![HaveSomeFun3344](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 117
- 4 084 740
HaveSomeFun3344
Registrace 13. 10. 2021
Johnny Carson Memories: Discussion With Audience Member Begins After Her Home State Is Mentioned
This came from a segment where Johnny was reading postcards from viewers containing jokes in order to help his show during the Writers’ Strike (which had ended). EXCERPT. Original Airdate: 6/9/88
zhlédnutí: 294
Video
Johnny Carson Memories: Joke About Winchell’s Donuts Company Being Sold, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 267Před měsícem
Original Airdates: 7/21/89 and 3/19/85
Johnny Carson Memories: Johnny Shares Stories About Marlon Brando And John Wayne
zhlédnutí 377Před měsícem
Guests: Christopher Reeve and Diahann Carroll. Original Airdate (both stories, same night): 7/26/79
Johnny Carson Memories: Ed Ad-Libs About Johnny’s Office Light
zhlédnutí 1,5KPřed 2 měsíci
EXCERPT. Original Airdate: 2/25/81
Blooper From Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In: Gladys, Tyrone & Don Rickles
zhlédnutí 1,8KPřed 2 měsíci
The entire clip is available on CZcams.
Johnny Carson Memories: Ed’s Wife And Ed Both Get Stung By Bees
zhlédnutí 3,5KPřed 2 měsíci
EXCERPT. Original Airdate: 6/26/86
Johnny Carson Memories: Modified Design Of Diapers, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 1KPřed 3 měsíci
Original Airdates: 5/19/88 and 6/26/86
Johnny Carson Memories: Bob Newhart (Guest Off-Camera) Gives A Great Punchline During Interview
zhlédnutí 15KPřed 3 měsíci
Saundra Santiago (‘Miami Vice’ cast member) talks about her dog’s identity crisis. The complete interview is available on CZcams. EXCERPT. Original Airdate: 9/17/86
Johnny Carson Memories: Johnny Attempts To Catch A Sponsor’s Product Thrown By Doc
zhlédnutí 1,3KPřed 3 měsíci
Original Airdate: 2/25/81
Johnny Carson Memories: Joan Embery Brings Along Two Orangutans
zhlédnutí 1,4KPřed 3 měsíci
Her appearance was shortened because the show ran long that night. Original Airdate: 6/26/86
Johnny Carson Memories: Extended Clip Of Johnny’s Nudity-Themed (LOL) Ratings Segment
zhlédnutí 1,2KPřed 3 měsíci
Because of ratings, the theme of Giraldo Rivera’s show was going to be about nudity. This segment is Johnny’s response to that show. COMPLETE SEGMENT. Original Airdate: 2/1/89
Johnny Carson Memories: A Joke About Virile Men's Health, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 1KPřed 6 měsíci
EXCERPTS. Original Airdate: 2/1/89
Johnny Carson Memories: Foreign Commercials
zhlédnutí 228Před 6 měsíci
COMPLETE SEGMENT. Original Airdate: 5/28/80
Johnny Carson Memories: A Joke About Ronald Reagan's Age, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 381Před 7 měsíci
EXCERPTS. Original Airdates: 7/23/80 and 3/19/85
Johnny Carson Memories: Another Joke About Divorce, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 1KPřed 8 měsíci
EXCERPTS. Original Airdates: 5/4/77 and 5/14/82
Johnny Carson Memories: Carnac The Magnificent
zhlédnutí 93KPřed 8 měsíci
Johnny Carson Memories: Carnac The Magnificent
Johnny Carson Memories: Show Open Includes Tommy Newsom Interaction, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 35KPřed 9 měsíci
Johnny Carson Memories: Show Open Includes Tommy Newsom Interaction, Plus Extra
Johnny Carson Memories: Jim Fowler Brings A Bear Cub To The Show
zhlédnutí 11KPřed 10 měsíci
Johnny Carson Memories: Jim Fowler Brings A Bear Cub To The Show
Johnny Carson Memories: Ed Lands A Zinger During ‘Carnac The Magnificent’
zhlédnutí 986Před 11 měsíci
Johnny Carson Memories: Ed Lands A Zinger During ‘Carnac The Magnificent’
Johnny Carson Memories: Discussion Of English Terms/Expressions Evolves Into Game Show
zhlédnutí 10KPřed 11 měsíci
Johnny Carson Memories: Discussion Of English Terms/Expressions Evolves Into Game Show
Johnny Carson Memories: Audience Member Gets A Kiss During ‘Stump The Band’
zhlédnutí 3,3KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Audience Member Gets A Kiss During ‘Stump The Band’
Johnny Carson Memories: Professor Shares Two Thought-Provoking Puzzles With Johnny
