Video

Awesome guy

S-Risks = Socialism-Risks. Look HOW MANY MILLIONS have ESCAPED from Socialist countries into the USA just in the last 3.5 years. Socialist Countries export product = REFUGEES. Also look at Socialist Eastern Germany that had to IMPRISON THEIR population with the self-shooting and mine-field Iron Curtain. Skyrocketing Suicides. S-Risk

More people should know about this.

I love the animal ethics CZcams channel.

3:30 if all of the offsprings survived - can you imagine the problems? THE reason that many animals birth tons of offspring is because most will die. Even in our own species, it wasn't until very recently that our birth rates became safer.

Welldone

Capture entire things .....❤

is there transcript available? as sound and consequently also autogenerated subtitles are bad

I wonder what Claire Zabel did for the over 60000$ (which is only what we know off, it may be much more) she was 'gifted' from FTX / SBF? And I also wonder if any of the minimum wage workers who put their life-savings into FTX (which was then given to people like Claire as a 'Gift') saw any of these 60000$ again? I mean, someone in a position as Claire makes some very good money already, so I'm sure returning 60k would not be an issue, eh?

The speaker in the video is Baobao Zhang, a political scientist focusing on technology policy. She is a research affiliate with the Center for the Governance of AI at the Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford, and a fellow with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard. In her talk, she discusses how social science research can inform AI governance. Points made by Baobao Zhang in her talk, "How social science research can inform AI governance | EAGxVirtual 2020": 1. Advances in AI, particularly machine learning, have been rapid, with machines now able to outperform humans in various tasks. Looking ahead, there is a 50% chance of AI outperforming humans in all tasks by 2061. 2. The potential risks of unaligned AI systems pose existential risks to humans. Tech companies, governments, and civil society have started to take notice and publish AI ethics principles to guide the development and deployment of the technology. 3. Social science research, including political science, international relations, law, economics, and psychology, can inform decision-making around AI governance. 4. Studying public opinion towards AI is important from a normative perspective, as AI will impact much of society. It can also help anticipate how electoral politics will impact AI governance. 5. A nationally representative survey of 2,000 Americans found that an overwhelming majority think that AI should be carefully managed. They consider all AI governance challenges to be important but have low to moderate levels of trust in the actors who are developing and managing AI. 6. The governance challenges perceived to be high in both perceived likelihood and issue importance include protecting data privacy, preventing AI-enhanced cyberattacks, preventing mass surveillance, and preventing digital manipulation. 7. There are variations in perceived issue importance between subgroups, with older Americans perceiving governance challenges to be more important, and those with CS/engineering degrees perceiving them to be less important. 8. Two works by colleagues in the EA community working on AI governance are "Toward Trustworthy AI Development" and "The Windfall Clause." 9. Open research questions in the field include: * How to build incentives for developing safe, robust, and fair AI systems and avoid a race to the bottom. * How to transition to an economic system where AI can perform many tasks currently done by humans. * How to address other geopolitical risks that make AI governance more difficult, such as great power war. 10. Social scientists can be impactful in the field of AI governance by engaging with the tech and policy worlds, writing op-eds, doing consulting, and communicating with the media. The speaker also mentions that they are currently working on a new iteration of their survey on public opinion towards AI, which they hope to launch in the US, EU, and China to get interesting cross-country comparisons.

I cant believe that there arent more views on this talk, amazing speaker and very heartening to see the Centre for Effective Altruism in practice.

Please give me a phone number for any animal rights org. In Taiwan.

Thank you.

Thank you.

the absurdity happening all around the world in the name of effective altruism in the hands of the 0.5% elite. Please rethink your methods and your motivations. Google's first result for "effective altruism famous people": Pages in category "People associated with effective altruism" Sam Bankman-Fried.

Kind of shit people who make 500k a year like to spout

Hey guys im an AI academic too

What qualifies her to be at this position im curious...mum and dad know people?

Merci pour ce partage de grande qualité et d'utilité publique 🙏

Exactly what I am trying to understand. Considering switching careers

20:03 Glad to know that a scientist is not a bad person but they don’t know how to close a window. I’m happy the interviewer is writing this important information down.

Nice to know the native people are skeptical of you. I would be too.👌

Is EA a front for a pedo ring?

🙏

A new idea I found today

Great. Something New have landed. I find it awesome. Have my regard.

Amazing

This was incredibly helpful. Thank you so much!

This scenario also does not consider that the income gain of 25 per cent or even 50 per cent may not be enough to ensure adequate standard of living in urban areas or cities as opposed to rural areas as the cost of the food basket and essentials for instance will increase significantly. So, it may be a zero sum game.

"AI academic" loves to talk more about management and organisations then the actually product. Eventually tries to destroy openAi. Thank goodness she failed.

Thank goodness she was fired

Freaking Australian women. I swear to god.

This talk does not sound like it would put her in a position with significant influence on the future of AI, but maybe it’s just one talk. The reaserch paper comparing large language models to nukes and calling for safety measures assuring states using AI for war still have safety gates allowing them to stop AI from destroying civilization doesn’t sound like that either.

what a loser

Thank God she was just fired from OpenAI...

Wait to learn her tactics on how to Fire her own CEO and get fired from Board. And failed attempt to sale OpenAI to Anthropic 😂

Omg there she is 7 years ago planning her terrorist attack …

Jezebel is my guess! 99% Sure of it....

Wow her accent changed significantly from her Aussie accent

One wonders how some people get to some positions.

Anyone else pulling up older videos of her, trying to get a judge of ones character. Easy when you have the gift of seeing through people.

She seems pretty sane to me. Perhaps she may become humanities only failed attempt to try to save humanity from mindless unchecked development of AI by Microsoft and Open AI

Don't listen to the bullies. Stay strong.

Context: OpenAI debacle. This video paints a fair view of Toner. Perhaps the granular aspects of her discussions with Altman and the Board reflected these kinds of insights about the value of taking a step back. Both innovation and ethical decision making are positive by-products of this.

Wow! not surprising that the force behind all the chaos at OpenAI is an effective altruist. Like SBF, there is a departure from reality that seems to be a common trait in this community.

I do not care about Sam Altman, but listening to her makes me feel uncomfortable in many ways.

Who put this person in an executive positions? 😅

This woman almost destroyed chatGPT

I think she has a phony accent. If you watch the video from the early 2010s, she had a normal Australian accent. I'm an Australian who moved to Canada 15 years ago in my early 20s, and it still hasn't changed my accent to this degree. A disingenuous accent = a disingenuous person.

Useless *&%$*& who got Altman fired. She's prolly only on the board b/c of her gender (cf California laws). Waste of air.