Video

❤

🇲🇪

Religija je ostala ista vjera nije😞

Romania is Bulgaria - greeks divided us....

Thank you for making this video of the capital of my country.good job🙂

7:05 "[the Hungarian language's] closest linguistic relatives are Finnish and Estonian" That can be true only we consider just Europe, disregarding other Uralic languages... As far as I remember, the closest relative of Hungarian is Khansi (I'm not sure f I'm retranslating the name correctly)

People like you learn history ... at no frequency ?

The only "romance" language ... its not even ROMAN, but LATIN Language! and you can talk about romances there or romantic ... but the language is NOIT called ROMANCE

It is already a known fact that Romanian Da (yes) derives from Latin Ita (thuss,so) and is one of many examples when "t" is interchangeable with "d" in many languages Best example is Italian "da vero"( truly so) from Latin Ita vero Otto(8) becomes Oddo in Italian Tati/ Daddy Tu in Latin/ Du in German Takk in Scandinavian/ Danke in German Visigoths becomes Vizigodos in Spanish and Portuguese Da is used instead of "the" in Chicago ( Da Bears/ Chicago Bears) Da boiz/ rap slang Ida is pronounced instead of Da in Bihor region of Romania, as they are known as slower talkers Bulgars adopted Da from Romanian and their priests introduced it to Russians via Ortodoxism Notice that Belarusians are Russians and don't say Da but the real Slavic word for Yes "tak" short from Tako/ so, like Polish and Ucrainians. Other examples when slavs borrowed Kashubians say Jo Sloveniens say Ja Both from German Ja Google Ita vs Sic in Latin ( ita is a counterpart with "sic") Or A Latin Yes for Romanian word Da, by Keith Massey You Tube.

The extinct Dalmatian language was the link between Italic languages and Daco Romanian, but it was broken. From 200 Dalmatian words, 100 are very similar to Romanian and some 20 with Albanian.

As a Turk I can only agree with your tier list

Check out our full-length video about the history of Budapest! czcams.com/video/ADnzHc1R_LU/video.html

Evropski Jerusalem 🇧🇦❤️

Hungary is landlocked so why show a battleship sinking?

Fascinating! I've always wondered how Romanian developed despite its location and being surrounded by many Slavic languages.

Keep up the good work, loved it

7:13 "Hungary wasn't exactly freed by the Hapsburgs, More Like under new management" -Titan

much like crack I'm indefinitely abstaining from trying the civ series for fear I'll never come back out

Great video

❤ Dacia

Thank you

sinteti de o prostie nemasurabila.limba latina romana provine din limba dacica ,adica o latina arhaica si dacia nu a fost nici o data romanizata si nici ocupata.traian a reusit sa ocupe doa 30 la suta din teritoriul daciei.tot ce faceti voi este o propaganda ieftina de stergere a adevarului despre stramosii mei geto daci.dar nu veti reusii nici o data.

There is no argument. Ancient macedonians are hellenic, slavs were not even in the region (balkans) during alexander’s reign. He spoke greek, names greek, hellenized his kingdoms… it’s not an argument, it’s a fact

