Video

I dont like hearing my doctor telling me he dont know whhy he being told how to treat his paitents, when he responsible for them.

Prasad is a foggin fraud, just call him Fauci junior

In 1948 Shirley Jackson published a story in The New Yorker, 'The Lottery' which is exactly about this subject.

19:45-20:25 Historian and author Hillel Cohen would disagree with the idea that Israel didn't create Hamas. 🗣️🗣️🗣️

Love this one Russ. Girard’s “scapegoating” ideas are very compelling.

He still believes the studies?

Terrific conversation 👌

What a sad deflection from the truth.

Very interesting. I would really like to buy the book on Audible at some point if you plan on putting it up. Maybe I'll check out your last book I see here. Thank you.

I like your content..but would love it if you’d put the words you say on the screen in English.. thanks..

Fantastic

Professor Munger begins by talking about large price fluctuations, like the 1929 stock market price collapse, as an example of markets not getting prices right. Professor Roberts responds with a discussion of the Wright brothers' innovation and how it came about, but Roberts fails to fully enunciate why this augurs against Munger's case that Pigou was wiser than we give him credit for in arguing for bodies of experts to play greater roles. What I wish Roberts would have seen is that it is impossible for prices to be gotten right by anyone when there are with goods that have not yet been invented, no way for anyone to get the prices (of yet-to-be-invented goods) right. So Munger's emphasis of Pigou's desire to "get prices right" seems largely inapplicable to what Schumpeter considered the most essential process advantaging capitalism -- namely, creative destruction. I wonder if Pigou gave any thought to Schumpeter?

Oh geez this host is a simpleton. I thought this podcast was about economics not about blind political ideology.

The host is not a sophisticated thinker. He evidently has a very narrow US centric neoliberal ideology that blinds him to unbiased economic analysis

What a complete joke. Keynes in there over Mises? LOL...And how DARE you even mention the name "Marx" in this context? Jesus, man, clown world indeed....

WOW!!! Thank you for your educational discussion in this show. I have been wondering for a long time, how the Jewish people ended up in the Holocaust! Thank you so much Russ and Haviv for your great show. I have learned so many interesting parts of the history. Well done! Keep up the good work! GOD bless 🙏 you both.

" COVID-19 a decoy for launching the mRNA LNP vaccine platform" There exists a parallel between severe illness from COVID and that of vaccine induced side effects. The common denominator is the over expression of the pathogenic spike protein and the inability of the host to eliminate it. In the case of the infection it is the systemic entry of the pathogen (modified virus used as a vector for the mRNA expressing the spike protein). Whereas in the case of the vaccine the successful and uncontrolled transfection of the lipoprotein coated mRNA resulting in acute and subacute injuries. And its integration into the host gene via reverse transcription resulting in more chronic and life long injuries (representing long covid post infection). One cannot rule out the fact that both the modified virus as vector for antigenic mRNA (SARS COV2) via inhalation and the mRNA LNP a alternative antigenic mRNA delivery formulation via injection, was an attempt to create and investigate a new form of vaccine delivery technology. The former became an infection going out of control in the test subjects resulting in a plandemic and the latter was repurposed into a possible treatment for the infection. The zoonosis theory and the lab leak theory have become a potential alibi for the above crime.. The entire pipeline of mRNA LNP based vaccines were well underway before the pandemic. The pandemic proved to be a feasible proof of concept evaluation and an opportunity for large clinical trial to convince the population and coerce the regulatory authorities to endorse this heinous technology.

It is all ugly and full of lies and people wanting to make a fast buck and others wanting to be power houses. Sorry you can all get screwed until you stop lying to other humans.

Great interview

It is astonishing that you don't know anything about the foundation of Zionisme.Christians invented Zioinisme in 15th century.Read Martin Luther:The jews and their lies.Read your own heroes Herzl,Jabotinsky and mostly the real Torah.We were expelled from that land and we shall return when the Messiah returnes.

Is there a such thing as the wrong price? Undesirable perhaps, but wrong? Not sure if that makes sense.

great discussion

Comment for traction

President Trump was calling for a lift of all lockdowns in Easter 2020. "Masks" never prevented anything.

The drug companies all knew beforehand the experimental / untested "drug" did not prevent transmission. The narrative that the experimental "drug" did not actually prevent the virus, but prevented a more severe case of it, didn't come out until after the vast compliant majority began to get get the virus after 2 or more doses of the drug. When it was first rolled out, the propaganda was the drug actually PREVENTED the virus.

