![Law with Denise](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 65
- 138 618
Law with Denise
United Kingdom
Registrace 29. 10. 2017
Welcome to Law with Denise :) I am Denise, a qualified Law Teacher with an LLB (Hons) 2:1 and an LLM in Human Rights (Merit). I completed a CELTA in 2013 and I was graded an 'outstanding' teacher when I completed the PGCE at UCL's Institute of Education in 2016.
I have been teaching law since 2015 and I am skilled at helping learners get clarity on the law and the skills needed to succeed on law courses in the UK. I love helping students see that law is not that hard!
I create content on various areas of law including Tort law, Criminal law, Human Rights law and the English legal system. If you are an A level law student, Cilex student, Btec student or an Access student, you will find this channel useful. Undergraduate law students and international students who are completing pre-masters and foundation law courses in the UK will also find the work useful.
I have been teaching law since 2015 and I am skilled at helping learners get clarity on the law and the skills needed to succeed on law courses in the UK. I love helping students see that law is not that hard!
I create content on various areas of law including Tort law, Criminal law, Human Rights law and the English legal system. If you are an A level law student, Cilex student, Btec student or an Access student, you will find this channel useful. Undergraduate law students and international students who are completing pre-masters and foundation law courses in the UK will also find the work useful.
What is Intellectual Property Law?
This video is an introductory lecture to Intellectual Property law. The lecture provides answers to the following four questions: 1. What is intellectual property? 2. What are the main types of intellectual property? 3.What are the reasons for intellectual property law? 4. How do countries around the world give and enforce rights for intellectual property?
The lecture also includes explanations of the differences between real property, tangible and intangible personal property and a brief explanation of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) and its purposes.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
00:37 Property: real property and tangible and intangible personal property.
04:43 What is intellectual property?
07:01 What is intellectual property law?
08:51 How intellectual property laws protect consumers and creators.
15:14 How do countries give and enforce rights for intellectual property?
23:09 What is the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)?
Keywords:
intellectual property rights,copyright law,intellectual property,law with denise,intellectual property law explained,trade mark licence registration,intellectual property law patents,intellectual property law full lecture,intelectual property and wipo,property law,real property law,tangible and intangible personal property,the differences between tangible and intangible personal property,the differences between personal and real property
The lecture also includes explanations of the differences between real property, tangible and intangible personal property and a brief explanation of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) and its purposes.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
00:37 Property: real property and tangible and intangible personal property.
04:43 What is intellectual property?
07:01 What is intellectual property law?
08:51 How intellectual property laws protect consumers and creators.
15:14 How do countries give and enforce rights for intellectual property?
23:09 What is the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)?
Keywords:
intellectual property rights,copyright law,intellectual property,law with denise,intellectual property law explained,trade mark licence registration,intellectual property law patents,intellectual property law full lecture,intelectual property and wipo,property law,real property law,tangible and intangible personal property,the differences between tangible and intangible personal property,the differences between personal and real property
zhlédnutí: 62
Video
What did the Lords decide in McLoughlin v O'Brian and Others [1983]? House of Lords' Judgement. Tort
zhlédnutí 121Před 6 měsíci
In this video I discuss the House of Lords' case of McLoughlin v O'Brian and Others [1983]. The video includes a description of the facts of the case, the decision reached at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and in the House of Lords. The arguments the appellant and the respondents submitted to the House of Lords are also outlined. Following this, the decision reached by the House of Lord...
What are the facts of McLoughlin v O'Brian and Others [1983]? Did Mrs. McLoughlin win her case?
zhlédnutí 248Před 6 měsíci
In this video I give a case summary of the case McLoughlin v O'Brian and Others [1983]. The video includes explanations of the following: The facts of the case, the plaintiff's and defendants' arguments, the decisions reached at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and in the House of Lords. Chapters 00:00 Introduction 00:21 Who were the plaintiff and defendants in McLoughlin v O'Brian an Oth...
