Video

@@JerryLim2002 no adapter needed.

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective hi sir just need your small help. I am beginner, i decide to get the Sigma 150-600mm lens. Do I need adapter for the lens? If yes then what kind of adapter do I need? Your help would be really appreciated.

@@JerryLim2002 hopefully you bought the Nikon F mount of the Sigma 150-600. Then you would need to buy the NIKON FtZ ii adapter.

Thank you! Hopefully there will be more to go to.

Thanks 😅

I'm sorry for your loss, but you can be thankful the media director position is in good hands with Bernie. And the turnout was amazing! I would guess 5-10,000 attendees easily. I can't wait to go back again.

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective that’s great to hear! I know Steve would be happy! It’s amazing that they only have one paid position in PVGP, everyone else is a volunteer!

@@mikebreazeale2563 use subtitles if it's difficult to understand the audio track.

@@lokthalas7540 so good!

Sharpest thing outside a Plena

@@martinhild thank you! I've had the Sigma 105 EX for about 5 years of macro practice. This one is so far superior in every way.

@@JRodPhotoArt after posting this I seen some on ebay for 750 😅

I've never owned a Z6ii camera. The Z6ii supports 14fps at 12 bit raw in single point focus. If you want 14 bit raw with tracking, its 10 fps. But you can find more information here on this review. photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-z6-ii/3

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective i mean you shoot a Z9 and its capable of 30fps burst, if the lens supported that speed, it’ll for sure support 14fps Z6ii. That is my question hahaha, im sorry if my question is a bit unclear initially. Im planning on switching to Z6ii from A7iii and planning to get this lens as well for sports

@@trippydante My mistake, i read it as you asking if the Z6ii shot 14fps. Its all good. Yeah the 70-200 VR2 can handle 14fps easily. Nikon doesnt limit your camera FPS based on the lens like Sony will do. My question is why are you switching from the A7iii that has more reliable autofocus for sports? I would personally go for the Nikon Z6iii if you are switching to Nikon and want an actual worthy upgrade.

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective hahahah my reason will be: 1. Ergonomics, sony grips becomes very uncomfortable when paired with heavy lens. 2. Burst speed, A7iii can only do 10fps and even im upgrading to A7IV its even worst at 6fps burst uncompressed RAW. While Z6ii capable of max 14 fps and it’ll be easier transition to upgrade to Z6iii. 3. Colour! 4. Autofocus wise, ive tested Z6ii before. My view on its autofocus is more towards like how you use the autofocus rather than what the camera has to offer on making it easier. Also sacrificing the autofocus on A7iii for better colour on Nikon actually lol hahaha.

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective yes sony does offer better cameras for sports like the A9 series, but i simply couldn’t afford the body and sony native lenses (to support the full burst speed) while nikon offer more burst rate on Z6ii than A7iii + they have tons of good dslr lenses that can be adapted to mirrorless and they are way way cheaper.

Its a great place!

@@photogrifmike thanks! Going by your profile photo I swear I seen you 😂

I thought stills were illegal, aint that what they use to make moonshine 😂 or is that why you were shooting them , tir put holes in them so as they couldnt be used and the moon 'd shine through the holes after all the liquor had done run out.. 😂

@@fergusodoherty-gy7wt just what you call photos or frames 😂😂

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective so you got a photo of the still ....I thought you shot holes in it ....or ....did you shoot the photo...of the still

Thanks for watching!

Thank you! Its hard to convey image quality across youtube videos. Its best to find some image samples from websites to view on your own screen. It can be splitting hairs on the basis of images produced. But if you need something just built better than the Sigma you'll be looking at the overweight sport version or just buying the Nikon 180-600. And the 180-600 weighs a few pounds less than the Sports. Along with native mount and internal zoom. All things considered its not really a fair comparison. I just happened to be upgrading from the Sigma to the Nikon as many people do. If someone isnt in need of the better quality of life functions, theres not much reason to upgrade from Sigma C to the Nikon. This week I'll be posting a Nikon 105 2.8 MC Macro review, hopefully.

@@chuckchristianson4334 thank you! In the last 6 months I had to replace all the leg locks as they cracked. It was covered under their 5 year warranty. Took about 4 months just to get ahold of someone to send me the parts though. Soon I'll be replacing it with a different venders copy of the Benro Mammoth tripod.

@@AlbertoRiomao very welcome!

A motorized gimbal? Probably, but not much else.

Welcome! Easy mistake 😂

Hopefully in a month I'll have some new aviation stuff.

@@juancarlosluna1977 what?

Thank you!

@@sonulukose thanks! If I wasn't into video work, I'd probably still be on F mount.

@@Crystallizer132 nothing for me, kid caught 2 little bluegill dinks.

It maxes about 4-6mph depending what's in the kayak.

Being in the kayak.

This is a Jackson Kilroy DT, a tandom kayak.

@@UncleBen67 😂 they always have that face when there's no fish to see

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective I think there doing the catch fish meditation 🦈😎

😂😂

Not at that moment 😂

@@GilFavor101 😂 only the simplest tests

@dragonzjan2 sure it would. Age doesn't make a lens less sharp. And it would be saving you thousands from buying a 70-200 S lens.

@@bigboi36 thank you sir!

😂 Probably would have been tossed into Ohio.

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective LMAO!

Zcam Ipman Gemini.

This is with software yes, DaVinci Resolve.