Video

There is no thing behind CIMA UK

CIMA’s reputation is falling fast by their own doing (introducing a “buy your qualification” model with FLP), just google it and look through the discussion boards. Most qualified members don’t know about it or there would be uproar. My view is that FLP is a cynical, money-making con concocted by CIMA’s American parent company (AICPA), designed for only one purpose: to exponentially increase membership income by handing out the CGMA qualification on a plate to anybody that pays the entry price, with minimal testing of candidates’ abilities. This has all been presented to us under the guise/smokescreen of “adapting the profession in a digital world”, and “offering flexibility to modern students.” If you peek behind the thin veil of their bullshit sales pitch, the shocking reality of FLP is that 13 out of 16 exams have been removed and replaced by what is essentially online text books that students will need to read through. At the end of each chapter, they are required to complete a small bank of questions outside of exam conditions - they are not timed, the student’s identity is not verified, and the student has full access to all materials (as well as the entire internet) whilst completing the questions. Anyone with a basic grasp of the English language would be capable of passing these questions with little effort, or even asking a friend to do it for them if, for some incomprehensible reason, they find them to be a challenge. An entire stage of studying in detail to understand syllabus content (in preparation for the requirement to pass an exam in it) has been removed and students are now assumed to be fully capable after reading through the text book once and stumbling past some piss-easy end of chapter quizzes. The 3 case study exams remain, and do offer assurance that candidates can at least string a sentence together in a finance/business context. However, they contain little to no in-depth financial content and calculations required in these exams are always brief and perfunctory (a quick profitability ratio for example - one number over the other). Under the traditional route to qualification, this is permissible because the candidate has been rigorously tested in these areas of study already, whereas under FLP, it is possible for candidates to pass the entire CIMA syllabus and call themselves a qualified accountant, when they may not even be capable of producing a simple journal entry or accrual, never mind a comprehensive capital investment appraisal. For CIMA to tell us with a straight face that these aren’t necessary competencies for a qualified accountant under a meek and nebulous reference to “AI taking over”, and the world’s transition towards a “digital future”, is nothing short of a disgrace to the profession. You will never see another profession or professional body sell out their members and degrade the importance of their work in such an egregious manner. How long can we realistically expect it to be until CIMA decides to do away with the 3 remaining exams and maybe even PER in their race to the bottom? At least they will be well funded with membership fees, that is, until the gravy train ends and everyone realises CGMA isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. With FLP, CIMA has stopped providing a rigorous and respected finance qualification (such as those offered by ACCA et. al.) and now offers what can only be described as a short-course in general business management with a light seasoning of finance. This is a monumental change to what many of us signed up for and its impact is being downplayed by CIMA, who are gaslighting us all with low effort sales patter; the fact that it was implemented with no consultation with qualified members is an abhorrent action by CIMA and part of a pattern of disrespectful behaviour that began soon after they triumphantly walked out on CCAB, hand in hand with AICPA who have since held them over a barrel. Competing for jobs against ACA/ACCA qualified candidates in a competitive labour market just got a whole lot more difficult; ACAs/ACCAs now actually have a good reason to look down on CIMA qualified accountants and they will not hesitate to do so. I don’t blame them, I would not have chosen to study with this professional body had I known what it would become. Because of CIMA’s myopic greediness, we all face the unenviable prospect of potentially having to pick exams up again in the future with a reputable CCAB body if we are to remain a viable candidate for many employers. In a world where finance jobs continue to increase in complexity and demand more, CIMA is demanding significantly less - all they care about is the colour of your money. The only redemption possible for CIMA’s tattered reputation would be the full withdrawal of the disastrous FLP experiment and a return to their roots, and original USP: rigorously training accountants for a successful career outside accounting practice.

