Video

Will we be of this Lesson Learned???

Good review.

Four hour reviews for all your 1L classes?!?!? Dang. What's even the point of testing after all that?

+

@9:23 you said the answer was "C.", however, you showed the answer highlighted as "B.": the correct answer according to the standard for the movant concerning a summary judgment motion. Thanks.

Summary judgment 👹

I did not express, consent, sign, no clearances letter, state wave of my attorney/client privileges, nor waived work product.

Atty Little maliciously excluded me from knowing his conspirared adverse strategy. Because of his Malfeasance manipulated Malpractices, Fraud Concealment, illegal Dismisal, suppressed supported evidence, and conflict of interest with PRL Legal Counsel, etc.

I was Gaslighted Abused during depositions conducted by PRL'S Legal Counsel Atty Nancy Sprattlin and Affiliates.

Atty Kevin Little REJECTED MOST OF my supported evidence and charges.

Atty Little maliciously drafted lies, omitted and incident in my EEOC'S Investigation without my knowledge. I provided Atty Little 2 Chronological timelines which he suppressed to place in my Client File. He adversely refused my request to receive a copy via phone conversation. He also denied me the right to read, correct or confirm what he falsely wrote and / or misconstrued. As one can see in his statement, my signature and signoff were intentionally breached/blocked. The client, Helene was excluded/oppressed, because Atty Little was adversely litigating with PRL Legal Counsel. Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Fraudulent Concealment of Witness/Complainant Helene Webster.

Very beneficial for me, Thanks

According to Rule 26.1e Atty Little nor Amanda and Ben violated in not submitting initial Disclosures 26 1e to EEOC'S Investigation.

Unbeknownst to me, Kevin Little egregiously suppressed and spoliated information that did hurt me.

Atty Litttle did not do nor recommend.

Greetings Mr. Nathanson I still not sure if your right or wrong in professing treason law's in our effort of Counter-City. But, I notice on proximaty 5:19 you mention P.D.Q staffing and notwithstanding, they are responsible for the rough draft Operation just cause, what does that mean? Nathanson v. Murphy, 132 Cal. App. 2d 363, 282 P.2d 174, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 2196 & Candyman Kitchens v. Indeed, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121754, 2020 WL 3803936

God Bless You and Thank you so much for what you do. I think you’re awesome and I will do great thanks to you.

Thanks again

Thank you

Thanks again

Thank you 🙏🏻 for teaching. This is very useful for me learning while training

Well put together. I admit it makes me optimistic to here the words communicate and educate being promoted in civil procedure.

I just wanted to let you know that I have watched your videos over the past 2 days and you have helped me so much to study for my Civ Pro exam tomorrow!

Thank you for this video! As a pro se Plaintiff I needed this video!!!

Way better than my civ pro prof lol

Thank you sir

Your lecture makes sense, except for one thing poverty poverty is the number one problem in this country. How do you account for something that could be a remedy? Otherwise, dumb should be against the law, your right about the problem though. Jones v. Riot Hosp. Grp. LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90241, 2023 WL 3603684

This is federal rules of civil procedure right?

I wanted to get mad at you at first, but something was revealed that is total madness with regards to the principal, he wants a conventional, notwithstanding. And, he haves real bad issues with his family especially his females, maybe you can help in some way, but evidently, we don't want to lead with that kind of b/s. It will hurt the world, I am not a donkey in account of earning it for them. My family fought thru all the American wars, I don't want to be the level of the street, it is about honor for this country -America.

I wish you were my civ pro professor, I am so grateful to find your channel. Thank you, Professor. Nathanson.

Thank you so much for your work Professor Nathenson. Our professor recommended your CZcams Channel for our class and I am so glad she did.

This has been so helpful thank you so much

is a Employee of the company a Party?

ADA title ll torts access ♿ to the court account mizell vr Hamilton mizell vr neuss mizell vr Hernandez x3 appeal pharma poparus disabled prosecutor prose Marshalls vagabond code for president 💯

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

great video, you answered all the question in was looking for.

Great info!! Thank you. I’m going through a 9 year custody battle and this helped big time. Any other videos you would recommend?

Awesome!

Neither ird numbers arnt linked to land title lol meaning goverment not the lanlord

Good going Mr. Nathanson I would've agreed and I bet you had a following that possibly was questionable in their merrits. But I think we should be reasonable in helping people to give them a head start in developing their culture. Otherwise, Americans will always be in the way of helpless people. Thank you Lisa

What is this?

Hello Professor, A foreigner came to work for 5 months and went back to his country. Can he sue US citizen? At State Court or Fed Court?

What are your thoughts on an action against the United States not allowing for a Jury trial.

One of the better legal videos out there. Thanks a lot!

state Citizens- are now called U.S. Nationals, Nationals do not have to be US citizens, read the case laws, quit teaching the corporate deceit.

More Rock Concert Videos Please!

aight my brother I love your teaching!!! I will move for discovery and then file for summary judgement!!! I have a sure case but will allow for the opposing party to submit air then ill move so my summary judgement don't get tangled up.. sucks being pro se, but thats why im here

Moron….

The word legal means, the undoing of god’s law, legal…..

Govern, to control, ment, mental… government to control the minds or mental…..