Video

What was the previous video?

Brutal video. Congratulations!

Its MEH by fama and french

great!

great explanation

Totally wrong, you confused Taylor's development with calculating the differential of a function over a domain? df(x) = f'(t).dx + (1/2)f''(t)(dx^2) ?? that's not even remotely close to being correct: df(x) = f'(t).d(x) and that's it, it's also just writing system equivalence that holds true by definition, you're confusing more than helping with this video.

very good and easy explanation good job

brain，please，these information deserve your energy

In case of ROCE M+M theory does not give significant impact although the ROE has a big impact on the Returns made by the investment. through the choice of investment.

Can you make a video about treasury department and its role?

Wonderful video! Such a clear way of explaining

Great video! But what do I miss? I get that the capitalstructure is irrelevant regarding EBIT but it can not be true for ROE - even if you do not consider deductables and taxes?! If you see it from an accounting/reporting perspective where equity is a residual size and (last-ranking in the event of liquidation ) compared to debt, which is always served first. There are always some provision for debt equity but never for equity. Also: Anyone who has ever recognized goodwill in a business transaction, knows that it is significantly influenced by the debt capital acquired. Thanks for a reply :)

At 2:56, “doesn’t depend on an ordinary variable x but Brownian motion Zt”. Umm… whyyy?? Feels like there is a conceptual leap between df(x) and df(Zt), that needs more context - what is this new f? Does it transform the stochastic process into a new stochastic process? If so, what’s the point of doing that, what purpose does it serve? Determinism, class of random variables, differentiability, so much conceptual context needed. Not to mention you haven’t actually stated what the lemma is. But ofc, no one questions any of this.

best content for rookie bankers like myself, ty so much

Very interesting! It seems that every strategy has a capital range at which it doesn’t work anymore

Thank you so much for making this video! I absolutely love everything that has to do with derivatives, Black Scholes and financial contacts. I have been watching all your other videos as well, you’re doing an amazing job! Keep it up! Thank you so much!!!!

Great video!!

If tomorrow I get a good grade would be bc of u thx so much

Skew is delicious

We call them Pumpementals

Thanks. I had no idea looking at the original econometrics papers what was going on.

Hey, I would like to ask. Is the expected value (EV) perspective you mentioned here the same as the Economic Value of Equity (EVE) perspective?

Could you go over the second pillar of Liquidity gap analysis? Great video!!!

Nice

By far one of the best explanations on CZcams I could find. You should consider teacher this to university students.

aren't most of these models wrong - i'm reading a book by thaler (misbehavior) he didn't have the most flattering comments for miller and his ideas (seem stuck in old school U of C group think). i'm not a finance or econ guy (computer) so i probably have no idea what i'm talking about

Can you explain the connection between GMM and OLS

Really well explained. Thank you

my professor needs to see this video

Hello, thank you for the great video. I'm curious about this; if the intervention group consists of a large number of people and it's difficult to regulate the control group, can we still apply the synthetic control method? Or is there a possibility of obtaining unhealthy results?

Excellent video, I would like to see more videos of this type

Economic growth, both scale and speed, exceed the carry capacity of the planet, and the rate at which nature regenerates. Financial capital creates more money by issuing debt, at which point it does not create the interest. So there is simultaneously never enough money and too much debt. More economic activity is required to attempt to pay debt, which means the poor and indebted must convert more of nature and resources into commodities. Production, consumption and disposal. Yet, the ever growing pools of money are claims on future resources which exceeds their ever diminishing supply. Depletion and supply constraints should cause money to lose value, but interest rates are adjusted to increase the cost of capital and therefore on a relative basis devalue nature and people - thus preserving the value of capital and saving capitalism. And as the wealthy realize their money exceeds the supply of resources, they purchase all of the assets, and rely on a system of debt bondage and rent seeking to maintain their lifestyles. As feudalism returns, human civilization enters a new dark ages on a dying, increasingly uninhabitable planet.

but what is the implication of the variance or standard deviation for that matter? if i find a variance of X what does this mean? what is the significance or interpretation of this?

Best ito lemma explanation I've ever listened.

Really good explanation. Thank you.

Thank you very much for this series!!! I really appreciate how you explained everything step by step! Could you please also explain American option and Heston model? I really struggle understanding those two....

Excellent video, keep on doing videos like this.

Great job with these videos. Helped me greatly!

cool! I was waiting for something like this.

This was a great video. Happy to have learned something new: the sewage bacteria/ pharmaceuticalstocks trading idea .Still not convinced when you said satellite trading ideas are exhausted, as we have more precise imaging now than ever, and AI that can scan and analyze with great accuracy; but yeah probably a creative out of the box approach is needed to make use of this abundance of data.

Thank you for the video. I would like to understand the Itos Lemma and Brownian Motion. Any videos that can take me through, its for the financial engineering class under stochastic and optimisation in finance so would @ like something finance related but handy

OMG you are a treasure! I am so glad that I found your videos and you explained so well!

great video but I have a doubt: in the risk-neutral pricing you are calculating pi*1 based on a price value (9.1) given in the risky pricing. this actually brings us to the same conclusion but you are assuming the risky pricing is already computed. I mean you are pricing in "risk neutral" using a value from risky pricing ain't you?

Can you recommend any papers regarding this topic ? :)

please make a separate video on risk discount rate

Please do a video on convergence in probability and convergence in distribution, if possible covering chebyshev's inequality etc. It would be very helpful. Thanks!

Thank u so much, u have managed to turn a very difficult concept into an easy one for beginners

If you have a simple example illustrating the exact steps in calculation, that would be really helpful. May be an idea for a video.

i've never seen anyone write 1 like that

But isn’t the counterfactual only as good as your construction of your model of synthetic control?