Video

It is reassuring that they are not least looking for ways to reuse and repurposing land and resources of a very historic base. I hope that the promises are met. I hope they find a path to honor and tell the story of the thousands of soldiers that are a part of Fort Ord’s history.🇺🇸

Watching this mock trial so I can prepare for a trial within minecraft lmao

just when you think all hope is gone for our youth, these "CHESS PIECES" show up and "checkmate" you! This is a must have class for inner city schools along with learning how to INVEST in financial markets! note to self.

I was reeled in already in the first 10 minutes of this. Great job!!! Wow

It’s an honor listening to these future attorneys. Absolutely incredible the level of preparation, thinking and effectiveness.

Can someone correct me if I’m wrong.? Was the defendants first argument to have the evidence removed that the actor understood her rights but misled to believe she had no choice but to relinquish them. Would a better argument have been she actually didn’t know her right. Could it not be argued that had she had actually understood her rights and what the cop had said it would’ve been in her best interest to maintain her position and stop the search until the warrant was present? Like she’s an actress. The law is debated amongst professionals everyday. I mean how many people call freedom of speech but don’t really know how to apply it. Saying “I know my rights” dramatically as an actor would is not an accurate declaration if she doesn’t actually know her rights. If she was not explained her rights and asked if she understood, there is no real way of determining. She could be explained the situation and said “oh, I didn’t know that, she didn’t tell me that. If I had know that I wouldn’t have don’t it” and that would disprove there argument against right saying that she declared “I know my rights” out of ignorance and not because she actually understood them or lied. The responsibility should fall more on the officer (knowing the law) to make sure and understand that an Oman that was not in distress understood her rights. The cop could’ve given her space and then came back in and fully explained her rights. The cop was at fault. She had the responsibility to inform, she force the scene to be seen as a threat by blocking the door and she did not submit the forms. If the forms weren’t even getting approved. Fill g out the paperwork without submitting it means nothing to a court. If it stayed in that state she could not accurately claim she would get in them if they liked it or not. Nah wild call throw it out

This was a really good mock trial. I think the prosecution would lose on the appellate level for this case. I know this was a mock trial but LOL when I first watched this I was really upset at the judge on her ruling. To be honest this would for sure have a jury panel. The deliberation would take more than just a few seconds that the judge took in her procedure to decide on this ruling. I will give it this based on the details of this crime the evidence doesn't point to anyone else besides the defendant. Yet I do not believe that means that this is beyond A Reasonable Doubt I don't believe there was enough evidence to convict besides the fingerprints and his phone was nearby the scene. It was clear he had a shoulder injury and making a right-handed slash he would not have been able to hurt the victim the way he did. His fingerprints were on the weapon because he gave it to the person as a gift even the detective investigating the crime agreed with that. In fact as far as I can follow along it seems she actually proposed that in her investigation. The motive was very low. There were other people whose phones were nearby. The geofence was not done with the proper warrant as the defense pointed out. It seems to me the judge based on finding the defendant guilty more so on the evidence is not pointing to anyone else despite the stronger motive of other people and the fact that their phones were also nearby when the murder took place. We must remember in our legal system what beyond a reasonable doubt means. It was never verified the defendant was in the room during The Killing. No other evidence aside from what point did he gave the gift to this person that was a knife that was used to stab the victim pointed to the defendant having actually done the crime. This person did not confess and even the geofence done without the warrant did not show that he was actually in the room with his cell phone based on the geofence Data Tracking his cell phone. I don't have access to Lexis or Westlaw but I feel it would be easy to shepardize a case similar to this in which similar evidence such as fingerprints pointing to the person still led to an acquittal. Well how about OJ Simpson? In which much more evidence was pointing to his killing of Nicole Brown Simpson. Yet he was acquitted because it was not Beyond a reasonable doubt that he had done it. Not a very good sighting though is the facts and the details of the OJ Simpson case I believe are very different to this case. But I feel further shepherding would results in sightings in pretty good cases to compare that would acquit this person. A reasonable doubt means, well it means beyond a reasonable doubt. We must remember to keep fairness in the judicial system and to be aware of inconsistencies and errors in the legal system. In real life by imagine this being appealed. In real life I imagine the bar association doing an investigation on this judge and looking for previous inconsistencies in errors and bad rulings and possible mistrials that this judge would have a history of ruling over. Possibly she could be disbarred. You cannot retry a case based on Double Jeopardy but appealing because of a legal error means the trial was in error and the person can definitely have another trial. 😂 I will say this was a mock trial. Definitely this is the realism of this mock trial it looks and sounds so much exactly the way the two opposing counsels would argue their case and do lead examination and cross examination of the defendant and the witnesses that were subpoenaed and make their initial and closing arguments and go back and forth with the judge. I actually have an emotional reaction from watching this. Lol pretty realistic. Some high schools barely have extracurricular activities beyond music lessons. You can learn an instrument really well. And if you become famous enough you'll be a rockstar or something. But a high school with a legal program that teaches students legal procedure? Does it have engineering or architectural classes as well or biology or medicine classes? LOL people need to really consider taking their kid out of whatever high school they're in and putting them in this High School. Very realistic mock trial.

