Video

GREAT!!!!! DEAR BARRERA...THANX 💯💢👍👍👍🙏

FANTASTIC ❤❤❤❤❤❤🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Wow! Nice graphic.

Nice graphic . . . Where are forces?

Great show! 👍 you make science to an amazing art work ! I love your work ,especialll your great music! 😊

music?

Do you mind sharing the paper you got this from

if these are real quarks, how did you got them?

Woooow......

as someone who is both interested in computer graphics and synthesizer music, i would love to collaborate on a project in the future - Bill_Zzz

Can't tell what's going on here, can't read the text, good luck.

Old UFO but with 2 guitars. Might also like Lucifers Friend from Frankfurt. 🚀🏴‍☠️🎸

Good Sound ! 🚀🏴‍☠️🎸

1:04 nice squircle 🤪

I suggest to replace the fairy tailes about chimeric gluons and quarks by the more realistic, more clear consept described in the "(Pseudo)science fairy tailes" , accesible on ResearchGate. Serving the simplicity, consistent approach and plenty of enjoy from the understanding of the nature of the elementary particles and their interaction. No more will be QED incomprehensible for you.

Gluons are a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The actual source of the Strong Force is found below. Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. The model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

Skicklig musik!

Snyggt jobbat!

wow 👍

This is neat

what is this

Show me a jar of quarks, first. Where do they go after spiraling around in that bubble-chamber? What do they decay INTO? Think!

GOOGOLQUADRIPLEX (10^^5^100

ZETTAVERSE IS 10^^45^50,000 LIGHT YEAR

The actual dark matter solution: www.silverbellsring.com/

nice

Fan ta$tiC#

czcams.com/video/wEDL45N-CRg/video.html

The solution has been found piece by piece..

Imagine not being first lol

Good stuff.

Very sweet video

Du är super 👏

Ballony

Gillar konceptet vetenskap och suggestiv musik.

Cool combination of science and music.

Some sort of labeling would be nice.

Pedagogiskt och bra med en inledande förklaring om mörk materia som lågfrekvent kurvatur av rumstiden då det förbereder hjärnan att kunna följa ekvationerna. Men igen ser det ut som jag bidragit som bild- och ljudkonstnär där jag istället varit delaktig i utvecklingen av idén. Mitt namn ensamt räcker gott och väl. :)

Snyggt jobbat!

And if dark matter doesn't exist ... czcams.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/video.html

Wow! 😃

😮

Neat. Is the music yours as well? Thank you for uploading. 🍃

you are JUST calculatin the movement of the OBJECTS(stars etc) NOT the Space they are IN. one cannot calcultate invisible ..like pool table,, no one says after hitten them balls.. Look table is expanding.

Infinite accurate,yes.

However there exist heroes..

EVERYTIME YOU HAVE A GREAT IDEA, OF COURSE THERE COMES AN IDIOT WHO WANTS TO DESTROY..

Always 2 up and 1 down to begin a proton. In it's beginning, the kinetic implosion becoming and explosion is electron neutrinos passing through boson matrixes to find 3 poles at work, and expands that space with electrons displacing muons. For the strong force sphere contained between bosons, the muons implode, and between these two you have a rest mass of either (2+2+6=10)/3 or 6+6+2=14)/3 equaling 3.33333 or 4.66666 [relative negative electron mass at 1] : giving what? It rationalizes mass and energy as a differential resting among 3 poles thereby proving we exist in a fully kinetic and infinite universe. All you need is to find the geometry which exists between the opposing particles moving to and from stars which makes and consumes these particles, all but Kmeson+/-(#2) which has rest mass between all others and it's DeBroglie resonance sits exactly where the universe appears to be giving 7.2K thermal constant but it's not from a big bang cooling off, it's because that is the least recycled particle. Ie; redshift is just a result of DeBroglie waves slowing down due to particle recycling which IceCube proved to us years ago. Also, with energetic particles flowing into a galactic bulge and mass flowing out, the flow opposition causes a flattening and acceleration of mass against energy, fully explaining how stars at galaxy's edge can orbit much faster without loosing arc.

Yet there are 2 electrons necessary to explain a number of elements as well as the supercomputer modeling of superconductivity ref: Egor Babaev type 1.5 superconductivity. This is however academic, as I used projective geometry to discover the same exact 8/1 pattern he did 10 years later or more after web publish 96, copyright 03. It would seem to me the proton vs neutron is merely positive electron vs negative electron and up and down quarks reach rest mass between an electron and a muon mass based on a constant cycle of explosion and implosion from a building block linear plane where matter is the 3rd pole causing a disturbance. This only works in a fully kinetic universe with DeBroglie waves. This is what I consider reality, not these ridiculous photons or superstrings. I can convert Planck's constant to this 3 pole system real easy using a simple formula. What I haven't done is spend the time to put it all together, which is really just differentials they've already discovered. If the golden ratio expands from 3 arms at once to describe 3 poles, that is easy enough, but what about the plane it sits on getting warped due to the flow opposition pressure between energetic particles moving into stars and high mass particles leaving them. It is, after all, flow opposition I proved which causes timeflow. I predicted electron neutrinos would be found moving into stars deep in the galaxy core in 1995, and was vindicated after results of the $270million Ice Cube experiment. In cases where you always find 1 left over, it is that flow opposition putting a tilt on the number plane. Unification is really just a quest to discover the tilt degree, which varies because the pressure varies depending on vicinity to stars and star types! As there are 7 densities of space which directly relate to matter and at least 2 beyond that. Why do men seek unification though? Is it not to realize anti-gravity and free energy? Well, we already have it. It is the real version of zero point energy, not what you find on Wikipedia. I mean Tom Bearden's definition. Kinetic pump z waves imploding in sync yet out of phase through a nonlinear medium. These are usually sinewaves riding on a carrier wave, and that carrier wave does not reverse cycle if the pump z waves combine as they will by focusing through an infinitely small point. This is something one can do over 3 or 4 charge points in electronics, as well with elementary particles themselves.

Far out.