Video

Nice video. By the way, what's the difference between primary literature and secondary literature?

Im really confused with him talking about the Road to Terror book. I thought he wrote that a good while after the opening of the archives? Is he confusing it with Origins of the Great Purges, which he wrote before the opening of the archives?

Great talk

BUT! For the fist method, if we use 1.1, 1.2 or something that less than the root of 2, it should be converge! But when I put these number (1.2), it is periodic with periodic number 3. WHY??? I should get the approximation of value of root 2.

A ittle late but this can link to OCR Y318 Russia and its Rulers 1855 - 1964.

needs a better thumbnail picture

Thank you for uploading Harris Pt. II

Thank you for the upload of Harris! 🎉

This does not explain why Stalin ordered the purge of the overwhelming majority of the delegates to the party Congress of 1934( I can't remember what number it was). This fact was a major theme of Khruschev's "secret speech" of 1656) to a later party congress in which hw denounced Stalin and his "cult of personality," essentially destroying his reputation within Russia. Some sources also report a massive purge of party members who had joined the party in the period 1974-to `924 (:enon's death). In this early stage of the 1930s purge, the dismissed ex-party members were not killed, but the priveleges that they enjoyed as party members were taken from them. The rationale was those purged were "opportunists" who only joined the party because it was in their interest to do so, not because they were sincere Bolsheviks.

Magnificent. I wish I had a teacher like you.

Incorrect, My 14th Great Grandfather Sir John Stanhope was a member of the privy council in 1578 and he was born in 1545

Thank you so much I really understand more the Routledge handbook in easy simple way ❤

Thank you so much it was really interesting and help me alots ❤❤❤

Trash

Most examples of iterative methods involves finding the nth root of a number N . typically square root and cube root. first guessing xo ,then go on to x1,x2.......During the iteration, the calculations to reach the next level is only limited to basic arithmetic operations of add,subtract,multiply & divide. For other functions like exponential (e), logarithmic, trigonometric etc. The given N is so close to a know value f(xo) that only involve a one time calculation and no further iterations were shown. So my question is : how do we show the second, third, fourth...iterations of those trancendental functions using only the basic arithmetic operations, without resorting to Taylor series ? Examples: Ln ( 1.2 ) ~ Ln (1) + (1.2-1)/1 ~ 0.2 ; what is the next iteration procedure , using (0.2) ,to get to the next level. Same thing with finding e^1.2 or Sine ( 33 degrees). How do you do the second, third iterations without resorting to a scientific calculator or using Taylor series ?

"The good mathematician" Very good video!!

Very interesting and informative thank you !

Great lecture!

Thank you very much. Good lecture it is! Precise and to the point.

What a liar this J. Getty! I’m pretty sure he is on CIA and MI payroll. If you want to know about Joseph Stalin you might want to read Soviet documents which can be found here in Russia or contemporary Russian publications. .

god came from the heaven to teach me this thank you very much for this as it will help me get more interest towards childhood and development.

Sergey Kirov was a prominent Soviet politician and Bolshevik revolutionary. He was born on March 27, 1886, in Urzhum, Russia, and he was assassinated on December 1, 1934, in Leningrad (now known as St. Petersburg). Kirov played a significant role in the early years of the Soviet Union and was a close associate of Joseph Stalin. He was a member of the Bolshevik Party and participated in the Russian Revolution of 1917. After the revolution, he held various positions in the Soviet government and Communist Party, including the leadership of the Leningrad Communist Party organization. Kirov's assassination in 1934 is a subject of historical controversy. Some historians believe that he was murdered as part of Stalin's efforts to eliminate political rivals and consolidate power, while others argue that it might have been carried out by disgruntled party members. The exact circumstances surrounding his death remain the subject of debate. Following his death, Kirov was the subject of a personality cult, with his image and memory celebrated in Soviet propaganda. The city of Leningrad was renamed "Kirov" in his honor from 1934 to 1991, and several other cities and institutions in the Soviet Union also bore his name.

You actually believe that Stalin didn't kill Kirov?😂😂😂

very helpful, thank you!

I have an exam in 4 hours

Lies!

I took a modern 20th century European History class on 1989 at UC Riverside, and J. Arch Getty was my professor. I have extremely fond memories of him and this course!

