![Acadia Divinity College](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 548
- 821 007
Acadia Divinity College
Canada
Registrace 25. 01. 2012
The official CZcams channel for Acadia Divinity College.
Cultural and Social Paradigms
Join Joel as he introduces the final driver of change, Cultural and Social Paradigms.
zhlédnutí: 34
Video
Raising the Conversation Season 2: Episode 2 - Dr. Marion Taylor
zhlédnutí 39Před měsícem
Measha Brueggergosman-Lee in conversation with Dr. Marion Taylor, Professor of Old Testament at Wycliffe College, University of Toronto. Season 2 of Raising the Conversation is called Common Ground: Conversations about God. This season is hosted by Measha Brueggergosman-Lee, award-winning Canadian musician and Acadia Divinity College student. Measha invites guests from both Christian and non-Ch...
Raising the Conversation: Season 2 Episode 1 - Bruce Cockburn
zhlédnutí 36Před měsícem
Measha Brueggergosman-Lee in conversation with Canadian singer-songwriter Bruce Cockburn. Season 2 of Raising the Conversation is called Common Ground: Conversations about God. This season is hosted by Measha Brueggergosman-Lee, award-winning Canadian musician and Acadia Divinity College student. Measha invites guests from both Christian and non-Christian backgrounds with the aim to explore the...
Technology & a Digital Age
zhlédnutí 9Před měsícem
Join Joel as he introduces this month's driver of Change: Technology & a Digital Age! Floating Garden - Tech Music by: bensound.com License code: NMTITGN7A9DBG8RV
Introduction to Demographic Shifts
zhlédnutí 27Před 2 měsíci
Get a glimpse into the driver of change, Demographic Shifts. Music: Bensound License code: QGSNM4ZEZV1BEBBN
Introductions to the Drivers of Change
zhlédnutí 46Před 3 měsíci
Join Joel Murphy as he introduces the Drivers of Change! Music from: www.bensound.com/free-music-for-videos License code: 1HAX9VA75MHONILP
What is Futuring with Anna Robbins
zhlédnutí 24Před 3 měsíci
Join Anna Robbins as she introduces the concept of Futuring. Royalty Free Music: www.bensound.com License code: RBC2NE25XQNTYZFA
Mennonites and the Dutch Art World: Faith and Visual Culture in the Dutch Republic
zhlédnutí 99Před 11 měsíci
Dr. Nina Schroeder-van 't Schip delivers the 2023 Zeman lecture on the topic of "Mennonites and the Dutch Art World: Faith and Visual Culture in the Dutch Republic" The Zeman Lectures were established in 2009 in memory of Dr. Jarold K. Zeman. Born in Czechoslovakia in 1926, Zeman came to Canada as a student in 1948. He earned degrees from Charles University, Knox College, and University of Zuri...
A Call to Action - Rev. Dr. Lennett Anderson - Lecture 3
zhlédnutí 137Před rokem
A Call to Action - Rev. Dr. Lennett Anderson - Lecture 3
A Call to Accountability - Rev. Dr. Rhonda Britton - Lecture 2
zhlédnutí 50Před rokem
A Call to Accountability - Rev. Dr. Rhonda Britton - Lecture 2
A Call to Awareness - Rev. Dr. Rhonda Britton - Lecture 1
zhlédnutí 53Před rokem
A Call to Awareness - Rev. Dr. Rhonda Britton - Lecture 1
Chapel Service - Rev. Dr. Lennett Anderson - 2022 Simpson Lectures
zhlédnutí 402Před 2 lety
Chapel Service - Rev. Dr. Lennett Anderson - 2022 Simpson Lectures
Change with Purpose - Acadia Divinity College
zhlédnutí 769Před 2 lety
Change with Purpose - Acadia Divinity College
Preaching and Plagiarism Rev. Dr. Danny Smith
zhlédnutí 305Před 4 lety
Preaching and Plagiarism Rev. Dr. Danny Smith
