Video

If this is the case then this is a universe thats moving backwards starting from the end, that is parallel to are current universe starting from the beginning, Perpetual to each other in a motion of infinity. What will happen has already happened and what hasn't happened yet will. The Big Bang versus the Big Crunch working with in tantrum everlasting never ending looping and overlapping each other is what my simple minded self believes in and is what makes this universe so special out of many others. I think it is what attracts dimensional entities here in this part of the cosmos in the first place, a universe showing that it has just been born but is dying down at the same time. It's the perpetual motion and the such making of set universe that keep a universe from dieing out of existence key is the knowledge their trying to obtain. Maybe because this universe contains so much life at an abundance across each and every Galaxy The Immortals are trying to debunk by extracting life essence from life itself from every cluster to further understand what keeps the clock ticking here and not in there universe. Personally I do not understand why they would be searching for something we take for granted which is life for a period of time. Maybe they no longer wish to be immortal and just simply want to live and die to be reborn again, like here and this universe. If you truly think about it being immortal sucks watching everything around you grow old and wither away after some time. Immortals get a chance to see everything, get to learn everything get to be everything that was and will be over and over again with no ending. We tend to ask what is the meaning of life? Wile they ask what is the meaning of death? Everything I have spoken about here just now have enlightened me to a better understanding and is the first time I ever thought about this outside the box'. I never thought I would have this conversation to myself and hope someone out there understands what I am talking about and comment back there thoughts about this here. I understand this is the wrong page to post this here. I'll find a page that better understands and hopefully I'll get a few replies back and we can talk about this all in detail with people that also fully understands this semi conversation to myself. God bless to you and have a good 👍🏻 rest of your day 😁

all the videos untill this have been dreadful lacking volume and so on..totally useless. It makes me angry.

"uhm, so uhm ehm, ehh, umm" Come on for fuck's sake.

This is an anorgasmic moron coping

Great job fixing the audio early! You might of added a note that it will be fixed so people don’t click out of the video too fast❤

O lo😊😊

Why is Animal Liberation not available in English on Audible?

Bisakah anda menyediakan subtitlenya

Audio is really bad, could not understand what was being said as a background video, thank you for posting maybe others don’t have a hard time

Appalling sound quality. How does anyone stand to listen to this?

Does anyone know where I can find her literature on Darwin and gender bias in the research?

the trouble I have with these evolutionary explanations rooted in contemporary observations ("empirical evidence") is that soooo much time has passed since the inception of the trait, here, the species's orgasm itself. quite apart from the shape and form of the orgasm over time, for orgasms occurring from appropriate stimulation of the clitoris, isn't Professor Lloyd assuming that the human clitoris we see today is effectively the same size as it has always been, even over millions of years and across very different substrates? that seems highly unlikely and yet a massive missing data point. nonetheless, she concludes from that dubious assumption that the low rate of orgasm from unassisted intercourse (32:00) is the result of a lack of proper attention, i.e."...appropriate necessary rhythmic stimulation..," to the glans clitoris. Well, it could also be that relatively recent selection pressure has been for smaller clitorides; indeed, a selection against unassisted female orgasm, especially as human societies became more complex and ruthless in controlling Others, importantly their horny females. Perhaps, our foraging ancestors left the trees with massive hyena-like clitorides confusing predators and orgasming on demand with penetration. who knows? (well, besides the misandronists) it's not like we can check the fossil record for clitorides let alone orgasms.

What a weirdo doing the introduction. Wth?

I've known Margaret since she was born. I miss her. Rest in Peace, my friend! Thom xo

Vegan 5 years now! We can do this people

Kendrick Lamar brought me here

Thanks putting subtitle on questions.

1:12 I’m a living philosopher who can make the change of I was given one chance to speak in public. I won’t write a book.. I am not interested in praises. I’m only interested in changing the world for the better for all on the planet. Peter Singer is wonderful don’t get me wrong. Just not the “only” one who can live up to it. God bless him for what he’s done. I have something that will offer the next level. Could we talk for 5 minutes? It would change your lives.

