Video

There are a number of errors in the summary of Assange. One example: Swedish police did send someone to interview Assange and he gave the interview in London in 2015. He had also been quesitoned prior to that in Sweden. Nils Melzer, representing the United Nations, interviewed the victims and found no legal standard of rape applied, based on the women, who themselves said they were interested in getting Assange to take an STD test after communicating with each other. The case was dismissed as non-criminal by the first prosecutor who looked at the case and then shelved. Later, mysteriously, it was re-opened (and presumed to be for political reasons by Assange's legal team). When Melzer interviewed the two women they seemed more concerned with their treatment as political pawns by Sweden than by Assange.

14.41mins re.2010 Murder of U.K.codebreaker Gareth Williams - body in bag in a bath, and fall down an Oxford staircase of Gudrun Loftus?

Cheery on mate😂

Loving your podcast guys … great banter. Well done.

There was no proof of cobwebs no pictures only people saying they saw them

So you have no opinion or analysis of this case but you do have an opinion on the laws of the US. Really helpful.

The torn top edge of the ransom note matched the torn piece left in the notebook for each page. Also, and this is an unexplainable point - there were NO fingerprints on the note. So a ghost picked it up and moved it from the stairs to the kitchen counter then? Or the parents read it in place on the step? I think not.

Yeah Yeah mmm yeah

No way! Ozwald was clearly a Communist+made into a “patsy.”

Jon Benet, John Andrew

Loving the Zodiac look 💪🏾

7:12 Incorrect! The Grand Jury voted to indict the Ramseys. The Prosecutor never pursued the indictment!

Donut. Hi Donny my protector??

Hi Ally. I know it's ridiculous. I was lucky. Quick think fast. You have to man.

There Was NO Pineapple Found IN JonBenet's Stomach (Check The Official Autopsy Report Findings). There WAS A "Fruit/Veg-LIKE Material" Which "COULD Represent Pineapple" Found In Her Duodenum (Or Upper Small Intestine) Which Takes At Least 2-6 Hours For Food To Arrive There. But There Were Also Later Discovered Cherry & Grape Skins Found In Her Intestinal Tract Too (From Univ of CO Boulder Studies Published In Paula Woodward's Book), So Where Did Those Come From ?!?!? Victim Advocates, Jedamus & Morlock, Are Known To Have Brought "bagels & Fruit" To The Crime Scene That Morning (from P.M.P.T.), Perhaps That Bowl Of Pineapple Was Theirs ?!?!? All In All I Think The Pineapple Is Yet Another Red Herring In This Case, It Certainly Will Never Lead Us To Who Actually Killed This Poor Little Girl.

The Ransom Note Began "Listen Carefully" & The Garrote Was Still Around Her Neck At Autopsy. (I Wish People Would Do A Bit More Research Before Covering These Cases - Like Reading The Ransom Note & Looking At The Actual Autopsy Photos) 😖

The Head Injury Likely Happened LAST, Not First !!! There Was Petechial Hemorrhaging In Her Eyes, Half-Moon Claw Marks On Her Neck, & Only 8-10cc (less than a teaspoon and a half) Of Blood On Her Skull. Had She Been Hit First, There Would Have Been Much More Swelling, And Likely No Petechial Hemorrhaging Or Half-Moon Claw Marks. It Certainly Did NOT Occur 45 Minutes to 1 Hour Before, As Some Have Claimed.

How old is this?

This is a great channel.