Preachers! - Understanding and Caring for Your Voice - Dr. Christianne Rushton
zhlédnutí 149Před 4 lety
Preachers! - Understanding and Caring for Your Voice - Dr. Christianne Rushton
God Scotland and the Politics of Nationalism
zhlédnutí 112Před 4 lety
God Scotland and the Politics of Nationalism
What to expect this Fall at Acadia Divinity College
zhlédnutí 230Před 4 lety
What to expect this Fall at Acadia Divinity College
Red Couch Conversation with Rev. Dr. Doug Gay
zhlédnutí 160Před 4 lety
Red Couch Conversation with Rev. Dr. Doug Gay
Feels Like Mission? - Rev. Dr. Doug Gay - Lecture 3 of the 2020 Simpson Lectures
zhlédnutí 78Před 4 lety
Feels Like Mission? - Rev. Dr. Doug Gay - Lecture 3 of the 2020 Simpson Lectures
Stir It Up - Rev. Dr. Doug Gay - Lecture 2 of the 2020 Simpson Lectures
zhlédnutí 98Před 4 lety
Stir It Up - Rev. Dr. Doug Gay - Lecture 2 of the 2020 Simpson Lectures
All the Feels - Rev. Dr. Doug Gay - Lecture 1 of the 2020 Simpson Lectures
zhlédnutí 183Před 4 lety
All the Feels - Rev. Dr. Doug Gay - Lecture 1 of the 2020 Simpson Lectures
Running with the Horses - Rev. Dr. Stuart Blythe
zhlédnutí 302Před 4 lety
Running with the Horses - Rev. Dr. Stuart Blythe
Service of Induction for Rev. Dr Anna Robbins
zhlédnutí 86Před 4 lety
Service of Induction for Rev. Dr Anna Robbins
Hayward 2019 Red Couch Conversation with Dr Randy Woodley
zhlédnutí 292Před 4 lety
Hayward 2019 Red Couch Conversation with Dr Randy Woodley
Decolonizing Western Christian Theology - Dr Randy Woodley
zhlédnutí 2,4KPřed 4 lety
Decolonizing Western Christian Theology - Dr Randy Woodley
The Myth of History and Progressive Civilization - Dr Randy Woodley
zhlédnutí 872Před 4 lety
The Myth of History and Progressive Civilization - Dr Randy Woodley
Comparing Western and Indigenous Worldviews - Dr Randy Woodley
zhlédnutí 1,4KPřed 4 lety
Comparing Western and Indigenous Worldviews - Dr Randy Woodley
Be in the Know Acadia Divinity College
zhlédnutí 803Před 4 lety
Be in the Know Acadia Divinity College
Aula magnífica.
Truth overrides fact is very power full
Excellent learning from Dr wright❤
God bless you more
BEAUTIFUL🫂 Chicago, IL.
Ancient heresies never die. And Dale is certainly doing his part keeping Satans work alive. Tragic, eternally tragic. Revelation 6:12-17; 29:11-15 are indeed terrible warnings of what is to come.
Rev. Dr. Moss is such a blessing and light! 🙏🏿💜
This "God in some sense" recalls Dr Evan's "in a certain qualified sense"-how is that saying anything? In multiple senses, some unqualified, an apple is a tomato. In the sense that they start with "st", stoicism is string theory is step-dancing is strangulation.
Just as relevant today as it was when it was spoken.
Very good
So good
“Many of you will already know Prof Bart Erman. But let me now give him a proper introduction………” such Pompous pseudo academic formality is so tedious, especially when read with such stultifying meticulosity!! 🥱 Yes we know Bart! And we we’re hoping not to have you read out his exhaustive bio because we know we’ll be here all day. 😮
Seems like a lot of useless debate. Go spend time with your families.
I agree with Dan, I bought into some of Bart’s theories. Have recently been listening to Dan & have my peace back again.
However, historians and bloggers are now increasingly questioning whether the man called Jesus actually existed at all. He may be no more a historical figure than Hercules or Oedipus.
J Walton is a bit of a heretic!
Your face is a heretic.
