Video

This man is straight evil for contributing to the poisonous noise of religious thinking.

Amen. So frustrating when people say he's different. He's so good and loving. If you believe that then you haven't studied the Old Testament.

Why didn’t god reveal to Sye not to have that inappropriate relationship with a parishioner that got him (Sye) kicked out of his church a couple years ago?

Isn’t it convenient that anything supernatural, by definition cannot be tested, proven or disproven?

Perfect revelation

The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed! The New Testament is the Old Testament REVEALED! There is symmetry in the entire Holy Bible! The keys to understanding the Old Testament Holy Scriptures is to seek the Lord Jesus Christ on every single page (Luke 24:27-34)! The Old Testament is so fertile and rich with symbolism, Christ types, bible numerology! IF I was a lost Jew, seeking to know if Christianity is right, I can find the answer in Genesis 9! Here we can see that Christianity is part of the Holy Scriptures and that Jesus must be the Messiah because the Torah cannot be honored since the temple was destroyed in 70AD and the genealogical records are lost destroyed! (Here, Genesis 9, verses... state: 18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan. 19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. 20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. 24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. 27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. 28 And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years. 29 And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died. Noah is a type Christ. He symbolized the Lord Jesus Christ who saved the world from the law of Sin and Death; the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). Noah is also the father of the human race that survived the global flood! Noah is also the symbol of us, human beings. In these verses, Noah got drunk and passed out. Satan (Lucifer) is the accuser (Revelation 12:9-11) and prosecutor railing at each and every one of us to the judge (God the Father). Noah is a sinner just like us and he is not perfect. Satan is exposing Noah. I am guessing that he is telling God the Father (Yaweh): look at Noah. Noah is a hypocrite. Noah is a drunkard... Noah is a gluten... Look at this fallen shameful sinner... hypocrite... He vomited after he got drunk and is now passed out and sleeping in his pool of vomit... In Genesis 9, Satan is using Ham as his microphone. Shem and Japheth took a garment and covered their father Noah's nakedness and shame. Shem symbolizes the Old Testament which was written in Hebrew and Aramaic (important languages from the House of Shem). Japheth symbolizes the New Testament, which was written in Greek (an important language from the House of Japheth). The garment symbolizes the finished work of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. All the sins and shame of Noah are covered by the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ bought and paid for Noah with His own precious blood on the cross at Calvary. Japheth will dwell in Shem's tents refers to the fact that all of Europe would embrace the New Testament to the point that they will be known as "Christendom." And, the Jews will remain loyal to the God of Noah (Shem) and hold faith in the Masoretic Text (Old Testament) but unfortunately Ham drifted away from the God of Noah and fell into false religions and idols. We know from Genesis 9 that the New Testament is truly part of the Holy Bible! Japheth will truly be enlarged not just in world exploration and commerce and emigrate beyond Europe to inhabit the Americas, Australia, Asia, Africa... but Japheth and Shem will improve the entire world through their science, technology, mathematics, and other disciplines of knowledge. Ham will depend upon the great knowledge of Shem and Japheth to survive and improve their own lives. ALL OF GENESIS 9 has already happened! The WHOLE WORLD DEPENDS upon the great knowledge and inventions of Shem and Japheth. Shem and Japheth have indeed improved the quality of life of the whole globe! We all depend upon Shem and Japheth's science, technology, mathematics, agriculture, commerce, economics, inventions....! Without Shem and Ham's great knowledge and contributions, the entire world would be so much worse off right now! We know from Genesis 9, that the Holy Scriptures came from the Masoretic Text (Shem; Old Testament) and Textus Receptus (Japheth; New Testament), and not from false religions like Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Confucianism,... There are other ways to view Genesis 9 like different camera angles of an athletic performance, but I thought this perspective would be helpful.

I was looking to potentially take on your channel name, but you deserve it well more than I. Thank you for bringing this message

Xtians are at their most stupid when they fancy themselves clever. And theres 'stioo not a shres of proof of God's existence.

Millions of Christians are going to vote for an unrepentent adulterer and fornicator for president.

The only possible way Jesus is resurrected from the dead unless we use resident evil logic the t-virus 😏

Wow Alex is really slow on the uptake

The Ethiopian Bible is the oldest and most complete bible on earth. Written in Ge'ez an ancient dead language of Ethiopia it's nearly 800 years older than the King James Version and contains over 100 books compared to 66 of the Protestant Bible.

