- 1
- 41 183
Hollywood Chesterton Society
Registrace 17. 11. 2013
Introduction To G.K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy - Dale Ahlquist
Dale Ahlquist, the president of the American Chesterton Society speaks on Chesterton's Orthodoxy.
www.HollywoodChestertonSociety.com
www.HollywoodChestertonSociety.com
zhlédnutí: 41 184
I love Dale’s presentation style. He is full of so much joy and pleasure, as if he is always ready to laugh. Like he finds infinite enjoyment in the world of Chesterton.
Can you talk without saying “and er” so much?
Orthodoxy is Biblical
Excellent video! I’m grateful for having been able to see past my doubts and giving this video a go, and whoah! The content was exquisite and the delivery was superb. Thank you. 👍 👍
Pouvez-vous traduire en Français ? MERCI
Look at the paradox of Eden where a paradise was agiven if the Law also was zero tolerances? unlike Jesus & his beloved community with only an expectation of it and the fulfillments of the Law via Love, Faith as Hope if not Tempter is utmost unavoidable!
GK Chesterton's Orthodoxy is the book that lit me up for Christianity, and led me to listen to the entire Bible and countless sermons. Edit: I don't like Roman Catholicism at all, but I love this book.
This is so helpful. I'm reading it now as part of my personal study plan and i keep flipping back and rereading. I'm also doing the audio book when I walk around town.
🎁G.K CHESTERTON MERCHANDISE🎁 Unisex t-shirts with an exclusive illustration: ‘G.K Chesterton’s Lost Arts of War’ 💲SIGN UP WITH YOUR EMAIL FOR A £5 DISCOUNT💲 Pick a colour and order straight to your door 👇👇👇 www.phlexiblephilosophy.com/merchandise
Although I live in New York City (lived in Bay Area for 3 years to be counted in) and have reached only the first reading of Orthodoxy, I have subscribed. Thank you, I look forward to the 2nd part. - 6/15/2022
Read 1 Corinthians 15: 14 before you read the book, then take highlighter pen and mark every sentence that contains a mustard seed's worth of empirical evidence to support the biblical resurrection claim. I can assure you that you will have no need to remove your pen top. Belief without sufficient evidence is indistinguishable from gullibility and Chesterton was demonstrably gullible in that book.
Do you have any concrete proof for your claim about belief without evidence? I've never seen any.
@@pierrebitcan Yes, the fact that I never had to remove my pen top. Additionally the fact that no Christian theist has ever presented empirical evidence to support the truth of 1 Corinthians 15: 14. Your reply is a perfect example. Instead of providing the evidence that I assert, with the same degree of confidence that the sun will rise tomorrow, is not there, you instead attempt to intellectually dishonestly shift the burden of proof. There is no empirical evidence, deal with it, or become an atheist.
@@pierrebitcan don't join the "concrete proof" argument. It's insanity.
Can't help laughing!!! I'm on my third read and third color of pen. I thought there was something wrong with me, a deficit of attention and intellect.
Thank you for your work and teachings of G.K. Your work will save souls.
This is the worst thing I've ever seen
I've read it two and a half times. And I'm just smart enough to see that there is more here than I can grasp.
Always with humor!
19:54 coulombe?
Has to be.
Haha he looks like Robert California from The Office a little bit.
The Netflix series Father Brown is based on Chestertons novels.
Another way of explaining paradox is the goldilocks principle. Too hot too cold and just right. It applies to understanding the incarnation as well as porridge
He is correct about reading Orthodoxy for the first time, i've nearly rewrote the first 3 chapters in my notebook. Looking forward to my 3rd time reading through the book. Its funny how things work out- Sam Harris sent me to Peterson, Peterson to Lewis and Lewis to Chesterton. Thanks for the talk.
I had a very similar journey. From atheism to Christian to Catholic in about 5 years.