Good

Without Stalin, the USSR could not have defeated the Nazis.

ty

second?

Well.... the more good teacher you are , the more worse cameraman you got , you should have fixed the camera at a spot rather than giving it to someone whose playing with the camera.

7:26

2:55

thank you for making half term homework engaging and intresting

👍🙏

Thank you very much

PG was the biggest joke lmao

4:00 is the key idea.

LINGUISTIC approach = words and their communicative intent. I'm a semanticist or NSM scholar and also studied literature.

Hello, very interesting, I see the pattern of insecure attachment from relationship with my mother and passed to me, and I formed the same with my older son, interestingly my younger son (5 y younger) seems to have secure attachment with me, and I am the main caregiver in their life, how this apply to IWM?

Sadly, the sage professor takes a one sided and incorrect view on Bolshevik relations with the opposition and press, does not mention national self-determination as key reason for Bolshevik victory along with Trotsky's success in mobilizing the masses in the military and building up a strong force. Also the 10th congress aimed to fight factionalism(although opposition also faced the fallout)and factionalist tendencies not suppress any kind of opposition and even after this congress frequent debates and dissension continued until 1923(and to a lesser extent until 1927).

this is for secondary school?

Excelente Dr. Yeates. Muy buena explicacion!

Just an idea: British don't declare war alongside pathetic France, but move in to bolster mainland Europe behind Hitlers turn East?

Extremely interesting. Thank you!

Where is the rest of this??

Are you the same guy who gave voice to the headspace?😮

I also can't help but *strain my brain*, so to speak, trying to figure out how *forced labor* in prison in one country is "totally fine and rehab", even though IN ANOTHER COUNTRY, it's "totally bad"? The same folks who, rightly, call-out prison labor in the US as leftists or MLs, will then *totally-justify it*, UNIRONICALLY, within gulags and similar systems elsewhere! It just seems, to me, like a reactionary double standard repackaged as "communist and sensible." Forcing people to work in prison in the US and similar nations is "bad", but it's... "good" or "ok" in other nations, simply because they CLAIM to be "socialist", or they pretend to be "dictatorships of the proletariat"? Or claim that THEIR *prison labor* is "different" "With US, you see, it's REHABILITATION!" ...forcing people to work "is rehab"? yeah... sure... Sounds like some despicable, far-right nonsense a hard-ass parent would tell their 5-year-old kid in a condescending or patronizing manner, ngl This is far from "leftist" or "transformative", justice-wise like... given the COERCIVE NATURE of prison in general, why is *forcing people to work* while there somehow seen as "totally fine", if it's in USSR or PRC? Aren't you EXPLOITING the nature of the prison system and why those inmates are *to make them work* for various "important state projects"?? How is such exploitation, "totally socialist and necessary"? This is nonsense It's hypocrisy Be they gulags, laogai, corporate prison labor in the US- it's all the same (forced labor under the most-exploitative conditions possible, in a "free" society) Like... if the people in charge of those state projects, in 'tankie' states, TRULY CARED about "being socialist", wouldn't they, first and foremost... HIRER FREE WORKERS OUTSIDE OF PRISON AND PAY THEM WELL for such things?? but... instead, they rely on mandated PRISON LABOR OF PEOPLE ALREADY FORCED TO BE THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE! This is, in no way, "socialist" REMOTELY! It's INCREDIBLY inegalitarian, even if you just compare free and inmate 'workers' It's strange how more "leftist" Marxist-Leninists don't see this

Stalinists and tankies *love*, especially, to pretend like there was "no other way." It's a pretty-easy way to justify, or at least excuse, the stuff their favorite "communist" leaders did. "Yeah, mistakes were made but... that was the PRICE OF PROGRESS" or "it was a diff. time! They had no choice" ...or did they? Maybe those in charge just *didn't want to listen* to those proposing alternatives Or maybe they were in such a state of "panic" or "frenzy" that they didn't take the time to look into alternatives They were so "in a hurry" to "get shit done NOW" that they just 'went with their gut', in a sense. There were, surely, many alternatives to the absolute worst and most-despicable policies under Stalin! Stalin and Co. were just *so dogmatic* that it was, essentially, "our way or the highway."