Video

Maybe some disinfectant, a kind of cleansing, or a light inside would have helped, it can, you know, do a real number on the virus. Perhaps the medical doctors should have looked into that.

In my country: Step 5: End of the road in case you are no woman.

Very informative! Thanks.

Too bad that company mission statements (visions they are calld over here) usually are changed overnight without any participation of 99.99% of the employees in their reformulation.

Haha, how little liberal of YT to delete my too liberal opinion on the airplane crash example for libertarianism.

Too bad the humanist manifesto III speaks of humanism as if this were a homogenious monolith. Thats just as erroneous as when a priest of a small apostate church hubristically claims to speak for the whole of christianity. Dont steal the name humanism, which describes a whole tree of philosophical approaches with the human in the focus, choose a clear name for your branch.

So, thanks for the clarification in this video. I understand now, how the english (not my first language) word "gender", which so far simply ment "gennus" when describing forms in language, has been extended in meaning onto the social construct that nowadays many people, of whom unfortunately the far majority isnt capable of engaging in a clear and calm conversation, talk so much. Lets just recap, that the biolocical variety in between male and female human geno- and phenotypes even though there is a strong relation cannot function as an adequate/complete explanation to the social construct of this new meaning of the word gender. For social constructs, some are more or less forced on us (like money e.g.) and some are purely voluntary (like marriage e.g.). Some may even be exclusive (like citizenship). The social construct of gender is also an example of one that is purely voluntary. I really cant see nor feel any obligation for me to follow the sexually related fantasies of other people. People allways will seem to me how I see them and never how they want to be seen by others. Demanding doesnt really make things better for them, it just shows them to be cought in a state of confusion. If they want to play their new sexual fantasy game, they have to find voluntary participants, like in any other forms of sexual encounters.

Nonsense... you don't understand generic expression or the compounding effects of admixture Let alone hybridization of ancient hominids devonisians and neanderthal that DIDN'T happen in Africa Meanwhile Africans have primitive ghost DNA. You can look at a skull, thigh bone, or tooth and it tells you more about race than if we took your flawed reasoning Guaranteed Einsteins grand kids are smarter than your average african and usain bolts grand kids will be faster than einsteins

It is impossible to have an open debate on this topic because CZcams removes comments that contradict germ theory. I challenge anyone who believes in germ theory to debate me on a free speech platform. I would like to suggest some free speech platforms, but CZcams won't allow me to mention their names.

You managed to make an over 8 minute video about the germ theory and so-called denialists and you didn't provide one single iota of substantive evidence based information on the foundational methodologies for finding a novel pathogenic microbe and proving it is the specific cause of a specific set of symptoms known as a disease. You mention logical fallacies - this entire video is an appeal to authority / begging the question / circular reasoning exercise. You don't have to mention Bechamp or Pasteur to refute the psuedoscience of the germ theory of disease - but you DO have to look at the foundational studies and the details of the methodologies for "isolating" a novel virus and proving it causes a novel disease. We can start with SARS and end with SARS-CoV-2 as the perfect place to begin shredding apart the house of cards that is virology.

lol wrecked that imbecile

I try not to write comments on youtube, but nostalgia has brought me back to this video. I wish to pay tribute for the intellectual journey which this video has aided me on. I present you with a paradox. No, of course there is no dragon in the garage, and you've argued perfectly well why we should discard such notions as nonsense. However, what are we going to do about the dragon in our garage? The impact it has on the physical world is demonstrable even with skeptics present. One only needs to consult the dragon enthusiasts to learn whether the garage dragon has strong feelings about you. You might not be able to escape the reach of the garage dragon if it seeks you out, as it does many across the world. And yes, the dragon could be a malevolent force. But recognize that the dragon could be a benevolent force as well. If we instead name that dragon "language", we can use it to clumsily bridge the gap from one person's mind to the next. If we instead name the dragon "reasoning", we could use it to construct arguments that garage dragons don't exist. Name it "rights" and we can use it to define which actions are or are not permitted among us. We could name it many things, such as capitalism, tarot, gender, anarchy, or "the correct side of the road", and they would all have different effects on the world. A dragon named "ethics" might be able to explain to us which of the other dragons we can trust, and which we should fight against. Thus, it is important paradox to remember that the garage dragon are made up, fictional, and yet very real.

global warming isn't a problem. at all. neither are neti pots.

“Trust science”

I hear your point about Trump being elected president, but I suppose Bidenomics and covid Lysenkoism are all excusable. - give a balanced view for goodness' sake.

Are you alive?