Excellent quality analysis of government bureaucracy from Russ towards the end of this episode.

This whole talk was undermined once Roland Fryer advocated for school choice. The fact is that school "choice" is one of the major tools used to undermine teachers' unions and destroy public school districts. So, once you advocate for school choice, it is likely that both teachers and a large contingent of parents will likely distrust any and/or all of your suggested reforms.

First here!

People LOST their jobs standing up for YOUR rights

The position of these commentators makes me sick to my stomach.

You cried 60 days in a row?

I agree with Yuval that members of Congress increasingly treat their job as a platform to complain about the other side, rather than as an obligation to negotiate with the other side. However, if you look at Congress over the last two years, that problem is almost entirely the fault of the extreme right wing. Republicans who make bipartisan deals with Democrats are viciously attacked in right-wing media. Republicans who screech and howl about how evil liberals are get all kinds of media attention (Boebert, Greene, Gaetz, etc.). It is mainly conservatives who are responsible for the breakdown of the institution of Congress. And that is mostly because they are scared to death of having to share power with the more left-leaning elements of society.

"💉saved many lives, you know" no i dont know actually. Odd no hard evidence ever provided for that claim

Wow, as soon as Mr. Roberts talked about wearing plastic baggies on his hands I was done listening. Absolutely no common sense. Extremely disappointed that Vinay would not have addressed such idiocy.

"compared to what" is such a good question!

Year zero was 1400 years ago.

Haviv you are wrong. The first leader to bring the Israelis back to independence in Israel was Prophet Moses AS, he was the first Zionist leader, some 3300 years ago. The second in importance was Ezra the scribe 538 BC.

1400 years conflict.

But what about the costs of minority rule? If the winner of the Electoral College is frequently at odds with the winner of the popular vote it delegitimizes the representativeness of the system. Similarly with Congressional representation that results from gerrymandered elections and lifetime Supreme Court appointments made by a President who does not win the popular vote that are confirmed by a Senate that represents a minority of the population. At least with a president decided by a national popular vote everyone knows their vote is counted equally rather than the absurdity of the current system where people in smaller states have proportionally more say than those in larger states. Additionally, with a national popular vote, the political middle that politicians try to persuade would now be spread out nationally (likely concentrated in the suburbs/exurbs) rather than simply in the same handful of battleground states that get outsize attention and political favors/handouts.

Mistakes ? 😂 Hundreds of Billions in profits is no mistake - its an achievement of epic proportions ECONTALK should be ashamed of continuing to play along with this chicanery

Undoubtedly, the slave labor of Polish forced laborers in the Third Reich contributed to the post-war economic miracle in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Thankyou. It happened after research a product is good afterwards there is mentioned the product that they said was healthy is afterwards not so good and I also did made a mistake what I drink or took and should not . A person must be cautious what enter your body For health sake

Wonderful distinction. And depending how we define “acting together”, I would argue that we rarely actually need to do either one. Freedom also means each individual can pursue his or her own goals (absent harming each other), and no consensus is required to coexist.

The Constitution was devised to make it difficult for anyone to get things done politically. The authors feared powered. Political competition differs from economic (business) competition by the absence in the former of a trade. In the latter, to get something someone else controls you have to convince them that you have something they'd rather have. Reciprocity. It's largely absent in politics. Indeed the motto in politics is, 'Don't get mad, get even.'.

One of the best episodes this year. Yuval Levin is a national treasure. My input: The Commerce Clause has always been a quagmire but the Administrative State is a serious threat to our Constitutional system of “checks and balances.” Too much power in the Executive.

I like how he's a social scientist who has rigor in methodology and math, he loves the truth and seeks it, and cares enough to do rigorous relevant work outside of academia.

59:00 The average American would disagree with this take. 🌝🌚

The most moving episode I’ve listened to. Amazing guest.

You have to understand, Dr Prasad is considered to be " too radical" by some of the pro-vacciniacs out there.He has to straddle the line to save his elite academic face to his colleagues. Nevertheless, at least Dr Prasad will admit that many mistakes made whereas the vacciniacs will continue the propaganda that the vaccine was great , while denying the benefits from early therapeutic intervention that a small number of us implemented since March 2020, that not only saved lives but greatly minimized the progression to "Long COVID". Imprison those corrupt, incompetent, criminal vacciniacs!

Prasad, I liked you very much and I listened to your podcast, but since I heard your "good" feelings of the vaccine I don't believe you anymore.