The verdict should have been guilty 😊 loved the prosecution argument.

Kourtney Kardashian im in deathrow

wow they are brilliant ! They are better than some real lawyers ive seen 😂

I wish I would have been able to act in this trial as a student… this is next level education ❤

How are y'all doing this in high school?!?! Please let's talk

Idolo bouchard se las mando a guardar !

Ms. Reyes is honestly a sweet heart my family love her so much lacey adores you Creekside is blessed with you

Allied health insurance: variant.

Your word is your bond!! I truly believe in everything you believe in. Even to the root and being awakened.

Aww beautiful 😍 ❤🔥🌊🌬️🌎

Beautiful Prima I ❤️ u

Where do you buy your jade from?

i want billy share ig

Hello sir I'm Deepak Sharma from Jaipur India you are good carving I'm master carving mecker

This Helped Alot 🤫🧏

My heart is melting and it just started 🙏 as evil as our world is … to see all this light through the dark when I was completely blocked to even have knowledge of this. Is absolutely gut wrenching and incredible!!! 🎉🎉😂😂

These high school students give me hope. We are creating a new world. 🫶🏼

I have a mock trial soon, im not in it, but im excited to witness it!

Amazing work. I wish my school did these things.

These kids did so great! I am in 8th grade and I have a Mock trial today. I am a prosecution attorney doing a cross exam and closing argument. I am hoping to do as good as these guys did! update: it's a few weeks after the debate...my team VERY unfairly lost. everyone agrees that we should have won, we absolutely crushed it!

These kids are amazing. I enjoyed watching every moment of this mock trial. They did a great job.

They are not dead soldiers there just waiting on their next assignment

it feels sooo real. Good job y'all;)

23:28 "The cost of taking down buildings and rebuilding was very very expensive." CalEPA is a joke 😂

Who’s watching from Sojourners

Omg, He is really down to earth, I could marry him ❤️❤️💙💙

what a brilliant bunch of counsels 👏

With the awesome talent and dedication these students need to return to the Monterey Conference Center again. Their parents and jazz fans alike truly miss the way it used to be. Every April was looked forward to. BRING "NGJF" TO THE MONTEREY CONFERENCE CENTER. 🎷🎺🎹🎵

I have my mock trial tomorrow and I'm the bailiff

This is so cool. I played Jordan Franks at my school

I’m a mental health professional. I wish we did this for counseling at this age level … mock therapy

Is this a real judge or lawyer playing judge

These kids amaze me. Bravo Gen Z!

mock trial with judge reinhold! (mock trial) mock trial with judge reinhold! (mock trial) mock trial with judge reinhold! mock trial!

Thoroughly enjoyed watching the Mock Trial Finals between Carmel High School and Stevenson School! It's evident that the students poured a significant amount of effort into preparing for their roles, showcasing not just their understanding of legal procedures but also their public speaking skills. While the trial had its Hollywood-esque moments and the portrayals may not fully capture the gravitas seen in real courtrooms, the educational value and entertainment provided were unmistakable. Kudos to all the students involved for their dedication and hard work. It’s clear that such experiences are invaluable in understanding the legal system and developing critical thinking. Well done to everyone involved!

They look like high school kids 😂

New homes and shops going up on those sites.

Served there from 1968-1972.

If I am a defense attorney doing a pretrial motion, do I have to quote other cases? Or does arguing my point suffice... I notice here they have alternate examples of similar cases to back up their standing and opinion.

I'm glad to hear that the old WW2 era barracks are going to be removed. While most of us have fond memories of the entire base, seeing those buildings marked with graffiti and practically falling down on themselves is depressing. I hope that the local areas find a way to marry "Best Use" and "economic development". If i could see one thing implemented in my lifetime, it would be that ONE SINGLE UNIT of the old WW2 era barracks be rehabilitated and preserved as an historical record of what was once there. Truthfully, much of the old Ord lives on now only in memories of we: the aging veterans who were there, and (if we are lucky) some cherished photos. From the age when taking pictures was a drawn out process, involving finishing the roll of film, sending it to be developed, waiting for it to be sent back to the AAFES Post Exchange, and finally opening the envelope to discover what we had captured.😊

ill go with the Defense Team ..POWERFUL