Thank you for this video. I think your production skills are fantastic. I like the images and you speak very well. Your cadence is perfect. T. Midgley's work led to a great and lasting shift in human thought and consciousness. In his day, work focused primarily on solving the problem. Once a problem with solved the work was done. Leaded gas and CFCs provided perfect solutions to automotive performance and refrigeration / gas propellance. These were brilliant advances in chemistry and technology which changed the world. But I am not convinced that there weren't voices of concern for human and environmental health when these advances became popular. We knew lead as a potent toxin. One volatilized into the air and deposited into the soil, it doesn't require great genius to conceive that human and animal kind would take up the lead into our bodies. I think I'm safe to say DUH, without being overly judgmental. I think it was really deceptive when Mr Midgley didn't inform his colleagues or the public that he was sick with lead poisoning for a whole year. This circumstantial evidence shows he knew all along the grave dangers of his new product. He had to know. Chemists of old were much more hardcore people than we are today. Today I am not willing to work without a fume Hood, protective clothing and eyewear, plus a safer process to deal with laboratory waste. Old school scientists prioritized the work over their own health by tolerating much discomfort and even illnesses for the work. As for chloro or fluoro hydrocarbons, presently our modern world continues to be addicted. There is no uncertainty about ozone destruction from these refrigerants and propellants. We Love convenience. And when you can't breathe that little asthma inhaler is a lifesaver. We love to live all over the world, frequently this is made possible by air conditioning. Our industrial thinking still prioritizes short-term gain over long-term sustainability. If this guy hadn't imagined it somebody else probably would have. Many of these inventions are just discoveries waiting to be found by the right mind at the right time. My belief interprets it as this: errors are powerful tools purposed for human learning. Pain, wrongdoings, hurt are catalysts for elevating generational consciousness. Lead poisoning is so miserable and devastating to life that I doubt humanity will accept industrial lead poisoning ever again. Now we fight to prevent it. This current generation is blessed by the sustainability model of engineering. The entire product life cycle needs to be thought of and risk to human health of the environment must be evaluated alongside product usefulness.

Regarding your list of characteristics of Lysenkoism to look out for. - A single charismatic leader. It just happened to be this way, its really irrelevant. It could just as well be the case that its a group of scientists promoting the same ideas. And your second point of going against the majority of scientists in the field is also irrelevant, It could just as well be the consensus of an entire field. The main characteristic in my opinion is insularity, hostility to criticism and other ways of protecting certain ideas from criticism. I think the clearest form of Lysenkoism today is gender studies and similar fields. Here is what Charlotta Stern writes about gender sociology: In my experience as a sociologist, I see many ways in which gender sociology tends to insulate itself from challenges to its own sacred beliefs and sacred causes. The sacred beliefs are to the effect that the biological differences between the sexes are minor and that the cultural differences between the genders have little basis in biological differences. The scholarly findings that challenge the sacred beliefs come from anthropology, developmental psychology, evolutionary psychology, the neurosciences, genetics, biology, and many other fields. For many decades now researchers have amassed findings of differences in competitiveness, aggression, sexual interest, risk behavior, and many other traits, and differences in brain physiology and neuroimaging, by many different methods and approaches. I investigated a sample of top cited gender sociology papers to test my impression, and indeed the findings illustrate extreme insularity. It saddens me to see students and scholars fall into insular communities of highly dubious sacred beliefs and causes. I propose that gender sociologists strive to undo insularity. (Charlotta Stern is associate professor and deputy chair of the sociology department at Stockholm University.)

👍👍👍

Invensible things is considerebly the reason you to faith, but away from reality 🥱👎

Today LMFAO NOVACAINE LASZLO WHOS CALLING PLEASE OH HI VLADIMIR PUTIN ITS ME Amy use my SSN it's in comments all over here. Tell IQ4 he's probably dead so I'll take WWW3 JOKES MONEY... MAN O MAN CAN MANNA TYPE. A birth to write..... WTF I'll type Ana Anunaki knocks Again

Ein tragischer Fall, der deutlich zeigt was sogenannte alternative Wahrheiten, das permanente Leugnen von wissenschaftlichen Fakten auslösen kann. Christine M. und ihre kleine unschuldige Tochter waren Opfer der AIDS- Leugnung. Beide würden mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit, so die Experten heute noch leben, wenn sie entsprechende Medikamente gegen HIV rechtzeitig eingenommen hätten.

But, isn’t Dawkins a gender essentialist?

Race doesn't exist. You just turned out a color. Culture DOES exist and people pair it with a skin tone, which is erroneous.

I loved how he bullied and made false dmca claims against children as well as set up fake fraud charity events on blog tv. RIP dickhead.

10:18 Cookin

why is he being a dick?

That's cancel culture.Myers has no personality.All he wants is to be popular.Now he's woke, because it's trendy.

Audience member: How do you justify the scientific method? Richard Dawkins: ...If you base the design of planes on science they fly... It works.

“As I’ve tried to stress, at the heart of science is an essential balance between two ... attitudes-an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive, and the most ruthlessly skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new.” - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

Listening to this all I can say is it sounds like humanism is just a list of platitudes in vague generalities

It's been a while C0nc0rdance. I miss your videos.

I didn’t know. Was Covid a factor?

Christine outlived nearly everyone from 1992 that took azt. Like show me one person who was diagnosed with hiv and took azt and outlived Maggiore. Just fucking one.

This video is bullshit.

Amoxicillin kills kids all the time, don't omit that.

Alan --- ALAN!!!

AIDS denialism still exits in 2024. What a shame!

Circumcision does not save lives... Hundreds of babies die from circumcision every year... You jerk off...