zhlédnutí 903Před rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Professor Shares Two Thought-Provoking Puzzles With Johnny
Johnny Carson Memories: His Trademark Pencils With Erasers On Both Ends
zhlédnutí 2,4KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: His Trademark Pencils With Erasers On Both Ends
Johnny Carson Memories: A Monologue Joke Aimed At Director Bobby Quinn, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 1,6KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: A Monologue Joke Aimed At Director Bobby Quinn, Plus Extra
Johnny Carson Memories: Joan Collins' Masked Interview, Then She Jokes About Monogram Towels
zhlédnutí 808Před rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Joan Collins' Masked Interview, Then She Jokes About Monogram Towels
Johnny Carson Memories: Guest Discusses Farm Life And Marriage, Then Has Johnny Engage In A Stunt
zhlédnutí 1,9KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Guest Discusses Farm Life And Marriage, Then Has Johnny Engage In A Stunt
Johnny Carson Memories: A Life-In-Reverse Observation From Comedian Sean Morey
zhlédnutí 689Před rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: A Life-In-Reverse Observation From Comedian Sean Morey
Johnny Carson Memories: Actress Christina Pickles Stumps Johnny With A Question About Marriage
zhlédnutí 1,9KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Actress Christina Pickles Stumps Johnny With A Question About Marriage
Johnny Carson Memories: Post Office ‘Delivery’ Joke, Plus Extra
zhlédnutí 2,1KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Post Office ‘Delivery’ Joke, Plus Extra
Johnny Carson Memories: Brief Discussion On Night When Things Aren’t Going So Well
zhlédnutí 1,8KPřed rokem
Johnny Carson Memories: Brief Discussion On Night When Things Aren’t Going So Well
Was this a Linux advertisement?
Good show
When's the last time you saw a legitimate logic puzzle on late night TV?
There's only four possible outcomes. #1 R R R, #2 R R B, #3 R B B, #4 B B B. The only two outcomes where all three would raise their hands are #3 and #4. It isn't #3 because if either of the people wearing the black hats had seen a red hat, they would have realized they must be wearing one of the black hats. Since neither said anything, it must be outcome #4. I'm not good at these things and it took me 90 minutes to work through. Makes sense now.
The real 3 black hat puzzle is worded differently by a university professor which makes it mich easier to decipher
You have two buckets of water and you have to dump them into a barrel but you have to keep the water separate. How do you do that? You freeze one of them.
Way past that kids bed time. Tough interview.
The problem is everyone is wearing all black hats. It would work if one is wearing a red hat.
It does indeed simplify the problem. It also sucks the mystery and delight out of the problem. If there are 3 men and I know one of the hats is red, then if I see only black hats on others, don't bother raising hands. My hat must be the red one.
Its a <show-your-work> equation. Here's a fun iQ quiz that most get wrong: < I'm 2 years old, my brother is half my age. I just turned 100. What age is my brother?>
99
For clarity it should say, "WHEN I was two years old..." just saying 😃
Who’s on first?
But what if you have to give the what-color-you're-wearing answer alone or first? _Then_ can you solve it 100% of the time? Final mental test: If you have _three_ smart people, they'll all say black and be correct.
exactly
there's a flaw in this test. the person giving the test is lying when he says one of them has a red hat. that means to get the correct answer those taking the test must assume they're being lied to. no one would assume that because there's no reason to assume it. what the employer is actually saying is - the first applicant that deduces the employer is lying to them gets the job. what kind of way is that to run a business? thanks for the video. it was funny.
No. The statement is, “you’re either wearing a red or black hat.” Doesn’t mean any one of the mean has to be wearing a red hat.
