Video

@@WhatWhat-ot5nr Service of process is the legal procedure that involves delivering a summons and a copy of a complaint to a defendant, which are the documents that initiate a lawsuit. The summons informs the defendant of the case against them, and the complaint details the allegations of wrongdoing. The delivery of these documents is called service of process.

Thanks for reaching out. What did you mean by your comment: 1:07? thank you

@@cathyclark5102 thank you!! I can never get enough of these comments. I'm so so glad it was helpful.

Hi! email me questions@jdsimplified.com

In this lecture. You need to watch the whole thing; lol. I promise the lecture gets better.

@@originalgangsta794 you're very welcome. Happy it was educational and valuable.

@@charliesvids I never get tired of these type of comments. So so glad this video was helpful. Thank you for the compliment.

@@TheSaintlo Awe! Thank you. I hope the lesson was valuable to your studies.

I'm so so glad it was valuable to you! You're so very welcome.

😆😆😆

Thank you for the compliment! Glad it was helpful!

Awee! Thank you. So glad you found it helpful.

I'm just now starting Evidence. More to come!

These comments make my day. I'm so glad the videos are helpful.

I’ve watched so many videos on this topic. This is the absolute most complete and detailed one.

That Cheezy went off the rails when Kam divorced him 🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

Who the people liable to her are? Is that what you mean?

So glad it was helpful. These comments make my day! Trying to post more.

Im so so glad you found it helpful. These videos are all I have for now. But soon I’ll be working on them on a full-time basis. So by the time you take the bar exam, shoot me an email and I’m happy to grant you access.

I’m so so happy it brought you so much value. Totally makes my day every time I get one these comments!

So happy it was helpful. If you don’t mind me asking, did you begin with another one of my videos or a video from a different person/company? Nonetheless, thanks for the compliment.

You are very welcome! I am so very glad you find it so helpful. Your comment absolutely made my day.

So so glad they’re helpful! Thank you for the compliment. It means the world.

Glad it was helpful!

Haha! Not sure if you’re being sarcastic, but thank you! I do not teach at a law school. I tutor law school and bar prep. Thanks nonetheless for the huge compliment! Glad you found it valuable

Thank you. I’m so glad it brought you value.

Hi! Are you referring to Rule 18 of FRCP or Rule 18 of appellate procedure?

FRCP@@JDsimplified My professor wants us to discuss 10, 18, 13 (a,b,g) and 14 when it comes to joinder. Idk why 19 is missing.

@@jeffh.2588 ok. When is your exam? Monday?

He calls it the "piggy back rule"

@@JDsimplified yep!

Hi! Plaintiffs, since they’re the ones bringing the action, have the initial choice of forum. That is, P has the choice of where to sue. There are many reasons for them to want to bring the action in state court; the court might be geographically closer, maybe it’s a state claim P thinks state court will be better suited to resolve, maybe P’s lawyer is better versed in state civil procedure, maybe P knows D wants to litigate in federal court so P sues in state court to be a brat about it, lol. If the lawsuit could’ve been filed in federal court from the start, Defendant can then use Removal to “remove” that lawsuit from state court into federal court. Hope this helps.

It’s in the hands of mi editor 😩 so it will be posted sometime in the next few weeks. A little too late…sigh.

@@JDsimplified Oh no! My exam is in 2 days so that's a wash for me :(. But regardless, thank you for this video!!! So helpful :)

@@JDsimplified I'm keeping an eye out for it as well! Thanks for posting!!

Thank you! These comments and emails make my day. I’m so glad it was helpful.

Thank you! So glad it was helpful! Please subscribe. I will be posting supplemental jurisdiction tonight or tomorrow.

@@JDsimplified If you have time tonight I would be so grateful!!! My exam is tomorrow night, yikes!

Awe, thank you! My pleasure!

Hi! The Supreme Court actually relied on the Worldwide Volkswagen case to support its decision in Ford. You are right that these two are so similar, and both address purposeful availment. However, Ford conceded that it had contacts within Montana and Minnesota. The plaintiffs in Ford brought their vehicles to the forum, just like the Robinsons did in World-Wide Volkswagen, true. The difference in the Ford case is that Ford had substantial contacts within the forum, whereas VW did not have any contact with Oklahoma (the forum state in that case). Specifically, the Ford Court considered the billboards, commercials, advertisements, and direct mail which were seen or circulated within Minnesota and Montana. Also note that Ford didn’t consider the reasonableness factors. Hope this clarifies it! Thanks for watching!

Awe! 🥹 thank you! It means a lot! I’m going to post supplemental justification in the next few days.

You're very welcome! ❤️🤓

Glad it was helpful!

Every time I get these comments, I smile for hours. So glad you find my vids to be a value-add to your learning experience.

@@JDsimplified Your videos will serve as the basis for my outline, and I’m going to share your channel with friends! Thank you so much for dedicating the time and effort it took to make these!