I almost died from amoxicillin too. Believe it or not people are allergic to amoxicillin. This is one anecdotal at best. She lived for decades after diagnosis of hiv. She died of pneumonia. Furthermore, she may have died from ATZ. There is no way of knowing. Now go take your booster.

this video aged like a fine wine we got no policys under trump no plan and even as covid ravaged americans and kille over a million people trump only gave himself tax cuts for huimself and his buddies. Didn't fix the border as he promised kept us in every war and made it impossible to find out the truth about drone strikes Made iran and Russia stronger Caved to china and North Korea then tried to illegally stay in power by making is own set of electors Threatened Gerogia to get him the votes he needed to win only looked for elction fraud in states he lossed MF deficit spent more than any dem in 4 years treid to pull us out of the climate change and has done everthing he can to make himself rich and america more isolated and weak

You're conflating false with wrong. When people say most research is false, they are stating that the conclusions are wrong and/or not supported by the evidence presented within the paper itself.

What about the people who have serious issues their whole loves, until they find out about msg? Is that placebo? Imo, playing it safe, is avoiding all forms of it. Not minimizing it. All symptoms are rampant, and we keep treating them with drugs, when it’s likely some new change in the last 40 years is the cause.

I miss this guy. I miss the pre-woke online atheist community as it was 15 years ago or so.

Hi Jonathan I read your article on the irreducible complexity of chemotaxis with interest because I had reached the same conclusion. As you say, it's not only the flagella engineering which appears statistically impossible to have arisen via natural selection, it's the combination of this with all which must align in the anatomy and physiology of all components facilitating chemotaxis. The number of components. The number of proteins. The precise positioning etc. Given that, even with a biased random walk, the system essentially overcomes random behaviour ie bringing about motility that moves towards attractants and away from repellents it is not surprising that multiple improbable phenomena must align. Of course there is something physical to permit a potential discernment ie as you move further from the source, the chemical dilutes and so a different concentration occurs between point A and B en route to source. This gives a differential to be detected but the means of sensing and directed motility is a far cry from the fact the potential is there. Has anyone tried to establish the probability of the flagella and chemotaxis occurring via random mutations (even taking into account some structures and proteins and mechanisms potentially preexisted eg the shift of usage of some anatomy)? I imagine it is statistically impossible. Have you also considered how certain phenomenon existed in an invisible state and yet the miraculous plasticity of organisms (and natural selection) brought them into play. Eg photons via photosensitivity became sensed and ultimately allowed sight. Molecules in atmospheres or fluids meant sound could evolve. Molecules to be sensed via smell (via lock and key and quantum phenomenon).etc... In other words, the evolution system coincidentally builds anatomy and physiology that takes phenomenon that preexisted billions of years and overcomes incomprehensible barriers in order to permit the sensing of these hugely varied information forms. But the real magic is the experience of qualia. The miraculous non physical yet correlating to said physical phenomena consciousness created minds eye models. These also must have been potentialities or they could not exist and yet they do (in a way mind would wish it). It's not that evolution wouldn't harness their existence but the fact 1. They exist (a miraculous phenomenon if not hyper normalised) and 2. The means arise that hone in on the ability to experience qualia (assuming the anatomy and physiology is in order to provide such experiences). It seems to me consciousness and intelligence is fundamental and this is not only responsible for life and all processes like evolution, but that it influences the evolutionary process such that it is not solely random mutations that drive it (likely a manipulation via quantum mechanics). I'm not sure this verifies most of organised religion foe me, but it does indicate fundamental intelligence and design. Keen to hear your thoughts. Best Matthew

I love Richard Feynman and have followed his advice since I was much younger. I am now around 60. I haven't always been liked for being honest though. I told one company I worked for after they asked me to assess a project for them, that they were wasting 50 K on a project that could be achieved for 3 K better using a microwave link and why. Well that didn't go well, because the people I was working with had already made plans to spend 50 K on their project, and I was being disruptive, rather than just giving it a rubber stamp. They spent the 50 K. Their system worked okay but it is now obsolete and they will spend more now having chosen their way, since that's the method they chose to employ. People needed to defend their incompetent descion rather than save the company money. I have no regrets though, since I would prefer to give an honest opinion over being a mindless "yes man"...

Sometimes I stop and wonder how can you feel anything else other than curiousity and awe over the beauty and comlexity of human condition when the subject of this video comes up. Why are some people so negative, so obsessed and upset over transgressions (voluntary or otherwise) of categories of sex and gender. Then I remember that it is but a symptom of our collective insecurities, so much of the culture is tied up on neat categorizations, so much depends on it. It starts with childhood stories and fairy tales and continues into adulthood with attires, bathrooms, languages, etc, etc, etc. I hope that some day we can rid ourselves of these needless chains as we mostly did with racial categories of the 19th century.

Not necessarily due to Plato, we generalize and categorize phenomena of the world

Lysenko is Fauci's idol.

0:56: I think A+ schould be also overlapped by the " religious" field. They clearly tried to bring a believe structure into the group of non-believers.