Infant damnation. If you believe that, you are completely sick in the head. I don't care less about your profession of any Christian faith.

God brought about the Messiah.

Sye is the nightmare of atheists.

0:37 _"Are vicious circular arguments logically invalid?"_ Well for starters, the descriptor "viciously" is attempting to fallaciously create a difference without a distinction. And the basis upon which circular argumentation is challenged is not on logical validity, rather on soundness. So pointing out that a circular argument is logically valid (which it is) fails to address the actual criticism. As far as soundness goes, no circular (and/or question begging) argument _can_ be accepted as sound. The "arguments" are simply disguised assertions, that lack any justification. (if there was any justification outside of the "argument" then it wouldn't be a circular argument. 2:57 _"I'm simply asking you if it's viciously circular to employ your reasoning to justify your reasoning."_ Circularity is irrelevant. Sye's arbitrary requirement that "reasoning be justified" is simply an incoherent demand. Reasoning is the tool we use to justify things. If you ask me to justify reason I can either do that by using reason, or without reason. If I attempt to do it without reason ten _by definition_ I'm not actually providing any _reasonable_ justification. So the only option left is to use reason to justify reason, which isn't circular in the way Sye is trying to suggest. Just like I can test a hammer by using the hammer, I can test reason by using reason. It isn't circular unless I define my standard as whatever the outcome of the test is. 7:53 _"So how do you know your reasoning is valid?"_ Another irrelevant question. Validity (in this context) deals with logical structure. What Sye is really trying to get at is "How do you know your reasoning is efficacious?" And Alex's answer is perfectly reasonable. After testing his reasoning repeatedly over decades and his reasoning yielding the expected results it can be known to be efficacious. Of course Sye wants to split hairs here and suggest that anything that isn't known _with epistemic certainty_ doesn't qualify as knowledge, but this is just an arbitrary standard that Sye made up, and fallaciously invokes as an equivocation. Also, "reason" is simply an axiomatic system. These systems, don't require and definitionally cannot have any external justification. Just like there is no justification for the rules (axioms) of chess, there is no justification for the axioms of reason. All that is required to play chess is a mutual understanding of the rules and an agreement to abide by them. As long as one is operating within those rules then it is true that one is playing chess. If someone breaks the rules, they are operating outside of the axioms (rules) of chess so they are _definitionally_ no longer playing chess. Likewise, if I'm following the axioms of reason I am _by definition_ being reasonable, if I follow the axioms of logic, I am _by definition_ being logical. That Sye thinks any other justification is possible let alone necessary just goes to show Sye's PROFOUND misunderstanding of the nature of logic, reason, and other axiomatic system.

It’s not just translated so many times and rewritten so many times, it’s bcuz of money, and power. Religion has been taken seriously and it started wars, deadly cults, and more religious wars from this day on . Bible has words for war and to take slaves, and to repent of your evil. Rape a woman or child and repent and your free of that horrific crime and you can go to heaven, murder someone and repent and now your under gods under gods care you go to heaven. Of an aetheist says thieves no actual proof of a god them he goes to hell. 😂 that’s dumb. There is so many lies and misinformation in the Bible. How much is truth and not.

This is awesomely, lovingly gracious ❤

it's also typical muslims argument

luther…rejected the letter of james…offered sex with nuns in exchange for military support…admitted he was a pile of sh*t…was protected by german nobles who stole Church land…and legalised usury…proddyism is a scumbags’ creed

If one wishes to disagree with the Catholic Church, fine, but please properly represent what the Church actually teaches. Unfortunately this video does not do this.

The archeological record proves - Israelites are Canaanites - the exodus didn't happen as described in the Bible - the ancient Israelites worshipped Canaanite gods such as El, Asherah, and their sons, Baal, YHWH, etc. - No conquest of Canaan took place - Jericho fell centuries before Israelites found it The academic consensus of archeologists, historians, and even biblical scholars is that Moses, Abraham, and Joshua are fictional characters. The earliest biblical texts date no earlier than the 10th century, with the bulk of the Old Testament being written and redacted between the 7th and 5th century BC. By then the priesthood of Judaism had become mostly monotheistic, while the people remained polytheistic, or henotheistic. The New Testament tells of a different God from that of the early Hebrews. So different in fact, that the gnostics believed that the father of Jesus is the true God, and the god who created the garden of Eden, wiped out humanity, and commanded genocide was a monster. It takes years of systematic theology to harmonize the contradictory ideas, books, and prophecies of the Bible.

