Video

No

Definitely won’t be a civil war but in this specific scenario the country side about to get overrun for resources by the cities could just implement a scorched earth strategy. They would more likely be able to move further away and to survive off the land over their city counterparts.

They absolutely wouldn't. The right has all the weapons. Also, the vast majority of members of the United States military tend to side with the right, and funnily enough dislike the Left dominated government.

if only teddy won

The rural America has a rifle behind every blade of grass.

Us and uk nightmare during 3am be like

Us and uk nightmare during 3am be like

CANZUK and The US Would be an unstoppable pair

They already did. Clinton softened the belly and bush capitalize off the 9-11 death blow

Get your LGBTQ agenda out of the schools and we may avoid a war.

The federal government and "some" of the military. The military hates them as much as we do.

Finally someone who gets it. Good thing is, the SCOTUS cannot make law. These are just rulings they are NOT law. RESTORE THE VOTE

NO

lol The cities would starve

Does the RCC need a new pope?

How can you expect Britain to become the world police? They are struggling with their economy and their military. According to a US general he warned that it would take Britain 5 to 10 years to be able to field a division of about 25 to 30k troops for war.

Where will the glory of America go? I don’t want America to become a second class nation without the power to do what we wish.

After all the Fruitloops and grape drank has been looted from the stores, and the city boys can't feed themselves, it wont last long. How many in the densely populted cities have any way to get around? They'll have to wait for the fight to come to them. Everybody i know knows how to hunt, fish, raise food and preserve it for later. Im ready. Somebody say when.

Dude doesn't know what he is talking about

BS: nothing more than a socialist daydream. First all the Democrats they would recruit would get mad and go home when you refuse to use the proper pronoun or miss gendered them. So they wouldn’t be anybody to fight. The conservatives might hang around for a while but then college football season will start and they will be headed for the nearest TV with beer. What everyone refuses to accept is that if you get away from college campuses. Get out of the democratic run cities. What you would find it’s just a bunch of Americans going about their day-to-day life. Yeah they get pissed off but the next morning they gotta get up and go to work because somebody’s gotta pay the car note and somebody’s gotta pay the electric bill somebody’s gotta pay for the food for the kids and oh yeah we got to get that house note paid. But there’s always the weekends BBQ and sports.

There is not a snowballs chance in hell of the city dwellers overwhelming anything but taxi drivers and corner stores. My private parts are even laughing at this. Send them out here. Watch 'em come running back. The ones who make it, that is. There will be few.

What a misinformed fellow this is. Where will those urban areas get their food and water? A major city is three days from chaos, i.e., when the food stops arriving, it will be bedlam in the streets!

Video starts at 7:00

Let America lead it

Short answer: no Long answer: also no

There is no group less capable of winning a civil war than the left wings. Hell they won't even be able to get along with their own side bc of their impossible woke philosophies that no two liberals even have the same understanding of.

It is a good point that it would be harder to organize in the countryside but let’s be real, if cell phones are still working we will be at every American legion, gas station, and police station pretty damn quickly to organize. Russian farmers and rural civilians were not armed like Americans either.

I find it hard to believe Hamilton County, Tennessee (Chattanooga) is red.

The military wouldn't divide. It would be the government and military vs the people who are wanting change

As an American I do think we need more strong democratic players in the world. I think a more integrated Europe is more likely than CANZUK, but if that’s what the other anglophone countries wanted I’d wholeheartedly support them. My concern is if a divisive conflict like the Iraq War comes up again, is there going to be a situation where the members disagree on whether to get involved? If three countries are for it and one against, will the dissenting country be dragged along? Or will all the nations have to sit it out? Also, and this is very important, even if the nations completely fused into one country, only half of CANZUK would be protected by NATO. Only territory in the Northern hemisphere is protected, which is why Hawaii and the Falklands are not covered despite belonging to member states. Either CANZUK would have to leave NATO, or all of NATO will have to agree to expand the scope of Article 5, which will then open it up to all territories of member states. Finally, what will this mean for other treaties CANZUK nations have? Will Canada pull out of its free trade agreement with the U.S. and Mexico? Will the other Anglo countries join the agreement? Also NORAD is the joint aerial defense force that is jointly operated by the U.S. and Canada. I can’t see the U.S. being willing to disengage from the defense of Canadian Airspace given how Canadian security is directly linked to the U.S. At least not without some reluctance.

pax romana: this one really established many things, and surely was important monsieur z: ...yeah, some things were a bit weird, but he sure was a lot dovah: this guy fucking sucks. 11/10

Interesting analysis but you might want to consider the communists in the cities are largely unarmed, whereas the more rural areas are relatively heavily armed. Another consideration is that it would not be difficult to blockade routes into the mostly unarmed cities and watch the rats eat each other.

"The world doesn't need, and doesn't want a continuation of the American Empire" is definitely some high level Chinese propaganda

I enjoyed this video! One thing I was a little confused about though, it describes the Midwest as "largely Catholic," which I'd never really thought of it as. I'd considered it more of a "mixed" region. While there are definitely more Catholics than, say, the South, I thought those Midwestern states all had a significant Protestant majority. idk I'm sorry if I'm nitpicking, I'm not trying to correct, I guess I just don't understand and I'm curious how these things are judged? (I'm mostly saying this as a Midwesterner who experienced huge culture shock when I moved to the Catholic-dominant Mid Atlantic, as I'd previously considered it one of the major differences between the two regions.)

Tell me you know nothing about rural areas without telling me.... what a joke 😂

Trump won’t win again

Bring it

they have to put you on a spectrum to create a false dichotomy in order to make themselves seem sane or good

Ah yes a new British empire, this time everyone's named Abdul.

It would have let to war between Prussia and Britain in the 1860s. Simple answer.

That's easy for you to say, but have you been in the military?

Dude the city people don’t even know how to hold a rifle.. most country kids do that before hitting 10 most people who live in cities have family who do not so I’d take the country over cities

About 50% of the Scots want to leave the UK.

Starve the cities…

Miami is absolutely not a subregion of the south. The city, alongside south-east Florida extending north to the Martin County line, has its own unique civilization. This region is far more Hispanic than the US average, but it has little in common with the similarly-Hispanic southwest border region. Part of the reason for this differentiation is demographic; the southwest is largely Mexican-American, while most of SE Florida's Hispanic population comes from the Caribbean and South America. This factor, exacerbated by the excesses of the left within said populations' original homelands, tend to make SE Florida far more politically conservative than other largely-Hispanic areas of the US. Really, SE Florida is unique in terms of its relative "new-ness" to large-scale settlement, its cultural and financial ties to South America and the Caribbean, and the largely northeastern origin of its white population. The most accurate description I've heard of the region came from Joel Garreau's Nine Nations of North America; he refers to this civilization as "the Islands," and considers it predominantly Caribbean in character.