@@I_need_a_new_user_name Exactly <"each is wearing EITHER a black hat or red hat">
@cjmacq-vg8um <"A hat is placed on each man's head. Each is told you have EITHER a black hat or a red hat">. Key word EITHER
The person giving the test did not say one has a red hat. He said EITHER one has a red hat OR they all have black hats. Its one of the three guys that ASSUMED there should be one red hat. He assumed wrong.
The winning applicant would raise their hand and say black because an all black hat scenario is the only equal opportunity scenario that would pick an applicant based on response time although there is a risk that all applicants would respond with the correct answer simultaneously. An all red hat scenario, no one raises there hand or gives a reason, or is hired; either one red or one black hat scenario eliminates one applicant unfairly; a one black hat scenario two applicants could simultaneously raise their hand with correct reason but the other applicant could not and would not be eliminated based on reasoning; one red hat scenario three applicants would simultaneously raise their hand and two could accurately identify their hat color based on number of raised hands, the hat colors the see, and give reason but one would be eliminated unfairly by giving a wrong hat color black when red. The all black hat scenario all raise hand, all could could correctly identify their hat color, all could give a correct reason, so answering first is key but scenario risks all answer correctly simultaneously then the employer could choose randomly.
The flaw here is that the smartest guy would reason his hat is black because if it was red, then the other two would have answered with no pause. The very assumption relies on the reason the other two paused or not paused. But if the other two don't reason the same at the same time, that assumption becomes unreliable. If they were not smart enough to reason their own hat is black at the same time as our smartest guy, then they may pause even if they see a red hat or may answer quickly even if they see two black hats. The smartest guy would still interpret the assumption and reason similarly but his answer would be wrong.
The employer would not have chosen the one red hat scenario because it would be unfair to the red hat candidate. Why eliminate potentially the best candidate for no reason.
@@42976675 That's all you learned from my comment? That's not the point. You wouldn't hire the guy who answered his hat color quickly but gave a flawed reason. Why conduct the test for no reason.
Borrrrring, Johnny. Pretty sure his entire studio audience nodded off.
Intelligent??? No.
The hat puzzle is brilliant. I initially thought it was a silly experiment where none of the men would be able to figure it out since they all would see at least one black hat, and would not know whether their own hat was black or red. But the key was to assume your own hat is red and look at it from the other two men's perspective. The first man to figure that out is the most intelligent, and gets the job.
there's a flaw in this test. the person giving the test is lying when he says one of them has a red hat. that means to get the correct answer those taking the test must assume they're being lied to. no one would assume that because there's no reason to assume it. what the employer is actually saying is - the first applicant that deduces the employer is lying to them gets the job. what kind of way is that to run a business?
@@cjmacq-vg8um No, each person is simply told they either have a black or a red hat. They might assume there is at least one of each color, but they are never told that.
@@ThePopeII ... with the mere mention of a red hat people are going to assume there's a red hat in the mix. the test is purposely misleading. its what's known as a classic "trick question." there's many ways to reword the test so its clear there maybe no red hat at all. sorry, i think the logic and the test are flawed.
@@cjmacq-vg8um Yea I agree that makes the puzzle extra tricky. It can vary a bit depending on how the instructions are given. However it could still be seen as a test to see how well people pay attention to detail for the specific instructions given, as well as having the reasoning ability to solve it.
@@ThePopeII ... we also have to remember this was a thought experiment. it was never actually used by any employer to determin someone's employment. could you imagine if we had to start solving silly riddles and puzzles to get a job? this particular puzzle reminded me of those yt "i. q. tests" that contain nothing but trick questions, riddles and puzzles to solve. this was an interesting puzzle i was destined to fail because i'm TOO logical!
With these three contestants, there could be no other solution.
Ed had to add the extra Z to the TV station name (WXYZZ) because there is an actual WXYZ (Detroit's longtime ABC affiliate)
Tommy said it was 1933. It was 1932.
The beauty of the puzzle is when you can make the transition to any number of men, not just 3. For instance, if there are 4 men, then the 4th man should reason that if his hat were red, then each of the other 3 men would be able to use the solution for 3 and give the correct answer. But since they did not, the 4th man knows his hat is black.
