Video

Umm I am trying to think in a situacion where i compare in a loop the same data. I know you do that just for explanation but we alway are compairing Dinamically data not static

For me go to is label break just for bring some clarity. Because goto outherloop is better that just break

omg, does he think RC checks for items and delete the vector when item count is zero ? 5:20

thank God I'm not the only one confused

what code editor do you use atm and in this vid?

It's like a dog scratching his right ear with his left leg. Terrible syntactic choices, in my opinion.

Again, fix the Go Gopher art or this entire playlist is copyright infringement

Hey - you cannot misrepresent the Go Gopher like that in your thumbnail - fix it or it is getting reported. The rules are clear about the Go Gopher, you can’t just make up your own version. You have 3 days.

Its confusing af. All the callback and syntactic sugar kind of hard to understand

Why don't we embed interface into structures? For example, If you intend to make a structure implement an interface, simply add "implement interface_name" in structure definition. That will add clarity in code. Right?

It's impressive, closer in performance to something like Vi/m, Kakoune, Helix than VSCode. I still prefer Helix but for something more like a full IDE and all the AI, multicursor, modes, collab features it's great.

Lee Scott Jackson Karen Johnson Joseph

pray tell how you are making these videos they are awesome !

Are you interested in creating a Udemy course? to teach the go language, because you explained it very well with an interactive video

Congratulations on 10K subs sir. I'm happy I was here before this milestone 😊

Not sure where I read that Golang is a fool proof language, easy to learn for any noob.

Honestly dude, this explanation rocks! Thank you!

the sintaxis is ugly , i prefered it if it was a interface with a HasNext and Next methods or something like that

Function inside function inside another function... Little confused, hope will get it know.

The only problem for zed is it lacks of extensions.

Plugin plugin plugin 😂 vscode is useful when it has plugins otherwise, I can code in notepad as well 😂😂 Zed is good too but the plugin ecosystem is missing currently, hopefully it will grow soon and we can have same shortcuts and feature as vscode for our workspace ❤

Thank you very much!❤

When creating your interfaces, all this is easy to understand. It's when you are using imports (even from the standard library), is when it gets hard. There is no clear way to tell (that I'm aware of) what interface a stuct implements without digging through the code finding what functions an interface implements, and then checking if the struct you want to use implements those same ones

Zulauf Fords

On createUser we must assign a ID to the user struct type User should have another property of int ID And after creating a user the server should send the userId back to the client otherwise how would the client know the id for the GET users/{id}

This is too much editing for me

If you don't understand what is the purpose of it, believe me, you have used the same concept of sharing a lot before, I suggest reading article on Go Blog about the unique package and the wikipedia about interning

Instead of storing 1000x of "example", what handles does is that they save 1x "example" in interning way and other 999x handles are references to it, am I getting it right?

Nice video, I wonder what happen with more complex structs or with pointers

can you please create a video on you developer workflow? Editor config etc

I really wonder what people mean by "slow editor". Never, like not even once, peeked into a situation where code was appearing slower than I typed or I dunna, waits more than a few seconds - like 2 or 3. Problem seems a bit like made up by the developers of Zed ;) I mean even JetBrains is not that slow, and when it is, you just reload it. But exchanging top notch static analysis and code intelligence for one second of saved time - like, whyyyyy? :) It's a bit like going with a bike around the world and saying it allows you to save on fuel. Well, yeah, it does. But... :))))

You are not comparing the same thing. You basically create two ints and compare them, which is certainly faster. Move hash creation to inside the loop, them it will be a more fair comparison. Make hash is useful if the comparison happens multiple times.

What does second call to read memory actually show ? shouldn't handled be garbage collected at that point?

What is ur used font ? 🎉🎉🎉

you can replace `for _ = range 10` with `for range 10`

Good video. Incidentally, in benchmarks written in Go 1.22+, you can replace for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ by for range b.N

I wonder what happens when you just do one comparison without a loop, that time unique should ideally take more time because it is maintaining other things about the vars you have declared and also it might have to compute a hash of some sort on each var which might add a little more time, but I am unsure though, I will definitely give it a try. Really nice video.

I noticed you write loops the same way i do which is forgetting that there is a range keyword 😂

Garbage video.

Thank you!

Thank you!