Video

Yes, I exported the video in 8K and uploaded it to CZcams, but CZcams did not render the video in 8K. I do not know the reason. I have uploaded the raw versions of the videos in the description section, you can download them and compare them yourself. In general, the difference between the two cameras is that the new camera captures a little more detail, but the image has more grain. If you are going to upload the video to CZcams in 360 degrees, the difference between the two cameras will not be noticeable due to the limited bitrate of CZcams. However, if you are going to crop the video and use it without 360 degrees, then you can see the video in a little more detail.

@@aspetmanukyan it takes a lot longer to process. Anyway for quality comparisons you should be exporting a flat 4k. The "vr" feature really bottlenecks quality.

Camera is factory default. IR not cut.

Does the 4k not have the most highlights at iso 1000 and the most shadow info at 1250? and 400 iso is a nice blend of the two? Thats the way I always understood it, but also why the pocket is so noisy here. I mean realistically the Alexa has way better range across the board, but I imagine shooting at 800 here and using highlight recovery would make it seem like the 4k is kind of competing...even if the shadows are trash. :)

@@joshkiddfilms1295Correct, as the entire DR is being shifted upwards, so you would gain highlight information as you increase iso and lose shadow detail. The reverse is true, go down in iso and get more shadow detail (cleaner blacks) while losing information in highlights.

I did it. I will share as soon as possible...

HOCAM CANON EOS M DE KULLANDIM BEN , ÇOK KARMAŞIK VE MAKİNEYİ ÇOK YORUYOR GÜZELCE ÖĞRENİP ÖYLE KULLANMAK LAZIM

@@AlperBuran Eyevallah hocam, evet haklısınız. Ben yükledim ve denedim, kartım hızlı olmasına rağmen makina acayip kastı. Magic lantern'i silip silip yeniden ve M2'ye uyumlu farklı magic lantern yazılımlarını yükleyip kullandım, makina yine kastı, dondu, eror verdi sapıttı. Bende sinirlenip bi daha yüklememek üzere sildim. Şimdi iyiki de silmişim diyorum. Zaten bu riskler olmasa fabrika yükleyip gönderirdi. Ha sorunsuz kullananlar var yok değil. Ama ben kötü bi tecrübe edindim, yokluğunu da aramıyorum.

wrong, the highlights are clipping more on the RED than on the Alexa.

Wrong, the RED looks significantly better.

The RED is clearly losing highlight data, and this is a dynamic range test not a sharpness or noise test, so the ARRI is the pretty clear winner.

And I think you forgot that Monstro is a VV sensor, so you definitely cannot compare it to the Alexa with the same lenses... you should use a 29mm lens on the Monstro to get a similar AOV. Do the test again and we'll se which camera looks better...

1- Next month I will compare with Mini LF vs Monstro. That time I will select 4:1 compression ratio. 2- This is not resolution test. I wanted to use same lens because I wanted to compare dynamic range. It should be same brightness level. And also I used in test 2 different lens with Monstro.

HDRx record options accept only 10:1. Next month I will record without HDRx then I can record 4:1.

cevap geç oldu ama evet

@@elmasx Ne yüzle burada geziyon Berat efendi! Git ekonomiyi düzelt.

@@thegodfather4713 hazinede 600tl kalmıştıda bende canon 550d almıştım. Şimdi sattım, dolar alcam

Arri Alexa's highlights recovered and shadows cleaner then Red Monstro. So Alexa's image dynamic range is higher and cleaner. Conslusion: Alexa's image looks better...

@@aspetmanukyan thanks!

Aspet I thought the Monstro had 17 stops of DN versus 14 for the Alexa... Is that true ? Shouldn't the monstro destroy the Alexa ?

@@VincentCottier Red's DR claims have always been total BS

@@bhdfield Oh thanks for the heads up

Timelapse için Nikon D800 Gimbal'da Sony A6500 Monopod'da Blackmagic Production Camera

@@aspetmanukyan güzel çekim olmuş kutlarım