What???. The problem said 3. I Don't get the job because if one has a red hat he sees 2 black hats but it's if you see a black hat. So, if one has a red hat they all 3 still rase their hands. So, one with a red hat still rases his hand.
@@davidheathcoat3408 Maybe I didn't explain it well. Lets accept the 3 men, 3 black hat solution of the video. In a group of 3 men where they each see black hats on the other 2 and all 3 raise their hands, THEN blessed with perfect logic, each of them should conclude that their own hat is black and each should race to give the correct answer. NOW, introduce a 4th man who thinks, I see 3 black hats. If my hat is red, then I don't matter to the other 3 men and they should STILL find the correct answer with their perfect logic. But none of them are speaking up. It can ONLY be that my hat is NOT red, so my hat MUST be black and I shall give it as the correct answer.
@@pascal1947 It wouldn't work with 4 men because if your hat were the only red hate, each of the other 3 men would see 2 black hats. So they would not know their own hat was black, because the other two men wearing black hats would be seeing each other's black hat.
there's a flaw in this test. the person giving the test is lying when he says one of them has a red hat. that means to get the correct answer those taking the test must assume they're being lied to. no one would assume that because there's no reason to assume it. what the employer is actually saying is - the first applicant that deduces the employer is lying to them gets the job. what kind of way is that to run a business?
@cjmacq-vg8um they did not say there was a red hat. Either means maybe. Each of you will either have a black or red. Not one of you will have a red hat.
Ah, got it. Makes total sense now. A bit confusing but the answer lies in the reaction of the other two men. Their uncertainty is the give away because if there really was a red hat then they would have known the answer.
there's a flaw in this test. the person giving the test is lying when he says one of them has a red hat. that means to get the correct answer those taking the test must assume they're being lied to. no one would assume that because there's no reason to assume it. what the employer is actually saying is - the first applicant that deduces the employer is lying to them gets the job. what kind of way is that to run a business?
Yes sir. Excellent job
Since neither one of the fellows said that.... The key resides in the winner's hesitation -- which tells him that he must be wearing a black hat.
Back then the tickets were free and and available in the front of the theater entrance or by mail. Shows were done in the afternoon. They were fun. Vaya con Dios
That makes sense
Who's on first?
Thank's, that' what I was gonna say!
Even if Johnny had a red hat on, everyone would still raise their hand, because they all see at least one person with a black hat
It's not a good explanation
The explanation of "there was a pause then the man knew his hat was black" is correct. However, they would all know this, not just one of them.
How did we go from something this fascinating to Jimmy Fallon playing simple party games?
Very simply...a very-much dumbed-down, classless audience.
De-evolution.
This is actually an early example of "social engineering" as used in computer science, used for investigation rsther than hacking.
I get it It's what you call Logical Deduction or Process Of Elimination
I’d change to a babooska!
🐈⬛ 🙄 How come I got a black cat??
If all intelligent, possibilities: 1. No black, everyone know cause no one raise their hand 2. 1 black, everyone know too cause 2 hands raise 1 doesn’t 3. 2 blacks, if no one jump to answer, the one seeing 1 black 1 red would know he has a black. 4. 3 blacks, if no one can quickly be #3, than each wearing black.
Even if the person has a black or red all three see a black hat and if there is a red hat they still lift the hat.
Making the assumption is key.
That was a complete bomb.
Agreed.
Here's the proper answer: The smartest person reasons as follows: If I'm wearing a red hat, the other two guys would quickly reason that they're looking at each other's black hat and would have already claimed their hats are black. The only reason they don't do that is because I'm not wearing a red hat. My hat must be black.
But the other two men would reason exactly the same as the first guy and thus all conclude their hat is black simultaneously. Because if you otherwise assume the other two men are less intelligent, then you couldn't assume the reason why they would (or would not) answer. You can't assume they'd be smart enough to recognize they don't immediately know that they have a black hat and not smart enough to draw the same conclusion as the first guy to deduce that they do have a black hat.
@@packerfan2010 No, the idea is to determine who is the smartest. Assuming one guy is smarter than the other two, he's the one who will first figure out that his hat must be black.