Feeling Empty? What does it take to be a Christian? Faith in Christ Matthew 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. John 3:16-17 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. The Gospel 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. Faith Alone in the Death, Burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ (God) to Forgive your Sins through His blood. By believing in this you have become a new creation in Christ, and have a promise you’ll be with the Lord in your death, but also have the Holy Spirit living in you forever as a guide for you. If you believe, from that moment on to eternity you are saved (No matter how much you struggle with sin after). Romans 3:23-25 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; Romans 3:10-12 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Hell or Heaven? Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Matthew 23:13 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? HELL IS A REAL LOCATION ALL NON CHRISTIANS WILL BE THERE AND ARE THERE John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Heaven or Hell? A PRAYER FOR SALVATION THROUGH FAITH “I know that I am a sinner and need your forgiveness. I believe that Christ died for my sins and rose three days later from the grave. Thank you for forgiving my sin on the cross. You alone Jesus is now why I have forgiveness and eternal life. Thank you in Jesus name. Amen.” If you have prayed this with faith you are Forgiven and now in the Body of Christ. Welcome brother or sister. Remember saying a prayer does not save you, having Faith does in Jesus and what He did for you. I encourage you to find a Godly Bible believing church as well God Bless

This might sound mad, but could it be possible that our observable universe is actually contained within a black hole? .... perhaps the missing matter and energy are outside of our host black hole?

The quote mentioned by Professor Achinstein appears to be at the beginning of 'On the dynamical evidence of the molecular constitution of bodies' 1874/1875

Anyone who thinks that they can just torture animals and it's okay with God is wrong. When God gave us Dominion he meant we are supposed to be the caregivers. In the Old Testament the only reason why animals were sacrificed was because of man's sin. If man would stop sinning animals wouldn't have to die. A lot of people who call themselves Christians don't seem to be using discernment these days. So my only thought is they must be wolves in sheep's clothing.

Your time is precious. But....I already knew when there is no spring in Nashville, Tennessee this year that the global warming is here and it's very scary. The fires here in the US it's not just here....France and across the world. I'm sorry but let me enlighten you with the climate changes. The spring and fall weather is disappearing now. There will be only two seasons that will remain.....winter and summer. I will explain why this is happening. The earth axists is off now....as the earth turns with the gravital pull it's actually moving closer to the sun along with the ozone layer being thin doesn't help because the ozone keeps the earth cooler. You are correct about carbon dioxide being the biggest problem.

52:40 Paraphrasing, the questioner asks "How do you give meaning the the change" and then goes on to say that it refers to the "absolute standard of proper time" then moments later he contradicts this by saying "the absoluteness is lost" without noticing how absurd this is. Einstein's insistence on Mach's universal frame eliminates the absolute relativity of SR which leaves a parameter permanently undefined, so this problem he gives has been solved by postulating a real preferred frame dictated by gravity. IE ALWAYS determining which twin is actually older instead of it remaining permanently undefined as it does in the defunct precursor of SR. (and then he'll later mention they discard Machian frame after he's just made a complaint predicated upon discarding the solution thereof) 53:40 He goes on "...that would be to get rid of the metric as one of the basic structures." Patently false. This comes from modern theoretical physicists not understanding poincare-lorentz anisotropic constancy. They don't even know there IS an illusion, no less understand how it works. It's a failure of education that they don't know enough history to understand the equal but different physical interpretation of relativity. Looking for some version of absoluteness in a theory called "relativity" seems comical to me... If we remove the earth and everything else in he universe and leave only the oceans of this place, what's the absolute stationary we compare to when we are caught in one of the flows of the ocean?? It's an asinine question when properly contextualized. 54:07 "We don't think here's a Mach principle as he repeatedly asserted" Yes, that's because you don't understand and think you went beyond him, but instead you screwed it all up. I blame leaded gasoline lowering global IQs during the latter half of the 20th century... 54:38 "This is an argument from authority" [...and then he pounds the desk with self-congratulatory glee] No, it's a recontextualization of remarks being used to elucidate a specific worldview for examination. It is the rebuilding of lost history, but this guy doesn't understand the alternative and therefore cannot even conceive of the alternative's existence, no less the interlocking coherence of that alternative. Ergo pearls before swine is the more apt figure of speech to use here. The problem they have with the Machian frame is that they don't understand the necessity of a preferred frame because they cannot comprehend the problem with leaving an undefined quantity (or willy-nilly picking it) because they still believe that special relativity is finished valid by itself, when it's not. They don't grasp how adding another real dimension just pushed the twins paradox into problems with block universe and one's undefined relative initial placement on that block. They have been taught to swallow the belief that leaving a reference quantity undefined can be complete. It cannot be. You MUST have the Machian frame at a minimum. Minkowski spacetime and all the subsequent theories that expand reality into more and more dimensions are just methods of cheating and introducing magic by altering the fundamental nature of reality. Doing it in a structured way via math is no more excusable than making new assumption about reality such as fairies, it's just better at being misleading towards having one act in a superstitious manner. Numerologists have always thought they were superior to other magical thinkers, but personally I find them to be worse. Namely they cannot understand the critical difference between a representative language and what it represents and how those two things can be disconnected. They don't intuitively grasp the concept of equal divergent interpretations within a single mathematical structure. They don't sense their own connections between the map and the territory and therefore cannot examine them or recognize their presumptuousness. Thus it's nearly impossible to teach them about the mathematical equivalence of Lorentz-Poincare ether with relativity (something well known by anyone with good historical grounding) and how it can still be valid today fully within the experimental record. They reject it outright before even comprehending it because of a fundamental failure of being a numerologist: Conflating map with territory. ...forget even trying to discuss the one-way speed of light with them.