Catholicism is true Christianity! Protestantism is a religion invented by some man. For those interested in Traditional Catholicism hit me up. Ave Maria

A PSYCHIATRIST TOLD ME YOU NEVER BE HAPPY TRYING TO PUT A ROUND PEG IN A SQUARE HOLE BECAUSE IT JUST DOESN'T WORK

czcams.com/video/jJCbCs-y1_k/video.html

The What Really Matters person suggested that Saint Mother Teresa of Calcutta may "not be saved" and also stated, "Cursed be everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law, and do them.” Know what? I like Mother Teresa's chances better than yours.

Saint Mother Teresa established the Missionaries of Charity, and they had as their "mission" to serve Jesus Christ in the distressing disguise of the 'poorest of the poor' - and to serve the 'poorest of the poor' as if they (Mother Teresa and her Sisters) were actually serving Jesus. They adhered to Matthew 25:36-40. "He will place the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the king will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.' Then the righteous will answer him and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?' And the king will say to them in reply, 'Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.'" When you clothe the naked, and give food to the hungry, those are called.... [...wait for it....wait for it...] ..... WORKS!!!

Nate Pickowicz should read the Bible more thoroughly. Scripture says in Ezekiel 33:12-16 (ESV) the righteous shall not be able to live by his righteousness when he sins. Though I say to the righteous that he shall surely live, yet if he trusts in his righteousness and does injustice, none of his righteous deeds shall be remembered, but in his injustice that he has done he shall die. Again, though I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ yet if he turns from his sin and does what is just and right, if the wicked restores the pledge, gives back what he has taken by robbery, and walks in the statutes of life, not doing injustice, he shall surely live; he shall not die. None of the sins that he has committed shall be remembered against him. He has done what is just and right; he shall surely live. He ridiculed what is written in the above verses in his diagram. The reason is obvious - he follows the Reformers who taught that through faith alone ALL his sins (past, present AND FUTURE) are imputed/counted on Christ and God already punished Christ for those sins. Scripture says our salvation is affected by our future sins in Heb. 10:26-27: “For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries.” “We” in verse 26 refers to the believers - it is first person plural that even includes the person who wrote Hebrews. If future sins will not affect our salvation, then 1 Jo. 5:16-17 would not warn us about deadly (or mortal) and non-deadly (or venial) sins. James 1:15 says: “sin when it is fully grown brings forth death”.

The speakers in the video are entitled to preach their version of "gospel" following that of the Reformers. Below are four questions on their belief of justification: 1. You believe that through faith alone you get Christ' righteousness imputed/counted on you and your sins (past, present and future) imputed/counted on Christ. How do you reconcile it with what Ezekiel 18:20 says (ESV): "The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself."? Does this verse say both righteousness and wickedness are NOT transferrable from person to person? 2. You believe that by imputation you are counted as righteous while you remain unrighteous - in Latin "simul iustus et peccator". How do you reconcile it with what Ezekiel 33:12 says (ESV): "the righteous shall not be able to live by his righteousness when he sins.”? 3. You believe that God will let you enter heaven while you remain sinner (as your sins will be hidden under the righteousness of Christ imputed on you) and that God punished Christ on the cross because your sins (past, present and future) imputed on Him, while He remains sinless. In contrast Prov. 17:15 says (ESV): "“He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the LORD.” Does your belief make God do what Scripture refers as abomination? 4. You believe that through faith (in Christ) alone you are counted as righteous, but not made righteous. In contrast Scripture says in Rom. 5:19 that through Christ we are made righteous. Who is right?