Case Summary: Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] Lawful omission or positive act of murder?
zhlédnutí 177Před 7 měsíci
This video is a case summary of the case Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993]. Bland sustained life threatening injuries in the Hillsborough in 1989. This case concerned whether or it was lawful for his doctors to turn off his life support machine. The video includes a summary of the facts, the High Court's declaration that the doctors could do so, the Court of Appeal's decision and the House of L...
What was the HOUSE OF LORDS' DECISION in White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]?Tort law.
zhlédnutí 106Před 7 měsíci
In this video I explore the details of the White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire case which arose as a result of the Hillsborough disaster which occurred on April 15th, 1989. In addition to outlining the facts of the case in detail, I explain Waller Justice's reasons for his decision at first instance, each of the Lord Justice's position in the Court of Appeal and explain the House of Lord...
What happened in the Hillsborough disaster? Taylor Interim Report-Inquests-Unlawful Killing
zhlédnutí 292Před 7 měsíci
This video includes a detailed explanation of the Hillsborough disaster which occurred at the Hillsborough stadium in Sheffield England on April 15th, 1989. I use the Taylor Interim report describe what unfolded on the day. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction 00:23 Overview of what happened on April 15th, 1989. 02:08 Diagram of Hillsborough stadium and detailed explanation of what happened at the stad...
Case Summary: Bourhill v Young [1943]- House of Lords' decision-tort law-negligence-duty of care.
zhlédnutí 262Před 7 měsíci
This video is a case summary of Bourhill v Young [1943]. I explain the facts of the case, the arguments put forward by the plaintiff and the defendant and the decision reached in the House of Lords. 00:00 Introduction 00:16 The facts of Bourhill v Young [1943] 01:09 What was the plaintiff's argument in Bourhill v Young [1943]? 01:57 What was the House of Lords' decision in Bourhill v Young [194...
What is the law on rescuers in tort? Can rescuers get damages for pure psychiatric harm?
zhlédnutí 179Před 8 měsíci
This video involves discussion of the law relating rescuers and pure psychiatric harm in English tort law. There is close examination of the cases McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1994], Chadwick v British Railway Boards [1967] and White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]. In the video, I also answer the following 4 questions: 1.Who is a rescuer? 2.Is a rescuer a primary victim or a secondary...
Case Summary: Chadwick v British Railways Board [1967]-Tort law-Rescuers-Lewisham Train Crash
zhlédnutí 94Před 8 měsíci
This is a case summary of Chadwick v British Railways Board [1967]. The case concerned Mr. Chadwick who rescued victims of the Lewisham railway crash which occurred in South London, England on December 4th, 1957. The video outlines the facts of the case, the arguments put forward by both the plaintiff and the defendant and the decision reached by the court. 00:00 Introduction 00:17 Facts of Cha...
Case Summary- McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1994] Alpha Piper disaster-Tort law
zhlédnutí 102Před 8 měsíci
This video includes a case summary of McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1994]. You will learn the facts of the case and the decisions reached at first instance and in the Court of Appeal. Chapters 00:00 Introduction and facts of McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1994] 01:09 McFarlane's 3 grounds for his claim for damages. 02:05 What decision was reached in McFarlane v EE Caledonia at first instance? 02:37 What...
Case Summary- Page v Smith 1996- Tort law- Primary Victims-Psychiatric Harm
zhlédnutí 280Před 8 měsíci
This is a case summary of Page v Smith [1996]. In the video I outline the facts of the case, the decisions reached at first instance and in the Court of Appeal. The video then explains the House of Lords' decision in Page v Smith [1996] while outlining three significances of the Lords' decision in the case. 00:00 Introduction and facts of Page v Smith [1996]. 01:14 Decision at first instance in...
Case Summary: White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]-Tort law-Rescuers
zhlédnutí 201Před 8 měsíci
In this video I explain the facts of White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]. I summarise the decisions reached at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and in the House of Lords. Cases mentioned: Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992] Chapters 00:00 Introduction and facts of White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. 01:23 Who were the defendants and who was the claiman...