Bosnia should have just used the older flag with the white background and shield

Budapest has such a long and surprising city

Why Romanian Isn't Like Other Languages - because it is the closest to Ladino Origin of Romanic languages in Ladino, not in Latin. Amasing. Ladino is the Semitic language, mother of all European languages. It is not that Spanish influenced this language. It is the other way around. Latin America is in fact Ladino America 🇺🇸. The continent where Ladinos or Jews emigrated. I always thought it has something to do with romance languages from Europe, but it is even prior to Americo Vespucci. Wow. It all makes sense. It comes full circle. Incredible. Ladino, romance language spoken in Israel 🇮🇱 We found the connection with the language spoken by the tribe of Dan, the Dacian, back to Israel. Incredible. Ladino. Latin America, could be Ladino America. 70% Jewish genes in Latin America. Either Ashkenazi or of the lost tribes of Israel. A huge revelation for today. Zal-Moxis Dacia Dan Look for the Serpent's Trail If you consider the other Romanian like languages such as Aromanian, istroromanian and others, that developed away from Dacia, you cannot say that the Dacian language was Latinised. And you cannot say that Aromanian is Latinised Greek. Because the way the latin words are spoken into these languages is close to Romanian and not Latin. How can a Latinised Greek develop 2000 km away from Dacia in the exact way as the Latinised Dacian language? No chance. It is more like Dacian language was a language that gave birth to Latin. Important to know!!!! Dacians and Sarmatians are THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Sarmatians are Samaritans. Dacians are the Dan's. The lost tribe of Dan. They colonized first what became Thracia and Dacia and move forward up north when the Romans invaded Dacia and colonized Scandinavia known as Province of Dacia and formed also countries like Olan-da, Dan-mark. The people living in Olanda/Holland/The Netherlands, are called Dutch (pronounced Daci) They were also Dacians. Dan-mark was called Dacia in the 4th century. The tribe of Dan, colonized Iberia, France and Wallonia, as well as Irland and Scotland. Zal-Moxis was Chief Moses, the God of the Dacians. Why? Because Moses brought Israel out of Egypt. The Tribe of Dan was in Exile as well and got Moses worship 🛐 to be their protector. The Serpent with wolf 🐺 head on a pole, was the war flag of both Dacians and Sarmatians and it was inspired from the Old Testament book of Numbers 21.4-9. The serpent on the pole of Moeses. Moesia comes from Moses. Is the country of Moses people. Moesel is the river of Moses. Dan-ube is the river of Dan. Many rivers in Europe have the name based on Dan derivative in the first place. Saxons is derived from (I)saac sons. The sons of Isaac. Europe is therefore Semitic. România 🇷🇴 was occupied by many other powers over the centuries. The Ottoman Empire was there for 500 years yet Romanias don't speak Turkish. The Austr-Hungarian Empire was there for 300 years. Yet only the colonized villages in specific regions where Hungarians and Germans emigrated 700 years ago, speak Hungarian and German and are the emigrants. No Românian people ever spoke another language. The Roman occupation was only 150 years at maximum. It is no way the Dacian peasants were Latinised. Therefore Latin was not the language that formed Romanian language nor the other Romance languages from Iberic Peninsula, France, Wallonia, Italy. It is most likely that all these languages developed separately from a Semitic language that became Dacian language that got variations according to the region the segmented parts of the Tribe of Dan emigrated to. It is extraordinary and fascinating at the same time. Look for the article. The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The tribe of Dan. Btw. The Gypsies are Semitic too. They are from the lost tribes of Simeon. Sardinia was also colonized by the Tribe of Dan. Romanian language and Sardinian language are similar. This is another hint.

Ladino is the Semitic language, mother of all European languages. It is not that Spanish influenced this language. It is the other way around. Latin America is in fact Ladino America 🇺🇸. The continent where Ladinos or Jews emigrated. I always thought it has something to do with romance languages from Europe, but it is even prior to Americo Vespucci. Wow. It all makes sense. It comes full circle. Incredible. Ladino, romance language spoken in Israel 🇮🇱 We found the connection with the language spoken by the tribe of Dan, the Dacian, back to Israel. Incredible. Ladino. Latin America, could be Ladino America. 70% Jewish genes in Latin America. Either Ashkenazi or of the lost tribes of Israel. A huge revelation for today. Zal-Moxis Dacia Dan Look for the Serpent's Trail If you consider the other Romanian like languages such as Aromanian, istroromanian and others, that developed away from Dacia, you cannot say that the Dacian language was Latinised. And you cannot say that Aromanian is Latinised Greek. Because the way the latin words are spoken into these languages is close to Romanian and not Latin. How can a Latinised Greek develop 2000 km away from Dacia in the exact way as the Latinised Dacian language? No chance. It is more like Dacian language was a language that gave birth to Latin. Important to know!!!! Dacians and Sarmatians are THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Sarmatians are Samaritans. Dacians are the Dan's. The lost tribe of Dan. They colonized first what became Thracia and Dacia and move forward up north when the Romans invaded Dacia and colonized Scandinavia known as Province of Dacia and formed also countries like Olan-da, Dan-mark. The people living in Olanda/Holland/The Netherlands, are called Dutch (pronounced Daci) They were also Dacians. Dan-mark was called Dacia in the 4th century. The tribe of Dan, colonized Iberia, France and Wallonia, as well as Irland and Scotland. Zal-Moxis was Chief Moses, the God of the Dacians. Why? Because Moses brought Israel out of Egypt. The Tribe of Dan was in Exile as well and got Moses worship 🛐 to be their protector. The Serpent with wolf 🐺 head on a pole, was the war flag of both Dacians and Sarmatians and it was inspired from the Old Testament book of Numbers 21.4-9. The serpent on the pole of Moeses. Moesia comes from Moses. Is the country of Moses people. Moesel is the river of Moses. Dan-ube is the river of Dan. Many rivers in Europe have the name based on Dan derivative in the first place. Saxons is derived from (I)saac sons. The sons of Isaac. Europe is therefore Semitic. România 🇷🇴 was occupied by many other powers over the centuries. The Ottoman Empire was there for 500 years yet Romanias don't speak Turkish. The Austr-Hungarian Empire was there for 300 years. Yet only the colonized villages in specific regions where Hungarians and Germans emigrated 700 years ago, speak Hungarian and German and are the emigrants. No Românian people ever spoke another language. The Roman occupation was only 150 years at maximum. It is no way the Dacian peasants were Latinised. Therefore Latin was not the language that formed Romanian language nor the other Romance languages from Iberic Peninsula, France, Wallonia, Italy. It is most likely that all these languages developed separately from a Semitic language that became Dacian language that got variations according to the region the segmented parts of the Tribe of Dan emigrated to. It is extraordinary and fascinating at the same time. Look for the article. The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The tribe of Dan. Btw. The Gypsies are Semitic too. They are from the lost tribes of Simeon. Sardinia was also colonized by the Tribe of Dan. Romanian language and Sardinian language are similar. This is another hint.