Nice to hear my Grandfathers/ grandmother's voice and see them, ❤️
For Craig, this debate took place on Jan 19th, or the 20th, or the 18th. To insist that one or more of those dates is inaccurate is merely a wooden interpretation of the event. 😅
😂
First 20 min is a mixture of an argument from authority, an ad populem, with a dash of what I think of as the "veracity of Spiderman" argument (we know Spiderman to be a real superhero because of how accurately his chronologicalers represented New York City and the lifestyles of those who lived there at the time. The first 20 minutes were completely squandered. 😢
Took the words from my mouth
30 years later, this is more relevant than ever
That is such an amazing change of perspective! First time listening to Dr. Wright... I'm going to buy several of his books. Thank you! 💜
Dale Martin cites incorrectly?
God doesn't allow evil you do you get punished for it it's that simple
I very much appreciated listening to the lecture. Thank you.
Regarding the example of Jairus's daughter. only when speaking of the Bible would the story as written in Matthew and the story as written in Mark be considered inconsistent. It is more than a little nitpicking. Mark by the way does not have Jairus say that his daughter is "ill". The phrase used is that his daughter was "at the point of death". And Mark has the servants meeting Jairus and Jesus while they are still traveling to Jairus' home. Matthew does not have that event. He leaves out a few other details as well. Basically, Matthew compacts the story. In both, the daughter is dead before Jesus reaches the home and Jesus goes to her anyway. In both their travel is interrupted, and in both Jesus brings the girl back to life. I don't see the contradiction. It is quite reasonable to think that the father was imagining the worst, and when he met Jesus he may have said "my daughter is dying and she may have already died (while I was travelling to you)". I find it odd that skeptics are more literal in their interpretations of the Bible than I, a conservative Christian, am.
Do you think ‘Matthew’ was using ‘Mark’ as a source, or that he wrote his gospel independently?
@@endofscene Mark was likely one of his sources. [I say it cautiously because for a long time Matthew was considered to be first and Mark was thought to be an abridgment of Matthew. Scholarly consensus changes.] But Matthew clearly had other sources. Those that think the author of Matthew may have been an eyewitness, would say that Matthew copied some things from Mark as a matter of convenience or as a starting point. There is also an argument that both Matthew and Luke recognize some kind of "authority" (for lack of a better word) behind Mark. The tradition is that Peter was that authority behind Mark. So, they do not contradict, but only expand upon.
The question at hand is whether Jairus' daughter was dead when he approached Jesus. Yes and no, depending on which Gospel you read. Bart Ehrman's decision to highlight such an insignificant contradiction in the Bible is strategic. He understands that for those who are psychologically incapable of acknowledging the myriad contradictions within the Bible, presenting a clear yet minor one might just be the key to open their eyes. However, most of the time it does not work, and the person resorts to forgetting or to any rationalization.
@@vejekeIf you are going to make a semantic argument, which is what you are doing, then be more precise in your semantics. We can be fairly confident (from both accounts) that Jairus' daughter was indeed dead when Jairus approached Jesus. The question is "Did Jairus know that his daughter was dead when he first approached Jesus?" The answer I gave above is that he did not know with certainty, but suspected/worried that she was. In Matthew he expresses it with certainty and in Mark he expresses it with initial uncertainty (that becomes confirmed shortly after their initial meeting). Ehrman contradicted Mark (using your reasoning) when he reports that Mark says Jairus' daughter was ill. This not only is not what Mark says, it is a guess at what caused the daughters death. [Her death could have been caused by an injury rather than an illness.] Now I do not know how far Jairus travelled to get to Jesus, but to say "my daughter is at the point of death" would have a very different meaning if he only travelled 5 minutes than if he had to travel for 5 hours. But neither gospel gives that distance traveled. But given that they did not have motor vehicles back then I suspect it would be more likely 5 hours than it would be 5 minutes. The gospels do not, nor any of the New Testament, pretend to be an exhaustive verbatim account of every event or every dialogue that its books describe. No one, not even conservative Christians, believe that is what the New Testament writer's claim. Only skeptics present the New Testament in such a stilted way in making their straw man arguments.
