Video

Who outside engineering would need this?

very informative video. thank you sir

Informative🤗

So basically the second derivative is useful to have an idea about the whether the point is local minima or maxima

Về hàm số bậc hai.....

Jack black's long lost brother

loved it

I cant believe be said 2x negative number equals negative

Great❤

Thank you sir!

I always wondered why math texts are indecipherable. Now I know why. As always, when you see a situation you don't understand, look for the monetary cause.

I used to voice record all of my lectures and then listen to the recordings in the evening while rewriting my notes. It's amazing how much I missed during the actual lecture that I picked up on the recording. I went from C's to straight A's by this method. It's very time-consuming, but effective. Forget about having a life outside of school though

What a quick and rich summary

Thank you for sharing!

Thank you alot ,was truly helpful

Big boi stuff

thanks for the vid, your the best

Thanks❤

Professor, I hope you are ok, since you haven't been posting since 4 years. I really like learning from you, you help me visualize maths, and not just learn formulae.

❤

Thank you so much sirrr❤❤... Im an jee dropper student and i was facing difficulty in this topic even learning this in my online lecture... But you cleared it in just 3 min... Hats off to u sir☺☺👍

Best explanation ever lol

You just proved that Homer would require an infinite amount of time to complete the journey.

Problem I have is when X=1 the Y is negative. The words coming out of my bro’s mouth aren’t matching the graph 🧐 (confusion is around the second graph)

Thank you so much!

You deserve more likes😢 Best explanation ever seen

Thank you so much professor. The best explanation on concavity and maxima and minima points that i found on youtube.

Thank you!

Can we use transcendental numbers without integers in order to create a new system of numbers? I would think that they are a good fit for explaining the infinite nature of logarithmic exponentiality in quantum physics. I do not believe time is real, I think entropic charge of a system defines the rate of transformation, and that it is not a constant. I want to create a system based on pi = 1 quark oscillation, and Euler's constant can be used to explain the return to entropic neutrality after x amount of cycles based on initial entropic charge and energy present in the system. I arrived here looking into radians, but most of the content out there is about converting them into degrees, which is the opposite of what I'm trying to achieve. I believe the current system of numbers is flawed because assuming linearity is simplifying the exponential curve of infinity into something that it is not. I want to create multidimensional numbers that are always true to transcendental numbers and resonate with quantum physics like quark oscillation and "sacred" geometry without being hindered by the assumption that time is real which is what is, in my opinion, holding current science back to a primitive level. Entropy is what defines the rate of change, time is just an illusion we use to explain the rate of entropy based on planets circling around the sun, which is totally bonkers primate thinking to think one equals the other, it is obviously different in different entropic systems. I was thinking of modelling my system based on how RNA shapes DNA while hold information yet always being able to change. I think such a system would allow us to replace the linearity of integers with an underlying rate of entropy that shapes how these numbers interact between each others at the vector level. I'm not trained mathematician so this might all sound like gibberish to some, lmao. TBH I dropped out of school when I couldn't wrap my head around polynomial calculus. I didn't understand the way to do it they explained to us, I purposefully did it differently, but somehow I always ended up with the right answer anyway. I just did it in a way my teacher declared incorrect, so how did it always lead me to the right answer? Math is no different to languages in the sense that it holds the meaning we extract out of it, and we can infer different meanings using similar forms of breaking things down. That's why I want to take what works with current mathematics and translate it to a different numbering system that accounts for infinite exponentiality using vector physics and transcendental numbers.

Thank You Sir ❤

I'm here because I want you to understand that in the summer earth is 1) farther from the sun and 2) moving slower Time dilation, according to Einstein says time moves "faster" when farther from gravity source and moves "faster" when "traveling slower." Time moves "slower" closer to gravity source and "slower" when "traveling faster." So, in conclusion, the passage of time seems doubly faster in summer and doubly slower in winter. Or the reverse, who knows?

Great explanation, thank you!

In India we have to learn this in class 11 .... And there is no teachers like you sir in our schools🙏🙏🙏

Very clear explanation! Thank you!

I wish I had seen this earlier. Thank you so much you are great!

Another great explaination

Great job!

Bro effortlessly you explained this whole concept...Good job prof! Put some more videos. Like and sub.

Топ

Hello sir if you are seeing this I want to say a very big thanks 😊...it helped me to understand it after struggling for 1 whole day

Concave up is known as convex (like the "v" in the word). We use these to classify our characterizations. You can also have convex with zero second partial derivatives (multivariable) which is a halfpipe and concave with zero second partial derivatives (multivariable) which is a tunnel.

🙏जय श्री राम 🙏

This guy is great!

Thanks for this video, it explained the second derivative test conceptually really well!

Thank you very much!

Thank you so much...

En fait, on peut trouver les sin, cos, tan etc des angles multiples de 3° par additions, soustractions etc mais comme dans le cas des polygones, il faut que le nombre de côtés soit un nombre de fermat ou un multiple de 2 par ex. Je me suis pris la tête pendant des années avec l'équation simple : X^3-3x=1 pour essayer de la résoudre sous forme de radicaux sans utiliser les complexes. Mais résolue par "Cardan" elle fait appel à des racines cubiques de nombres complexes, résolues elles-mêmes par des cos pi/9 etc...(3 solutions). On tourne en rond...

Loved it 🥰🥰

No One has seen this masterpiece? Hi, from Mozambique (África).

www.trisectionpolysectionsolutions.com