Zal-Moxis Dacia Dan Look for the Serpent's Trail If you consider the other Romanian like languages such as Aromanian, istroromanian and others, that developed away from Dacia, you cannot say that the Dacian language was Latinised. And you cannot say that Aromanian is Latinised Greek. Because the way the latin words are spoken into these languages is close to Romanian and not Latin. How can a Latinised Greek develop 2000 km away from Dacia in the exact way as the Latinised Dacian language? No chance. It is more like Dacian language was a language that gave birth to Latin. Important to know!!!! Dacians and Sarmatians are THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Sarmatians are Samaritans. Dacians are the Dan's. The lost tribe of Dan. They colonized first what became Thracia and Dacia and move forward up north when the Romans invaded Dacia and colonized Scandinavia known as Province of Dacia and formed also countries like Olan-da, Dan-mark. The people living in Olanda/Holland/The Netherlands, are called Dutch (pronounced Daci) They were also Dacians. Dan-mark was called Dacia in the 4th century. The tribe of Dan, colonized Iberia, France and Wallonia, as well as Irland and Scotland. Zal-Moxis was Chief Moses, the God of the Dacians. Why? Because Moses brought Israel out of Egypt. The Tribe of Dan was in Exile as well and got Moses worship 🛐 to be their protector. The Serpent with wolf 🐺 head on a pole, was the war flag of both Dacians and Sarmatians and it was inspired from the Old Testament book of Numbers 21.4-9. The serpent on the pole of Moeses. Moesia comes from Moses. Is the country of Moses people. Moesel is the river of Moses. Dan-ube is the river of Dan. Many rivers in Europe have the name based on Dan derivative in the first place. Saxons is derived from (I)saac sons. The sons of Isaac. Europe is therefore Semitic. România 🇷🇴 was occupied by many other powers over the centuries. The Ottoman Empire was there for 500 years yet Romanias don't speak Turkish. The Austr-Hungarian Empire was there for 300 years. Yet only the colonized villages in specific regions where Hungarians and Germans emigrated 700 years ago, speak Hungarian and German and are the emigrants. No Românian people ever spoke another language. The Roman occupation was only 150 years at maximum. It is no way the Dacian peasants were Latinised. Therefore Latin was not the language that formed Romanian language nor the other Romance languages from Iberic Peninsula, France, Wallonia, Italy. It is most likely that all these languages developed separately from a Semitic language that became Dacian language that got variations according to the region the segmented parts of the Tribe of Dan emigrated to. It is extraordinary and fascinating at the same time. Look for the article. The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The tribe of Dan. Btw. The Gypsies are Semitic too. They are from the lost tribes of Simeon. Sardinia was also colonized by the Tribe of Dan. Romanian language and Sardinian language are similar. This is another hint.

