of time, billions of years to bring about home sapiens physiology. He also saw to it that every other kind of hominid was extinct (put into a deep sleep). Even a human who has a very slight dna difference and disorder such as down syndrome has great trouble growing beyond an emotional and intellectual level. Dr Craig doesn't understand that emotional and intellectual development are the scaffolding/ladder by which the spirit grows along with constant infusions of God's love. To suggest that the exact physiology that God brought about over 14 billion years of effort just doesn't matter and another species can work just as well is frankly just ignorant. Could God have put a soul into an ape or a cow or an ant? Of course not.

Two years before Christopher died.

I would love if this was translated to English lol. Jk, some of the things go over my head, I will have to google a few words I guess

Low Bar Bill has no clue to what a scientific theory is. No Bill, there are NOT "several theories of evolution", there is only one--which we call 'Modern Synthesis'. And it entails a body of several hypotheses, all being tested and grounded in empirical evidence, that make up evolutionary theory.

I think it's young earth creationism that discredits Christianity more, flying in the face of mountains of scientific evidence about the age of the universe, offering an unintended (by the Holy Spirit) analogy with Jesus's turning the water into wine as it's only new testament defence. Really bad....

Dale wins again. WLC is the loveliest of men but unfortunately he looked as if was going to have a fit of some kind as Dale tied him in knots. For Christians there is One God - the Father. 1Cor 8:6

This channel is so under-appreciated!

15:52 THIS. THIS is why you want to indoctrinate children at a young age to believe in this fairytale. So they can't walk away from it. Pure evil

She does speak about a subjective "feeling" of connection in her conversion. You can hear about this if you listen to her debate with Richard Dawkins.

Always love your content❤ From India

I feel a little sorry for Shermer. Blind to everything non-material, but has no clue he's blind. It's very sad, in a way.

Craig broke the Law with this beating:)

Love you Bill and the work you do but within a matter of minutes you were hypocritical on a position, which is that you said it's wrong to implement our modern scientific understanding into the text because the original audience couldn't have known that (which is correct and proper exegesis) but then you go on to say that Noah's story is in conflict with modern science. FACT: OT and NT authors understood patriarchal figures to be literal people. Jesus himself referenced Adam as a literal person. You are wrongly shoehorning in modern science and theistic evolution into the text. The OT audience believed whole heartedly that the patriarchal figures and their stories literally happened. Modern age conservative Jews who take their faith seriously still do believe that. Why would Matthew go to the trouble of writing Jesus' forefathers, on each side, all the way back to ADAM if he wasn't a real person? The 6-day creation story is referenced in Exodus as literal. I would love to hash it out with you if you're willing.

Tuggy is making much more sense. The other guy appears to be flustered.

Thank you for starting out with defining the trinity. However, he goes on to say that it's simple... but it really isn't. ONE God, but made up of THREE persons... that would be THREE Gods... I'll keep listening. I'm trying to understand, having not been raised in a trinitarian tradition. Maybe "persons" needs defined? Seems self-evident, but maybe it's not.

Great conversations and great questions. I am happy to learn of William Hasker as another voice on a very interesting topic.

God bless your faithful disciples! I hold advanced degrees and need to keep a dictionary handy to look up some of the extensive, prolific vocabulary issuing forth from Dr. Craig's lips! I remember as a child reading The Reader's Digest and they had a section entitled, "It Pays to Increase Your Word Power". I loved learning new words, their origins, etc., even though to this day I often mispronounce words, putting the emphasis on the wrong syllable! Hahaha 😂. Dr. Craig, I always feel my frontal lobe growing a bit, the neurons twitching to process your apologetic prose! Blessings to you and Jan!

Interesting discussion

38:52 to 44:24 - Fascinating commentary on the original sin doctrine.

7:30 Heh, the computer incident. That was a classic.