Case Summary- Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992]- Control Mechanisms-Tort law
zhlédnutí 390Před 9 měsíci
In this video I summarise the case Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992]. I explain the facts of the case, the decision reached by the House of Lords and the three control mechanisms that they outlined, setting precedent for the requirements secondary victims would need to meet in order to establish a case for pure psychiatric injury in English tort law. What to watch next How does...
How does a secondary victim of psychiatric injury get damages in tort law?
zhlédnutí 323Před 9 měsíci
In this video I explain how a secondary victim of psychiatric harm can establish a claim for damages in tort under English law. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction 01:04 What type of psychiatric injury will the court recognise? Are stress and grief recognised? Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992] ion v Hampstead Health Authority [1994],, McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983], Attia v British Gas [...
How does a primary victim establish a case for damages for psychiatric harm in tort law?
zhlédnutí 288Před 9 měsíci
In this video I explain how a primary victim can establish a case for damages for psychiatric harm in Tort law. Cases Discussed include the following: Page v Smith [1996] Dulieu v White [1901] Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992] McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1994] Nicholls v Rushton [1992] Young v Charles Church [1997] 00:00 Can a primary victim get damages for pure psychiatric harm?...
Victorian Railway Commissioners v Coultas (1888)
zhlédnutí 234Před 9 měsíci
Victorian Railway Commissioners v Coultas (1888)
Who won in Dulieu v White & Sons [1901]?
zhlédnutí 433Před 10 měsíci
Who won in Dulieu v White & Sons [1901]?
Contract law: Invitation to Treat or Offer?
zhlédnutí 9KPřed rokem
Contract law: Invitation to Treat or Offer?
What is a legally binding offer? How can an offer be made by conduct?
zhlédnutí 1KPřed rokem
What is a legally binding offer? How can an offer be made by conduct?
Contract Law: Unilateral and Bilateral Contracts
zhlédnutí 1,9KPřed rokem
Contract Law: Unilateral and Bilateral Contracts
Contract Law- What is a legally binding agreement?
zhlédnutí 10KPřed rokem
Contract Law- What is a legally binding agreement?
Who makes laws in the UK? What types of law are made in the UK?
zhlédnutí 536Před rokem
Who makes laws in the UK? What types of law are made in the UK?
The 1966 Practice Statement, MPC v Caldwell [1982] and R v G & R [2003]
zhlédnutí 806Před rokem
The 1966 Practice Statement, MPC v Caldwell [1982] and R v G & R [2003]
Thanks for sharing!
You are welcome.
Thanks for sharing!
You are welcome.
Thank you, love from down under. ❤
You are so welcome. ❤️
she didn't buy the drink in question , she had no contractual agreement with the Cafe owner nor does she have with the manufacturer.
What's the application of the principle of law this case
❤
❤
Thank you Denise 🙏
@IshaDumere You are very welcome.
🙏
Great information! You said that the precedent “must” be followed. My question is what if a lower Court decides NOT to follow higher Court precedent and are there any examples of consequences in this type situation?
@wiltonsaunders7606 Thanks for the comment. I am glad the information is useful to you. There are methods that judges can use to justify not following a precedent. One of them is 'distinguishing'. Please have a look at the video linked below. It will explain how that works. As 'distinguishing' is acceptable in the system, there are no consequences for judges when they apply it. It's also good to bear in mind that if someone believes a judge has not followed a precedent in their case, they can appeal- if an appeal is possible. I hope this helps. czcams.com/video/Z-BMznH4pLM/video.html
@@LawwithDenise 🙏 thank you. I watched the link and it was very helpful as based on the substance of both cases referenced I agree with the Court’s decision in determining that the two cases shared key difference in which the precedent rightly so should not have been allowed. I am a subscriber from The Bahamas and your information is helpful. Take care and again Thank You!
@wiltonsaunders7606 You are very welcome. Thanks for sharing your opinion and location. It is always great to know how the work is received by others and I love knowing where people are learning from. :) All the best to you!
Can I share my binding precedent case with you? I’ll like for you to analyze it and post it on your page. It’s quite interesting. Thanks!
Thanks for the message. i am happy to learn more about your case. However, I cannot guarantee that I will share an analysis of it on the channel. Please feel free to share the details here or by email. Kind regards, Denise.