I think what is unclear here is the central question. Is the shortening of a rod ontologically real within a given frame (the frame of the rod itself) because it is an effect upon matter, or is it merely perspectival that we are missing some of the view of a foreshortened rod as it cuts through a 4D reality almost as though infinitesimal sections placed at infinitesimal intervals of it have been displaced into another less accessible part of reality. Shortening as an impact upon matter versus a simple aspect of viewpoint location in the universe are two radically different theories with the same mathematical outcome. Namely it's one of the ontological dividing lines originally placed between Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz-Poincare ether. Weyl was the primary force, starting at Bad Nauheim, to try to force Einstein more fully towards a Minkowski-like interpretation (the perspectival shortening) but in the debate itself Einstein referred to the more clearly articulated preferred frame of the Machian view found in his may speech on the "ether" of relativity delivered to Leiden. (leaning more towards physical shortening that returns to Poincare-Lorentz ontology) My question to you is if you understand the that invariant nature of ds and therefore the length of a rod specifically requires the assumption of isotropic constancy instead of the equal anisotropic solution of a 2 way experiment which also gives the *appearance* of constancy? There are many quotes in which Einstein expresses the failure of constancy and it is this very point upon which it all hinges and it is to *isotropic* constancy that Einstein refers when he decries its validity When rods and clocks are solutions to the theory instead of some abstract ideal, they no longer assume the isotropic constancy of he 1 way speed of light, but subsume the question once again into physical dynamics which are agnostic to the question of light speed isotropy. The former idealized rods and clocks were a placeholder for the naïve isotropic constancy of light whereas the fuller theory that produces the rods and clocks returns fully to Poincare and therefore allows anisotropic solutions once again. (leaving Minkowski spacetime as much an abstraction as "electron holes" still used in modern electrical engineering. Not real, but mathematically useful) Thus my program of re-examination starts upon the same dividing point succintly commented on by Popper, which lies in the physical differentiation of Poincare Lorentz interpretation of relativity with Einstein Minkowski interpretation - though you are speaking about the same issue in a different manner. I hope that fact is clear. A geometric interval can cover over the dynamics of a real systems (rods) which might be best described in the case of an anisotropic 2 way path being equal to an isotropic 2 way path. This is because the geometric interval can inherently abstract away real underlying dynamics of a reliable illusion such as described by Lorentz-Poincare by merely removing directionality in place of the average full two way trip. (the actual underlying dynamics) Phonons don't exist but are useful. Electron holes are useful but don't exist. Spacetime is useful but is not real. Truths within limits have limited usefulness. Extensibility. Natives believe the "spirit of the fishing tree" grants them fish when it's just the neurotoxin released during the ritual of prayer. they have a theory that is empirical truth. That truth is limited however in it's abiity to connect with the rest of reality and be extended. The neurotoxin interpretation is also true but it is a greater truth because it is more extensible and has greater integration with the rest of the system of reality that lead towards the ability to predict. Ability to predict limits the area of search for new truth down from infinite therefore there is a heirarchy of truth. Spacetime is a lesser truth to Poincare's relativistic ether which can be applied to GR because of the fact that they both descend from MacCullagh's ether reintroduced by Fitzgerald leading to special relativity, and generalized by Mie and then used by Hilbert to help Einstein finalize GR. GR is an aether theory in denial. The only thing Einstein got wrong in the 1920 speech is the claim that space doesn't move against itself when when know via experiment there is lense-thirring or frame-dragging.

