Video

🤔can we ? 🤪🤣❤

An incredibly nice comment for me! Thank you ❤

Thnx, I was quite challenge for me😄

For now, thnx😃

That was lovely session 🥰

I think we were both very creative. It was great playing together. It's a pity that there wasn't a game later that would offer such interesting co-op.

I still love it :) It was great time 😃

This name is on my screen when I play this song but after your post I checked meta and I found this: title: Aniversário, Artist: A Naifa, and this as well: DSIGUAL 19 ANIVERSARIO but if I google it I am getting something different. I am confused now.

Thank you ❤

Thnx ❤ But I have to disappoint you. The one that looks like a giant Vitus NOT gate is simply a clock with double time. The smaller loop is for non-ALU instructions and the larger loop is for ALU instructions as they require a longer time to complete.

@@jewoGRFS yeah, I knew it wasn't really a Vitus. It just struck me funny.

If you have a quantum computer, then yes, it is possible 🤣

Thank you. I still didn't have time to watch your last video. I hope to find time during weekend❤

@@jewoGRFS 🙂 thank you

It is currently able to process 33 instructions, including 3 jump instructions. You can build simple programs. Nothing serious though. After all, it was only done with trains. Don't expect too much.

Thank you 😊

On rewatch, I was wrong about why my trains didn't get the second flash. It's on the inputs. If the main input has a combo and the result input is unsignaled, you don't get the second flash because as soon as the logic engine is released, it's instantly in the small circle. Just friended you on Discord, I'd like to share some designs with you in the next few days. You really got me analyzing every segment of these amazing logic gates.

Thank you:)

That's why I call it "crazy stuff" 🤣

Thank you ❤

Thank you. This is very interesting information and could be very useful, I will look into it. Thank you for your nice comment ❤ Right now I'm on the verge of creating a very simple CPU with a limited instruction set but it will take couple more weeks.

I just checked it. You are right. In my normal orientation of NOT gate it is enough to change one 2 tiles to make it work in another even 1 tile was enough. Now while using Maglev, change 2 tiles to PURR made it work. Thanks ❤❤❤❤❤

It looks like if you figure out what legs need to be added, you can then remove the legs and swap the track type to achieve the same result.

@@jewoGRFS I first discovered this behavior a few months ago working on my LED counter. I wanted to show a difference between active elements and information lines. I changed some of the track types and suddenly the trains wanted to go to the new type. Forgot about it until this weekend. I have yellow PURR set up with a lower speed, and I wanted my logic train to be in that zone longer, so I put yellow in, suddenly the train wouldn't go around the small loop at all. It was then that I put the two together and tested to see if it acted like a leg. Like I said, it has the benefit of not having a dead end to get stuck in, you can use signals on the corners and if you have another element close to the corner you don't have to worry about them touching.

In my old yeti (0.1.6) I see that I can fund 17 industries. I'm not sure what has changed in newer versions. I'm not sure if you don't know how to fund an industry or you know but you have a limited number of industries to fund. If it's later, try downgrading to an older version to see if you can fund others.

This style of play is commonly called coop style. The name probably comes from the first team of multiplayer players cooperating to build large and complex railway networks. The regular game allows you to build simple networks. Co-op players set high standards for themselves to consider the game completed. This required a different approach to the game. It turned out that hidden in new versions of the game, the so-called pre-signals, can be used in building complex systems. Thanks to them, you can build logic gates, do synchronization and many other things, things that cannot be achieved by playing only using path signals and order lists as is currently propagated. If I were you, I would start from this page: wiki.openttdcoop.org/Main_Page It was founded by former co-op style players. There you will find a lot of interesting information and an archive with saves of old co-op sessions they played. Good luck and have fun.

@@jewoGRFS Hey thanks. This is great. I was very curious about it. I'm using the jgrpp programmable signals and it's very addictive.

I met a very good gaming buddy of mine when he was a casual gamer for me. Together we destroyed hordes of robots. It all depends on luck. I think now that the game is no longer popular it's hard to randomly find someone new who knows how to fight this robot. Old players have changed the games they play. The video you commented on was filmed at the very beginning of these missions being introduced into the game. At that time, few people knew how to fight these robots.

I'm not sure what you mean. I haven't played JGR or JPP for a long time, so I don't know what changes have taken place there. I am sure that what I recorded was done with the "train acceleration model" set to "realistic". When you write "the block signals you need in order to trick a train into the reverser" do you mean "double exit signal" just after junction that can take train to reverser from main line? If you loose pre-signals in signal toolbar maybe check if in new JGR there is an option to unhide signals like in new version of classic/vanilla openttd there is setting "show signal types" and this should be set to "all signals".

@@jewoGRFS Not acceleration. Braking. Realistic braking in JRGPP and block signals are not compatible. You can't have a game that has both.

I recorded this video when I was using JGR 0.33.2 and there was no such setting. I still have that version. Just checked the settings. You could build overflow with pre-signals only, without slots, if, of course, pre-signals are present in your game.

