Video

Was the district court judge correct to suppress the communications made between Defendant-Appellee and his wife, relying on the privilege for spousal communications? Was the district court judge correct to suppress the communications made between Defendant-Appellee and Sullivan, relying on the attorney-client privilege? Held: Yes; the communications at issue were privileged under the spousal privilege and were not subject to any exception; therefore the district court judge was correct to order them suppressed. Yes; the communications at issue were privileged under the attorney-client privilege and not subject to any exception; therefore the district court judge was correct to order them suppressed.

What a terrible interpretation of the 2nd amendment and not what the founders intended. Does any other amendment have an "introductory" clause. No. Why? Because they made it up to justify their personal opinions on guns. Blatantly going against the original purpose of the amendment

This is fire 🔥

Why would Hamer appeal if she won the trial? I’m missing something.

Gangbangers & armed robbers get convicted of this all the time.

Why is Hand Unit teaching me about historical events 💀

Its generally true that evidence during an unconstitutional search is inadmissible under the 4th amendment exclusionary rule, but what about evidence that was first noticed during an unlawful search? Don't they train these officers of the law? But, later seized during a 2nd search pursuant to a warrant obrained without reliance on the information learned during the 1st search.Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 108 S. Ct. 2529, 101 L. Ed. 2d 472, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2881, 56 U.S.L.W. 4801

Arizona is a schmitt -hole

Negligent conduct often leads to civil liability but it can also lead to criminal liability as explained in state vs. Larson -Mark Larson and his friend Nicholas Claire and Len Morgan spent several hours drinking in bars then in the early morning hours, the trio got into Larson's truck and he drove them down a remote country road going about 20 miles per hour over the speed limit. Larson drifted onto the right shoulder and over corrected into the left ditch no one was wearing a seat belt so all three were ejected. Larson v. Dep_t of State_ 565 F.3d 857

The Supreme court has established various tests to determine whether government action involving religion violates The Establishment clause: typically the test applied depends on the type of government action at issue. Larson vs. Valente explains the type of government action 456 U.S. 228 (1982) that triggers strict scrutiny, a Minnesota statute required charitable organizations to register with the Minnesota Department of Commerce and report their annual income & costs, the statue Exempted religious organizations from these requirements if over 1/2 of their contributions came from their members rather than the public. Larson v. Dep_t of State_ 565 F.3d 857

How about instead of forcing women to give birth we force men to have a vasectomy which by the way it's reversible 😏 "snit it or skip it" ladies ,lets start a movement!🎊🎉🎊

I love how these videos end just before we find out who won😁😁

damn handunit still educating us

Do you think that's where you should put out limited editions. And only allow like so many so you can see what the repercussions of everything else is going to show up as

andy fields what are you doing here-

So what they do change the engine coverage Lansing

Looks like a big con

Who would have guessed Charles Kuwaklt had been burning so many ends of the rope in his RV?

I can make 2d animation

I can make these type of video

why is a guy online saying the kid won?

Thank you Quimbee

You guys need to do a better job explaining the actual SCOTUS ruling and its ramifications, which is what really matters

This case isnt talked about much on CZcams but it is very important. Thank you

Bedbug furniture

Was gonna like but you cut it off

Advertisers use all sorts of techniques to catch an audience's eye and keep its attention often they use drama and humor to encourage interest in the product but what happens if a viewer takes the silliness seriously? The federal court in New York City addressed that question in the 19...88 F. Supp.2d 116(19..) the case of Leonard vs. PepsiCo. Campos-Lopez v. Konieg_ 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202549

A daring helicopter escape from prison 622 F. Supp. 1083 United States v. Lopez hoes thorny question about aider & a better liability in United States v. Lopez. After disappearing from Federal Custody Ronald McIntosh landed a helicopter in the prisons recreation yard where his girlfriend Samatha Lopez was being held. 10 days after their blockbuster worthy getaway this stargust pair was arrested, while buying wedding rings in a mall...Campos-Lopez v. Konieg_ 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202549

A lot of mfs in these comments are trying so hard to seem like yall know what you talking about with the balenciaga pedo shit lmao im not even defending them but some of these comments sound pretentious 😂😂

BUT WHAT DID THE SUPREME COURT DOOOOO?????

