Video

这是一部启示录,其实是纪录片而非电影,电影的哲学深度无法用理论形容.人工智能,生命轮回,纬度进阶,这块石板既如今的手机比例,产生独立意识的人工智能,影片中的设定几乎影响了后世所有太空科幻电影的创作,甚至科技细节都得到预言.介于影片制作的年代,一切都是尽在不言中!科幻迷心中永远的经典,对人类文明有着无以言表的影响力.就像尼古拉特斯拉一样,斯坦利也是高等文明选定的对象.顺便推荐大家去看一本《海奥华预言》,书里有你对这个宇宙所有未知的答案!

我有一个最大的逻辑问题，既然你说都是比尔的梦境，那么我想知道为啥比尔看到妻子发现面具崩溃了，最后的坦白也是梦吗，很显然不是，那你前面所有解读只对了一半啊

Great!

I love how Who Framed Roger Rabbit is sorta based off this story with some elements changed of course

AI..it's Jake, not Jack.

看過數百（或說數千），這是我唯一用正常速度細看的解說頻道（通常我都1.75倍速，太忙了……），包括版主對閃靈等等的視頻解說，因為真的需要靜下來專注，如此欣賞完一部深入精闢且獨到的短視頻，彷彿一種享受，腦補滿溢，腦洞大開，心門也被觸動，同樣看完三個小時的太空漫遊2001，於我也只是「讚嘆」，想推薦給友人，又不知如何介紹，看完視頻真的是大大的「驚嘆」了。😊👍

厲害

Chinatown and True Detective Season 2 pretty much spell out how a small handful of elite families control the state of California

Good analysis. Thank you. I find it disturbing though that the AI voice says 'Jack' when it mentions Jake Gittes, whereas the other characters are correctly called by their fictitious names.

連續看了幾個解說，很榮幸看到這個視頻，非常厲害，其餘都是冰山一角，這個解說深入潛意識。

终于看懂了

Well done man. Thanks.

Maybe Next Time...wilL C

Excellent Work I wish this clip had 2m views

That explains a lot. Yes, when Reagan was elected a lot of the mental hospitals were shut down across the country including here in Ohio. I remember being told that it was a civil liberty thing. What followed was a lot of mentally ill people on the street and bag ladies. I do recall a guy in graduate school who was social worker talking about he and his buddies were setting up halfway houses. I was a building inspector at the time and we had these houses for mental patients being set up in neighborhoods providing little or no supervision. They were getting a lot of money from the federal government. So now the mystery is solved. It was awful. The bag lady was a big symbol of fear for women that anyone could fall into poverty if they weren't careful. A couple of cold winters and they were gone -- probably dead.

我發現你是以Kubrick為主題經營這個頻道的，好開心，我好喜歡他。感謝你解說2001：太空漫遊和閃靈，大大幫助我理解Kubrick的思路

Great analysis!

The Name of the Father ==> Oedipus Complex ===> incest ====> fear for castration ===> castration comes true (sacrifice of Helena) ===> follow the superego / power

终于看懂了闪灵

Is this ai generated

Thank you. Cause the WHOLE ending just confused and baffled me. I didn’t hate the movie though.

Also feel like it could represent Jake and how he was always writhing in his cave alone

Many people want instant answers and need to know exactly whats going on NOW, others can just enjoy the ride and try to figure it out later. Or not at all. You need to be in category 2 to love this movie. I am.

This was good. Thank you.

22:57 so what's the truth behind Puck wearing necklace? Is it Shasta's?

不解读奇爱博士么？

非常非常精彩的解說，希望還能在看到其他電影的內容分析❤️

我觉得 大家来找茬这个有点过度解读了吧，导演给一个1秒不到的镜头 ，，除非闲的没事，谁会暂停下来看区别啊🤣🤣

“All you can see is his rear end” The brown bear was giving a man CPR

10:25 right. Now I understand why the film is actually called Chinatown.

不错的分析😊

The bear could be associated with this but you gotta look at danni's bear blanket in the beginning of the movie when he is laying on it and talking to the nurse. Same face

If you’re depressed or anxious as a person, read The Catcher In The Rye. But kiss goodbye to any degree of normality you’ve ever enjoyed. Lots of autosuggestion and mind control paragraphs. Don’t believe me? Try it. Or don’t!

Also I noticed on Danny’s bed when the doctor visits there’s a big brown bear /cuddly toy .

What the bear suit guy blowing the other dude

二十年前第一次看这电影有种说不出的压抑，尤其那配乐到现在还久久不能忘怀。开场阿汤和她老婆要去宴会前，妮可基曼退下衣服加上配乐给人一种好戏就要开始的感觉，这一幕还一直记到现在。

Ai shows no emotion reflexion. CANT do it. Next.

Was Ida Sessions the woman that claimed to be Evelyn Mullray at the beginning of the movie?

mulray does wear glasses in the movie?? And evelyn says he doesnt!!!

Wow interesting connection

Noah Cross hires JJ Gittes to find his daughter, but all he really needs to do is follow her mother. A plot hole wide enough to drive a truck through.

great analysis

I think you work for the CIA; the movie is in your face about elite control manipulation sexual perversion / abuse and child abuse for pleasure and power. The story of the couple is just a vehicle to take us to the world Kubrick knows, 😮hates and wants to expose. All the other stuff are tricks he puts in or fails to put in for reasons we Will never understand. Dreams reflect reality he tells us the truth thru a story about a couples sexual relationship presented as a dream as much to protect himself as us. It didn’t work; they murdered him. Again your analysis failed or you work for the elites. But we know.

Hang on. Did I miss something? I thought that Cross had sex with his daughter and that’s where the child came from. That’s why when Jack was slapping her around at the end trying to get the truth she kept saying she’s my daughter, she’s my sister, she’s my daughter, she’s my sister. Which means that the girl was both her daughter and sister because of incest between her and Cross. Plus, given the fact that Roman Polanski is a pedophile himself this type of story line would be right up his alley, and probably turned him on. That’s my take anyway.

讲得很不错，我了解到这个正式版本可能是被发行方剪辑并删减后的版本，不知道你是不是这样认为的？

Jake NOT Jack. Say it correctly.

I saw the film for the first time when it came out in theaters, I never fully understood this film until just now after watching this video, I’ve seen people try to explain it before but none I’ve done such an amazing job as yourself good sir

I always had it in my mind that they were singing to show how they had lost their minds together, the duality of man, the struggles of war. showing they were reverting to a child like innocence while being “born the kill” as it said on jokers 🪖

解说了个寂寞，重点是一个没敢提啊。丢了西瓜，捡了芝麻，是对这个解说的最高的评价。

寶藏級的影片還好我挖到了❤