@@kenhaley4 you should read reply then because if only one was smart enough to deduce his own hat is black and the other two couldnt then his rationale is flawwed because its based on assuming the other two are smart enough to respond or not respond when they did If you assume only one of the three guys is smart enough to figure out his own hat color and the other two are not, you create a paradox because the reasoning that would lead the smart guy to his conclusion relies on the other two to be equally smart but you're assuming otherwise, completing the contradiction
@@packerfan2010 Let me reiterate. Assume I'm one of these guys, and I know the other two aren't stupid. After all, we're all applying for the same job. So, I look at the others and see 2 black hats. Now I think, either my hat is red or black. If my hat is red, each of the other guys sees one red and one black hat. We all raised our hands, so they know we all see at least one black hat. It would only take them a few seconds to realize they're looking at each other's hat, and they would almost immediately announce that their hat is black. But several seconds go by, and no one says anything. So I conclude, they must not see a red and a black hat. They must be looking at 2 black hats, the same as me. Therefore my hat must be black. Now, sooner or later, we can assume all 3 guys would reach the same conclusion, but the smartest guy would reach that conclusion first. It wouldn't be simultaneous, because it's not an easy conclusion to arrive at. This is a classic problem--I first heard it decades ago.
@@kenhaley4 The difference between the first guy answering and the third guy answering would only be a few seconds but you're just splitting hairs at that point.
Waste of time. Instructions were flawed.
This is messed up. The puzzle instructions DID NOT say that there was only one red hat. Therfore the puzzle, as given, is bogus and not solvable.
Turns out there wasn’t any red hat.
This is as bad as "who's on first?",,,,Abbott and Costello.
For the problem to make any sense there must be at least one of each color and the instructions would so state. I think Johnny is misstating the problem. If all black hats, everyone would see at least 1 black so all would raise hand. If all red, no one would see black, so no hands raised.
No, to demonstrate the logic of the problem you need to have everyone wearing black hats or two wear black and one wear red hat. 0 black and 3 red: no hands raised 1 black and 2 red: two hands raised 2 black and 1 red: three hands raised 3 black and 0 red: three hands raised The solution is obvious and immediate if you see 0 or 2 hands raised so you need 3 hands raised to figure the logic of the problem.
@@packerfan2010 Your delineation is correct which illustrates the problem's problematic issue.
@@roseymalino9855 The problem's problematic issue is not the necessity of Prescence of each color, which is your assertion. My replied proved that's not the case.
Actually, the first one to realize that none of them can answer, and also realize why- understands that his own hat is black.
@@peterbaruxis2511 your flaw is assuming only one can draw that conclusion. The rationale for one getting it correct fails if the other two dont also get it correct You can't assume the other two are smart enough to know their hat cannot be red while also assuming they aren't smart enough to know that their hat must then be black
You can say that again
A simpler way to put it would be that three black hats are the only combination where all three hands would be raised and the answer wouldn’t immediately be obvious. Since the riddle must be designed to be difficult and not give an advantage to any one person, it must be three black hats. Another way to put it would be that the raised hands weren’t the only piece of info used the solve the puzzle - it was the raised hands plus everyone’s confused pause.
False, two black hats and one red hat would cause three hands to raise.
Never ever ever assume for a logic problem that just because the question/problem/riddle exists that it must be difficult.
@@packerfan2010 yes but the answer would be immediately obvious to the people with black hats
Your first paragraph is false. No matter if all 3 have black hats or one has a red hat they all SEE A BLACK HAT....so the guy that says his hat is black has a 50/50 chance..the instructions are not giving enough info to do anything but guess. Now if the instructions say IF YOU SEE 2 BLACK HATS RAISE YOUR HAND THEN THERE IS ENOUGH INFORMATION TO BE 100%. SO, IF I SAID I HAVE A BLACK HAT THE CORRECT ANSWER IS I HAVE A 50% CHANCE OF GETTING IT RIGHT. BECAUSE IF I HAVE A RED HAT BOTH THE OTHER GUYS SILL RAISE THEIR HAND. 50% GUESS. THEIR IS NO 100% ANSWER SO NO CORRECT ANSWER.