A very entertaining discussion. This 'bradwilliams' who comments below is a heavily biased troll that spreads his opinionated nonsense on every Ned Kelly related video uploaded to CZcams. All of his diatribe is from the law enforcement perspective and he refuses to even discuss any other possibility due to his dogmatic belief system. He has been called out as wrong and spreading misinformation many, many times. The simple fact that Ned Kelly had a vast amount of sympathisers across North east Victoria during the Kelly Gang's 18 Months on the run as outlaws, clearly shows that it was divided whether people considered Ned an uneducated thuggish terrorist or a victim of Constabulary prejudice and harassment. If you research into the 1870's Land Acquisition laws and the resulting Social Divides caused by the corrupt landed gentry Squattocracy's abuse of 'dummy' bidders to purchase whatever farmland they wanted - you can understand the reason why Ned Kelly had so many sympathisers. Ned Kelly took all the responsibility for the killings at the Stringybark Creek shoot-out, we don't know who shot Constable Lonigan, Constable Scanlan or Sergeant Kennedy - it could have been any of the Kelly Gang as it was a shoot-out. Constable McIntyre claimed it was Ned Kelly that shot Constable Lonigan and Constable Scanlan - but how could he be sure when all four of the Gang fired shots. Dan Kelly was shot in the shoulder - so shots were fired on both sides. Ned Kelly claimed he also shot Sergeant Kennedy to put him out of his misery - did he though - it could have been any of the Kelly Gang, Ned Kelly just accepted responsibility - especially if it was in fact Dan, who Ned may have been trying to protect from such a charge. In regards to the Aaron Sherritt murder, Aaron was a double agent spy for the Kelly Gang. The Gang knew full well that Aaron was spying for the police only to lead the astray from where the Gangs movements truly were. Superintendent Hare rated Aaron Sherritt as one of his best spies, but Detective Ward was suspicious and knew Aaron was deliberately giving false information for the Kelly Gang. Aaron was ultimately set-up as a traitor to the Kelly Gang by Detective Ward, who spread gossip and rumours of Aaron being a turncoat. Joe Byrne may have been led to believe (with help of his mother Margret Byrne and a blasphemous comment made to her by Sherritt) that his best friend was a traitor, by these false rumours. When Aaron was completely innocent of any traitorous action. Detective Ward was heavily criticised by the Royal Commission Inquiry of 1881 and recommended to be "censured and reduced one grade." The Kelly Gang were heavily supported by the poor Selectors and the simple fact that the reward money of £8000 was never taken up by any of them is very telling. All the spies used by the Constabulary were costing the Victorian Government a fortune (£115,000 by the end) yet none of the spies intelligence ever got close to the Kelly Gang over 18 months? The sympathisers for the Kelly Gang were verging on a guerrilla army in revolt, and even the use of farming plough mouldboards for the Kelly Gang's armour, can be seen to reflect the poetic reference to the farmers and the Land itself, the symbology is profound. It has to be noted that once Ned Kelly was pronounced an 'Outlaw' from society, he considered himself 'at war' with the Protestant British empire, the Victorian Government and their Constabulary. 'War' and 'murder' differ because murder is legally defined as unlawful - while killing in war is sanctioned under the rules of war - so the derailment of the Special Police Train was planned under the case for 'war'. It was also well known to Superintendent Hare that the Kelly Gang were going to derail the rail lines somewhere after Benalla, as he was warned in advance - warned by whom is unknown. Yet Superintendent Hare allowed civilians and reporters onto the Special Police Train? Superintendent Hare was also heavily criticised by the Royal Commission Inquiry of 1881. The Kelly outbreak is full of 'grey areas' - nothing is known in enough fact to be so precise on anything - and the trial of Ned Kelly has long been branded a miscarriage of justice with experts, including the exChief Justice of Victoria, believing his court case was hopelessly unfair. They argue that Judge Redmond Barry was biased, the jury improperly instructed, and his conviction unsafe.

Very good podcast. I liked it a lot. Good interactions between hosts. Now, I'm going to binge on the channel. :)

(FACTS OVA FEELINGS). Every crime that was eva committed happened due to the person perceiving themselves az being both separate and disconnected from the person they committed that crime against and so it can bee said the perception of separatness is not only the greatest pain wee experience in this life its ollso the single most dangerous thing on the planet

Our nation's first modern prosecution of war crimes was of the man who reported war crimes. We've given multiple confirmed war criminals effectively a pardon for their war crimes committed in Afghanistan at the request of the United States. I don't know that Australia or Australian solicitors are the best to talk about prosecution of war crimes when we seem to do it the other way around and prosecute complainants rather than prosecute offenders. I enjoy the content usually but war crimes is not something our government has prioritised as relevant for the attorney general to look into.

the irony of having Putin, when Benjamin Netanyahu is currently commiting extermentation in Gaza and has arrest warrants out for him, stop using Russia as the symbol of Terror in War, it is the pariah state of "Israel" that is the most relevant.

Joe - you come across as a misogynist.

Great episode!

Great episode! Love listening to you two.

That's an interesting topic. Keeping criminal history from juries can foster fairer trials by preventing bias based on past actions and ensuring verdicts are based solely on the evidence presented in court. It allows for a focus on the specifics of the case rather than potentially prejudicial information. It's a step towards ensuring that justice is blind and decisions are made impartially.

Looking forward to tuning in next Monday! Justice Matters is always insightful and thought-provoking.

Why the woman was there?! To read him an essay? And play coquette?! Ridiculous!

Innocence Fraud Project?

A caterpillar??? Now that’s a first..

First time wstching this podcast. I found her dismissive of his comments, many times. Didn't like that. Other than that, excellent.

Absolutely it’s a crisis!

Facts !

She went to a wedding straight after giving birth, and between the birth and the wedding the baby disappeared.

A TV Doco series was made about Lane. Before that incident, Lane had (unbeknownst to her friends or family) given birth at least 2 or 3 times before and given the babies up for adoption. With the last baby, Lane claims she gave the baby to the father (of whose name she was unsure of despite having a sexual relationship with him and her boyfriend for some time). Lane's continual story changes throughout her interviews & often lack of cooperation probably didn't help her case IF she was innocent.

Yeah the fact that nobody came forward to corroborate her story just speaks volumes about whether she did something wrong or not

Is she that stupid for not protecting herself by obtaining positive identity information of the father?

How do you write from a woman's perspective? "Take away reason, and, accountability"...Jack Nicholson in As Good As It Gets.

Who's the phycho siding with this murdering mother ?

No child around , she facilitated the disappearances of the baby , only a reasonable conclusion is that she is guilty of a crime .

Check out Vybz Kartel case a Jamaican artist CMT no evidence for conviction

Well, if she had simply legally documented transferring custody to the man, or even had a witness to the transfer, she wouldn't have a problem!

She sounds as evil as the person she's talking about. 😅😊😮

Well she either did something bad or she knows someone who did, no sympathy

This woman is evil

She fed it to a dingo, obviously.. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Eew 👀 crocopkey 🐊 🏊‍♀️

Its not disgusting l, disgusting is being 200 lbs overweight.