I have gone on a "Quest for the historical Serpent" of the garden of eden. In my deep dive i have confirmed it would have been a Cryptophis boschmai. I look forward to publishing a book based on this research very soon, It will be in the blackwell companion to natural mytho biology.

I have gone on a "Quest for the historical Serpent" of the garden of eden. In my deep dive i have confirmed it would have been a Cryptophis boschmai. I look forward to publishing a book based on this research very soon, It will be in the blackwell companion to natural mytho biology.

This is a tough subject matter even for Christians to fathom.

where are my Ethiopians??

Quoting the Bible isn’t proof of a god.

Dr Craig, John Lennox, Turek, Dr Ross, etc all these guys are incredible scientists who know astrophysics, biology, philosophy, mathematics, and much more. They say consistently that there are basic principles that underlie the Christian faith that are in line with science and the existence of all things in our universe. The eye, our senses, reproduction, the complexity of our brains, and consciousness, our ability to reason, create, do mathematics, and learn languages and complex information… this is not a sign of random mutations. We have a conscience. Our moral objectivity is built in to us. Most people would agree that cold blooded murder is wrong. Rape is wrong. Child abuse is wrong. But without a God, there is absolutely no moral objectivity. It means there is no objective right and wrong. So go ahead and do whatever you want. Then come back and tell me how that worked out. Without God, we would not even understand right and wrong. The only way to know a line is crooked, is to have a straight line as your basis on which to judge all other lines. This is the same with any morality. The reason we can judge right from wrong is because we know what right is and that wrong things contrast things that are right.

Science shows that size is not necessary for power. Today's palm-top computers are as powerful or even more powerful as the gigantic first generation computers. Therefore, there seems to be no logical reason to conclude that the cognitive capacity of any pre-human primates is less than that of humans solely on the difference in brain size.

The joy in the students' faces is conspicous and contagious.

Not sure why creationists even talk about physics… Just stick to making baseless claims. Even if all of physics was proven wrong today, it wouldn’t mean god exists. That needs to be demonstrated. Just quoting from old books isn’t evidence.

I think that WLC made quite a few logical fallacies in his 5 points, and also that Hitchens did a pretty poor job of refuting them. I've always maintained that debates like this one favour people that have more charisma and quick thinking than it does the letting the truth rise to the top so to speak. A much better format which I wish had been done would have been an informal conversation / dialogue between the two.

Isaiah 44:6 NIV "This is what the LORD says-Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God. Revelation 1:8 NIV "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." Revelation 22:12-13 NIV "Look, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to each person according to what they have done. [13] I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

I want one of these shirts :(

Dear Dr. Craig, I wanted to briefly discuss why it cannot be rationally defended that there will be a global flood? Can the resurrection of Christ be understood? His brain was already completely destroyed. It is impossible that that brain could be used again. In addition to being 100 percent God, Jesus was also a man who was burdened to bear our sins and that is also stated in Isaiah. He has been sick and one who is only God does not hunger or become sick. Because if he did not have a real human body then he would never be tired because the laws of our nature do not apply to Him, you will see that after the resurrection. His body could pass right through matter with its matter. There you see that God does not have to take anything into account after His resurrection. After His resurrection He had a glorified body, but before that He was truly the Man of sorrows. He was wounded and tormented and bruised for our transgressions, says Isaiah. But after His resurrection, Christ can fly and does not need oxygen as He flies up into His world. This cannot be rationally defended as to how it is possible that Christ rose from the dead. And yet we believe it happened. But just because we know it happened doesn't say anything about whether we understand it. With God there is no time and He does not have to take it into account. There is a certain event in time that will influence eternity that cannot actually be explained. Because has the judgment day already happened for God or is it in the future for God? But the future is a part of time and can only exist if there was a plan. And a plan starts somewhere and ends and yet it was God's plan that started somewhere. And time already came into existence in eternity and By God's plan time was already there before time existed. Time is also the beginning of no beginning. Can this be substantiated by our reason or should we believe that God is so much more than we can think and that man's reason is not something you should rest on? Salemo also says that we should trust God and not our reason . Can you convince me that faith is also about trusting what God does even though we don't understand it and it doesn't make sense to our minds?