CIMA’s reputation is falling fast by their own doing (introducing a “buy your qualification” model with FLP), just google it and look through the discussion boards. Most qualified members don’t know about it or there would be uproar. My view is that FLP is a cynical, money-making con concocted by CIMA’s American parent company (AICPA), designed for only one purpose: to exponentially increase membership income by handing out the CGMA qualification on a plate to anybody that pays the entry price, with minimal testing of candidates’ abilities. This has all been presented to us under the guise/smokescreen of “adapting the profession in a digital world”, and “offering flexibility to modern students.” If you peek behind the thin veil of their bullshit sales pitch, the shocking reality of FLP is that 13 out of 16 exams have been removed and replaced by what is essentially online text books that students will need to read through. At the end of each chapter, they are required to complete a small bank of questions outside of exam conditions - they are not timed, the student’s identity is not verified, and the student has full access to all materials (as well as the entire internet) whilst completing the questions. Anyone with a basic grasp of the English language would be capable of passing these questions with little effort, or even asking a friend to do it for them if, for some incomprehensible reason, they find them to be a challenge. An entire stage of studying in detail to understand syllabus content (in preparation for the requirement to pass an exam in it) has been removed and students are now assumed to be fully capable after reading through the text book once and stumbling past some piss-easy end of chapter quizzes. The 3 case study exams remain, and do offer assurance that candidates can at least string a sentence together in a finance/business context. However, they contain little to no in-depth financial content and calculations required in these exams are always brief and perfunctory (a quick profitability ratio for example - one number over the other). Under the traditional route to qualification, this is permissible because the candidate has been rigorously tested in these areas of study already, whereas under FLP, it is possible for candidates to pass the entire CIMA syllabus and call themselves a qualified accountant, when they may not even be capable of producing a simple journal entry or accrual, never mind a comprehensive capital investment appraisal. For CIMA to tell us with a straight face that these aren’t necessary competencies for a qualified accountant under a meek and nebulous reference to “AI taking over”, and the world’s transition towards a “digital future”, is nothing short of a disgrace to the profession. You will never see another profession or professional body sell out their members and degrade the importance of their work in such an egregious manner. How long can we realistically expect it to be until CIMA decides to do away with the 3 remaining exams and maybe even PER in their race to the bottom? At least they will be well funded with membership fees, that is, until the gravy train ends and everyone realises CGMA isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. With FLP, CIMA has stopped providing a rigorous and respected finance qualification (such as those offered by ACCA et. al.) and now offers what can only be described as a short-course in general business management with a light seasoning of finance. This is a monumental change to what many of us signed up for and its impact is being downplayed by CIMA, who are gaslighting us all with low effort sales patter; the fact that it was implemented with no consultation with qualified members is an abhorrent action by CIMA and part of a pattern of disrespectful behaviour that began soon after they triumphantly walked out on CCAB, hand in hand with AICPA who have since held them over a barrel. Competing for jobs against ACA/ACCA qualified candidates in a competitive labour market just got a whole lot more difficult; ACAs/ACCAs now actually have a good reason to look down on CIMA qualified accountants and they will not hesitate to do so. I don’t blame them, I would not have chosen to study with this professional body had I known what it would become. Because of CIMA’s myopic greediness, we all face the unenviable prospect of potentially having to pick exams up again in the future with a reputable CCAB body if we are to remain a viable candidate for many employers. In a world where finance jobs continue to increase in complexity and demand more, CIMA is demanding significantly less - all they care about is the colour of your money. The only redemption possible for CIMA’s tattered reputation would be the full withdrawal of the disastrous FLP experiment and a return to their roots, and original USP: rigorously training accountants for a successful career outside accounting practice.

CIMA’s reputation is falling fast by their own doing (introducing a “buy your qualification” model with FLP), just google it and look through the discussion boards. It’s not even mentioned on this video as most members don’t know about it. My view is that FLP is a cynical, money-making con concocted by CIMA’s American parent company (AICPA), designed for only one purpose: to exponentially increase membership income by handing out the CGMA qualification on a plate to anybody that pays the entry price, with minimal testing of candidates’ abilities. This has all been presented to us under the guise/smokescreen of “adapting the profession in a digital world”, and “offering flexibility to modern students.” If you peek behind the thin veil of their bullshit sales pitch, the shocking reality of FLP is that 13 out of 16 exams have been removed and replaced by what is essentially online text books that students will need to read through. At the end of each chapter, they are required to complete a small bank of questions outside of exam conditions - they are not timed, the student’s identity is not verified, and the student has full access to all materials (as well as the entire internet) whilst completing the questions. Anyone with a basic grasp of the English language would be capable of passing these questions with little effort, or even asking a friend to do it for them if, for some incomprehensible reason, they find them to be a challenge. An entire stage of studying in detail to understand syllabus content (in preparation for the requirement to pass an exam in it) has been removed and students are now assumed to be fully capable after reading through the text book once and stumbling past some piss-easy end of chapter quizzes. The 3 case study exams remain, and do offer assurance that candidates can at least string a sentence together in a finance/business context. However, they contain little to no in-depth financial content and calculations required in these exams are always brief and perfunctory (a quick profitability ratio for example - one number over the other). Under the traditional route to qualification, this is permissible because the candidate has been rigorously tested in these areas of study already, whereas under FLP, it is possible for candidates to pass the entire CIMA syllabus and call themselves a qualified accountant, when they may not even be capable of producing a simple journal entry or accrual, never mind a comprehensive capital investment appraisal. For CIMA to tell us with a straight face that these aren’t necessary competencies for a qualified accountant under a meek and nebulous reference to “AI taking over”, and the world’s transition towards a “digital future”, is nothing short of a disgrace to the profession. You will never see another profession or professional body sell out their members and degrade the importance of their work in such an egregious manner. How long can we realistically expect it to be until CIMA decides to do away with the 3 remaining exams and maybe even PER in their race to the bottom? At least they will be well funded with membership fees, that is, until the gravy train ends and everyone realises CGMA isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. With FLP, CIMA has stopped providing a rigorous and respected finance qualification (such as those offered by ACCA et. al.) and now offers what can only be described as a short-course in general business management with a light seasoning of finance. This is a monumental change to what many of us signed up for and its impact is being downplayed by CIMA, who are gaslighting us all with low effort sales patter; the fact that it was implemented with no consultation with qualified members is an abhorrent action by CIMA and part of a pattern of disrespectful behaviour that began soon after they triumphantly walked out on CCAB, hand in hand with AICPA who have since held them over a barrel. Competing for jobs against ACA/ACCA qualified candidates in a competitive labour market just got a whole lot more difficult; ACAs/ACCAs now actually have a good reason to look down on CIMA qualified accountants and they will not hesitate to do so. I don’t blame them, I would not have chosen to study with this professional body had I known what it would become. Because of CIMA’s myopic greediness, we all face the unenviable prospect of potentially having to pick exams up again in the future with a reputable CCAB body if we are to remain a viable candidate for many employers. In a world where finance jobs continue to increase in complexity and demand more, CIMA is demanding significantly less - all they care about is the colour of your money. The only redemption possible for CIMA’s tattered reputation would be the full withdrawal of the disastrous FLP experiment and a return to their roots, and original USP: rigorously training accountants for a successful career outside accounting practice.

