Video

I have an argument against william racist craig. The oldest civilisation on earth is still going despite middle eastern religion trying to make us extinct. Can willaim racist craig explain where his god beliefs fit in with 65,000 years of civilisation with no evidence ( apart from the jewish/ China owned rio tinto who recently destroyed a 46,000 year old Aboriginal cave settlement), of middle astern judeao based cults beliefs. Even the koran claim's to that allah sent prophet's and messengers to and from amongst all the peoples of earth, Yet nothing to my people the Australian Aboriginal people with 65,000 years of civilisation and culture have no record of any biblical god or koranic god or prophet or anything in our dreamtime that gets near the genocidal misogynistic gods from the middle east. Here is some evidence , Noah`s ark ( global flood somewhere in the order of 3 kilometres of water from the naoh`s ark flood.( Both melting will only get around 220 meters above current levels , some 10- 15 years at most away.) Aborignal oral and dance records of a sea level rise forming the great barrier reef from some 14,000 to 7,000 years , NO GLOBAL FLOOD, and my peoples evidence of this as fact despite science agreeing and giving an approx date for the origin of the story. As the marine geologist stated they can only give an approx for the last event as they have discovered evidence for a further 2 formations of the great barrier reef , the scientist's state as do the aboriginal's they think it was the last one but may not be , it may have been either previous iterations, look up the dates for previous ice ages. The oldest suspected cranium from a homid species is currently dated at 3 million years , haven`t followed it up since it was in the paper. I will even debate this fucking ignorant racist moron craig. William lane Craig is disgrace to his race ( that`s homo sapien to religious people who think their is a genetic tag for religion.)

"Richard Dawkins is Scared of William Lane Craig" Nice lie. He has debated the dishonest WLC. He doesn't want to deal with the immoral supporter of genocide again. Yes WLC supports genocide if its done by his god. Sick puppy isn't he.

1000 views over six years. lol your folks are losing the battle and fast. good thing too

Dawkins is so obviously afraid of Craig. He doesn't care WHO calls him a coward.......because he knows it's true. Better (for Dawkins) to be thought a coward by many than to chance a debate with a worthy opponent and risk losing the respect of his groupies.

"War broke out" ? This formulation is intentionally chosen to claim that the Creationists have arguments to fight. There are none. "Refuse to debate the existence of GOD"? There is not one reason to believe in one of the many Gods. Even Christians do not believe in all of the other Gods and they do believe different things each about the same GOD. Usually a "debate" ends that an agnostic or atheist has to show that there is no God, which in itself is ridiculous. There is nothing to rebut. Any argument can easily be rebutted, but Theists demand the a priori rebuttal of all possible arguments for the existence of all Gods and their own one on top.

Some are not expressed I hear and read. Shall the truth be dependent on what a "majority" believes? Hard-core Christians are about 1:50 minority in mankind and 1:1000 among highly educated people. Guys, eat more feces (to the most of you: eat more shit)! Trillions of flies cannot go wrong

ROTFL "American academic"'s scientific ideas about theory of relativity and of time are far off anything that can be regarded as anything but devious philosophic wishful thinking. A child building castles in the sand is no architect. If he studies with master architects he may become an architect. By studying in respectable institutes of physics you maybe end up as a respected physicist. By studying in religious schools you get religious. "Some .... are not impressed"?! NOBODY can really be impressed by this silly old Holey Book.

You cannot philosophically argue for the existence of god without it being reducable to the "God Of The Gaps". ( I don't have a clue about reality, therefore: GOD)

Dawkins is so scared

I think Craigs only makes a plausible casefor a Deistic god

@bigspliffs Nah I'm good

I would again like to point out the hypocrisy of a channel calling anyone a coward that censors nearly all their videos.

Again, Craig has been shown to be demonstrably wrong in all of his argumentation and it's made clear that he doesn't care. So Dawkins debating him would only give Craig and his pseudo-intellect more publicity.

Dawkins is a putz.

Hey man! Been trying to message you! Thanks very much for the mirror uploads! Would love it if you could feature my latest one on Craig V the British Humanists running away (Toynbee, Dawkins, Grayling)! That's become the truly big story at the mo and would love to get the message spread! Thanks again, and loving your other vids!