@@skiamach6208 I'm not making the point you think I am. I'm actually saying that Ehrman points out a clear but minor contradiction because he understands that those who struggle to accept any contradictions in the Bible are less likely to engage in the kind of rationalization you're doing now, especially over something that's ultimately trivial. "dying", "at death’s door", "at the point of death", "at the last extremity", etc. Those, and the Greek text on which they are based, are expressions said about someone who is still alive, not about someone who has already died. So clearly depending on which gospel you read the daughter of Jairus was either alive or dead when he came to Jesus. People who are willing to accept that fact may come to realize the many, many other contradictions in the Bible. People who are not willing to accept that fact will most likely not see any other contradictions whatsoever, nor will they come to be able to do so. That's the reason why Bart is so nitpicky in this case.
I can´t see the problem. According the Bible god did so many monstrous deeds, that nobody in his right mind can call him loving or good.
Can´t see the problem. God allegedly did so many monstrous deeds according to the Bible that I can´t see how anyone can claim he is a loving being.
No Jew believed any being he or she was equivalent to Yahweh. There are many (new) PhD theses about what constitutes a "divine" being. When the Witch of Endor, in Kings, conjures the shade of Samuel, she says she sees a "divine being". That IN NO WAY meant the shade was equivalent to Yahweh. Jesus NEVER claimed to be a divine being, and his disciples never bought that crap.
Ugh, Stackhouse, the sex pest! Just another Christian pervert!
What's up with the sound quality?
Uh! If only you could do the sound for all you tube videos! Oh well.
@@tulpas93 I'm not a sound engineer. But they needed one
@ellie698 Sounded just fine to me (considering what I paid to listen to it), and it seems to me you have more of an ear for this kind of thing! Sounds engineering might be great for you! Good luck in whatever you do!
"some of my best friends ate lawyers" 😅😂
Prof. Ehrman is a rare gift.
I love this
What is the evidence to show that the new testament we have today is the same with what the original author has written.
As we all know, the universe is broken because man sinned. Heaven, on the other hand is perfect, because there are no men. It follows that only women go to Heaven !
"In some way"! 😇😎😉
this guy is in his own world....just read the text, and take it, at face value...
in the beginning God created the heavens, and the earth....so time, in the beginning, space, the heavens, and material things.....the earth....these three things came into existence at the same time....what is so strange, here...
Is the chapel message on the tower available?
Not on youtube, but you can find it on our podcast here: soundcloud.com/acadiadiv/immanuel-god-with-us-dr-john-walton
Thank you for sharing beautiful
❤
What can we know about Jesus, the son of God ? For example, where did he sleep and shop ? How often did he clean his teeth ?
All scripture should be judged by if it is kill, steal and destroy it is of Satan. If it is love, it is from the Father, Jesus dad. John 10:10. Twist it anyway a person wants to, but this does not change the Bible.
There is no evidence that says he did. None of the so called witnesses to the resurrection is verified with signed authorship. This is what I constantly keep calling out the apologists on in my own vids. Authorship of witnessed signature. The earliest texts written were decades after the fact, 30 years at best. This screams urban legend. At least Joseph Smith had 11 actual signatures of verified people who existed. I think they are lying but at least they say they were there. You have none for the resurrection and constantly the apologist uses the circular reasoning of using bible texts to prove the bible which is a huge fallacy. They do not win with us skeptics with this sort of bad speculation. Cheers, DCF
Ehrman says here that Mark presents Jesus as a merely human messiah, but in his debate with Licona he admits that Jesus is divine in the Gospel of Mark,
I think he's said Jesus himself does not claim to be God in Mark, not that the author does not perceive him as God.
I have benefitted and still do benefit from Dr Griffiths' ministry. He came several times to mid Wales to preach a series at the Keswick in Wales convention. I vaguely remember his series on Romans (60+ years ago), 2 Corinthians, Job and Luke. He gets to tghe thought flow of a passage and communicates it. He must be getting near 100 by now. Maybe someone would encourage him that his ministry has been faithful and fruitful.
As President Trump has said: a story is not untrue just because it did not happen.
👏🙂
There are too many inconsistencies of copies of copies of copies I could go on and on but WHY?