Be thou the first true merit to befriend. His praise is lost, who stays 'til all commend. Alexander Pope

Such a bore ! Worse person ever ..tortures most female students Crap English Awful misogynist

Way over my paygrade ! At this point at 24:31 when she states 'when the apparatus knows what you're doing" is when I got lost ! (since when does a mechanical construct *knows* anything ?)

In reality we are just talking heads and the brain is in control because as to the I the me it does not really exist but it is only an illusion.

Cow by Andrea Arnold brought me here

oh boy. i'm old and have seen changes....learned old-i like it!

Fascinating speaker. Thanks.

Fun fact: there isn't such a thing as a quantum field in a QFT, just wave functionals on the infinite dimensional space of classical field solutions to the Euler-Lagrange equations.

I am finding an issue with the inequality used. You need not only variables for each possible way of measuring the outcome of the photon, but also variables for each orientation of measurement corresponding with an actual outcome. I.e.: N11_1, N12_1, N21_1, N22_1, N11_0, N12_0, N21_0, N22_0. No wonder your inequality is violated, already an abuse of notation and poor assumption!

I understand the words. But my understanding drops significantly when going from words to phrases to sentences. So that at end of the first 10 minutes I am completely lost. Clearly above my intellectual level!! 😳

Cool stuff ⚛️

Vegan for Animals ❤ one of the best decision of my life.

“That’s what I used to look like before I took too many psychedelics” 😂😂😂

There are no valid arguments for unnecessarily eating animals (and it can be handled so it's never necessary for anyone)

👏👏👏

1:08:10 space is curved or not ? space is not curved , but light travels at curve-linear path . thus in order to model quantum scale and astronomical scales , a cure-linear coordinate system ( as i have described in my compendium in mathematics ) , is required . Thus at middle ground scales , objects like surface of a planet can be measured to be straight and not curved as external geometric. measurements .

30 :00 Hermitian operator = position , and you connect regions in the state space ; with sentences ( which - equation ? = an algebraic equation derived from empirical data by interpolation and then time operator being Khalili operator | or | a probabilistic wave equation { a stochastic modeling of a system } , whose state spaces are interpreted as various energy levels [ momentums ] derived from [ being function of ] only the geometric position , of those possible quantifiable entities ; since time is not included in the equation { time operator does not exist > as an endogenous operator within the model } ) , that gives truth conditions , and so forth and a non-Boolean logic . ref => Hermitian adjoint {Hermitian operators} | in Wikipedia + Self-adjoint operator | in Wikipedia on semantic analysis of ...

Great talk! Looking forward to any more content from Corey Maley.

Nice and interesting information mam. Thank you 🙏🙏🙏

The moderator man doesn’t believe in what he’s introducing…. What a joke!…. Worst introduction ever! It’s actually disrespectful to laugh at eating animals in a room that supposed to talk about animal liberation! I wish this awesome writer/speaker would have a better introduction. Peter singer is amazing.

Regardless, of these so called video's and studies, I will continue to eat meat, eggs, cheese and drink milk and not eat plants.

420 views, nice

I can't wait for the new generation of particle physicists to replace the old guard... All photons are capable of fusion & fission, it's not that hard to understand...

Wonderful to hear some empirically responsible philosophy engaging with a notoriously wobbly epistemic zone. I'm sure many other people have already mentioned that the charge of 'Comforting epistemological delusions' can be leveled at Naturalism - or indeed, any attempt by primates to fully systematize what philosophers laughingly refer to as ''reality''. Very fine work Sir, many thanks! M.

what ethical way to eat meat?