Video

Very enjoyable talk!

Very entertaining and educational. Pity so few have watched.

"... thanks, by the way it's David C-R-ockford"

Announces a new programming language. Proceeds to describe message passing and databus / data mesh architecture. Useless talk.

What kind of arrogant douchebag thinks they're so much better than everyone around them that they won't answer a question like the guy asked when introducing him??

Thank you

I'm having a hard time seeing this as a language instead of a design pattern.

Nothing new, check out Scala/Akka-Actors ... and its not paperwork and works already ... does this mean the future is already here ;-)

Sounds a lot like Erlang?

Could you talk about that neo language and also perhaps do some crash course on neo so we could probably see the difference

JS is a corrupted Scheme.

I love this guy, read many chpters of his book

Thoughts on the bevy engine built with rust? That game engine inspired my search for more videos on this topic and I was surprised to see no mention of it.

Type hints and type checkers exist 🤦‍♂️

Yeah you should defenetly use strict typing or basically add the types to variable names instead of making the code less efficient

Whenever you try to make things invulnerable to all complications, you are trying to make the world foolproof ... but the world will just create a more powerful fool.

Design Patterns is/are primarily about providing features not available in your programming language. In the 1950s, subroutines were a design pattern. Nowadays, it's a machine language opcode. 2) - Getters and Setters are actually a mortal sin. You might GET your bank balance, but you never ET it ... you deposit or withdraw from your bank acount.

Great talk, very comprehensive and complete explanation of this, not so easy, topic

I still haven't seen one code sample where coroutines are better than callbacks. By better I mean more readable, easier to maintain, etc...

I don't get it, they boo people who come up with an actual algorithm for reversing a string and instead they glorify using the premade std::reverse function without even mentioning about its complexity ?

Wonderful lecture - thanks! I've been around since assembly language around the 1970's. . But isn't a try / catch structure at he end of the day not just a GOTO? You just adjust he stack pointer ?

Very interesting programing course. Excuse me please realizes different syntaxs

Hi, it the video from Michał Redford kowalczyk online? Thanks

10:46 _Static_assert is also a keyword since C11

To work around the problem with 'optional<void>' (which is isomoprhic to 'bool' btw), you could use regular void, i.e. std::monostate if you don't want to implement your 'Void/void_t' class

Great talk, I always love your talks that go very far afield to make points about software development. Only note - when given the choice of writing a function that takes a path to a file or a file object, choose the third option - just return the data instead. I am happy to call open and write myself, if it means I don't have to call io.TextIO to get the output as a string :D

suggestions for the following snippet that mixs type(signed/unsigned) in expression ``` signed char *ptr; if (ptr[0] == 0xff) ``` use the following ways, ``` char *ptr; if (ptr[0] == '\xff') // int_least8_t *ptr; // if (ptr[0] == -1) // uint_least8_t *ptr // if (ptr[0] == 0xff) ``` in cpp17, ``` byte *ptr; if (ptr[0] = byte{0xff}) ```

Brawo Kamil! ;)

Unsigned by default is dumb. At least in C++. It sounds great on paper, but in practice, its horrible Signed by default sounds bad on paper, but is best in practice.

when talking a new lang I'd expect memory management, null values, variable initialization, etc. He discovered microservices

So, the next programming language is "Misty"? I I doubt it.

Hearing Conor give a full talk about Python is almost like hearing him speak Polish

Rust has some merits, but thinking that it’s an appropriate tool in this space is a catastrophic mistake Guess you are going to find that out the hard way

Promo-SM ⭐

This was an amazing talk and for sure most in-depth technology-wise when it comes to space theme on a conference, thank you ❤

wooooo

Oh god this talk made me so furious! I agree with everything here and I've seen it so often! Especially the part about mutability and side efforts

0:00 - Speaker introduction 1:42 - Who am I? 3:06 - Rust's journey (from a crustacean point of view) 11:06 - What can we do? with the Embedded ecosystem 21:55 - Other domains and applications 28:00 - Rust, Adoption and Safety! and a bit more 31:08 - Communities 32:03 - AeroRust 35:08 - Join the community 35:36 - Open source workshop demo - Nanosatellites 43:00 - Mnogo space kits 44:06 - Conclusion 45:04 - Thank you! and Q & A

Incredible lecture! Thank you!

Very nice way of describing operators. It is good to follow.

Excellent talk! Thank you for spreading the word about combinators!

Rust ❤

Not only is range based for loop expressing the intent better, but it also usually prevents you from doing silly mistakes that we all make with off by one. It's safer language feature. Trailing semicolon used like a separator except in the last line in Rust functions (to return the last value)is just fine because writing in the whole language is a syntax error anyway. I'm kinda split if it's cool or concerning that python can have a 33-bit integer for example. It's nice that you don't overflow, but also what consequences does that have?

It is a paradox. I was Googling for explanations of why should I use discrminated unions instead of if else logic in my programming. Then I stumbled on this lecture. I already knew Bartosz from watching some of his videos on category theory. So I had high hopes of getting an answer. Then I watched one of the most fascinating videos I have ever seen. But my question remains unanswered.

Nice talk on Erlang.

This talk resonates a lot with features offered by functional paradigm - immutable data separated from methods, explicit flow, expressions instead statements.

Brilliant talk. Why so little views((