What is obiter dicta
@VictoriaAsare-cb4np Thanks for the question. You will an explanation of obiter dicta in this video m.czcams.com/video/YpC19ge2_No/video.html&pp=gAQBiAQB All the best. Denise.
Love from India ❤
Thanks for the ❤. I have sent some back to India. :)
i love your style of teach it's makes it easier for me thank you🙏🏽
You are welcome. All the best to you.
Great delivery 🎉
Thank you.
Great job ❤❤
@alansoul344 Thanks.
This is so helpful, especially for students thank you so much Denise
@Hartyyy04 Thanks for the feedback. You are very welcome.
you are the best
Thanks for your kind words. All the best to you. :)
This lesson couldn’t have been explained and summarised any better ❤️
❤ Thanks for this comment. Wishing you the very best in all your endeavours.
Thank you so much, this has helped more than you know, amazing explanation
You are welcome. This is exactly why I do this work, so people can really understand the law and the system better. All the best to you. Denise.
Most interesting. Today I saw an item for sale on a UK website at a price, there was a discount code that I had to input to achieve a more favourable price. That done the website detailed a significant discount, larger then expected. I hit the purchase buttons, instructing that the price be taken from a credit card. The apparent sale & purchase were acknowledged by email at the discounted price. So, please correct me if I'm wrong. There was an:- Invitation to treat. Offer. Acceptance of offer. Payment in full of the agreed price of £359.64. Then a few hours later, I received an email from the seller, cancelling the order & that monies paid via my credit card would later be refunded. BIG question: Can I enforce the contract of sale & purchase in a UK court of law? Can you advise please, as I do not know enough about legal stuff. I've just done some mad searching & found phrases such as Breach of Contract &Sue for specific performance. Where do I stand legally please?
@johnkay4701 Thanks for the message. Firstly, I can't give legal advice. However, I can explain some things for you. The short answer is, 'no, you can't take the seller to court'. Invitation to treat and offer are foundational theories in contract law. Law students normally study other areas of contract law such as when an offer or acceptance can be withdrawn, which add a little more complexity to how these theories play out in reality. Furthermore, your situation is directly related to another area of law, consumer law. As a consumer you have certain rights such as the right to receive the goods you ordered and the right to receive them in satisfactory condition. You don't have a right to take the seller to court if they realise they cannot provide the goods and promise to refund you. If they don't refund you, then maybe we could be onto something, though. :) I hope this helped a bit. Take care now. Love, Law with Denise. :)
@@LawwithDenise Hi Denise, thank you for your response. The company that I'd ordered this good from stocks this item, so they could most definitely fulfil the contract of sale. They issue is, that they do not like the price that their online system had offered & I had agreed to, & then paid via my credit card. So under consumer law, I don't wish them to just cancel my order & give me a refund; I wish them to fully fulfil the contract of purchase & send me the goods that I'd ordered & pre-paid for in full. So can they legally just unilaterally CANCEL such an order (contract of purchase) unilaterally & refund me my pre-paid money? I simply need to find out whether they are now legally bound to deliver the good to me at the price that I've paid, & if not, can I enforce it in law? I don't wish to receive a refund, I need the goods. It is an item that they probably have many of, just sitting in a warehouse. They simply made an error & applied a larger discount online, which probably means they would make a loss on the sale of this good instead of a profit. So surely, Invitation to treat, offer, acceptance, payment in full, has ALL been fulfilled by law. Have I got this wrong? NB. I have screen-prints of all the stages of the transaction & an email of order confirmation from the company. All should be good proof of the price agreed by their online system.
@johnkay4701 I see what you mean. Ok, so in your situation you will need to get familiar with precedent with similar facts to your case. Those cases will tell you if you have any chance of getting the business to fulfil the contract or not. I have never studied such cases, but I found this article which could be a good start www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/e-commerce-law-involving-electronic-contracting-contract-law-essay.php I hope this is somewhat helpful. This is such an interesting area of law, if I wasn't tied up with other work, I would be keen to delve into the case law with you. All the best, Denise.
