Video

Especially love the career choices linked to each indexes, which made the results session much more helpful and useful to the clients. Love it love it!! I have already incorporated this type of info in explaining data for WISC-5 for kids and their parents. They all are very appreciative.

may I ask whats the key difference between mcmi iii and mcmi iv?

There is no consensus about how to define intelligence nor is it universally accepted that it is something that can be meaningfuly measured by a single figure. Different societies value and promote different kinds of skills (see cultural relativism), the concept of intelligence is therefore culturally variable and can not be measured by the same criteria in different societies. Furthermore, the difference in intelligence between people in an ethnic group is greater than the average scores between the different ethnic groups (see qualia). Meaning: The intelligence of all populations is largely the same. Consequently, it makes no sense to propose relationships between intelligence and any other variables.

Thanks for posting this video!

The original version have to use the Caldwell scoring method validity scales for fake bad fake good, narcissism scale. But it wasn't intended to look at high scales and say 3 high this is a histrionic but may represent some somatiazation.

5:06 VCI, 6:07 VSI, 7:07 FRI, 19:03 Nonverbal Index, 19:40 General Ability Index

thank you for not pronouncing it dys-cal-cool-ee-ya, we don't cal-cool-ee-ete on cal-cool-ee-atets do we?

Still waiting on a more practical way to administer IQ tests remotely without sacrificing certain index scores. Is there something coming soon that makes administering these tests via Q-Global simpler?

Dr. Grossman, neither the manual nor your presentation addresses the diagnostic and interpretive confusion when trying to define the difference between BR scores 1-59, 60-74, 75-84, and 85-115. The manual implies on page 41 that BR scores below 60 are "relatively functional." Does this mean the same thing as "normal"? In your slide show at 25:49 you state that BR scores in the "style" range are "normal style." BR scores above 60 are elevated but nowhere in the manual or your presentation do you describe what "normal style" means. It is useless to have an undefined term being used that attempts to demarcate a standardized cutoff that literally tells us nothing about the examinee's score or how to interpret it. What do you suggest I write in my report: "Examinee obtained a BR score 62 on the SPHistr scale which means they have a "normal style" or "perhaps some of the histrionic traits are present which may be problematic" Why have the STYLE range if it can mean NORMAL and ABNORMAL especially when you refer to the TYPE range as ABNORMAL.

Genetics - Diet - Education (including parents and life experiences)

Your evaluation of CRPS patient shows virtually no understanding of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome as a disease. You even mistakenly call it CHRONIC Regional Pain Syndrome. You cannot compare pain of a patient with CRPS in arm to other patients with arm pain from other causes. CRPS can spread from one region to another. You cannot assume her headaches were stress headaches without understanding CRPS as a disease. Your reasoning is very simplistic for a complex disease and results in bogus outcome predictions. Has this instrument been scientifically validated?

So excited for the automated essay composition scoring feature :) Thank you for sharing this webinar.

Do we know why the test is not being sold anymore? I didn't see any anouncement for the Tea-ch 3 and yet the second edition seems to be discontinued.

This was an interesting intro. Where is the rest of the presentation?

I got this score MMPI-2 Validity scales suggest a valid profile (Welsh code: 89+6-375241/:0# L+K-F/); what does this mean?

Very helpul information. Thank you! Dr. W

Very helpful!! Thank you! Dr. W

Thank god all those years of hard work from numerous people are being rewarded by uploading things like this and ensuring anyone and everyone can once again achieve a truly invalid performance on the day of their appointment!

Venn diagram at 29:16 was very helpful, thank you

PLS-5 is the worst test I have ever given.

16:04 Scales

Is practising for digit span, bock design, coding or any other sub test considered cheating?

Thats without doubt the worst mic , i heard in my entire life on any course . Sounds like a recived phone call from an old telephone booth in africa in the middle of nowhere .

I find it difficult to download this to my phone

Excellent

I love Iq tests. Is the wais more accurate measure of Iq than the national iq test on tv 20 years ago.

Very useful info. Looking forward to get the updated version in Norway.

Hello! I am also wondering how we can change scores after the subtest has been completed? Thanks

49:00

Low IQ is the CAUSE of social problems; social problems are NOT the cause of stupidity. Anyone with common sense knows this to be true.

How can I correct an answer after a subtest is completed? I have found a video on this referencing the old app, and referencing buttons/tabs that do not exist in the current app.

I don't think this is an option now. But the app looks a lot different and I'm not finding all these options. Came here trying to figure out how the heck to get to subtest results. They seem arbitrarily available sometimes and not others. I'm sure it's not arbitrary, but I sure haven't decoded the path to find them.

Is the teacher questionnaire for the PK teacher. It just assumes the person administering it is their current PK teacher?

Having no timer on the Qglobal is a really braindead move, sure things can happen therefore messing it up but why would you not have a timer on the session regardless? It just doesn't make sense from a technical standpoint. more often than not an online timer that is exact to when the exam starts and ends would be more helpful rather than a physical one. That is the biggest issue i have with this.

Is the rest of the webinar available to watch?

I'm a nlgger

Thank you for this! The lecture was very good.

I'm dyslexic but never got tested

where is...where is the information?

'promo sm' 💃

Can you share the link for the skill/ability/indicator chart?

Looking back on my old testing and something isn't adding up. I have superior processing speed, below average working memory. But above average matrix reasoning. How is that possible? What does it mean.

Not exactly the most informative video...but not sure what I was expecting to hear in 20 seconds

Super informative, thanks!

Oddly enough I was expecting more information related to the WAIS when I clicked on the link. Here is more information... Apparently spatial addition has been added, I'm pretty sure the new blocks are blue and white, a running digit span task, naming speed, and set relations (whatever that is). It would be nice to talk about these in your video

Will it be available on Q-Interactive upon release? Not seeing that explicitly stated on the website.

Where does that Dyslexia range classification live? I can't locate it in the Technical Manual and don't see it on the standard WIAT4 protocol.

Thanks for sharing .. Are you providing ceirtfied courses for this test ?

thanks

Thank you for this great learning video!! It helps me a lot.