If you consider the other Romanian like languages such as Aromanian, istroromanian and others, that developed away from Dacia, you cannot say that the Dacian language was Latinised. And you cannot say that Aromanian is Latinised Greek. Because the way the latin words are spoken into these languages is close to Romanian and not Latin. How can a Latinised Greek develop 2000 km away from Dacia in the exact way as the Latinised Dacian language. No chance. It is more like Dacian language was a language that gave birth to Latin. Important to know!!!! Dacians and Sarmatians are THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Sarmatians are Samaritans. Dacians are the Dan's. The lost tribe of Dan. They colonized first what became Thracia and Dacia and move forward up north when the Romans invaded Dacia and colonized Scandinavia known as Province of Dacia and formed also countries like Olan-da, Dan-mark. The people living in Olanda/Holland/The Netherlands, are called Dutch (pronounced Daci) They were also Dacians. Dan-mark was called Dacia in the 4th century. The tribe of Dan, colonized Iberia, France and Wallonia, as well as Irland and Scotland. Zal-Moxis was Chief Moses. The Serpent with wolf 🐺 head on a pole, was the war flag of both Dacians and Sarmatians and it was inspired from Numbers 21.4-9. The serpent on the pole of Moeses. Moesia comes from Moses. Is the country of Moses people. Moesel is the river of Moses. Dan-ube is the river of Dan. Many rivers in Europe have the name based on Dan derivative in the first place. Saxons is derived from (I)saac son. The sons of Isaac. Europe is therefore Semitic. România 🇷🇴 was occupied by many other powers over the centuries. The Ottoman Empire was there for 500 years yet Romanias don't speak Turkish. The Austr-Hungarian Empire was there for 300 years. Yet only the colonized villages in specific regions where Hungarians and Germans emigrated 700 years ago, speak Hungarian and German and are the emigrants. No Românian people ever spoke another language. The Roman occupation was only 150 years at maximum. It is no way the Dacian peasant were Latinised. Therefore Latin was not the language that formed Romanian nor the other Romance languages. It is mostly likely all these languages developed separately from a Semitic language that became Dacian language that got variations according to the region the segmented parts of the Tribe of Dan emigrated too. It is extraordinary and fascinating at the same time. Look for the article. The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The tribe of Dan. Btw. The Gypsies are Semitic too. They are from the lost tribes of Simeon.

Love this vid, can you play Minecraft next?

Kosovo is not even an UN country member

Thats my wish

Pay attention what says an irish cardinal who studied Vatican library for 20 years....There are no latin languages ...Latin was not preserved even in Italy...All these languages are sister languages and appared before latin existed..and developed separately czcams.com/video/6T5Afl-yxa8/video.htmlsi=xk7Vmhop8C0s-kk2

Because all the other languages are not like the other languages. Could you choose a smarter title?

Sarmisegetuza

It is Sarmisegetuza and it is read like it is written like all romanian, like you would read latin, you read the letters there is no special rule, like in english the, for sh we have a special letter which is an s with a small acolade underneath :D

Eine oberflächliche und geirrte Geschichte.

There never was a re-latinization of our language but only the alphabet. Romanian was already latin even when we used the Cyrillic alphabet

First picture is from my neighborhood.

It is so nice that you painting orange and red the carpathian mountains without any hesitation 😀

Fantastic video, as perfect as it gets from start to end.

Romanian isn’t the only Romance language in Eastern Europe. There’s also Aromanian

"The only Romance langyage in Eastern Europe" Istriot, Istroromanian, Aromanian, and Meglenoromanian: "Father, why have you forsaken us?"

Bro there are 50 states in United states its like 50 countries why don't european try naming some us states

Romanians pronounce certan words exaclty the same as Bulgarian, especially the typical ă throaty sound identical to the Bulgarian ъ. Hungarian as well has a roughly 20% Slavic influence, but the pronounciation is different.

Moj grad❤❤❤❤❤

Wrong as usual, we spoke this language even 8.000 years earlier

Frumos!

The initial populations were celts and thracians. Then migrations over migrations came but language were kept. Vlachs were shepards, that is why thy prefered the mountians. They called themselvesl Romans and not Vlachs. Vlachs was the name given to them by othe nations, that is why the name did not stick. Since it was not used or assumed by the people labeled vlachs.

He was Burebista, not Berebista, that dacian king.