Video

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:15 A *conference discussing constitutional law with a focus on the Inter-American Court's consultative opinions.* 01:09 The *Ecuadorian Constitution being a central topic, acknowledging it as a constitutional state of rights and justice.* 02:27 The *incorporation of international human rights laws into Latin American constitutions, including Ecuador's.* 04:01 Emphasizing *the growing impact of consultative opinions on Latin American constitutional law.* 06:07 A *specific case study discussed: the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court's decision on equal marriage rights influenced by the Inter-American Court's consultative opinion.* 08:10 How *the Ecuadorian Constitution previously restricted marriage to heterosexual couples.* 09:32 Legal *actions taken by same-sex couples in Ecuador to secure their right to marriage, invoking human rights norms.* 11:07 The *legal debate regarding the application of international human rights standards in Ecuador's courts.* 12:44 The *incorporation of international treaties and human rights instruments into Ecuador's legal framework.* 15:04 Discussion *about the role of the Constitutional Court in Ecuador and its authority to decide on the constitutionality of laws, especially in cases of doubt.* 16:13 The *apparent tension between different constitutional norms regarding marriage equality in Ecuador was resolved by the Constitutional Court through interpreting that opinions from the Inter-American Court form part of the national legal framework.* 17:23 A *judge raised a consultation on the contradiction between civil code, identity data laws, constitutional norms, and the American Convention, leading to another Constitutional Court decision addressing differing interpretations.* 18:05 Prior *to the same-sex marriage case, the Constitutional Court had acknowledged the authority of Inter-American Court opinions, stating that Ecuador must abide by these interpretations in good faith as part of international treaties.* 19:01 Judges *had legitimate doubts about applying Inter-American Court opinions within Ecuador's legal framework, leading them to consult the Constitutional Court to determine if they should prioritize local laws over international interpretations.* 22:17 The *Constitutional Court deliberated that there wasn't a contradiction but a complement between the constitutional definition of marriage and the Inter-American Court's recognition of same-sex marriage rights.* 24:48 The *Court emphasized that the interpretation allowed for a complement rather than a contradiction in the constitutional definition of marriage, integrating international human rights law within national legal frameworks.* 27:37 Implementing *Inter-American Court standards through domestic courts offers substantial preventive impacts beyond just executing sentences, protecting and guaranteeing the rights of marginalized groups without solely relying on international mechanisms.* 29:16 The *focus of judicial interpretation should prioritize the best protection of the most vulnerable, regardless of whether it's through national or supranational courts, aiming at safeguarding human rights.* 30:25 The *Constitutional Court's decision to advance marriage equality wasn't solely dependent on legislative action, recognizing the importance of protecting rights beyond waiting for majority consensus.* 31:08 National *courts should heed international standards while also benefiting from regional consensus and domestic jurisprudence. Failure to do so might distance Inter-American Court decisions from national realities and risk their legitimacy.* 32:33 The *debate exists between courts being restrained or being guarantors and activists, both internationally and domestically, reflecting the challenge of balancing internal laws with international obligations for maximum rights protection.* 33:54 Internal *courts also face the same dilemma-whether to interpret strictly or favorably to uphold individual rights. The discussion extends to whether courts should adhere strictly to written law or utilize various constitutional interpretation methods for favorable rights outcomes.* 36:22 Strengthening *dialogue among courts to establish common ground in Latin America and bolstering constitutionalization of international law are crucial to avoid backlash following significant court decisions.* 37:46 Latin *American countries display resistance to voluntary compliance with reparative measures and advisory opinions from international human rights bodies, impacting the effectiveness of decisions in transforming circumstances.* 39:36 Local *judges play a pivotal role as the first point of contact with the legal system and need the skills to apply international human rights standards in their rulings, significantly influencing how human rights perspectives are considered in civil, family, or labor cases.* 42:20 The *utilization of international instruments by constitutional judges can be instrumental in transforming adverse circumstances in Latin America, particularly addressing issues of economic inequality, corruption, and concentrated power.* 44:15 Judges *must actively engage, listen, dialogue, and subject themselves to scrutiny to improve their decisions, considering criticisms and reflecting on their interpretations and actions within the legal framework.* Made with HARPA AI

Permitiria a las personas solicitar a los jueces reconocer derechos a las minorias.

Que bien la difusion de las opiniones consultiva. En mi pais

Agradecida maestros excelente informacion.

Pueden por favor subir la parte que falta

Queda cortado

Está cortado.

Me gustaría saber el fundamento normativo del control de convencionalidad.

10.05 - 35.03 Marco general del Derecho Internacional con el derecho interno 35.03 - 45.21 Formas de relación entre Derecho Internacional con el interno 45.21 - 1.00.17 Estándares o parámetros del control de convencionalidad

Muchas gracias por esta grandiosa información

Excelente! Felicitaciones

Felicitaciones, al los Juristas Dr.Sagúés y al Dr. Chiappini.

Sociedad X le debe dinero y promesas de diferentes cuestiones escritas en un contrato a integrante b de esta sociedad , entonces , quien lidera la sociedad le pide a un abogado(integrante también) que elabore un contrato para ya no deberle a el integrante b que pertenece a la sociedad X , entonces el abogado crea un contrato con estipulaciones a conveniencia de la sociedad X para no deberte a el integrante b , ya que el abogado pertenece a la sociedad X , y quiere aprovecharse del integrante b. Abogado a integrante b. "Vaya no se que decían los contratos anteriores , no se que plazos tenía , no se que obligaciones , pero loa puedo neutralizar , dejándolos sin efectos a través de este contrato, por que quien lo suscribe finalmente , sigue siendo la sociedad a la que perteneces" Palabras de: José Luis Caballero Ochoa en un intento de aprovechamiento hacia el integrante B y hacia W2M Enterprises. Y así gente , es como un abogado puede aprovecharse de una persona sin conocimientos legales , por eso , es super importante conocer las leyes de donde resides , para que no se aprovechen de tu desconocimiento o ignorancia en este tipo de temas.

Enhorabuena y muchas felicidades al autor Roberto Niembro. Extraordinario panel.

Muchas felicidades al autor. Enhorabuena por tan extraordinario evento.

Que aula excelente! Pena que ainda no Brasil, a jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos é pouco conhecida!

Buenas, echa un ojo a estas entrevistas si quieres saber mas sobre Escoltas de Elite 👉 #elsamuraimoderno

Muchísimas gracias por compartir esta gran oportunidad académica 🙂🙂🙂

Y el resto de la conferencia? :(

Brillante la ponencia del Dr. José Luis Caballero. Me atrevo a decir es quien más autoridad tiene para hablar del tema en México.