Video

1:43:06 I suppose Ctesippus meant the statue of Apollo Sitalcas at Delphi, which according to Pausanias was 35 cubits (= 53 feet) tall.

it is a great , thanks so much

Great reading

Thank you so so much

Thank you.

Thank you for this! I am doing both my art and reading homework thanks to this reading and couldn’t be happier (It could be the fact that it is 2:12am but I this is actually so entertaining Soc sounded so done with the servant 😭)

‍

thank you for your share

Thanks for this great explanation, I am passing this on to my fellow students!

I appreciate that you also laughed at your own voice

1:15:41

Excellent lecture, thank you.

“In your view.” The booze barons don't have to come to the defence of their product when somebody badmouths it, the booze hounds will. And the booze hounds will shout any supposed health benefits of alcohol from the rooftops, even is the studies are suspect. The benefit against heart disease is only for people leading an unhealthy lifestyle. But that's only in the fine print and is not reported.

Thank you for doing this! 🤩 Note to future-self: 28:00 everyone wants to be happy, and Wisdom (close to virtue) is the highest good. (14 min)

Your voices make me laugh so much... keeps me super engaged as well! Thank you for this

Excellent reading!

The data in that paper is as processed as hot dog meat, a hallmark of pseudo science. If you want to be healthy, just look at what most healthy ppl do, like those in the blue zone. It’s clear and simple. Most so called scientific paper are written to impress the peers, usually misleading the public.

omg this was the best!! thank you so much and your voices are AMAZING!!!! :)

Thank you professor, is it the same course that’s giving to mechanical engineering called corrosion engineering

Also a risk of 0.992 neglecting tuberculosis is still a risk because it's not 0 or below zero. And it's clearly what's increasing the "health benefits of alcohol" is not the alcohol itself but the vaccines or treatments of TB.

Can you read the Parmenides, Sophist, timaeus, menexenus, statesman, and charmides, and lysis? Your ability to dramatise this is fantastic and brings to life the dialogues. There are too many extremely dry “monologue” like readings and it’s too painful to bear. Cheers!

This is excellent…

1:43 4.0 Localized Corrosion 2:00 4.1 Uniform Corrosion 4:00 4.2 Bimetallic Corrosion or Galvanic Corrosion 15:48 4.3 Deposition Corrosion 18:30 4.4 Crevice Corrosion 24:05 4.5 Pitting Corrosion 31:56 4.6 Intergranular Corrosion and Weld Decay 42:54 4.7 Flow Induced Corrosion

This is a lovely, spirited reading of protagoras.

I love the voices, this is great.

i cannot express how useful this was to me while doing work for my philosophy class. thank you very, very much--you have made this college student's life a bit more bearable!

Can someone break down 2.11 on pg 18 in greater detail please?

Donald trump supporters should listen to this, although I doubt any of them are learned men or men that would commit themselves to any degree of wisdom.

I'm pretty sure the UK Chief Medical officer said that the study shows there is no safe level of alcohol consumption. Then she said in the same documentary that women who consume 5 units of alcohol a week have a decreased risk of developing breast cancer.

but there's still a risk because tuberculosis can still kill people even if there's a vaccine or if it's curable. it's extremely rare to die from it in the West but it can still happen and so alcohol can increase that risk, even if it's very very rare. why remove it?

Beautifully brilliant, thank you.

Let's also remember he was a theif of ideas and people who aren't greedy don't get they're heads removed

Thanks a lot pal it's Corrosion & type of it right in general chemistry right its related to petroleum engineering or not

These voices are great

Thanks so much for this!

Thank you for the lecture. I just want to clarify that should we write the report in double-spaced? Thank you for your help.

28:20 is the best part period! 🤣

Thanks for the video and tips. I would like to ask for the uncovered slides and terms (i.e., Nuisance parameters), do we also need to understand them ourselves (for our report) or just read them for our reference? Thank you for your help in advance.

Hi Eric, this is Edward from MPhil ACE at Cam, I am writing to confirm with you that in the playlist there are only three recorded lectures. And regarding the coursework, could you please give us some information about the structure/format of expected deliverables?

Hi Eric, this is Edward from MPhil ACE at Cam, I am writing to confirm with you that in the playlist there are only three recorded lectures. And regarding the coursework, could you please give us some information about the structure/format of expected deliverables?

Hi Eric, this is Edward from MPhil ACE at Cam, I am writing to confirm with you that in the playlist there are only three recorded lectures. And regarding the coursework, could you please give us some information about the structure/format of expected deliverables?

Thanks for this bud ! I didn't have the time to read but listened to it while i drove.

I noticed that too, but glad to see someone crunch some of the data. I'm in the States, so tb is not a worry. Ischemic heart disease is my main worry, and for many others here, diabetes is a big problem. Those drop with light to moderate consumption, though there's some increase in cancer risk. I'd guess that some of the car crashes are from binge drinking, where the daily average might be low, which raises the question of how many other risks are from bingeing. I no doubt drink a little more than optimal. But these sorts of scare headlines from the Lancet study don't help me weigh the true risks.

Around 1:50, obviously Geoffrey Boycott, and the Andrew is Andrew Samson. Can't be re-recording just to fix that ;(

Contrary to other comments, i actually love your manner of speaking. It is full of life and energy. It is the reason why i listen to you instead of many other readings out there.

Very interesting.Plato is my favorite philosopher.

LOL I love the performance

Link to CZcams video showing iron in nitric acid (but I'm mildly distressed he poured water into concentrated acid without wearing safety specs - though he does have glasses) czcams.com/video/qayfY19qiK8/video.html Compare with pH-potential diagram (Pourbaix diagram) for iron. Concentrated nitric acid is a strong oxidising agent, so iron in this acid has a high enough galvanic potential to be passivated. Dilute nitric acid isn't sufficiently oxidising to passivate the iron, so, soon, the iron corrodes actively (and fast, as the nitrate --> NO2 is still an oxidising agent).

Completely false. The "J curve" myth has been debunked time and time again. Take a look: czcams.com/video/l3ilpQ-_IME/video.html&feature=emb_title

What do you think of criticism of J curve? czcams.com/video/l3ilpQ-_IME/video.html