I love how this videos just keep confirming my hate for Scalia

A rundown of the Supreme Court opinion and dissention would have been helpful. I have just as many questions now as I did before I watched the video.

Many tax dispute aren't a question of whether the taxpayer received income but when that income was received, the IRS has several tools to determine timing, including the constructive receipt and economic benefit doctrines impulsive reverses commissioner the United States tax Court applied 64 T.C. 245 (1975) these doctrines to determine when to saddle a taxpayer with additional taxes. Then came the franchise tax board.

A 'large roll' of cash? Really, Quimbee? That probably didn't cover a single-family mortgage payment back then. $70Billion to Ukraine and our own courts criminalize and target citizens for carrying less than $800 bucks. Sick country.

Thus legally “blacks” are still slaves i.e. property. Christian Black Codes of 1724. It’s still legal, just used covertly.

Great video i understand the case better with the brief summmary

The United States Supreme court is know to save the announcement of its most controversial case fir the last day of each term. It's no wonder that Printz versus United States 521 U.S. 898 (19976) was announced just as tthe justices were headed out the door to close the 1997 term. The case raises deeply divisive issues involving gun control and the balance of power. Dept. of State v. Munoz (23-334

Technological advances that allow conversations to be recorded have created several legal issues including privacy and fourth amendment concerns the 1963 case of Lopez vs. United States documents 373 U.S. 427 (1963) the admissibility of a recorded conversation when the government agent doing the recording was part of the conversation. German Lopez operated clausen's Inn in Massachusetts internal revenue agent Roger Davis met Lopez at the inn while investigating excise tax evasion. Lopez claimedthat the Inn didn't host dancing or singing in the evenings bur Davis witnessed dancing on two occasions and believed the inn was liable for a cabaret tax. Campos-Lopez v. Konieg_ 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202549

why did you stop

Why doesn't this continue to the Supreme Court ruling?

William "Bill" Gasperini was my Distant Double-Cousin. Two of his Massachusetts Ancestors married into two different branches of my family. We 1st met in around 2010-2012 vis a Common-interest Social Group, and became Close Friends. It wasn't until he shared with me the family history research of his brother Jim that I discovered we were cousins. Around 2021, he was diagnosed with a rapid form of Early Onset Alzheimer's. Has he also had PTSD from his News Correspondence of multiple regional wars, in particular the Chechen War, I figure that factored into the rapidity of his progressive dementia. He passed away in Spring 2023.

Tax payers often use tax shelters to minimize the amount of tax they owe wouldn't it be even better if a taxpayer could create a shelter without any financial investment or risk, in the state of Franklin versus commissioner of internal revenue a (544 F.2d 1046(1976) a tax payer and his business partners check out what they can get away with. Estate of Franklin v. Commissioner, 544 F.2d 1045, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6466, 76-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9773, 38 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6164

Christian Nazis

?????? that's it??????????? LMAO

I did time with him in San Quentin. He's in his 70s now.

After billie ellish TV

❤

What do you get when you have an arsonist, his parents, and 2 insurance companies caused by a fight over who's on the hook for damages caused by a fire that was anything but accidental. A fiery legal battle in Unigard Mutual 579 P.2d 1015 (1978) vs. Argonaut Insurance we explore the fine line between coverage and exclusion for expected or intended harm. Galusha v. Unigard Ins. Co._ 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2285...

In Real Estate transactions the sellers promise to convey the property and the buyers promise to pay for the property are typically mutually dependent on one another but what if the seller breaches his promise and the buyer doesn't prove that he was ready willing and able to complete that purchase. Preston Exploration Co., L.P. v. G.S.F., L.L.C.., 566 Fed. Appx. 318, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8380, 2014 WL 1712469

You've got a new follower!