❤

I'm confused. This video says that you'll have two take exams but on your website it says 1 Management level case study plus all four papers of strategic level?

Can wait to register as CIMA Students 🇸🇱🇸🇱.. I am highly in need of sponsors for the CIMA qualification.

How best to register? When are examinations held? How much will be course cost?

What's the cost and duration

Hi I am unable to find a link to this certification program... can the admin please provide me a direct link to this buy this course?

A lots of things to talk about not online it may hurt others feelings for now!

How much is Fees for Exemption for 15 Papers

How much is 15 Paper Exemption fees for CIMA-CGMA C suite programme

LIKE

thank you for support

❤❤❤ I love CIMA PROFESSIONAL

I am looking forward to sit my E1 Exam.. 🥰😇

What things would count as personal experience requirement ?

Im skeptical.

Discover the Power of opportunity ❤ love the slogan

Can somebody please tell me the duration of this course?

有辮唔一定係女人

❤️✨

hello

I have had a chance to work under him. He is so genuine and very professional.

How to apply for admission

Is this program available for Bangladesh?

Great Organisation

Sold

is this program available in Botswana Africa,

This is possible. What more, I completed ACCA APM subject, which has lowest pass rate within two weeks whilst working, even though I did not have any practicle working experience in performance management before hand for last 4 years. Actually I entered ACCA through exemption. Firstly, if you are naturally gifted with a sharp mind and you have the desire to study then you can pass very quickly. I know scholars who have studied so much that the amount of knowledge that they have amounts to 200 degrees. Undoubtedly these people are gifted with very sharp mind. Second way is to approach a given subject based on overall look. Overall look means you deduce the subject matter just by reading the highlights, based on the vast knowledge you have in many fields or sciences. Second technique is much faster than first method, but the person needs to have the breath of knowledge. Every science speak truth and these truths are connected. This is similar to how sherlock holmes finds criminals based on subtle clues. People in second category don't just focus on theory per se but they focus on the wording as well. So you will find these people to be extremely eloquent compare to first category who focus in theory only. So this is how he might have passed the exams in record time. He is gifted with a sharp mind. He has desire to learn. Since he attempted the subjects in short span of time he can connect between theories. And finally the wording sticks in mind as well when you attempt exams in short span of time.

When it is good to start CIMA ( after 12 after ug or after pg)

Qualification required for data analytics

🌺 p̲r̲o̲m̲o̲s̲m̲

「こんなにいいとは思えない」、

What is a requirement to start?

「こんなにいいとは思えない」、

Excellent courses !

SORRY PAR KYA MUJHE KOI BATA SAKTA HAI KI AGAR MBA KE BAAD JB JOB LAG JAATI HAI TB HUM CIMA EXAM CLEAR KAR LETE HAI TO INTERSHIP 3YEAR WALA KARNE KE LIYE APNA MBA KE JOB KO CHHODHNA PAREGA????

how to register for CIMA

I am graduated how much paper I will get exemptions

This makes CGMA so less valuable as it's now so easy to get. It is diluting the importance

I want to register to this

How long does it take to get the qualification?

You did it Craigo congratulations mate !

Good one Craigo. 💪

Class Stasik Privet iz Francii Yulia Grushevskaya

Best qualification is CIMA

Total how many exam sitting per subscription year? Is it 3 sittings in total and thereafter student need to pay how much?

The CERT BA qualification is quite good, but i think CIMA needs to educate people more on the types of jobs one can acquire with each level.