Saint Mother Teresa of Calcutta spent her whole earthly life as a Roman Catholic. Billy Graham called Mother Teresa the most humble of God's creatures he has ever met. Do the people that made this video consider Saint Mother Teresa of Calcutta to be "saved"? Do they consider Mother Teresa to be a Christian? What is their opinion of Mother Teresa? (Don't hold your breath waiting for a response. They probably won't answer.)

czcams.com/video/jJCbCs-y1_k/video.html

If you want a more accurate representation of what Roman Catholics believe, please watch the videos on the two links below. They are way better than the garbage on this video filled with false claims about Catholics. Please take a moment to watch. You will like it.

Romans 2:6 “he will render to every man according to his works” That passage right there completely debunks your whole video.

czcams.com/video/dKmXg1-mKrE/video.html&pp=ygUKc2NvdHQgaGFobg%3D%3D

Where does it say faith alone in the Bible? Where does it say the Bible alone in the Bible?

“There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be” Fulton sheen.

As a former protestant, I say this is a "straw man"... why don't you debate Tim Staples? That would be helpful

Nate Pickowicz (at around 4:10) just decided to make things up. Nothing he said is in the Bible. Nothing he said is taught by the Roman Catholic Church. There is not the workd "tree" and "roots" in the Book of James. He just made everything up in a pathetic attempt to explain away the very clear statement in James, chapter 2: "Faith without works is dead." He had to do some real verbal gymnastics to overcome the fact that Holy Scripture is directly (and emphatically) contradicting everything in this video. When Protestants say you are justified by "Faith alone" (i.e. Faith without works) and Holy Scripture says "Faith without works is dead" - who are you going to believe? The protestants? Or Holy Scripture? Let me give you the answer: Believe Holy Scripture (and completely ignore these guys). Once again: Holy Scripture repeatedly and emphatically states: "Faith without works is dead." Read it for yourself.

James 2:20 "Do you not know that faith without works is dead?" The Book of James (i.e the Holy Spirit) states this at least 3 different times. This entire video was negated (i.e. body-slammed) with 5 simple words from James, Chapter 2: "Fatih without works is dead."

James 2:17 "Faith without works is dead." Ummm.... yeah,...that is in the Bible." But perhaps Protestants don't believe that part of the Bible. But for sure, it is in YOUR Bible. (Yes, even the Protestant Bible.) Don't believe me. Go get your Bible, open it up to James (Chapter 2), and read away. Aa a Catholic, I believe Holy Scripture is the inspired WORD OF GOD. INSPIRED by the HOLY SPIRIT. And when the HOLY SPIRIT says "faith without works is dead." I believe HIM. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. Now, y'all left us about 500 years ago, and it's time y'all came back.

I was born pentecostal in Bible belt then forced to endure the west coast contemporary stuff and because of trying to pray to Mary and Michael and the epic Liturgy and the Gregorian chants, I hope and feel that Catholicism is the more valid and if not, I would just go back to rock n roll give up. I don't mean to sow discord but protestantism was a horrible experience. Who the hell can worship God to that? Utterly no thanks!

James 2:14 "Faith without works is dead."

Very sad representation of Catholicism! But hey, we dont mind you using our “good works” the laborious hand copying over and over of God’s word before the invention of the printing press, for you to finally have your “rule of faith”. You are welcome - not as a “good work” of God mind you. 🤦‍♂

Anyone who leaves the Catholic Church is a fool and condemns himself. Protestantism is HERESY !!! Protestants don't believe ALL of Jesus' teachings...but only those parts of the Bible that "tickle their ears".

"Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" are false doctrines, both of which are denied by the Bible.

As a former Catholic, this is a very clear and concise explanation! Thank you!

Not a Catholic, but this is a terrible strawman of Catholicism.

I'm not a Catholic but I'm tired of protestants acting like Catholicism isn't a type of Christianity. It's a denomination just like any other.

This is not a terribly accurate representation of Catholicism. They never say "Faith + Works." And for good reason: simply putting your faith in Christ is sufficient to be right before God in the Catholic understanding. You don't have the absurd, man-made idea of balancing good deeds against bad deeds. Where we disagree is this issue of repentance. And yes, I do believe repentance is necessary for salvation. Jesus says it himself countless times: "Repent and believe." If you believe repentance is necessary for salvation, then you essentially agree with the Catholics, no matter what disagreements may remain.

Awful representation of the Catholic church. I highly recommend our brothers and sisters in Christ if they want to know more it's better to listen to a knowledgeable Catholic apologist than by people or are not.