Thank you Dr. Craig for your ministry and for all of your hard work over the years✝️

17:20 Christian history begs to differ, where was the love when the Jews and Muslims in Spain where prosecuted or the butchering and slaughter of 6 million Jews became remember nazism was a Christian movement, the nazis had iron cross

i´m sick to my stomach, someone doing it and the wolrd condemning it feels very diferent to someone doing it and the wolrd condoning

Perhaps this is an OT proof text of conservation from Job 34: “If it were his intention and he withdrew his spirit and breath, all humanity would perish together and mankind would return to the dust.” Job‬ ‭34‬:‭14‬-‭15‬

I have tried to ask Dr. Craig this question a few times both online and through a Reasonable Faith representative. The question is this... Why does early Genesis must and have to be about material physical creation? No one has ever proven this throughout history. Isn't it an assumption in which many people agree? But just because many people agree doesn't mean that it's true. Why can't it be about higher, realer, and better things and not material physical creation? After all does God care about rocks and planets and bugs? Or does he care about us!

Where can I find the transcript to this video please?

binitarian arguing against binitarian ... and you wonder why so many think Christians are a friggin joke

Swear I’ve seen this before. Even the same questions and responses at the end. But it says it was streamed today?

This is the problem when theology dictates translation instead of the other way around. In the Greek manuscript of 2 Thessalonians 2:3, the word used is "ἀποστασία" (apostasia). This term is typically translated as "apostasy," "rebellion," or "falling away." Jerome translated this Greek word into Latin as "discessio" in his Vulgate translation. The Latin term "discessio" carries meanings similar to "departure" or "separation," which aligns with the concept of a falling away or rebellion. Proponents of the Rapture argue that "ἀποστασία" in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 should be understood literally as a departure, indicating the physical removal of the church from the earth. They also point out that the context of 2 Thessalonians 2 discusses events surrounding the Day of the Lord, suggesting that the "departure" refers to the Rapture occurring before the revelation of the "man of lawlessness" (often interpreted as the Antichrist). Jerome also translated the Greek word "ἁρπάζω" (harpazo) to the Latin word "rapiemur" in his Vulgate translation. This occurs in 1 Thessalonians 4:17, where the passage describes believers being "caught up" to meet the Lord in the air. The verse in Latin reads: "deinde nos qui vivimus qui relinquimur simul rapiemur cum illis in nubibus obviam Domino in aera et sic semper cum Domino erimus" This can be translated to: "**Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord**." The term "rapiemur" is the root from which the English word "rapture" is derived. Therefore, Jerome's translation effectively laid the groundwork for the term "rapture" as it is used in eschatological discussions today. Paul also states that he was given secret revelation not known by previous propehts or apsotles and directly given to him by thebAscended Lord: Ephesians 3:3-6b Colossians 1:25-27; Romans 16:25-26. Paul was teaching a bre creation, neifhter Jew or Greek, but the body of Christ. Using the gospels to interpret Paul is bad hermeneutics as they have two different audiences. Paul taught the body of Christ, and Jesus taught Jewish theology, prophesy, and eschatology.

Jesus came for the Jews as the fulfillment of the prophets. He came to establish the establish the kingdom the would then allow the gentiles to be saved (Psalm 2, Exodus 19:6, ISaiah 42:6, Isaiah 49:6). The second coming of the Lord was the the followers of the Way. Paul taught the mysteries, secrets, that were kept from prophesy to Israel. Paul is telling the Body of Christ, this saved under the Goodison of grace, that they would not be facing the tribulation as OT prophecy did not apply to the body of Christ. Thessalonians is a book of hope to the gentiles behind saved while the Judaizers were telling them that they were in the tribulation or that they too would experience it.