I initially had trouble understanding it, so this seemed a good way to explain: If all three raise their hands, indicating they see at least one black hat, we know the possibilities are limited to there being either 0 or 1 red hats because if there were more, at least one person would not raise their hand. Suppose the ultimately successful applicant is indeed wearing a red hat. It would be as if it were emblazoned with fluorescent letters: “This the ONLY red hat!” If the others saw such a hat, they would know their own hats were black and shout out the answer. Since this did not occur, the successful applicant concludes he’s not wearing a red hat, so his must be black. This of course assumes the other two are smart enough to realize there can be no more than one red hat, but NOT smart enough to play the same waiting game as he does. If they all used the same tactic, they would each assume they had a black hat…and be right.
YES! Exactly! Someone gets it!
The all black hat scenario is the only equal opportunity scenario which is the only one the employer would use to find the best applicant. But might find three.
And not a drop imbibed! Silly fun but genius. Great show.
Either scenario of 3 black hats, or 1 red + 2 black hats = 3 raised hands. That's where the real thinking comes in.
The solution here is a little flawed. If we assumed all three were intelligent, then all three would conclude their hat is black after the pause. You're assuming that two of the men uses perfect logic only some of the time.
One was just a bit more intelligent than the others? Sigh…
@@gravizfake In that case, no information infered from their actions is reliable so he was only correct by luck.
This has me so baffled if all three are wearing a black hat, which is the case, but they don’t know what color their hat is if they see a black hat, each person sees two people with black hats on. As long as one person that you’re looking at has a black hat on then you can easily assume you’re wearing a red hat. And all three see two black hats then that person assumes they may have the red hat on.. So how is it that a person would say I’m wearing the black hat because neither of the two said they’re wearing the red hat? Is it because they did not mention that they have the red hat on is supposedly makes the most intelligent person realize he must be wearing black? Then suppose they did answer that they were wearing the red hat they would’ve been mistaken, but how does that confirm that your head is black? It is only then that you could correctly assume that your hat is now black because you know he’s wearing black. The other person who hasn’t mentioned what color his is you know it’s black because you can see that it is…regardless both opponents are gonna see a black hat, thus raising their hand. OK you’re wearing the black hat and everybody raises their hand. There is no true correct answer because you could definitely be wearing a red or a black hat and you could’ve been wrong had you said black and you were truly wearing red….and lost the job so I do not get this riddle and I don’t think I ever will. Each person sees a black hat, whether it’s two people wearing a black hat or one they raise their hand…..
So, there's some element of timing because he said PAUSE and its bascially process of elimination. The guy who answered correctly eliminated every other possibility. If you were one of the three guys and saw two black hats, there's two possibilities. Either your hat is red or its black. Suppose your hat is red. Let B and C be the other two guys. B raises his hand because he see's a black hat on C's head. C only sees a black hat and a red hat but because B raised his hand, C knows his own hat must be black because B cannot see his own hat. Thus, C would insanity reason that his hat is black. Similar logic suggest that B would also reason his own hat is black as well. But the PAUSE would imply that neither immediately deduced this. Therefore, this is not the case: the case where your hat is red. Therefore, the only other possibility is your hat is black. But then again, if we assumed they all knew perfect logic as is the case with these types of problems, all three would conclude their own hat is black after the pause.
Scenario 1 Everyone wears red No-one raises their hands Explanation: "We are all wearing red because no-one raised their hands." Scenario 2 Two people wear red, one wears black. Two people raise their hands Explanation: "One of us is wearing red, the person wearing black didn't raise their hand" Scenario 3 Two people wear black, one wears red. Everyone raises their hands The people wearing black know they are wearing black because in Scenario 2 (2 red hats) two people not 3 would have raised their hands. However in this scenario all three have raised their hands and the black hat wearers can see one red hat. So there can only be one red hat. Scenario 4 - the trick scenario Everyone wears black The cleverest guy figures out "if I was wearing red then guys wearing black hats would realise they are wearing black hats because we all raised our hands (scenario 3) and they can see my red hat. But they didn't say they were wearing black and are still thinking about it - so we must all be wearing black hats. The puzzle relies on an extra step in logic, the first 3 scenarios are fairly easy to work out for someone in that situation. But the final scenario (4) requires you to visualise the other three scenarios to figure out the answer.
Proving once again that no matter who the guest was, Johnny was the master and he'll never have a match.
What is the book he holds up at the end