@@LawwithDenise I thought that I'd update you as to what has happened Denise, as you were good enough to reply to me. The company Aferiy, tried to offer a slightly better discount off their price; however it was only small & I rejected this in writing. I gave them a time deadline for them to concede or I would initiate a claim in the UK Small Claims Court. Heard nothing. Then with about 3-hours to go, I sent them an email reminder of my action & this would be the last communication I would send before commencing the legal action at my set deadline. With minutes to my deadline, they sent me an email compromise offer of a special discount allowing me to purchase at a price of £635. This was about a 'meeting in the middle' price. I'd already tried to check whether they had a UK subsidiary registered with Companies House, but my searches found nothing; their parent company trades out of Hong Kong. Without me being able to find a UK subsidiary, I thought that launching a small claims action would prove difficult. So I accepted their much better/significant discount & charged them not to renege on this latest offer of theirs. So in conclusion, I paid £635 & now have an Aferiy power station delivered & working, having saved about £350 off their previous best price. Hope that I did the right thing; hang tough, compromise, reasonable deal. I think I paid just under their cost price. Worth the hassle? Probably.
@johnkay4701 Thanks for the update. Well done to you! :) It's great that you shared your story. Now other people can see it and follow what you did if necessary. All the best. Denise.
This is amazing! Thank you so so much ❤
@_-FreePalestine-_ Awww... Thanks for the comment. :) ❤ You are very welcome.
Good
What about advertisements for example "5 handmade cups to be sold to the first 5 customers that pays $5 by Tuesday " Would this be conisdered a unilateral or bilateral advertisement
Denise, this is a great video and very helpful! Thank you
Thanks for the feedback. Always happy to help. :)
Yet in reality the Postal Union was at Fault... And sadly back then the Postmaster General was the Judge... Or Administrator... Can we say BIASED... ❤🎉
I now find law simple,thank you
You are welcome. :)
Hi, thank you for the video. Can you make one for discussing the distinction between primary and secondary victims and to what extent that the damage claims for secondary victims accurued consistency and fairness?
@ysixthwm3774 You are welcome. Thanks for the suggestion for new videos.
Thank you, Denise.
@themeliadonpepe6713 You are welcome. :)
Thank you
You are welcome.
I like your explanation
Thanks for the comment. All the best.
Very helpful video! It was very clear and easy to understand the points in law!
Thanks for the feedback. I wish you the very best in your studies.
It was helpful mam Thank you ...
@amitsharma-fk7re That's great to know. Thanks for telling me. All the best.
beautifully explained, thanks!
@gaonemokute8896 Thanks to you! Take care of yourself.
Based in South Africa and I am starting to enjoy your channel. Appreciate the way you simplify and explain. Perhaps you should categorize your content into which info is or will be appropriate for the different years of study. This is my 1st year and I am in my 50's and shew it's a lot of reading. So your vids are a good alternative as a means learning. And well done on all your academic achievements to date 🌹
@rodrique1971 Thanks for the comment and your kind words. I am glad the channel is helping you. However, I would not advise you to use the videos as an alternative to reading, instead, I would advise you to use them as a supplement to your reading. I appreciate the suggestion to organise the videos appropriate to the different years of study. I will come back to this idea later this year. Perhaps you would benefit from joining my mailing list. Please follow the link to my blog and wait for the pop up which will ask for your email address. www.lawwithdenise.com/blog I won't spam you. :) Denise
You made it clear and understood saved me big bucks from getting churned by an Attorney
Thanks for the feedback. All the best.
Thank you, very clear
@antoinedelebecque1980 You are welcome. All the best.
Thanks so much for this. It would be appreciated if you could suggest any materials that speak about psychiatric injury in an employment context. Thank you.
@kassiespages4727 Thanks for the comment. You are welcome. I am really sorry that I haven't prepared any materials on psychiatric injury in the employment context. I do have books which refer to the cases, but I haven't prepared any materials yet.
@@LawwithDenise oh ok thank you for responding. Do you mind telling me the name of those texts, perhaps i could find them.