@@jewoGRFS Well, JGR is at 0.55.3 at the moment …

You don't even know how happy your comment made me. Sometimes I thought that everything I was doing here was in vain because no one needed it. Especially now that developers and the Reddit community are promoting the use of path signals instead of pre-signals. Thank you very much. This restores my faith that not all is lost in ottd ❤ I see you have your own CZcams channel. I subscribed. I don't have much time to play ottd and watch movies lately, but I will do it in the near future.

@@jewoGRFS yes, I have a YT channel. Not monetized or anything, and I'm not much for making videos. If I do make an OTTD series it will be tips, tricks and logic machines under the banner of Dr Strangetrains: or How I Learned to stop worrying and love OpenTTD.

@@jewoGRFS were you aware that the Vitus Gate works on an angle? Well, at least the NOT function does. I was working in a cramped space and needed another line to bridge in and turn at the corner of the gate, but there wasn't enough room for the inputs to squeeze in if I had my passing line in there too. So I thought, "could I save some room if I could build the gate on an angle?" It worked and I had the landing space I needed for the other wire.

Correction, the NOT requires additional track. I made one that looks like a kidney, but it could be done just extending the long loop an extra tile. The short angle can be done as a rising or falling edge detector.

Picture would be nice :) Anyway, Vitus design is quite universal and can be used with many other functions, even at the same time.

Thank you. It was a well-made game. The next parts of Ghost Recon were not so attractive to me. Thanks for the nice comment.

@@jewoGRFS I agree, Ghost Recon Future Soldier just had that live action feeling that the next games were absolutely lacking. It felt like you were there, commanding them and killing enemies.

I just got watch dogs 2 on steam

I'm playing Skull & Bones Beta right now and hearing Edward Kenway's voice in this game immediately reminds me of Black Flag. Thnx for watching and comment. I still love AC BL ❤

I'd love to see your designs. There's always something new to learn in OpenTTD. Thnx for watching and your comments.

@@jewoGRFS I'll be making a video of it in a few days probably.

Let me know about it. Maybe I'll subscribe to you if it's interesting.

@@jewoGRFSVideo’s up on my channel.

I managed to make my own unbalanced splitter design using two Vitus Gates and one engine on a clock. One of the Vitus Gates is just for the reset at the end of the cycle. The clock design is loosely based on the memory cell array that @LugnutsK shared in his logic series.

I call this flat map a logical playground. The second map (from the beginning of the video) comes from my friend's server.

@@jewoGRFS I did mean the 1st map :) , I recognise some of the names from the TG server. I also have a "logic playground" map haha, its great what you can do with a few signals.

@@jewoGRFS I just usually call mine a "test bed". But I like, "logical playground" a lot. I do my playground on arctic landscape. very high contrast makes it a lot easier to tell what your doing.

Thank you ❤

You're too good for me :D Thank you ❤

@@jewoGRFS don't mention it

I am not sure what you mean by "codin", do you mean "coding" or cargodist or something else?

@@jewoGRFS coding

Still not sure what "coding" means to you regarding openttd? :D

@@jewoGRFS They probably mean building circuits for a computer.

Thank you ❤😁

I'm editing this message for the third time :D Just checked and it works in the new version of the game. Do you have enough money to convert? For security reasons, use PURR Universal Rainbow 0.0.7 as universal tracks, that's what I checked. I'm curious what you're doing wrong that it's not working for you. Let me know how you did. If you didn't manage to convert, please describe what you are doing so I have some idea what could be wrong.

@@jewoGRFS nevermind turns out i didnt realise I HAD TO HOLD THE RAIL BUTTON TO CHANGE WHICH RAIL TYPE TO CONVERT TO also what do the conversions do

Oh nice, thanks for letting me know 👍

This solution, as it is in the video, will not work with trains of other lengths. You have to adjust the size of the loop as well as other connections to the length of the trains you use. If you are using different length trains on the same tracks, then no, this solution should not work efficiently. Right now, I don't have enough information to advise anything. If you have a google drive you can provide a link to the game-save file. Then I could take a look at what you have and only then I could advise what can be done. Maybe you are on Discord so you could send me private message.

​@@jewoGRFS , the problem was actually in one single signal, which was hard to notice - I used the exit instead of the combo signal, so all the cyclotron won't work and it seemed like it was something wrong with train lenght. After I replaced it, everything worked. In any case, thanks for the reply.

I am surprised that it work with trains 11TL :) Keep in mind, however, that cyclotrons are not very good with a very heavy traffic on main line.

Thank you ❤

Thank you ❤

Thank you ❤

Thank you 😁💗

Thnx 💗😁

I always preferred pre-signals, call me old fashioned :) It seems to be kind of new settings. I play with an old version due to unwanted for me changes in new versions of the game so I don't have this option in settings.

In JGR it's quite easy to do this with slot operations (it was called something like that), but it's more complicated in vanilla. I'm glad you like this video❤

I think some unusual exception happens in such an unusual situation. It's as if the developers didn't take into account that crazy people like me can start playing OpenTTD 🤣 ❤

@@jewoGRFS Yeah, I doubt anyone could predict such a use for a path signal, unless they watched your videos :D