Wow, same
We've had a similar journey to GKC
I had something similar. I went from Tolkien to Lewis, then back to Tolkien and finally to Chesterton.
funny how the intellect goes up with each author you mention in sequence
"The modern world is not evil; in some ways the modern world is far too good. It is full of wild and wasted virtues. When a religious scheme is shattered, … it is not merely the vices that are let loose. The vices are, indeed let loose, and they wander and do damage. But the virtues are let loose also; and the virtues wander more wildly, and the virtues do more terrible damage. The modern world is full of the old Christian virtues gone mad. The virtues have gone mad because they have been isolated from each other and are wandering alone." G. K. Chesterton, 'Orhtodoxy', 1908. And then, around 2015, someone coins the the phrase, 'virtue-signalling', a phrase that has come to mean a person promoting a 'progressive' policy, which is only progressing the west into cultural-barbarism. And so our world is just catching up with the thought of the Big Man, the prophet of the modern era, who will become MORE, not less, relevant, as time passes, and 'progress', continues...
It's hard to look at the world and say it's not following a path of destruction nuclear war, abortion euthanasia breaking up of the family. Too few fathers in the family greed etc I hope I'm wrong I don't see any of this as progress. We have turned from God and think we are gods and can be virtuous without His grace.
Virtue-signaling is banned in the Bible. We are told to give to charity but privately, not publicly, and we are told to clean up and be cheerful when we fast, not mope around. Edicts designed to prevent virtue-signaling, a modern word for an old idea/problem.
oh man this guy is good. like a prophet. Im only just beginning to understand him. I mean Ahlquist btw.
Thanks to /r/jordanpeterson for sending me here. Chesterton it turns out, is fantastic.
what does peterson have to say about chesterton?
Same!
I wonder, if he were around today, if he would still believe in democracy. Not the universal democracy (including both the living and the dead); but that democracy practiced in such places as the U.S.A.
what makes you think he would embrace anything but democracy? He would likely of been against Vatican II and rigidly traditional.
Democracies have become secular and materialistic. The Western democracies are turning away from God, and their Christian tradition. Think European Union. Doesn't sound like Chesterton to me. I don't know about V2: but, certainly, he would have seen CLEARLY the nuttiness of the 'spirit of V2'.
The west has been secular for some time. Now just as then, he would blame the people themselves for blind ignorance, not pin it on the failure of democracy.
Sorry. I don't understand. Democracy, by definition, is government by and for the people. I cannot help but wonder if Plato wasn't correct when he stated that democracy would ultimately evolve into tyranny. Republic, Book 8.
I don't understand your argument then. Are you not implying that Chesterton would reject democracy for another political/economic system? What would that be? Based on my knowledge of his worldview, he would not embrace a nihilistic view of democracy to begin with. He was certainly aware of the works of Plato in his time. How would they possibly have bearing on his thoughts about democracy any more today than in his time.
It's a ridiculously brilliant book, faith or not. A real modern masterpiece. Mind-blowing for me anyway, and a real shot in the heart. It's an heroic piece of writing, even if you cannot after all follow him so far as believing Christianity. I don't know if I can, but I love this book, and his writings generally. Reading this and Chesterton for the first time was a major event in my life, spiritually and intellectually. It's such a fantastically well-written and argued work. It's dazzling literature, whether or not you agree with his arguments. Sheer genius.
+Ishmael Forester Good philosophy will do that to you. Gaining insights from people you disagree with is a rare talent these days :)
labrynianrebel That's just it, in the case of Chesterton. He is a mind-boggling genius but you cannot help but feel he is biased where Christianity, the Church and the Middle Ages are concerned. He more than anybody squeezes everything worthwhile out of them but he does seem to go to far. But simply for the Ballad of the White Horse, the great poem about Alfred, the man is immortal as far as English literature goes.
+Ishmael Forester Yes, and do you know that the massive Norton Anthology of English Literature could not make a place for even a couple pages of GKC's best writings? The editors have found space for so many writers who mattered little to this world in their lifetimes and barely have any significance to anyone now. There is room for muddleheads and addledheads of many species apparently, but for GKC, the brilliant author of so many works in prose and poetry, not a word.
+Joseph Campagnolo No, I had no idea. Frankly, I'm disgusted by the fact The Ballad of the White Horse is not in there. I cannot imagine a more pivotal or important masterpiece of English literature. But it's their loss and shame. Obviously time will tell with Chesterton. I expect him to be appreciated more in the next generation than ours or the last, as every true great. Fashions pass, but genius is eternal.
+Ishmael Forester I mean, perhaps it was too Christian or something? Not modern enough? Then you remember Churchill ended his victory speech in 1945 by advising that Parliament visit their Chapel and pray.
hã
remarkable!
Wawwwww! Really true.....