@kassiespages4727 You are most welcome. I am going through a textbook called, Tort law: Texts and Materials by Mark Lunney and Ken Oliphant and I can see references to cases relating to psychiatric injury in employment contexts. Cases discussed are McFarlane v EE Caledonia (which I have a video on), Hegarty v EE Caledonia [1997] and White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. They also discuss Young v Charles Church (1997) and Hatton v Sutherland [2002]. Are you familiar with these cases? I have two videos on White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. They would probably help to understand some of the law relating to employees, but of course they are not enough if you are focusing on employment issues. I do have notes on Charles v Young Church (1997). It's on my list of cases to summarise and upload a video on and wouldn't be ready until February, but maybe I could share the write up as a blog on my website for you. Please let me know if it's a case that would help you and I will see what I can do. Another book I have here is Tort law by Sara Green and Jodi Gardner. I can see two cases related to employment issues. They are Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd [2007] and Barber v Somerset County Council [2004].
Thank you so much for a clear concise demonstration on secondary victims, this is now cemented in my brain 😂
@DionneJohnson-zd3hi That's great.
Could you do lectures about law please
@RabiaBibi-op9oy Thanks for the comment. There are lectures on law on the channel as well.
Ma please do you have cases for an invitation to treat
@Armani_k I only have this one czcams.com/video/rqLrojYB_1Q/video.htmlsi=tIABWw7lmGp9DCEU And this might be helpful czcams.com/video/EKEbOWd7swk/video.htmlsi=MP1NHAIHm9-o8WpK
What exactly do you want? Case summaries or lengthy explanations of cases on invitation to treat?
@@LawwithDenisecase summaries please. Thank you so much for the links ma❤
@Armani_k You are welcome. Thanks for clarifying what you are looking for.
Doing my revision for exams and your info is the most updated and better explained out there. Excellent video!
Thanks for the feedback. I am glad my work is useful. All the best in your exams.
Hello. Is there a video on the elements of a legally binding agreement?
@Stephen_nt Yes, here you go czcams.com/video/8g4sQU-5_QA/video.html
@Stephen_nt Here is a playlist on Contract law. I hope it is helpful. czcams.com/video/Cr2zHcuGIHA/video.html
Great Explanation Ma'am. Could you please help me to understand what's the difference between a "normal Appeal" and "Appeal by way case stated".
@Saffron_Kid thanks for this comment. Case stated appeals relate to a question of law. In other words, the appellant argues that a judge did not apply the law correctly and they ask the higher court to look into this. Non case stated appeals could be concerned with a court's decision or sentence. So, this type of appeal may be concerned with how long a person was sentenced to prison and the defendant may argue that they think it is too long a sentence; and they ask the higher court to reduce it. Or the appeal may be based on the final decision reached by the court. For example, a person may say that when the court decided that they were 'guilty', the decision was wrong and that this wrong decision was reached because of something such as wrong understanding of facts of the case; but not wrong application of the law because remember that whenever the appeal is about wrong application of the law, we are dealing with case stated appeals.
FAV CHANNEL TILL IM IN LAW SCHOOL
YOU ARE THE BEST
Awww. Thank you. :) I am glad my work is serving useful. All the best to you.
Aw thank you. This is helpful to understand
You are welcome. 😊
Love your videos very helpful💖
Thanks for the feedback. I am glad they are helpful.
smart, wise, and beautiful too..
Thanks for your kind words. All the best.
Maam, my law professor mentioned that the doctrine of precedence however is not followed in the matters of criminal offences. She said that it is only used to strengthen the standing in the form of reference or verbatim but is not binding for the court to give a similar decision. Can u please explain?
@pratikshashukla2464 Thanks for this message. I would suggest asking your law professor to explain what she meant when she said what she said. My explanation of the doctrine of judicial precedent is in some videos on this channel. All the best. Denise.
❤please talk about privity of contract 🙏
awesome,,,,,, lovely
Thank you for your videos They're really helpful
You're welcome. Thanks for the feedback. I wish you the very best in all your endeavours.