Video

You didn't even listen to the sermon, did you!? Lordship salvation is an accursed FALSE GOSPEL THAT ADDS WORKS TO SALVATION!! Did Jesus do ALL that is necessary for our salvation or not!? You are saying that He didn't, that Jesus' sacrifice WASN'T ENOUGH and that you have to ADD YOUR DIRTY RAGS CALLED YOUR OWN WORKS!! Well, guess what?!? You DON'T!! My salvation DOESN'T DEPEND on me having to PROVE I'm saved to anybody! My salvation also DOESN'T DEPEND on any promises I MAKE TO GOD, but on BELIEVING on the promise that God made to me, which is that He gives eternal life to whoever believes on the Lord Jesus Christ! To believe means to TRUST, and IT'S NOT A WORK!! Romans 4:4-5 KJV Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. [5] But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Romans 11:6 KJV And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

Faith in the bible does not mean "obey", it means to trust. Nothing in scripture says that works will automatically come after salvation. Believers have freewill (Romans 6:16), they may or may not grow.

No but it does say we are created for good works. Eph 2:10!People need to get through their head the difference between works of law vs works of love. They’re obsessed over folly of men. Rather argue over silly philosophies than devote themselves to breaking bread, teachings of the apostles and prayer. Hooting and hollering over nothing. Col 2:8

@@beecee3161 works are works wether if the law or out of love. We are saved by grace through faith apart from any works at all, that’s the difference. We should walk but faith after salvation and do the works God has before ordained that we should walk in them but it’s not a guarantee. Salvation is not a deal the sinner makes with God in exchange for service and discipleship, salvation is a gift to be received with thanks and because we are saved we should live for him, not everyone does and we can backslide etc

@@letstalktech96 willfully ignorant “works are works no matter what” derp derp. Did you get baptized? U dun did a work den der c. You can’t clarify the difference between what YOU are doing after being saved vs saving yourself by works? Lukewarm dullard. You disregard entire scriptures because “muh werks”.

That’s real preaching for ya.

let's hope they make it out someday like I did.

their cult extends back around 400 years at most, King James himself would condemn their theology.

WRONG

He meant Christianity not ancient false religions sir

It's unfortunate that you have no conception of Christianity outside your little cultish sect that doesn't recognize the ancient creeds of the church given to us by the apostles. But you know, they didn't have the King James version at Nicaea so they didn't really know the truth, did they... /s

That's me. This content was so off base.

This just made my day

Mr. Juder Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved and thy house

@@Number10400 Amen brother

@judahlabriel4593 YOU need to get saved

This comment says alot about you.

so because we believe in a certain translation we aren't Christians in your opinion? And fools? Pretty sure Jesus warned about that one buddy. 👍

@@formernifb6864 Believing that the King James translation was preserve from any error and making it above the very word of the apostle Paul or John in Greek is the foolishness. Now that foolishness doesn't prevent you from having an opinion or being save. You are save by believing the gospel so yes King James only people can be save. I would simply love to show the inconsistency of that foolishness in a moderated debate so that people leave that gravely mistaken movement... And let's be honest, this movement is only working in the US with people that only speak english. Anybody that is not an english native speaker can see it (which is my case).

@@alexivonkuciak3786 I'm not from America but of course it's mainly working in english speaking countries it's an English translation most KJV onlyists won't tell someone to learn english just get a good translation in your own language one example of a good foreign language translation is RVG (reina valera gomez)

@@formernifb6864 ultimately it all boil down to one question for KJVO; do you believe that the KJV is inspired or not. Do you believe that God inspired the apostles and the translaters of the KJV or just the apostle. If someone would tell me: the KJV is not inspired, I just prefer that version when I read the Bible then it would be a totally different matter. I would probably talk about John 7-8 passage that is problematic and the long ending of Mark but most KJVO believe that the KJV was inspired exactly like the apostle were and that sir is absolutely indefencible if you know history and biblical textual criticism.

What? Obviously Paul’s letters are God’s word just as the King James Bible is. God’s word exists in many languages, not just English. No true KJV onlyist would argue that Paul’s letters are not the Word of God.

@@letsgosoulwinning6301 Right on your first point but none of those languages completely or accurately reflect the original languages that the word of God was first delivered in 100 percent. On your second point; It wouldn't matter if it is directly argued or not, the logical outcome of placing the KJV as the word of God over and above other English translations by any subjective standard (as the KJV-onlyist does) automatically places it in the same way over and above the original manuscripts in the same way. You would need an objective standard that showed that the KJV superior to the other English translations but not superior to the original manuscripts.

@KaosKit Let’s start with the basic premise that God said his word is perfect and that it would be preserved. (Psalms 12:6-7, 2 Timothy 3:16) Based off that we can search for the manuscripts that have been passed down which are the Textus Receptus and the Hebrew Masoretic text. Using those manuscripts as a standard the KJV is the only bible that matches up with them. The modern versions take away and change verses which would mean they are not God’s word and therefore inferior to the KJV.

@@letsgosoulwinning6301 Define what you mean by "passed down" and show how the manuscripts used as a base for the KJV meet this standard and how the manuscripts used as a basis for more modern translations are not "passed down".

@@letsgosoulwinning6301 While I’m not against the KJV the question has to be asked, do the modern version "take away" or does TR "add" to the originals, the fact is the more the manuscripts are copied the more the manuscripts grow, generally the closer you get to the originals the more accurate they become. KJV onlyism is by its very nature anti-intellectual, thank God the reformed Calvinist scholars who translated the KJV were not.

Me To.

Same.

Same 😂

I agree 100%. I came from a similar church background. Praise the Lord I'm free.

eric fehrman I weep for you and pray you come to Jesus

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